Go to content

References

Abrams et al. (2025). Chapter 2.1: Introduction to Earth system tipping points risks. In Global Tipping Points 2025 Report.
Ackermann et al. (2020). AMOC recovery in a multicentennial scenario using a coupled atmosphere-ocean-ice sheet model. Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2019GL086810. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086810
AGU, 2024. Ethical Framework Principles for Climate Intervention Research. https://agu.mediavalet.com/portals/ethicalframework   
Albareda, L., & Branzei, 0 (2024). Biocentric work in the Anthropocene: How actors regenerate degenerated natural commons. Journal of Management Studies. Online. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/joms.13080
Armstrong-McKay et al. (2022) : Exceeding 1.5 C global warming could trigger multiple climate tipping points, Science 377.DOI:10.1126/science.abn7950
Asch et al. (2019). Climate change impacts on mismatches between phytoplankton blooms and fish spawning phenology, Glob. Change Biol. 25: pp. 2544–2559. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14650
Baker et al. (2025). Continued Atlantic overturning circulation even under climate extremes. Nature 638, 987–994. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08544-0
Bellomo, K., & Mehling, O. (2024). Impacts and state‐dependence of AMOC weakening in a warming climate. Geophysical Research Letters, 51(10), e2023GL107624.
Ben-Yami et al., (2024). Impacts of AMOC Collapse on Monsoon Rainfall: A Multi-Model Comparison, Earth’s Future. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023EF003959
Berdahl et al. (2014). Arctic cryosphere response in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project G3 and G4 scenarios. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 119(3), 1308–1321.
Bednarz, E. M., et al. (2025). Stratospheric aerosol injection could prevent future Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation decline, but injection location is key. Earth's Future, 13, e2025EF005919. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025EF005919 
Berx et al. (2021). Climate-relevant ocean transport measurements in the Atlantic and Arctic Oceans. Pp. 10–11 in Frontiers in Ocean Observing: Documenting Ecosystems, Understanding Environmental Changes, Forecasting Hazards. E.S. Kappel, S.K. Juniper, S. Seeyave, E. Smith, and M. Visbeck, eds, A Supplement to Oceanography 34(4), https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2021.supplement.02-04.
Biesbroek R et al. (2025) Adaptation planning in the context of a weakening and possibly collapsing Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC). Regional Environmental Change 25(3): 93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-025-02434-5
Bonan et al. (2025): Observational constraints imply limited future Atlantic meridional overturning circulation weakening, Nature Geoscience, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-025-01709-0
Boot et al. (2023). Effect of Plankton Composition Shifts in the North Atlantic on Atmospheric pCO2, Geophysical Research Letters, 50, e2022GL100230. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL100230
Boot et al. (2024). Response of atmospheric pCO2 to a strong AMOC weakening under low and high emission scenarios. Climate Dynamics, 62(8), 7559–7574.
Boot et al. (2025). Global marine ecosystem response to a strong AMOC weakening under low and high future emission scenarios, Earth’s Future, vol. 13, no. 1, DOI: 10.1029/2024EF004741.
Brent, K. A. (2021) Solar Geoengineering Is Prohibited under International Law.” Chapter. In Debating Climate Law, edited by Benoit Mayer and Alexander Zahar, 274–84. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108879064.021
Brodeau, L., Koenigk, T. Extinction of the northern oceanic deep convection in an ensemble of climate model simulations of the 20th and 21st centuries. Clim Dyn 46, 2863–2882 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2736-5)
Buckley et al. (2016) , Observations, inferences, and mechanisms of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation: A review, Rev. Geophys., 54, doi:10.1002/2015RG000493.
Caesar et al. (2021) . Current Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation weakest in last millennium. Nature Geoscience 14: 118–120 doi: 10.1038/s41561-021-00699-z.
Caesar et al. (2022). Reply to: Atlantic circulation change still uncertain. Nature Geoscience doi: 10.1038/s41561-022-00897-3.
Chafik et al. (2022). Irminger Sea is the center of action for subpolar AMOC variability. Geophysical Research Letters, 49, e2022GL099133. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL099133
Chen et al. (2023). Northern-high-latitude permafrost and terrestrial carbon response to two solar geoengineering scenarios. Earth System Dynamics, 14(1), 55–79.
Chen et al. (2020). Mitigation of Arctic permafrost carbon loss through stratospheric aerosol geoengineering. Nature Communications, 11(1), 2430.
Curry et al. (2014). Multiyear Volume, Liquid Freshwater, and Sea Ice Transports through Davis Strait, 2004–10. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 44, 1244–1266, https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-13-0177.1.
Cyr et al. (2024) Physical controls and ecological implications of the timing of the spring phytoplankton bloom on the Newfoundland and Labrador shelf, Limnol. Oceanogr. Lett, 9, pp. 191–198. https://doi.org/10.1002/lol2.10347
Desch, S.J., et al. (2017), Arctic ice management. Earth's Future, 5: 107–127. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000410
Diaz, D.B (2016). Estimating global damages from sea level rise with the Coastal Impact and Adaptation Model. Climatic Change 137, 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1675-4
Dima, M. & Lohmann, G. Evidence for two distinct modes of large-scale ocean circulation changes over the last century. J. Clim. 23, 5–16 (2010).
Ditlevsen, P. D., & S., Ditlevsen (2023). Observation-based early-warning signals for a collapse of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation. Nature Communications, 14, 4254. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39810-w
Drijfhout et al. (2012). Is a Decline of AMOC Causing the Warming Hole above the North Atlantic in Observed and Modeled Warming Patterns?. J. Climate, 25, 8373–8379, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00490.1
Drijfhout et al. (2025) . Shutdown of northern Atlantic overturning after 2100 following deep mixing collapse in CMIP6 projections. Environmental Research Letters, 20(9), 094062. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/adfa3b
Duffey et al. (2025). Low-altitude high-latitude stratospheric aerosol injection is feasible with existing aircraft. Earth's Future, 13, e2024EF005567. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024EF005567
Dukhovskoy, D. S., et al. (2019). Role of Greenland freshwater anomaly in the recent freshening of the subpolar North Atlantic. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 124, 3333–3360. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JC014686   
Engström et al. (2024). Policy options for reducing consumption-based emissions: A Nordic survey (TemaNord 2024:545). Nordic Council of Ministers. https://doi.org/10.6027/temanord2024-545
Falkena et al. (2025). Causal mechanisms of subpolar gyre variability in CMIP6 models. Earth System Dynamics, 16 (5), 1833–1844. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-1833-2025
Fasullo, J.T., et al (2018). Persistent polar ocean warming in a strategically geoengineered climate. Nature Geosci 11, 910–914. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0249-7
Field, L., et al. (2018). Increasing Arctic sea ice albedo using localized reversible geoengineering. Earth's Future, 6, 882–901. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EF000820  
Fjäder, C. (2017). Talous, infrastruktuuri ja huoltovarmuus. In J. Kielenniva, M. Hyytiäinen, H. Hovi, J. Raitasalo, K. Himberg, J. Eskola, & J. Mölsä (Eds.), Turvallinen Suomi 2018: Tietoja Suomen kokonaisturvallisuudesta (pp. 87–102). Turvallisuuskomitea.
Felgenhauer, T., et al. (2022). Solar Radiation Modification: A Risk-Risk Analysis, Carnegie Climate Governance Initiative (C2G), March, New York, NY: https://www.c2g2.net/wp-content/uploads/202203-C2G-RR-Full.pdf
Forster et al. (2025) Indicators of Global Climate Change 2024: annual update of key indicators of the state of the climate system and human influence, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 2641–2680, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-2641-2025 
Frajka-Williams et al., (2019) Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation: Observed Transport and Variability. Front. Mar. Sci. 6:260. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2019.00260
Fu et al. (2025). Characterizing the interannual variability of North Atlantic subpolar overturning. Geophysical Research Letters, 52, e2025GL114672. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025GL114672
Futerman, et al. (2025) The interaction of solar radiation modification with Earth system tipping elements, Earth Syst. Dynam., 16, 939–978, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-939-2025
Gardiner S.M. and A. Fragniére (2018). The Tollgate Principles for the Governance of Geoengineering: Moving Beyond the Oxford Principles to an Ethically More Robust Approach. The Tollgate Principles for the Governance of Geoengineering: Moving Beyond the Oxford Principles to an Ethically More Robust Approach 21, 143–174
Geden , O. and Reisinger, A. (2025). Overshoot: Returning to 1.5°C Requires Net-negative Emissions Targets. SWP Comment, November. Berlin, Germany: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP). Available at: https://www.swp-berlin.org/publikation/overshoot-returning-to-15c-requires-net-negative-emissions-targets (accessed 17 December 2025).
Gervais et al. (2018). Mechanisms governing the development of the North Atlantic warming hole in the CESM-LE future climate simulations. J. Clim. 31, 5927–5946
Goelzer et al. (2025): Interactive coupling of a Greenland ice sheet model in NorESM2, Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 7853–7867, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-7853-2025
Gregow et al. (2018). Ilmastonmuutokseen sopeutumisen ohjauskeinot, kustannukset ja alueelliset ulottuvuudet. Suomen ilmastopaneeli. https://doi.org/10.31885/9789527457047
Gu et al. (2024) Wide range of possible trajectories of North Atlantic climate in a warming world, Nat. Commun., 15, 4221, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-48401-2  
Haubner et al. (2025) Limited global effect of climate-Greenland ice sheet coupling in NorESM2 under a high-emission scenario, EGUsphere [preprint, accepted], https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3785
Haywood, J., et al (2013). Asymmetric forcing from stratospheric aerosols impacts Sahelian rainfall. Nature Clim Change 3, 660–665. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1857
Henry et al. (2025). Marine cloud brightening to cool the Arctic: An Earth system model comparison. Earth's Future, 13, e2025EF006508. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025EF006508
Henson et al. (2022). Uncertain response of ocean biological carbon export in a changing world. Nat. Geosci. 15, 248–254 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-022-00927-0
Hernandez-Jaramillo et al. (2024) New airborne research facility observes sensitivity of cumulus cloud microphysical properties to aerosol regime over the great barrier reef, Environ. Sci.: Atmos., 4, 861–871, https://doi.org/10.1039/D4EA00009A
Herrington et al. (2022). Impact of grids and dynamical cores in CESM2.2 on the surface mass balance of the Greenland Ice Sheet. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 14, e2022MS003192. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022MS003192
Hiedanpää et al. (2020). Beliefs in Conflict: The Management of Teno Atlantic Salmon in the Sámi Homeland in Finland. Environmental Management, 66:1039–1058. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-020-01374-6
Hirasawa, et al. (2023). Effect of regional marine cloud brightening interventions on climate tipping elements. Geophysical Research Letters, 50, e2023GL104314. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL104314  
Houmai et al. (2021). Black‑rice of Manipur: A potential waiting to be unlocked. Food and Scientific Reports, 2(8), 62–64.
Hubert, A-M (2021) A Code of Conduct for Responsible Geoengineering Research. Global Policy 12, 82–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12845 
Irvine et al. (2019) Halving warming with idealized solar geoengineering moderates key climate hazards. Nat. Clim. Chang. 9, 295–299 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0398-8
Jackson et al. (2023) Understanding AMOC stability: the North Atlantic Hosing Model Intercomparison Project, Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1975–1995, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1975-2023 
Karpouzoglou et al. (2022). Observed changes in the Arctic freshwater outflow in Fram Strait. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 127, e2021JC018122. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JC018122
Karpouzoglou et al. (2023). Freshwater transport over the Northeast Greenland shelf in Fram Strait. Geophysical Research Letters, 50, e2022GL101775. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL101775
Kelly et al. (2025) ‘Abrupt Changes in the Timing and Magnitude of the North Atlantic Bloom Over the 21st Century’, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans. 130, e2024JC022284. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JC022284
Kirchengast, G. and M. A. Pichler (2025). Traceable global warming record and clarity for the 1.5 °C and well-below-2 °C goals. Commun Earth Environ 6, 402. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02368-0
Kotz et al. (2022). The effect of rainfall changes on economic production. Nature 601, 223–227 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04283-8
Larsen et al. (2024). The Coldest and densest overflow branch into the North Atlantic is stable in transport, but warming. Geophysical Research Letters, 51, e2024GL110097. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL110097   
Lee, D. G. et al. (2025) Irreversible phytoplankton community shifts over Subpolar North Atlantic in response to CO2 forcing, Earth Syst. Dynam., 16, 2101–2111, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-2101-2025  
Lee, J. et al. (2025). Global increases of salt intrusion in estuaries under future environmental conditions. Nat Commun 16, 3444 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-58783-6
Lenton et al. (2023). The Global Tipping Points Report 2023. University of Exeter. https://report-2023.global-tipping-points.org/
Li, KY and W. Liu (2025) Weakened Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation causes the historical North Atlantic Warming Hole. Commun Earth Environ 6, 416 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02403-0
Liu et al. (2020). Climate impacts of a weakened Atlantic meridional overturning circulation in a warming climate. Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz4876, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz4876
Liu, W., and A. Fedorov (2022). Interaction between Arctic sea ice and the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation in a warming climate. Clim Dyn 58, 1811–1827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05993-5
Lockley et al. (2020). Glacier geoengineering to address sea-level rise: A geotechnical approach. Advances in Climate Change Research, 11(4), 401–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accre.2020.11.008
Lozier et al. (2019). A sea change in our view of overturning in the subpolar North Atlantic. Science 363,516–521(2019). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau6592
Macayeal et al. (2024). Glacial Climate Intervention: A Research Vision (Version 2). U.S. Antarctic Program (USAP) Data Center. https://doi.org/10.15784/601797
Madan et al. (2023). The weakening AMOC under extreme climate change. Climate Dynamics, 62, 1291–1309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-023-06957-7
McCarthy et al. (2025). Signal and noise in the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation at 26°N. Geophysical Research Letters, 52, e2025GL115055. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025GL115055
McCarthy et al. (2017). The importance of deep, basinwide measurements in optimized Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation observing arrays, J. Geophys. Res. Oceans, 122, 1808–1826, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC012200
McLaren, D. (2016), Mitigation deterrence and the “moral hazard” of solar radiation management. Earth's Future, 4: 596–602. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000445
McMonigal, K., et al. (2025). Fingerprints of AMOC decline are sensitive to external and mechanistic forcing. Geophysical Research Letters, 52, e2025GL116307. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025GL116307  
Menary M. B. and R. A Wood (2018). An anatomy of the projected North Atlantic warming hole in CMIP5 models. Clim. Dyn. 50, 3063–3080. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3793-8
Merikanto, J. et al. (2024) ‘The Significance of Climate Tipping Points for Finland: Latest Information on the Possible Shutdown of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) and Preventive Climate Actions’, Policy Brief, https://www.acccflagship.fi/wp-content/uploads/Tipping_points_Policy_Brief_english.pdf
Mettiäinen et al. (2022). ‘Bog here, marshland there’: tensions in co-producing scientific knowledge on solar geoengineering in the Arctic. Environ. Res. Lett. 17, 045001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac5715
Milkoreit et al. (2024). Governance for Earth system tipping points – A research agenda. Earth System Governance. 21, 100216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2024.100216
Moat et al. (2022) Atlantic meridional overturning circulation observed by the RAPID-MOCHA-WBTS (RAPID-meridional Overturning Circulation and Heatflux Array-Western Boundary Time Series) array at 26° N from 2004 to 2020 (v2020.2), British Oceanographic Data Centre, Natural Environment Research Council [data set], https://doi.org/10.5285/e91b10af-6f0a-7fa7-e053-6c86abc05a09
Moore J.C. et al. (2018). Geoengineer polar glaciers to slow sea-level rise. Nature 555, 303–305. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-03036-4 
Moore J.C. et al. (2024). Multi-model simulation of solar geoengineering indicates avoidable destabilization of the West Antarctic ice sheet Earth’s Future 12, e2024EF004424. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024EF004424
Moore, J.C., et al. (2021), Targeted Geoengineering: Local Interventions with Global Implications. Glob Policy, 12: 108–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12867
Moore, G.W.K., et al. (2022). Sea-ice retreat suggests re-organization of water mass transformation in the Nordic and Barents Seas. Nat Commun 13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27641-6
Moriyama et al. (2017). The cost of stratospheric climate engineering revisited. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 22(8), 1207–1228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-016-9723-y
Möller, T., et al. (2024) Achieving net zero greenhouse gas emissions critical to limit climate tipping risks. Nat Commun 15, 6192. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-49863-0
Nielsen J., (2025) The big green button: stratospheric aerosol injection as a geopolitical dilemma during strategic competition between the United States and China, and implications for expanding aerosol injection near-term research, Oxford Open Climate Change, Volume 5, Issue 1, kgaf009, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfclm/kgaf009
OECD (2022), Climate Tipping Points: Insights for Effective Policy Action, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/abc5a69e-en 
Oliver et al. (2025). The North Atlantic sub-polar gyre and phytoplankton bloom under potential future climate scenarios. ESS Open Archive . September 22, 2025. DOI: 10.22541/essoar.175855713.32401547/v1
Orihuela-Pinto et al., (2022) : Interbasin and interhemispheric impacts of a collapsed Atlantic Overturning Circulation, Nature Climate Change. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01380-y
Parker, A., and  P. J Irvine. (2018). The Risk of Termination Shock From Solar Geoengineering. Earth's Future, 6, 456–467. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000735  
Pflüger, D., et al. (2024). Flawed emergency intervention: Slow ocean response to abrupt stratospheric aerosol injection. Geophysical Research Letters, 51, e2023GL106132. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL106132 
Rahmstorf, S. (1996) On the freshwater forcing and transport of the Atlantic thermohaline circulation. Climate Dynamics 12, 799–811 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/s003820050144
Rahmstorf, S. 2024. Is the Atlantic overturning circulation approaching a tipping point? Oceanography 37(3):16–29, https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2024.501.
Rahmstorf et al. (2024) . Open letter on the risk of AMOC collapse and the need for urgent action [Open letter]. Icelandic Met Office. https://en.vedur.is/media/ads_in_header/AMOC-letter_Final.pdf
Rai, S. C. (2005) . Apatani paddy‑cum‑fish cultivation: An indigenous hill farming system of North East India. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, 4(1), 65–71
Reynolds JL (2021). Solar Geoengineering Could Be Consistent with International Law. In: Mayer B, Zahar A, eds. Debating Climate Law. Cambridge University Press:257–273. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108879064.020
Ritchie et al. (2021). Shifts in national land use and food production in Great Britain after a climate tipping point, Nature Food, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-019-0011-3
Ritchie et al. (2025). Global tipping points report 2025. Implications of overshooting 1.5° C for Earth system tipping points [Chapter 2.3]. Global tipping points report 2025
Robock et al. (2008). Regional climate responses to geoengineering with tropical and Arctic SO2 injections. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 113(D16).
Rossby et al. (2022). What can hydrography between the New England Slope, Bermuda and Africa tell us about the strength of the AMOC over the last 90 years? Geophysical Research Letters, 49, e2022GL099173. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL099173
Schaumann, F. and E. Alastrué de Asenjo (2025). Weakening AMOC reduces ocean carbon uptake and increases the social cost of carbon, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 122 (9) e2419543122, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2419543122
Schiller-Weiss, I., et al. (2024). Emerging influence of enhanced Greenland melting on boundary currents and deep convection regimes in the Labrador and Irminger Seas. Geophysical Research Letters, 51, e2024GL109022. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL109022 
Seidov et al. (2025). AMOC and North Atlantic Ocean Decadal Variability: A Review. Oceans, 6(3), 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/oceans6030059
Shin et al. (2025). Reconciled warning signals in observations and models imply approaching AMOC tipping point. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.22111
Sinet S et al. (2023) AMOC Stabilization Under the Interaction With Tipping Polar Ice Sheets. Geophysical Research Letters 50:e2022GL100305. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL100305
Smeed et al. (2018). The North Atlantic Ocean is in a state of reduced overturning. Geophysical Research Letters, 45, 1527–1533. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076350
Smith et al. (2024). On thin ice: Solar geoengineering to manage tipping element risks in the cryosphere by 2040. Earth's Future, 12(8), e2024EF004797. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024EF004797
Smith, W. (2020) The cost of stratospheric aerosol injection through 2100, Environ. Res. Lett. 15 114004 dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aba7e7
Smolders et al. (2025). Optimal observation locations for early warning of the onset of an AMOC collapse. Geophysical Research Letters, 52, e2025GL116242. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025GL116242
Stommel (1961): Thermohaline convection with two stable regimes of flow, Tellus, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1961.tb00079.x
Swingedouw et al. (2021) , On the risk of abrupt changes in the North Atlantic subpolar gyre in CMIP6 models. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 1504: 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14659
Tilmes, S., et al. (2020). Reaching 1.5 and 2.0 °C global surface temperature targets using stratospheric aerosol geoengineering, Earth Syst. Dynam., 11, 579–601, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-11-579-2020
Tilmes, S. et al. (2022). Stratospheric ozone response to sulfate aerosol and solar dimming climate interventions based on the G6 Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 4557–4579, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4557-2022
Trisos, C.H., et al (2018). Potentially dangerous consequences for biodiversity of solar geoengineering implementation and termination. Nat Ecol Evol 2, 475–482. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0431-0
Van Westen et al. (2024). Physics-based early warning signal shows AMOC is on tipping course, Science Advances. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adk1189
van Westen & Baatsen (2025). European temperature extremes under different AMOC scenarios in the community Earth system model, GRL. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025GL114611
van Westen et al. (2025b): A saddle-node bifurcation may cause the AMOC collapse in the Community Earth System Model; ESD,  https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-14  
Vinders, et al. (2024). Deliverable 2.2: Scoping note on applicable legal frameworks. Co-CREATE project. https://co-create-project.eu/publication/scoping-note-on-applicable-legal-frameworks/  (accessed 15.12.2025)
Visioni et al. (2020) What goes up must come down: impacts of deposition in a sulfate geoengineering scenario. Environ. Res. Lett. 15 094063, doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab94eb
Volkov et al. (2024).  Florida Current transport observations reveal four decades of steady state. Nat Commun 15, 7780, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-51879-5
Waidelich et al. (2024). Climate damage projections beyond annual temperature. Nat. Clim. Chang. 14, 592–599. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-024-01990-8
Weijer et al., (2020).  CMIP6 models predict significant 21st century decline of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation.Geophysical Research Letters, 47, e2019GL086075. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086075
Wett et al. (2023). Meridional connectivity of a 25-year observational AMOC record at 47°N. Geophysical Research Letters, 50, e2023GL103284. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL103284 
Wolovick, M.J., and J.C. Moore (2018). Stopping the flood: could we use targeted geoengineering to mitigate sea level rise? The Cryosphere 12, 2955–2967. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-2955-2018
Wunderling et al. (2024). Climate tipping point interactions and cascades: a review, Earth Syst. Dynam., 15, 41–74, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-41-2024 
Xie et al. (2022) Impacts of three types of solar geoengineering on the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 22, 4581–4597, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4581-2022 
Yue et al. (2023). Thermosteric and dynamic sea level under solar geoengineering, npj Climate and Atmospheric Science 6:135; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-023-00466-4 
Zhao et al. (2025). Active ice sheet conservation cannot stop the retreat of Sermeq Kujalleq glacier, Greenland. Commun Earth Environ 6, 186. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02120-8  
Årthun et al. (2025). Atlantification drives recent strengthening of the Arctic overturning circulation.Sci. Adv.11, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adu1794 
Østerhus et al. (2019). Arctic Mediterranean exchanges: a consistent volume budget and trends in transports from two decades of observations, Ocean Sci., 15, 379–399, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-15-379-2019