Go to content

Executive summary

A modern society needs access to all critical raw materials (CRM) that are necessary for maintaining and developing its industries, infrastructure and welfare system. CRMs are especially important for many ongoing technology shifts like the Green Deal of EU and digitalization processes. Europe has been facing increasing challenges in meeting its need for these materials, which are defined by their high economic importance and significant supply risk. Currently EU relies heavily on imported supplies of these essential resources.

The Critical Raw Materials Act of EU

The implementation of the Critical Raw Materials Act (CRMA) of EU aims to reduce this vulnerability by establishing a framework to ensure the Union's access to a secure and sustainable supply of critical raw materials. CRMA identifies 53 raw materials that are defined as critical,
Some of these CRMs are listed as a group like PGMs and light and heavy REEs.
but this number will likely change in the future when the list is updated. One important measure in this strategy is to increase the selective collection of waste streams that contain CRMs at levels that may be recycled, as stated in Chapter 5. This chapter also states that member states and other countries bound by the EEA Agreement is required to adopt and implement national programmes containing measures designed to increase the collection of waste with high critical raw materials recovery potential and ensure their introduction into the appropriate recycling system within three years after the agreement has entered into force. Within 2030 EU shall have reached a CRM-specific recycling capacity of 25% of its annual consumption of critical raw materials. This is a demanding task, and a successful implementation will require a good understanding of existing opportunities and barriers. 

Production of critical raw materials

Almost all critical raw materials are mined as minerals from ores that are a non-renewable resource. But the same raw materials can also be produced as secondary products from recycling of certain waste streams. Strengthening value chains for secondary CRMs will reduce our dependence on virgin raw materials and minimize future supply risks and the environmental footprint of these raw materials. By identifying the products and materials that use CRMs, we can locate the waste streams where these discarded products and materials are found. Important applications for many CRMs include magnets, alloys, catalysts and pigments. Waste streams where such materials or components occur are therefore of interest for potential CRM-recyclers. The review of Nordic waste streams performed as a basis for this report has identified waste with potential for recycling about 900,000 tonnes of CRMs. The quantitively dominant CRMs in this material stream are manganese, phosphate and copper. The waste streams with the largest theoretical recovery potential relative to the recycling targets in CRMA are tailings and waste from metal production.
These waste streams can provide a lot of benefits for the Nordic societies if recovered and used for new products and materials. It would increase circularity, reduce landfilling, provide stable and sustainable workplaces and secure access to raw materials for the downstream processing industries. The Nordic countries have existing industry and expertise that may especially facilitate increased recycling of aluminium, cobalt, copper, fluorspar/fluorine, gallium, rare earth elements, magnesium, manganese, nickel, PGM-metals, phosphate, silicon metal and vanadium.
A profitable and efficient recycling operation requires systems for collection and sorting of waste streams that may serve as feedstock for the recycling operation. There are significant barriers that must be overcome to improve collection, sorting and recycling in ways that make EUs recycling targets for CRMs achievable. Although the concept of circular economy is receiving increased attention, there are still many critical raw materials where the recycling rate is practically zero. This is partly due to high recycling costs compared to the costs of primary production of the same products. But another barrier is the fact that for many critical elements, no mature and cost-effective technologies for sorting and recycling exists. Technological development will eventually lead to more resource- and cost-effective recycling solutions that allow for recycling of more critical raw materials at higher recovery rates. However, this will require time and considerable R&D efforts where the Nordics can play an important part.
Five milestones must be reached to establish Nordic secondary value chains for CRM. These are:
  1. A system that makes it possible to identify waste streams with CRM-recycling potential.
  2. A system for cost effective and efficient collection of waste streams with CRM-recycling potential.
  3. A system for separating materials enriched with CRM from other materials in the waste stream.
  4. A recycling technology that allows for recovery of all relevant CRMs at acceptable recovery rates.
  5. Market conditions that are economically sustainable for all links in the value chain.

Barriers for better collection and sorting of Nordic CRM-enriched waste

The following barriers are found to restrict more efficient collection and sorting of Nordic CRM-enriched waste in the current situation as of 2023.
  • A systematic and complete description of CRM content in relevant waste streams does not exist.
  • CRM-enriched waste is landfilled in a way that limits excavation options for recycling purposes.
  • Products are designed and assembled in a way that disrupt efficient sorting of CRM-enriched materials.
  • Buildings and infrastructure are constructed in a way that make extraction of CRM-rich components during decommissioning difficult.
  • CRM-enriched waste streams are lost in cement and ceramic materials.
  • CRMs are lost in waste water.
  • Non harmonized standards for collection and sorting between different municipalities and regions.
  • No governmental incentives or requirements for collection of CRM-rich waste streams.
  • EPR-schemes only partly separate CRM-materials for recycling.
  • Some sectors are not included in collection and recycling schemes.
  • Some EPR schemes refuse CRM-enriched waste that could have been recycled. 
  • Challenges with increasing number of sorted waste streams.
  • Much collected CRM-enriched waste is not delivered to recycling.
  • No robust and flexible technology for advanced automated sorting and defragmentation of WEEE and other important CRM-enriched waste is available yet.
  • Magnets are difficult to separate from other materials.
  • European recycling industries loses much CRM-enriched material through questionable export mechanisms.
  • Biodegradable waste is incinerated instead of used for production of biogas.
  • Loss of CRM in spent drilling fluids.
  • Conflict with existing regulation that limits CRM-recycling options.

Barriers for better recycling of CRMs

The following barriers are found to restrict Nordic CRM-recycling.
  • Many CRMs are distributed in products and materials at low levels that make recycling challenging.
  • Substitution with less valuable materials and micronization of components with increasingly heterogeneous chemical composition makes recycling less profitable.
  • Large amounts of CRMs are lost during metal recycling.
  • No recycling technology is available for CRM-recycling from multiple feedstocks.
  • CRM-recycling is often less cost-effective than production of virgin CRMs.
  • Small volumes and large fluctuations in prices make CRM-recycling economically challenging.
  • Market manipulations from dominant CRM-suppliers disrupt European CRM-recycling.
  • NIMBY-responses blocks new CRM-recycling projects or necessary support infrastructure.

Measures and instruments for increased CRM-recycling

The following measures should be considered as instruments to reach the milestones necessary for increasing Nordic CRM-recycling.
Measures for systematic identification of waste streams with CRM-recycling potential:
  • National program for mapping CRM-levels in relevant waste streams.
  • National statistic accounting of significant CRM material streams showing both consumptions, collected waste and recycled CRM-volumes.
  • Put on market demands for product design that support efficient identification and separation of CRM-enriched components and materials.
  • Design and construction of buildings and infrastructure that support easy identification and separation of CRM-rich materials during future decommissioning.           
Measures for better collection of waste streams with CRM-recycling potential:
  • Separate collection and delivery of CRM-enriched waste for recycling.
  • Landfill bans on recyclable CRM enriched waste.
  • Mono-cell landfilling of CMR-enriched waste that cannot yet be recycled at well-marked locations in the landfill.
  • Mapping of available CRM-materials for recycling as part of all decommissioning and demolition projects.
  • Recovery of CRM from wastewater.
  • Consider EPR-scheme for non-WEEE CRM-enriched waste streams.
  • Upgrading EPR-scheme for waste regarding CRMs for WEEE, vehicles and tyres.
  • CRM-recycling obligation for sectors that are omitted from EPR-schemes.
  • Increased security measures to guard against illegal looting of high value materials in WEEE.
  • R&D program for capturing CRM material streams before ending up in unrecoverable recipients.
  • Collection of CRM-enriched ammunition residues from shooting ranges.
  • Requirements or economic incentives for delivery of CRM-enriched waste to facilities that can recycle it.
Measures for better separation of CRM-enriched materials from other materials in the waste stream:
  • Removal and sorting of components from printed circuit boards before recycling.
  • Incineration of selected waste streams in different W2E-plants that allow for enhanced CRM-levels in ashes.
  • R&D program for development of better sorting technology.
  • Mandatory sorting of magnets.
  • Industrial sorting system for magnets constructed by non-magnetic material to avoid stickiness problem.
  • CRM-recycling obligation for sectors that are omitted from EPR-schemes.
  • Consider EPR-scheme for non-WEEE CRM-enriched waste streams.
  • Upgrading EPR-scheme for waste regarding CRMs for WEEE, vehicles and tyres.
Measures that support development of recycling technologies that allow for recovery of relevant CRMs at acceptable recovery rates:
  • R&D program for development of new or more efficient CRM-recycling processes.
  • Program that monitors progress towards specific recycling targets for critical elements.
  • State investment fund that supports the establishment of new CRM recycling.
  • National CRM-stock pile program that buy secondary CRM-products at regulated prices. 
Measures for creation of market conditions that are economically sustainable for all links in the value chains for secondary CRMs:
  • State guarantee for recycling facilities.
  • State investment fund that supports the establishment of new CRM recycling.
  • National CRM-stock pile program that buy secondary CRM-products at regulated prices.
  • Information service that provides an overview of available recycling options for CRM-enriched waste.
  • Minimum requirements for recycling efficiency when delivering CRM-enriched waste to recycling.
  • Mandatory reporting of recycled secondary CRM from recycler.
  • Program that monitors progress towards specific recycling targets for critical elements.
  • Updating national regulations that restricts CRM-recycling.