Continued research
A number of studies also indicate what should be further explored in future research. There is a need for more quantitative and qualitative knowledge about older LGBTI people. As Bränström et al. (2022) indicate, it is important to include people of all ages in national public health studies, and to have questions about gender identity and sexuality to enable analyses of the impact of these factors. In light of the inclusion process for this report, we would like to emphasise that it is important to also present the results in such a way that all these factors are clear, so that it is possible to read something about this group. Bränström et al. (2022) also state, given how mental health is often better in older age groups than younger ones in quantitative studies with LGBTI people of all ages, that it is important to further investigate the causes of this. For example, it could be that during their lives they may have developed resilience to stress factors, but this is something that needs to be investigated further. Longitudinal studies may also facilitate analyses of causal effects and the effects of cohort and generation in relation to this (Bränström et al., 2022:10). Löf & Olaisson indicate that it is important to explore experiences of healthcare, social care and social services to a greater extent, and to translate research results into training initiatives for elder care (2018:261-262). The focus should be on how formal care and the general environment can contribute to reducing minority stress and instead strengthening mental health (Löf & Olaison, 2018; Synnes & Malterud, 2019).
In terms of quantitative knowledge, we need better data, with a larger sample of older LGBTI people, from many parts of the Nordic region. Based on the research overview, it is possible to conclude that knowledge from some countries, such as Finland and Iceland, and the Faroe Islands, Greenland and Åland is inadequate. We need more knowledge about older LGBTI people from these contexts. In view of the group’s different experiences, there is also a lack of knowledge about older intersex people, with knowledge today basically non-existent. Better quantitative data may provide greater knowledge about general patterns both in terms of the importance of gender identity and sexuality for health, well-being and ageing, to be able to point to differences within the group based on other structures/experiences, and to be able to compare differences between the different Nordic contexts. There is a need for both more systematic inclusion of gender identity and sexual orientation in population studies related to public health and quality of life, and targeted studies, which often have higher response rates than the general ones.
There are also specific knowledge needs relating to different subgroups within the group of older LGBTI people; in particular the very oldest (80+), people with trans and intersex experiences, racialised LGBTI people, LGBTI people living with HIV, and LGBTI people who are at increased risk of social isolation. Studies have previously shown how, for example, LGBTI people’s opportunities to participate in LGBTI communities depend on factors such as geography, class and health, and research needs to take these factors into account in the analysis. There is also a need to investigate how age-based arrangements and normativity structure LGBTI policies and social meeting places. Research into older LGBTI people should also aim to capture different experiences within the LGBTI community (Siverskog & Bromseth, 2019; Siverskog, 2016; Löf & Olaisson, 2018).
As can be seen from the knowledge inventory, there are large knowledge gaps in how LGBTI perspectives and ageing are included in education, professional practice and CPD. There is limited knowledge about the ways in which LGBTI people’s living conditions and life course experiences are included as mandatory elements in education and study resources (Tengelin et al., 2021; Areskoug Josefsson & Solberg, 2023), and hardly any knowledge about how older LGBTI people’s life course experiences and ageing conditions are included as mandatory elements in education and study resources. What are the knowledge and understanding requirements in intended learning outcomes, general syllabuses and course syllabuses in the Nordic countries, and how are they implemented in the form of course literature, compulsory modules and as part of the examination of the intended learning outcomes? Several studies and interviews show willingness to include knowledge, and that students seek more knowledge (Tengelin et al., 2021; Lunde et al., 2022) – but what are the reasons why this is not done by teaching staff? What are the structural changes that can support these processes? This needs to be investigated further.
Several studies have evaluated CPD initiatives such as LGBTI certification, but none of these was carried out in activities specifically aimed at older adults (Sommarö et al., 2019; Johansson Wilén & Lundsten, 2019). The studies suggest some effect of CPD in terms of norm-conscious treatment, but more inadequate knowledge about trans experiences. They also highlight the structural challenges of maintaining knowledge in organisations as a whole. Studies are needed that investigate the effects of CPD initiatives in activities that encounter older adults, including longitudinal studies that investigate the long-term effects of CPD and LGBTI certification.