In 2023, consumption in live weight equivalents was approximately 241 thousand tonnes in Sweden. Dividing this figure by the Swedish population gives 23 kg of aquatic food in live-weight equivalents per person in 2023. This is equivalent to approximately 440 grams per person and week. If 300 grams are needed per portion, each Swede would consume 1.5 portions per week. This is close to the estimate of Axelsson and Hornborg (2025), who report that consumption in 2023 was approximately 1.6 portions per person and week. However, it is far below the Nordic nutritional recommendations for eating fish 2.5–3.5 times per week. This is also lower than the rate in 2019 (1.9 portions per week) and lower than the Swedish National Food Agency’s recommendation to eat seafood 2-3 times per week (European Commission, 2025).
If the suggested goal for Swedish aquatic production is achieved (scenario 3), consumption would increase (assuming no substitution of imports) to 274 thousand tonnes, equivalent to 26 kilos of live weight per person (assuming the population does not change). This would increase consumption to approximately 1.7 portions per person and per week (assuming we need 300 g per portion), which is still well below the Nordic nutrient recommendations for aquatic foods.
The fourth scenario reduces imports by approximately 50 percent if a crisis prevents imports from countries outside the Nordic region. This would decrease consumption to an estimated per capita intake of 11 kilos in live weight equivalents, representing a sharp decline and moving further away from the Nordic nutritional recommendations. It would also imply that the average Swede would only consume 0.7 portions of fish per week.
The fifth scenario assumes that Swedish production can offset the decline in imports, allowing consumption to remain at the level of the reference scenario. Production would need to increase by 130 percent, which is significantly higher than the 60 percent target proposed by the Board of Agriculture. Assuming it is difficult to increase catches from sea fisheries, this increase would have to come from two sources. One possibility is to use herring (or possibly sprat) currently allocated to feed production, but the majority of the increase would most likely have to come from aquaculture production.
Summary
The aquatic food sector in Sweden is small in economic terms. In 2023, the sector accounted for approximately 0.06 percent of GDP and comprised around 1,500 firms and 2,000 employees. Primary production is dominated by pelagic fisheries—especially herring and sprat—which together account for more than 80 percent of total catch volume. However, most pelagic fish are used for feed rather than human consumption. Aquaculture contributes a relatively small share of total volume but accounts for more than one-third of total production value, with rainbow trout as the dominant species.
Sweden’s domestic production of aquatic food intended for human consumption in 2023 is estimated at approximately 56 thousand tonnes (live weight equivalents), including sea fisheries, aquaculture, inland fisheries, and retained recreational catches. Despite this production, Sweden is highly dependent on imports. Total imports of aquatic food amounted to roughly 250 thousand tonnes, while exports were about 66 thousand tonnes. As a result, domestic production covered only about 23 percent of total consumption. Per capita consumption was roughly 1.6 portions of aquatic foods per person per week, well below Nordic nutritional recommendations.
The sector operates under the EU Common Fisheries Policy, and several key fish stocks—most notably Baltic herring and cod—are below biological reference points, limiting the potential for increased capture fisheries. Recent policy developments include changes to trawling regulations, proposals for new marine spatial plans, and an increased emphasis on aquatic food within Sweden’s national food strategy. The Swedish Board of Agriculture has proposed increasing aquatic food production by 60 percent by 2035, primarily through greater use of pelagic fish for human consumption and expanded aquaculture.
Scenario analyses indicate that while higher domestic production could moderately improve self-sufficiency, Sweden would remain heavily reliant on imports under normal conditions. In the event of trade restrictions limiting imports to Nordic countries only, consumption would decline substantially unless domestic production increased far beyond the suggested policy targets. Overall, increasing the self-sufficiency of aquatic food in Sweden will likely require significant expansion of aquaculture alongside careful management of marine ecosystems and competing uses of marine space.