Go to content

References

Andersson, D. (2020): A novel approach to calculate individuals' carbon footprints using financial transaction data - App development and design. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256, 120396.
André, M., Bourgeois, A., Combet, E., Lequien, M., and Pottier, A. (2024): Challenges in measuring the distribution of carbon footprints: The role of product and prize heterogenity. Ecological Economics, 220, 108122.
André, K., Axelsson, K., Dawkins, E., & Gerger Swartling, Å. (2021). Drivkrafter för hållbar konsumtion på lokal nivå : Svenska kommuners roll och möjligheter. Retrieved from https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:naturvardsverket:diva-8916
Axelsson, K., Gong, J., Dugast, C., Lambe, F., Maquet, P. & Suljada, T. (2024). Consumption-based emissions: a new frontier for EU climate policy. SEI Report, June 2024. Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm. https://doi.org/10.51414/sei2024.025
Beiser-McGrath, L. F., & Bernauer, T. (2019). Could revenue recycling make effective carbon taxation politically feasible?. Science advances, 5(9), eaax3323.
Bendz, A., Bäckstedt, F., Harring, N., & Persson, U. M. (2023). Why do people accept or reject climate policies targeting food consumption? Unpacking justifications in the public debate in online social forums. Food Policy, 121, 102544.
Bergquist, M., Nilsson, A., Harring, N., & Jagers, S. C. (2022). Meta-analyses of fifteen determinants of public opinion about climate change taxes and laws. Nature Climate Change, 12(3), 235–240.
Brannlund, R., & Persson, L. (2012). To tax, or not to tax: Preferences for climate policy attributes. Climate Policy, 704–721. doi:10.1080/14693062.2012.675732
Brown, N., Croft, S., Dawkins, E., Finnveden, G., Green, J., Persson, M., Roth, S., West, C. and Wood, R. (2022): New methods and environmental indicators supporting policies for sustainable consumption in Sweden. Report 7032. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm.
Carattini, S., Baranzini, A., Thalmann, P., Varone, F., & Vöhringer, F. (2017). Green taxes in a post-Paris world: are millions of nays inevitable?. Environmental and Resource Economics, 68, 97–128.
Carlsson Kanyama, A., Nässén, J. and Benders, R. (2021): Shifting expenditures on food, holidays, and furnishings could lower greenhouse gas emissions by almost 40 %. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 25, 1602–1616.
Castellani, V., Beylot, A, and Sala, S. (2019): Environmental impacts of household consumption in Europe: Comparing process-based LCA and environmentally extended input-output analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 240, 117966.
Cederholm, E., Poldahl, A., Takman, J. and Brown, N. (2024): Experimental consumption-based environmental pressures for Sweden using FIGARO. Statistics Sweden, Solna.
Cherry, T. L., Kallbekken, S., & Kroll, S. (2012). The acceptability of efficiency-enhancing environmental taxes, subsidies and regulation: An experimental investigation. Environmental Science & Policy, 16, 90–96.
Christensen, I. (2024). Understanding Tradeoffs in the Institutional Design and Leadership of Collaborative Governance. Public performance & management review, 47(2): 263–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2023.2283583
Clarke, J., Heinonen, J., & Ottelin, J. (2017). Emissions in a decarbonised economy? Global lessons from a carbon footprint analysis of Iceland. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 166, 1175–1186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.108
Coleman, Eric A., Niklas Harring, Sverker C. Jagers (2023). Policy attributes shape climate policy support. Policy Studies Journal, 51, 419–437. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12493
Concito (2023). Analyse af kommunernes CO2-reduktionsbidrag til 70%-målsætningen i 2030. https://concito.dk/files/media/document/Analyse%20af%20kommunernes%20CO2-reduktionsbidrag.pdf
Crawford-Brown, D., Skelton, A., Grubb, M. (2014). Carbon-CAP (Carbon emission mitigation by Consumption-based Accounting and Policy). https://carboncap.climatestrategies.org/
Dalhammar, C., Mont, O. & Lehner, M. (2022a). Politik och styrning för hållbar konsumtion. En Forskningsöversikt
Dalhammar, C., Hartman, C., Larsson, J., Jarelin, J., Milios, L., & Mont, O. (2022b). Avveckla köp-och-slängsamhället. Fem politiska styrmedel för ökad livslängd hos konsumentprodukter. Mistra Sustainable Consumption, Rapport 1:12. Göteborg: Chalmers tekniska högskola
Danish Council on Climate Change (2024). Klimarådet (klimaraadet.dk)
Danish Council on Climate Change. (2023). Statusrapport 2023 – Danmarks nationale klimamål og internationale forpligtelser. Danish Council on Climate Change. https://klimaraadet.dk/da/rapport/statusrapport-2023
Dawkins, E., Moran, D., Palm, V., Wood, R. and Björk, I. (2019): The Swedish footprint: A multi-model comparison. Journal of Cleaner Production, 209, 1578–1592.
Dawkins, E., Strambo, C., Xylia, M., Grah, R., Gong, J., Axelsson, K., Maltais, A. (2023). Who is most at risk of losing out from low-carbon transition in the food and transport sectors in Sweden? Equity considerations from a consumption perspective. Energy Research & Social Science, Volume 95, 102881, ISSN 2214-6296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102881
Drews, S., & Van den Bergh, J. C. (2016). What explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies. Climate policy, 16(7), 855–876.
EFLA consultants for Reykjavík City (2022). Loftslagsbókhald Reykjavíkurborgar 2022. Document 103098-MIN-001-V01.
Ejelöv et al., forthcoming
Ejelöv, E., Harring, N., Hansla, A., Jagers, S., & Nilsson, A. (2022). Push, pull, or inform-an empirical taxonomy of environmental policy support in Sweden. Journal of Public Policy, 42(3), 529–552.
Ejelöv, E., & Nilsson, A. (2020). Individual factors influencing acceptability for environmental policies: a review and research agenda. Sustainability, 12(6), 2404.
Ellemann, K. (2024). ”Inför gemensam nordisk skatt på kött och socker” - DN.se. .https://www.dn.se/debatt/hela-norden-borde-infora-skatter-pa-kott-och-socker/ 
Eliasson, J., & Jonsson, L. (2011). The unexpected ‘yes’: Explanatory factors behind the positive attitudes to congestion charges in Stockholm. Transport Policy, 18, 636–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.03.006
Ergon, J. et al. (forthcoming).
Eriksson, L., Garvill, J., & Nordlund, A. M. (2008). Acceptability of single and combined transport policy measures: The importance of environmental and policy specific beliefs. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 42(8), 1117–1128.
Essayah, S., Kullgren, P., Pollestad, G. (2024). Helt fel väg att gå fram med en nordisk köttskatt (in Swedish: Completely the wrong path to introduce a Nordic meat tax. https://www.dn.se/debatt/helt-fel-vag-att-ga-fram-med-en-nordisk-kottskatt/
EU waste framework directive (Directive 2008/98/EC). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32008L0098
European Commission (no date). Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism - European Commission. https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/carbon-border-adjustment-mechanism_en
European Scientific Advisory Board on Climate Change (2024). Towards EU climate neutrality: progress, policy gaps and opportunities. Assessment Report, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, https://climate-advisory-board.europa.eu/reports-and-publications/towards-eu-climate-neutrality-progress-policy-gaps-and-opportunities
Eurostat (2024). Greenhouse gas emission statistics - carbon footprints - Statistics Explained (europa.eu). ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Greenhouse_gas_emission_statistics_-_carbon_footprints
Ewald, J., Sterner, T., & Sterner, E. (2022). Understanding the resistance to carbon taxes: Drivers and barriers among the general public and fuel-tax protesters. Resource and Energy Economics, Volume 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2022.101331
Farstad, F. M., M. D. Leiren, M. B. Lindberg, E. A. T. Hermansen, J. Wettestad, G. Søgaard, K. Øistad (2024). EUs klimaregelverk vedtatt: Hva nå for Norge? [The EUs new climate legislation has been decided on: What happens now for Norway?] CICERO Report 2024. Oslo: CICERO.
Fesenfeld, L. P. (2022). The effects of policy design complexity on public support for climate policy. Behavioural Public Policy, 1-26.
Fesenfeld, L. P., Wicki, M., Sun, Y., & Bernauer, T. (2020). Policy packaging can make food system transformation feasible. Nature Food, 1(3), 173–182.
Fauré, E., Dawkins, E., Wood, R., Finnveden, G., Palm, V., Persson, L. and Schmidt, S. (2019): Environmental pressure from Swedish consumption – The largest contributing producer countries, products and services. Journal of Cleaner Production, 231, 698–713.
Finlex (no date). Finnish Climate Act (423/2022). https://www.finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/2015/en20150609_20220423.pdf
Finnish Ministry of the Environment (2022). Keskipitkän aikavälin ilmastopolitiikan suunnitelma. Kohti hiilineutraalia yhteiskuntaa 2035 (valtioneuvosto.fi), https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/164186/YM_2022_12.pdf
Finnish Ministry of the Environment (2023). Annual Climate Report 2023. https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/165065/YM_2023_27.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Fischer, D., Reinermann, J.-L., Guillen Mandujano, G., DesRoches, C. T., Diddi, S., & Vergragt, P. J. (2021). Sustainable consumption communication: A review of an emerging field of research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 300, 126880.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126880
Future in Our Hands (2021). Forbruksbasert klimaregnskap for Norge [Klimaregnskap]. Aspelan viak, på vegne av Framtiden i våre hender. https://www.framtiden.no/artikler/dette-er-utslippene-fra-nordmenns-forbruk
Future in Our Hands (2024). Towards a fair consumption space for all: Options for reducing lifestyle emissions in Norway. https://kommunikasjon.ntb.no/pressemelding/18069233/framtiden-i-vare-hender-legger-fram-rapport-om-klimafotavtrykket-fra-nordmenns-levemater-og-forbruk?publisherId=17848511&lang=no
Government of Iceland (2023) Iceland’s 8th National Communication and 5th Biennial Report Under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change ISBN 978-9935-9705-2-7
Government of Iceland, Prime Ministers office (2023) https://www.government.is/topics/sustainable-iceland/
Grimsrud, K. M., Lindhjem, H., Sem, I. V., & Rosendahl, K. E. (2019). Public acceptance and willingness to pay cost-effective taxes on red meat and city traffic in Norway. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 9(3), 251–268.
Grubb, M., Crawford-Brown, D., Neuhoff, K., Schanes, K., Hawkins, S., & Poncia, A. (2020). Consumption-oriented policy instruments for fostering greenhouse gas mitigation. Climate Policy, 20(sup1), S58–S73. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1730151
Guilhoto, J., Legoff, G., Pegoue, A., Borga, M., Strassner, Erich. (2023) IMF Multi-Analytical Regional
Input-Output (IMF-MARIO) Database. International Monetary Fund, Statistics Department (IMF-STA). https://iioa.org/conferences/29th/papers/files/4743_IMF-MARIOPAPERIIOA2023.pdf
Hardisty, D. J., Beall, A. T., Lubowski, R., Petsonk, A., & Romero-Canyas, R. (2019). A carbon price by another name may seem sweeter: Consumers prefer upstream offsets to downstream taxes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 66, 101342.
Harring, N. (2014). Corruption, inequalities and the perceived effectiveness of economic pro-environmental policy instruments: A European cross-national study. Environmental Science & Policy, 39, 119–128.
Harring, N., & Jagers, S. (2013). Should we trust in values? Explaining public support for pro-environmental taxes. Sustainability, 5, 210–227. doi:10.3390/su5010210
Heinonen, J., Olson, S., Czepkiewicz, M., Árnadóttir, Á., Ottelin, J. (2022). Too much consumption or too high emissions intensities? Explaining the high consumption-based carbon footprints in the Nordic countries. Environmental Research Communications, Volume 4, Number 12 DOI 10.1088/2515-7620/aca871
Hellweg, S., Benetto, E., Huijbregts, M.A.J., Verones, F and Wood, R. (2023): Life-cycle assessment to guide solutions for the triple planetary crisis. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 4, 471–486.
Hennlock, M.,  Tekie, H., Roth S. (2015). Styrmedel för hållbar, konsumtion Perspektiv från ett urval av utvärderingar. Naturvårdsverket, rapport 6658.
IMF (2024): World Economic Outlook (April 2024) – GDP, current prices (imf.org), https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/NGDPD@WEO/CHN/USA
Isenhour, C., & Feng, K. (2016a). Decoupling and displaced emissions: on Swedish consumers, Chinese producers and policy to address the climate impact of consumption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 134(Part A), 320–329. doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.037
Ivanova, D., Stadler, K., Steen-Olsen, K., Wood, R., Vita, G., Tukker, A., & Hertwich, E. G. (2015). Environmental Impact Assessment of Household Consumption. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 20(3), 526–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12371
Jagers, S. C., & Hammar, H. (2009). Environmental taxation for good and for bad: the efficiency and legitimacy of Sweden's carbon tax. Environmental Politics, 18, 218–237. doi:10.1080/09644010802682601
Jagers, S. C., Martinsson, J., & Matti, S. (2019). The impact of compensatory measures on public support for carbon taxation: An experimental study in Sweden. Climate policy, 19(2), 147–160.
Jagers, S, C., Matti, S. (2020) Miljöpolitikens villkor. Studentlitteratur AB. Lund. ISBN: 9789144118543
Kallbekken, S., & Sælen, H. (2011). Public acceptance for environmental taxes: Self-interest, environmental and distributional concerns. Energy Policy, 39, 2966–2973. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.006
Kantenbacher, J., Hanna, P., Cohen, S., Miller, G., & Scarles, C. (2018). Public attitudes about climate policy options for aviation. Environmental Science & Policy, 81, 46–53.
Klimarådet. (2023). Danmarks globale klimaindsats. https://klimaraadet.dk/da/analyse/danmarks-globale-klimaindsats. 
Klintman, M. (2017). Human Sciences and Human Interests: Integrating the Social, Economic, and Evolutionary Sciences. London: Routledge.
Klintman, M. (2024). Personal communication.
Kirikkaleli, D., Abbasi, K. R., & Oyebanji, M. O. (2023). The asymmetric and long-run effect of environmental innovation and CO2 intensity of GDP on consumption-based CO2 emissions in Denmark. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 30(17), 50110–50124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25811-1
Kuntze, L., & Fesenfeld, L. P. (2021). Citizen assemblies can enhance political feasibility of ambitious climate policies. Available at SSRN 3918532.
Larsson, J., Elofsson, A., Sterner, T. & Åkerman, J. (2019). International and national climate policies for aviation: a review. Climate Policy, 19:6, 787–799.
Larsson, J. Matti S., & Nässén. J. (2020). Public Support for Aviation Policy Measures in Sweden. Climate Policy. 20:10, 1305–1321.
Larsson, J., Morfeldt, J., Johansson, D., Rootzén, J., Hult, C., Åkerman, J., Hedenus, F., Sprei, F., Nässén, J. (2021). Konsumtionsbaserade scenarier för Sverige - underlag för diskussioner om nya klimatmål. Mistra Sustainable Consumption, Rapport 1:11. Göteborg: Chalmers tekniska högskola.
Larsson J, and Nässén J (2019) Konsumtionens klimatpåverkan - trender, mål och styrmedel [Climate impact from consumption – trends, targets and policy measures] in Roos, J.M. (Ed.)
Leferink, E.K., Heinonen, J., Ala-Mantila, S., and Árnádottir, Á (2023): Climate concern elasticity of carbon footprints. Environmental Research Communications, 5, 075003.
Lindberg, M. B., Markard, J., & Andersen, A. D. (2019). Policies, actors and sustainability transition pathways: A study of the EU’s energy policy mix. Research Policy, 48(10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.09.003
Linstone, H., 1999. Decision Making for Technology Executives: Using Multiple Perspectives to Improve Performance. Artech House, Norwood, MA
Local government Denmark (2024). Realisering af klimaplaner i hele Danmark. https://www.kl.dk/klima-og-erhverv/klima/klimaalliancen-dk2020/klimaplaner-for-hele-danmark
Loë, R.C., N. Melnychuk, D. Murray, R. Plummer. Advancing the state of policy delphi practice: A systematic review evaluating methodological evolution, innovation, and opportunities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.12.009
Maestre-Andrés, S., Drews, S., & Van den Bergh, J. (2019). Perceived fairness and public acceptability of carbon pricing: a review of the literature. Climate policy, 19(9), 1186–1204.
Maestre-Andrés, S., Drews, S., Savin, I., & van den Bergh, J. (2021). Carbon tax acceptability with information provision and mixed revenue uses. Nature Communications, 12(1), 7017.
Majer, J. M., Henscher, H. A., Reuber, P., Fischer-Kreer, D., & Fischer, D. (2022). The effects of visual sustainability labels on consumer perception and behavior: A systematic review of the empirical literature. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 33, 1–14. doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.06.012
Matti, S., Nässén, J., & Larsson, J. (2022). Are fee-and-dividend schemes the savior of environmental taxation? Analyses of how different revenue use alternatives affect public support for Sweden’s air passenger tax. Environmental Science & Policy, 132, 181–189.
Meckling, J., Sterner, T. & Wagner, G. (2017). Policy sequencing toward decarbonization. Nature Energy. 2. DOI 10.1038/s41560-017-0025-8.
Meld. St. 13 (2020-2021). Climate Action Plan for 2021–2030. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/meld.-st.-13-20202021/id2827405/ ‘
Ministry of Climate, Energy and Utilities (2024). KF24: Klimamålet for 2030 er rykket tættere på (kefm.dk). https://www.kefm.dk/aktuelt/nyheder/2024/apr/kf24-klimamaalet-for-2030-er-rykket-taettere-paa
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark, (no date). Regeringens Strategi for Global Klimaindsats (um.dk). https://um.dk/udenrigspolitik/aktuelle-emner/regeringens-strategi-for-global-klimaindsats
Ministry of the Presidency, (2024) Hvítbók um sjálfbært Ísland: Drög að stefnu Íslands um sjálfbæra þróun til 2030.  ISBN 978-9935-482-47-1 https://island.is/samradsgatt/mal/3698
Mont, O., Lehner, M., Schoonover, H. (2021). Business models for sustainable consumption: Inspirational examples from the furniture and home textiles sectors. Mistra Sustainable Consumption, Report 1:9. KTH Royal Institute of Technology
Montfort, S., Fesenfeld, L., Stadelmann-Steffen, I., & Ingold, K. (2023). Policy sequencing can increase public support for ambitious climate policy. Policy and Society, 42(4), 454–477.
Moran, D., Wood, R., Hertwich, E., Mattson, K., Rodriguez, J. F. D., Schanes, K., & Barrett, J. (2020). Quantifying the potential for consumer-oriented policy to reduce European and foreign carbon emissions. Climate Policy, 20(S1), S28–S38. doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1551186
Morfeldt, J., Larsson, J., Andersson, D. et al. Emission pathways and mitigation options for achieving consumption-based climate targets in Sweden. Communications Earth & Environironment 4, 342 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-01012-z
Nilsson, A., Schuitema, G., Bergstad, C. J., Martinsson, J., & Thorson, M. (2016). The road to acceptance: Attitude change before and after the implementation of a congestion tax. Journal of environmental psychology, 46, 1–9.
Nordic Council of Ministers (2023a). Nordic consumption must change if SDGs are to be achieved, https://www.norden.org/en/news/nordic-consumption-must-change-if-sdgs-are-be-achieved
Nordic Council of Ministers, 2023b. Use of Economic Instruments in Nordic Environmental Policy 2018–2021, https://www.norden.org/en/publication/use-economic-instruments-nordic-environmental-policy-2018-2021.
Nordic Council of Ministers, 2023c. Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2023. Integrating Environmental Aspects.
https://www.norden.org/en/publication/nordic-nutrition-recommendations-2023
Nordic Council of Ministers, 2024.  Policy tools for sustainable and healthy eating. Enabling a food transition in the Nordic countries. https://www.norden.org/en/publication/policy-tools-sustainable-and-healthy-eating Policy tools for sustainable and healthy eating (norden.org)
Norwegian Environment Agency (2024). CaFEAN: Carbon Footprint of the Economic Activity of Norway (Oppdragsrapport M–2651; p. 55). Vector Sustainability & XIO Sustainability Analytics A/S. https://www.miljodirektoratet.no/publikasjoner/2024/januar-2024/cafean-carbon-footprint-of-the-economic-activity-of-norway/
NOU 2023: 25. Omstilling til lavutslipp- Veivalg for klimapolitikken mot 2050. Klima- og miljødepartementet. https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/20944f0c5bf14bd5b5112ae8aa08e853/no/pdfs/nou202320230025000dddpdfs.pdf
Ottelin, J., Heinonen, J., Junnila, S (2018). Carbon and material footprints of a welfare state: Why and how governments should enhance green investments. Environmental Science & Policy, Volume 86, pages 1–10, ISSN 1462-9011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.04.011
Ottelin, J., Ala-Mantila, S., Heinonen, J., Wiedmann, T., Clarke, J., & Junnila, S. (2019). What can we learn from consumption-based carbon footprints at different spatial scales? Review of policy implications. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 14(9). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab2212
Padriv Oslo (no date). Sirkulær Ressurssentral. https://www.paadriv.no/prosjekt/sras
Palm, V., Wood, R., Berglund, M., Dawkins, E., Finnveden, G., Schmidt, S. and Steinbach, N. (2019): Environmental pressures from Swedish consumption – a hybrid multi-regional input-output approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 228, 634–644. 
Paré, G., Cameron, A.F., Poba-Nzaou, P., Templier, M., 2013. A systematic assessment of rigor in information systems ranking-type Delphi studies. Inf. Manag. 50, 207–217.
Parekh, Vishal & Svenfelt, Åsa (2022) Taking sustainable eating practices from niche to mainstream: the perspectives of Swedish food-provisioning actors on barriers and potentials, Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 18:1, 292–308, DOI:10.1080/15487733.2022.2044197
Pedersen, O. G. (2021). Om hvordan man opgør udledninger af drivhusgasser. In E. B. Rasmussen (Ed.), Erhvervshåndbogen klimaledelse: Forlaget Andersen A/S. https://www.dst.dk/Site/Dst/SingleFiles/GetArchiveFile.aspx?fi=2108992358&fo=0&ext=national 
Persson, L., Arvidsson, R., Berglund, M., Cederberg, C., Finnveden, G., Palm, V., Sörme, L., Schmidt, S. and Wood, R. (2019): Indicators for national consumption-based accounting for chemicals. Journal of Cleaner Production, 215, 1–12.
Persson, L., Persson, Å., Nykvist, B. (2015). Styrmedel och andra insatser för att minska svensk konsumtions påverkan på miljö och hälsa i andra länder. SEI Working Paper.
Potter, C., Bastounis, A., Hartmann-Boyce, J., Stewart, C., Frie, K., Tudor, K., Bianchi, F., Cartwright, E., Cook, B., Rayner, M., Jebb, S. A. (2021). The effects of environmental sustainability labels on selection, purchase, and consumption of food and drink products: A systematic review. Environment and Behavior, 53, 891–925. doi:10.1177/0013916521995473
Remissammanställning (2022) Remissammanställning av Miljömålsberedningens delbetänkande Sveriges globala klimatavtryck (SOU 2022:15)  https://www.regeringen.se/contentassets/5c23b5b950c443ae92877718506ada36/remissammanstallning-miljomalsberedningens-delbetankande-sveriges-globala-klimatavtryck.pdf
Remond-Tiedrez, I. and Rueda-Cantuche, J.M. (eds.) (2019): EU inter-country supply, use and input-output tables — Full international and global accounts for research in input-output analysis (FIGARO). Eurostat, Luxembourg. 8d9af6c5-efbf-9da5-e2cc-e4a74d616c08 (europa.eu)
Retsinformation (2021). Danish Climate Act (lov om klima) https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2021/2580
Reykjavík City, (2021). Loftslagsáætlun 2021–2025. Reykjavík Kolefnishlutlaus 2040. Available at: https://reykjavik.is/sites/default/files/2021-10/rvik_loftslagsaaetlun2021-2025_final.pdf
Reynolds, J. P., Stautz, K., Pilling, M., van der Linden, S., & Marteau, T. M. (2020). Communicating the effectiveness and ineffectiveness of government policies and their impact on public support: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Royal Society Open Science, 7(1), 190522.
Riksrevisionen (The Swedish National Audit Office) (2023). Svart på vitt – rotavdragets kostnader och effekter. RiR 2023:26. https://www.riksrevisionen.se/download/18.4db26ca718c624538e822648/1702628549792/RiR_2023_26_rapport.pdf
Riley K, Cook R, Carr E, Manning B. (2021). A Systematic Review of The Impact of Commercial Aircraft Activity on Air Quality Near Airports. City Environ Interact. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cacint.2021.100066
Ross, V. L., Fielding, K. S., & Louis, W. R. (2014). Social trust, risk perceptions and public acceptance of recycled water: Testing a social-psychological model. Journal of environmental management, 137, 61–68.
Röös, E., Larsson, J., Resare Sahlin, K., Jonell, M., Lindahl, T., André, E., Säll, S., Harring, N., Persson, M. (2021). Policy Options for Sustainable Food Consumption: Review and Recommendations for Sweden. Retrieved from https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-293770
Röös, Elin & Tjärnemo, Heléne. (2011). Challenges of carbon labeling of food products: A consumer research perspective. British Food Journal - BR FOOD J. 113. 982–996. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/00070701111153742/full/html
Salo, M. et al. (2023). Measures to reduce the carbon footprint of household consumption (in Finnish: Ohjauskeinoja kotitalouksien kulutuksen hiilijalanjäljen pienentämiseen). Finnish government. https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/165085
Schanes, K., Jäger, J., & Drummond, P. (2019). Three scenario narratives for a resource-efficient and low-carbon Europe in 2050. Ecological Economics, 155, 70–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.02.009
Schmidt, R.C., 1997. Managing Delphi surveys using nonparametric statistical techniques. Decis. Sci. 28, 763–774.
Schmidt, S., Sodersten, C.-J., Wiebe, K., Simas, M., Palm, V., & Wood, R. (2019). Understanding GHG emissions from Swedish consumption - Current challenges in reaching the generational goal. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 212, 428–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.060
Schmutzler, A. & Goulder, L.H. (1997). "The Choice between Emission Taxes and Output Taxes under Imperfect Monitoring", Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 32, 51–64. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095069696909535   
Schoonover, H.A., Mont, O. & Lehner, M., (2021). Exploring barriers to implementing product service systems for home furnishings. Journal of Cleaner Production 295.
SEI (2024) Konsumtionskompass. (2024). Retrieved from https://www.sei.org/tools/konsumtionskompassen/
SEPA (2023) Konsumtionsbaserade växthusgasutsläpp per person och år. Retrieved from https://www.naturvardsverket.se/data-och-statistik/konsumtion/vaxthusgaser-konsumtionsbaserade-utslapp-per-person/
SEPA (2023b). Report for Sweden on climate policies and measures and on projections. https://www.naturvardsverket.se/4acd41/contentassets/caf14fb0008a41d29b9d51228f874fcb/report-for-sweden-march-2023.pdf
Seppälä, J., Mäenpää, I., Koskela , S., Mattila, T., Nissinen, A.,  Katajajuuri, J.M., Härmä, T., Korhonen, M.R., Saarinen, M., Virtanen, Y. (2011): An assessment of greenhouse gas emissions and material flows caused by the Finnish economy using the ENVIMAT model, Journal of Cleaner Production, 19 (16), 1833–1841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.04.021
Shove, E. (2010). Beyond the ABC: climate change policy and theories of social change. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 42(6), 1273–1285
SOU 2022:15, in Swedish “Sveriges globala klimatavtryck/Sweden's Global Climate Footprint" https://www.regeringen.se/contentassets/4a8366fdf6d84c2f929ab6e4a216e23f/sveriges-globala-klimatavtryck-sou-202215.pdf
Statistics Denmark (no date). The Danish Carbon Footprint (in Danish: Det danske klimaaftryk), https://www.dst.dk/da/Statistik/temaer/klima
Statistics Denmark (2021). Analyser: Dansk forbrug sætter i høj grad sit klimaaftryk i udlandet - Danmarks Statistik (dst.dk), https://www.dst.dk/da/Statistik/nyheder-analyser-publ/Analyser/visanalyse?cid=47752
Statistics Norway (2022). Fakta om miljø. https://www.ssb.no/natur-og-miljo/faktaside/miljo
Statistics Norway (2024) 13932: Greenhouse gases from Norwegian economic activity, by industry and pollutant, GWP-values due to Paris agreement (AR5) 1990 – 2023. Available at: https://www.ssb.no/en/statbank/table/13932
Statskontoret (2019) En analys av några offentliga styrmedel för bättre matvanor. Diarienummer 2018/168-5
Svarer, M (2024) Grøn skattereform. Endelig afrapportering. Report from Ekspertgruppen for en Grøn skattereform. https://skm.dk/media/jjypotl4/groen-skattereform-endelig-afrapportering-tilgaengeliggjort.pdf
Svenfelt, Å., Engström, E., Eggestrand Vaughan, H., Gerdin, E. (2022) 62 ways of enabling sustainable consumption. A collection of examples from research in Mistra Sustainable Consumption. Mistra Sustainable Consumption, Report 1.16E Stockholm: KTH
Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, 2024. Sveriges utsläpp av växthusgaser, https://www.naturvardsverket.se/data-och-statistik/klimat/sveriges-utslapp-och-upptag-av-vaxthusgaser/ (accessed 2024.09.01)
The Danish Prime Minister’s Office, (2022) Regeringsgrundlag  https://www.stm.dk/statsministeriet/publikationer/regeringsgrundlag-2022/
The Guardian (2024). The Hague becomes world’s first city to pass law banning fossil fuel-related ads. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/sep/13/the-hague-becomes-worlds-first-city-to-ban-fossil-fuel-related-ads
Thøgersen, J., Dessart, F. J., Marandola, G., & Hille, S. L. (2024). Positive, negative or graded sustainability labelling? Which is most effective at promoting a shift towards more sustainable product choices? Business Strategy and the Environment, (Online). https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3838
Tobi, R. C. A., Harris, F., Rana, R., Brown, K. A., Quaife, M., & Green, R. (2019). Sustainable diet dimensions. Comparing consumer preference for nutrition, environmental and social responsibility food labelling: A systematic review. Sustainability, 11(23). doi:10.3390/su11236575
UNFCCC (several years). (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change). National Communications and Biennial Reports National Communications and Biennial Reports.   Biennial Update Reports | UNFCCC. https://unfccc.int/biennial-update-reports?gad_source=1&gclid=CjwKCAjw1920BhA3EiwAJT3lSTQXV-wZ9zGVA4OcE9GhORTDdhtu-olcN_yrDqedw_TqQ51CJqnVQxoCI6gQAvD_BwE 
United Nations (2021). United Nations Handbook on Carbon Taxation for Developing Countries, United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York.
United Nations, European Commission, International Monetary Fund, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, & World Bank. (2014). System of Environmental-Economic Accounting. Central Framework 2012. United Nations. https://seea.un.org/sites/seea.un.org/files/seea_cf_final_en.pdf
Urban Agenda for the EU (2019). Urban Resource Centres. A classification of local approaches to waste prevention, re-use, repair and recycling in a circular economy. https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/sites/futurium/files/classification_of_urban_resource_centres_0.pdf
Vogel, J., Hickel, J. (2023) Is green growth happening? An empirical analysis of achieved versus Paris-compliant CO2–GDP decoupling in high-income countries. The Lancet Planetary Health, 7 (9). e759–e769. ISSN 2542-5196
Wood, R., Moran, D., Stadler, K., Ivanova, D., Steen-Olsen, K., Tisserant, A., & Hertwich, E. G. (2018). Prioritizing Consumption-Based Carbon Policy Based on the Evaluation of Mitigation Potential Using Input-Output Methods. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 22(3, SI), 540–552. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12702
Westin, A. L., Kalmykova, Y., & Rosado, L. (2019). Method for Quantitative Evaluation of Sustainability Measures: A Systems Approach for Policy Prioritization. SUSTAINABILITY, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030734
Nordic Council of Ministers I www.norden.org/publications I pub@norden.org