Technology Readiness Level A technology readiness level (TRL) is a scale used to describe the maturity of a technology while it is being researched (TRLs 1-3), developed (TRLs 4-6) and deployed (TRLs 7-9). | 4 – The process requires further research and continued work to ensure it can be taken to the next stage and rolled out at an industrial scale |
Risks | Explosion/Fire – Any process associated with EOL battery testing and/or disassembly will result in a risk of battery explosion or potential outbreak of fire. Underdeveloped – The process is an emerging technology and requires more research and testing to bring it to a larger scale. |
Emissions | None |
Strengths | Removes risk to human health – Automated screening would take away the risks and dangers of manual battery testing/disassembly. More cost-efficient – Automated screening is a more cost-efficient process than manual screening. |
Barriers to Circularity | Large number of variables – There are many different battery types and designs that would need to be input into the machine’s database to effectively carry out screening of all EV batteries. Ultimately, though, automated testing and disassembly would allow the EOL batteries to be assessed to determine if they can be repurposed, reused or recycled, which would facilitate full circularity of the EV battery. |
Applicability to Nordic Context | This type of technology is not well established and is still in the early phases of research. If it is possible to scale up the technology to industrial scale, then it would be extremely beneficial for recycling facilities. There are no reasons why this type of technology could not be applied to the Nordic countries. |
Technology Readiness Level A technology readiness level (TRL) is a scale used to describe the maturity of a technology while it is being researched (TRLs 1-3), developed (TRLs 4-6) and deployed (TRLs 7-9). | 4 – Non-destructive inspection has been used to detect anomalies in different materials for many years but has only recently been applied to battery packs and is therefore still only in the research phase of development. |
Risks | Explosion/Fire – Any process associated with EOL battery inspection has a risk of battery explosion or potential outbreak of fire. Lithium-ion batteries – It has been noted that it can be challenging to use X-ray inspection techniques on lithium-ion cells due to low attenuation of lithium metal. Majasan, J, et al. (2021). Recent advances in acoustic diagnostics for electrochemical power systems, Journal of Physics: Energy, 3. Retrieved from: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2515-7655/abfb4a/meta#:~:text=Over%20the%20last%20decade%2C%20acoustic,fuel%20cells%2C%20and%20water%20electrolysers. |
Emissions | None |
Strengths | Removes risk to human health – Non-destructive inspection allows the battery to be assessed without the need to disassemble any parts. More cost-efficient – this type of battery inspection is cheaper than manual inspection as it relies on technology and is quicker. Well-established process – non-destructive acoustic testing has been successfully used to detect anomalies in large structures, such as bridges, pipelines, etc, for the past few decades. Further research needs to be carried out to ensure that it can be adapted for use in EOL EV battery diagnostics. Comprehensive application – this type of inspection technology can be used on any EV battery type/design. Rapid assessment – non-destructive acoustic testing could be used initially to probe the battery cell, which could then be categorised against predefined pass/fail criteria to allow rapid assessment. The failed cells could then be subjected to further analysis to assess the extent of the defect in more detail, before a decision on the next steps – i.e., repurpose, remanufacture, recycle, etc. |
Barriers to Circularity | None – non-destructive inspection allows the EOL batteries to be assessed to determine if they can be repurposed, reused or recycled. |
Applicability to Nordic Context | This type of technology is well established for other applications but has not yet been established for EV battery testing. It is still in the early phases of research but, if it is possible to scale up the technology to industrial scale, then it would be extremely beneficial for recycling facilities. There are no reasons why this type of technology could not be applied to the Nordic countries. |