In ’
4.4.1 Involvement of gender experts’, the varying degrees of gender expert involvement in climate policy across the Nordic countries are assessed. Sweden, Iceland, and Finland have shown coordinated and systematic efforts to support collaboration between gender equality departments and climate-relevant ministries while also demonstrating varying degrees of proactiveness in terms of consulting experts. Iceland, for instance, has a strong collaboration with researchers from the University of Iceland and integrates academic projects on gender mainstreaming and budgeting into policy assessment. Finland exemplifies proactive stakeholder consultation in climate policy, inviting public input on gender and climate interlinkages, which informed its GIA for the National Climate and Energy Strategy. Despite this, Finnish non-governmental experts desire more proactive and consistent stakeholder involvement. In addition, challenges in engaging relevant experts in gender mainstreaming in climate policy have been raised by a non-governmental stakeholder, emphasising the need for greater communication, transparency, and a proactive approach - from both policymakers and stakeholders – to ensure inclusiveness and effectiveness of gender mainstreaming in climate policies.
The rest of this summary encompasses individual country reviews with the outcomes from reviews specific to each country regarding GIAs, gender budgeting practices, and document screenings.
In Denmark, in accordance with the legislation, the Ministry of Climate, Energy and Utilities have carried out relevance testing of all 63 legislative proposals put forward in the period 2005/2006 to 2021/2022. Only 2% of the bills proposed by the ministry were considered to have gender impacts to be further assessed in a GIA. Notably, the Danish Climate Law was considered to have no gender impact and a GIA was therefore not conducted. One proposal from the Ministry of Climate, Energy and Utilities – concerning the establishment of a hydrogen infrastructure in Denmark – was subject to a GIA. Several ministries, including the Ministry of Transport and the Ministry of Environment, have not performed any GIAs since 2016/2017.
Screening the national climate action plan and the long-term low-emission strategy submitted to the UNFCCC, the review finds the following results. The Danish Climate Action Plan of 2020, which has not been subject to a GIA, does not directly address gender issues but focuses on ensuring social balance during the green transition, aiming to protect livelihoods and prevent increased inequality, without including specific indicators for gender equality. Thus, the Climate Action Plan come across as rather gender-blind.
Conversely, Denmark's 2020 long-term low-emission strategy explicitly links climate adaptation to gender equality, recognising that efforts toward a green transition can support achieving gender equality (SDG 5). It advocates for investments in women's empowerment, such as education and health, as beneficial for broader climate goals. While the strategy lacks detailed gender mainstreaming measures it can be considered rather gender-responsive.
In terms of international development policy, Denmark's efforts emphasise gender equality, particularly through its development cooperation strategy, "The World 2030," targeting SDG5. However, detailed plans for integrating gender into foreign climate finance appear limited. In the recent the Biennial Reports (BRs) Denmark mentions gender equality projects but lack comprehensive integration strategies.
Finland incorporates gender budgeting across most ministries, with an emphasis on reporting expected gender equality impacts. A notable GIA was conducted on the Finnish Climate and Energy Strategy in 2021, revealing that proposed policy measures would impact male-dominated sectors positively but negatively affect female-dominated fields within the services sector. This GIA was conducted to align with the Government Action Plan for Gender Equality 2020-2023.
Screening the national climate action plan and the long-term low-emission strategy submitted to the UNFCCC, the review finds the following results. Finland's Climate Action Plan of 2017 integrates results from a GIA. Recognising the gender-segregated labour market, the plan acknowledges the potential varying impacts of climate measures on different sectors and highlights gender differences in political participation, consumption patterns, and responses to climate change, such as mobility practices and eating habits. The plan emphasises the importance of considering these gendered differences in climate policy design and implementation, which makes the plan gender-responsive.
Conversely, Finland's 2020 long-term low-emission strategy does not explicitly address gender aspects, focusing instead on minimising emissions reduction costs without a specific emphasis on gender equality. Although it mentions the government's responsibility to align climate action with human rights and efforts to reduce inequality, it lacks detailed actions or policies targeting gender equality or mainstreaming. Therefore, this strategy cannot be considered gender responsive.
Moving to Finland's international climate policies, the country showcases a strong commitment to gender equality in climate policies, focusing on women's participation in environmental management and the green economy. Its national strategies stress capacity building and knowledge dissemination to address the gender-differentiated impacts of climate change. Finland's BRs reflect this dedication through the promotion of gender equality in development policies and climate resilience planning.
Iceland mandates gender budgeting at the governmental level, applying it across all ministries and agencies. In the government's five-year plan on gender budgeting, the importance of integrating gender perspectives in environmental, transportation, and rural development policies is specifically mentioned. The City of Reykjavík has implemented gender budgeting across all departments, and a GIA was conducted on the city’s 2021 Climate Strategy. At the national level, at GIA was conducted on Iceland's Climate Action Plan from 2021, analysing the gendered impacts of climate measures, particularly in mobility, revealing differences in how men and women use bike lanes and walking paths, influenced by income levels. The Climate Action Plan emphasises the importance of ensuring that climate change actions are socially just and aligned with the SDGs, with a specific focus on equality across various societal groups, including gender, income, and sector. The mention of gender equality is indirect, referring instead to an assessment of impacts on different income groups and the overall goal of supporting equality and equal rights. Previously, in 2014, a GIA of Iceland's previous climate action plan highlighted the gendered aspects of job creation in the green transition and differing carbon footprints between men and women. Furthermore, the Icelandic government's reports on gender aspects across ministries emphasise the interlinkages between issues of climate and gender equality, advocating for inclusive and fair practices in the green transition. A notable project by the Ministry for the Environment and Natural Resources focuses on the gendered impacts of textile consumption, aiming to promote sustainability and social responsibility in the fashion industry. The 2021 long-term low-emission strategy in Iceland does not specifically articulate gender aspects, focusing more on the impacts of climate action on different income groups and the need for a just transition. It lacks explicit mentions of gender equality or gender mainstreaming, making it less clear in terms of gender responsiveness.
In the context of international climate policy, Iceland focuses on gender-responsive budgeting and international cooperation for gender-responsive climate strategies. Its recent BR emphasise the disproportionate impact of climate change on women and the country's role in promoting gender aspects in international discussions. Iceland collaborates with organisations like UN Women and WEDO and runs training programs aimed at enhancing gender-responsive climate strategies in developing countries.
In reviewing Norway's efforts, no concrete examples of GIAs in domestic climate policies were found. However, the Ministry of Climate and Environment is exploring the distributional effects of climate policy, including gender impacts. At the local level, Oslo Municipality conducted a GIA as part of its bicycle strategy, finding significant differences in bicycle use between genders.
Screening the national climate action plan and the long-term low-emission strategy submitted to the UNFCCC, the review finds the following results. Norway's climate action plan of 2020 addresses the SDGs, including SDG 5 on gender equality, but does not delve into specifics about how climate actions impact gender. It emphasises that climate action should be balanced with other SDGs and not negatively affect low-income or vulnerable groups or employment. The 2020-2021 white paper on energy briefly mentions gender in the context of the oil workforce transition, highlighting Equinor's goal for female apprenticeship, but does not extend gender considerations to other sectors or the wider energy policy.
Norway's long-term low-emission strategy of 2020 does not specifically include gender aspects. A detailed review of Norwegian policy documents conducted by academic researchers in 2023 suggests that Norwegian climate policies, in general, do not explicitly address the link between gender and climate change, with a noted absence of gender mainstreaming in climate policymaking.
Norway’s Eighth National Communication to the UNFCCC for 2022 does mention gender once in relation to "just transition" under the global SDG process. This suggests an acknowledgement of gendered differences in this context, however, concrete examples of gender integration in climate action are lacking. A focus on gender perspectives appears more pronounced in local strategies than in national policies. Viken county's regional planning strategy for 2020-2024 includes sustainability priorities that integrate an equality perspective, with specific links to SDG 5 on gender equality.
Moving the foreign- and international development policy in the area of climate in Norway, its strategic documents and BRs highlight a commitment to gender mainstreaming in foreign- and international development policy in relation to climate, emphasising women’s vulnerability to climate impacts and the importance of involving women to enhance gender equality in climate action. Despite this, the level of gender mainstreaming in climate finance reporting is considered the lowest among the reviewed Nordic countries.
Sweden's draft strategy for gender mainstreaming of the Paris Agreement emphasises integrating gender equality into all budget areas, including climate. However, this review has not been able to identify concrete examples of gender budgeting in climate policy. Efforts, particularly in Norbotten, Västra Götaland, and Umeå municipality, show a pronounced focus on incorporating gender equality into climate adaptation plans and urban planning, e.g. by conducting GIAs and gender analyses with a focus on social equality.
Screening the national climate action plan and the long-term low-emission strategy submitted to the UNFCCC, the review finds the following results. Sweden's Climate Action Plans of 2019 and 2023 emphasise the country's commitment to ensuring that the efforts towards climate neutrality do not compromise other SDGs. The plans highlight the interconnectedness of various areas and aim for a coherent approach that avoids high societal costs and considers differences across income groups and urban/rural divides. The 2023 plan notably integrates gender equality into climate efforts, and notably acknowledge the mutual reinforcement between gender equality and climate action. It specifies the importance of a gender equality perspective in areas such as public transport, the labor market, and STEM fields, and underscores Sweden's ongoing commitment to gender equality in the context of the Paris Agreement. The plan was prepared with a gender analysis, reflecting comprehensive gender mainstreaming efforts and rendering the plan as gender responsive.
The Swedish long-term low-emission strategy of 2020 is more explicit in its approach to gender mainstreaming, including a specific section on gender equality and climate change. It outlines proposals for integrating gender equality into the implementation of the Paris Agreement and acknowledges the importance of considering distributional and regional effects of the green transition on gender equality. The strategy suggests that promoting gender equality is both an end goal and a means to facilitate greenhouse gas emission reduction, highlighting the need to consider how the transition impacts different households across regions. This approach indicates an understanding that climate policies and initiatives that incorporate gender differences and aim for social cohesion are more likely to succeed, marking the strategy as gender responsive.
Sweden's Integrated Energy and Climate Plan, submitted to the EU in 2020, includes a dedicated section on gender mainstreaming, reflecting the country's long-standing commitment to gender equality. However, an academic analysis of the plan criticises it for portraying women primarily as vulnerable and as custodians of local knowledge, thereby perpetuating patriarchal structures without addressing power imbalances or intra-country gender dynamics. While the plan in itself could be considered gender-responsive in terms of section dedicated to gender equality, this critique raised indicates that gender mainstreaming in Sweden has increased vigilance from non-governmental stakeholders and experts, calling out the gaps in the performance of gender mainstreaming by policymakers, thus reflecting the comprehensive level of gender mainstreaming. With that said, the critique should be taken into account by policymakers as it can serve as a foundation for improving the implementation of the UNFCCC GAP goals.
Regarding the foreign- and international development climate policy of Sweden, the country is known for adopting the world's first feminist foreign policy in 2014 and taking the lead in integrating gender considerations within its international climate policy. The country's climate finance shows a high level of gender mainstreaming, with efforts to track and encourage further gender mainstreaming, although there has been a noted decline in recent years. Sweden's BRs also testify to the conviction that a gender-just transition is crucial for achieving the Paris Agreement goals.
4.5 Priority area E: Monitoring and reporting
Priority area E of the UNFCCC GAP focuses on the monitoring and reporting mechanisms for gender mainstreaming in climate-related efforts. Clear routines for data collection, analysis, and monitoring are essential to strengthen accountability and meet national and international reporting requirements. Reporting mechanisms also foster the possibility of sharing knowledge and experiences among countries. Ultimately, this priority area aims to enhance transparency, accountability, and effectiveness in gender-responsive climate policies and actions.
In line with this, this section provides examples of relevant monitoring and reporting mechanisms internationally and examples of national monitoring- and reporting activities related to the UNFCCC GAP.
The Commission on the Status of Women (CSW) reviews the implementation of the BPfA every fifth year. The United Nations Regional Commissions, in cooperation with UN Women, coordinate the review process, and for this the Parties must submit national review reports. The most recent reports from 2019 marked the 25th anniversary of the BPfA (Beijing+25), during which member states were invited to review their progress and submit national review reports. The review reports (2019) consist of 40 questions through which the countries must report on their progress towards gender equality. Among other things, the countries must report on their priorities, achievements, and challenges for the prior five years, as well as the five coming years. This monitoring- and reporting mechanism encourages the countries to develop and maintain national data collection and analysis structures, thus enhancing accountability. As elaborated in chapter 4.4, two questions relate directly to environmental- and climate policies, namely what actions the countries have taken in the last five years to integrate gender perspectives and concerns into environmental policies and programmes for disaster risk reduction, climate resilience and mitigation. The countries must also report on their actions in the past five years to “recognize, reduce and/or redistribute unpaid care and domestic work and promote work-family conciliation” – an aspect assessed in chapter 4.2 on gender equality in ‘the green sector’. The UNFCCC GAP and its priority areas and activities are not explicitly referred to in the 40 questions on which the Parties must report. Nonetheless, the national review reports can be considered one example of an international monitoring- and reporting mechanism of gender mainstreaming in climate policies.
In the national review reports, the countries also report on whether they have defined indicators for monitoring the progress of the SDGs. Reporting on the SDGs implementation is otherwise a voluntary reporting process, i.e. The Voluntary National Reviews (VNRs), which is part of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development review mechanisms, where countries are encouraged to conduct regular reviews of their progress towards the SDGs.
The VNRs are integral to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, designed for countries to conduct self-assessments of their progress towards achieving the SDGs. These reviews are encouraged to be inclusive, covering progress at both national and sub-national levels, and are meant to be country-led and country-driven. The VNRs involve multiple stakeholders and focus on sharing successes, challenges, and lessons learned to accelerate the implementation of the 2030 Agenda. They also aim to strengthen government policies and institutions and foster support and partnerships across various stakeholders. The High-level Political Forum (HLPF) under the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) serves as the platform where these reviews are presented, facilitating a global exchange of insights and best practices.
According to the country profiles drawn from the Sustainable Development Report from 2023, Denmark has 197 indicators, Finland has 42, Sweden has 65, and Norway has no indicators but rather online reporting on SDG indicators. The report also shows that Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden carried out VNRs in 2016/17 and 2020/2021. The report provides no information on Icelandic indicators or VNR.
This review has not identified any recent cross-Nordic evaluation or review on gender mainstreaming in Nordic countries in general. In 2014, the NCM commissioned reviews of the equality assessment work carried out in the Nordics at state and municipal levels, respectively. The state-level review shows that Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden have integrated gender-responsive measures and efforts into overarching policy frameworks across various sectors. Denmark's approach tends to be more practice-oriented and sector-specific, dispersed across departments rather than forming part of a comprehensive policy framework. Although the review originates from 2014, its conclusion remains consistent with the findings in chapter 4.3 regarding Priority area C on coherence. Based on the 2014 review, it is recommended that the countries establish requirements for the collection of sex-disaggregated data to be used in reporting on results, carry out gender analyses, and disseminate results and impact of gender mainstreaming to ensure political support for gender equality efforts.
The Nordic countries have adopted various approaches to monitor and evaluate gender mainstreaming, aside from the UNFCCC reporting mechanisms, which commit all Parties to report on the implementation of the UNFCCC GAP in the spring of 2024.
Denmark
The Ministry of Digital Government and Equality monitors the public gender equality efforts. Furthermore, the Danish Institute for Human Rights evaluates and monitors gender equality in Denmark and has a mandate to bring cases of a principal nature or cases of public interest to the Equal Treatment Board.