Even after the implementation of the policies in the Global Rules Scenario, 13 Mt of plastic would end mismanaged annually by 2040, requiring further research, data gathering and monitoring, and innovation – starting immediately.
It is assumed that the policies proposed in the Global Rules Scenario would be applied concurrently across all geographies. However, the Global Rules Scenario is limited by technological, economic and behavioural constraints; and by 2040, 13 Mt of plastic would still end up mismanaged, out of which it is estimated that 4 Mt would end up in dumpsites, 2 Mt would be burned in the open and 7 Mt would be released into land and water.
Of this 7 Mt of plastic volumes released into land and water, microplastics emissions would account for 5 Mt, with the remaining mismanaged plastic comprising a mix of macroplastics from all sectors. This section identifies areas for research, data gathering and innovation to bridge this gap and further mitigate the release of plastic volumes into the environment. The impact of these potential innovations has not been modelled, given the high levels of uncertainty.
Further research and innovation are needed to reduce microplastics emissions, scale reuse models, improve safe recycling, expand collection in rural areas, and develop and evaluate safe alternative materials.
Eliminate, or at least capture, all microplastics emissions (see Figure 15): As discussed, research, evidence and solutions to prevent microplastics emissions are currently lacking. Innovation is needed to improve the design of tyres, paints and textiles to minimise the release of microplastics without having to rely on more complex downstream solutions such as wastewater capture systems. Examples include further research and development of innovations such as adhesive or peelable paints – especially marine paints – to reduce wear and tear, and to control their removal and disposal; and new solutions to tyre abrasion, such as devices that capture tyre particles at source, low-wear tyres, stormwater road management and road sweeping, and standardised measurements of wear and tear to support better design requirements and thresholds.182 Other sources of microplastics emissions (eg, agricultural plastics, textiles during use) should also be investigated, to broaden our understanding of the field and develop policies and technical solutions to tackle these new sources.
Scale reuse models to further reduce plastic volumes (see Figure 7): Reuse models have the potential to reduce consumption and waste, but they lack scale. Private sector innovation to reduce costs and GHG emissions associated with reverse logistics, and to develop solutions that promote greater consumer take-up, would significantly enhance the adoption and success of these new models. Public incentives to promote this innovation would support the scaling of these models.
Improve sorting and recycling to expand recycling beyond the 43% global rate in the Global Rules Scenario (see Figure 12): Advances in sorting – including mixed waste sorting – could improve system yields through solutions such as sensors, tracking technologies, artificial intelligence recognition and automation, ensuring better sorting and recycling to complement improvements in design. Innovation could also be required for mechanical recyclers to expand sources of viable feedstock. For instance, there is currently a lack of closed-loop mechanical recycling systems for textiles, with chemical recycling emerging as a possible solution for textiles-to-textiles recycling.
Expand collection in rural areas to achieve collection rates of 95% or above (see Figure 11): While the establishment of waste collection systems may be viable in densely populated regions with support from financial mechanisms such as EPR schemes, extending such systems to low-density rural areas presents economic challenges, particularly in low and middle-income countries. Developing technologies and solutions to improve the economics of collection systems and to better integrate the informal sector into those systems would help to resolve an important challenge in the plastic system.
Develop and evaluate safe alternative materials to reduce plastic production and consumption and to increase circularity: New substitutes that are degradable and/or highly recyclable, while offering the same barrier properties, cost advantages and versatility as plastics, could reduce reliance on plastics in current applications. For example, materials could be developed to further replace multi-layer packaging, such as sachets. Areas for exploration could include highly recyclable fibre-based materials and seaweed-based materials. Similarly, research is needed on opportunities for the use of biodegradable plastics in agriculture, as well as in some relevant applications in fisheries and aquaculture. New substitutes should be developed only if their evaluation has confirmed that there is no risk of unintended consequences or negative impact (eg, on GHG emissions, land use, water use or human rights).
Beyond specific areas for innovation, further knowledge, research and data would be required.
Currently available data is limited and fragmented, requiring better data collection, transparency and accountability throughout the supply chain. In the context of stocks and flows, there is limited available data and transparency regarding plastics placed on markets, production, trade flows, consumption, waste generation and post-use patterns. There are a lack of field data measuring plastic stocks and flows throughout the value chain; and many parameters have high levels of uncertainty.