Professor Carina Mood from the University of Stockholm defines integration as multidimensional, distinguishing four dimensions:
Structural integration, which relates to education and work.
Cultural integration, concerning identity and values.
Social integration, involving relationships between groups and individuals.
Psychological adaptation, which pertains to potentially negative psychological effects of migrating or being in a minority.
Regarding structural integration, Carina Mood states that, despite widespread concerns in Sweden, there is no evidence that students with foreign backgrounds attend lower-quality schools. Students report receiving the support they need, they are not disscriminated against in tracking or grading, and they have higher school engagement than students with native-born parents.
At the same time, students from foreign backgrounds have lower grades. The descendants of immigrants tend to achieve higher grades than the children who have migrated, but they still do not reach the level of students with a Swedish background. Carina Mood describes the overall situation as bipolar. Students with parents who have migrated face disadvantages at lower levels of education, but they are not disadvantaged in attaining higher educational qualifications, despite starting from a weaker socioeconomic position.
They have higher aspirations and more positive attitudes towards education. However, they often have fewer parental resources and lower grades. Students with migrant parents are more likely to start tertiary education and face no disadvantage at university.
Regarding cultural integration, research has identified the most significant differences compared to the Swedish native population.
– Students with migrant parents are most commonly Muslim, accounting for 50% of such students, while one third are Christian. Among students of native-born parents, more than half are Christian, and more than 40% report they have no religion.
As many as 75% of students with migrant parents say religion is important, while only 14% of Swedish-background students say that religion matters to them. Religiosity decreases somewhat over time in both groups, but it does not converge between the student groups. Individuals with migrant parents also have more conservative values on non-married cohabitation, homosexuality, divorce, and abortion.
– All groups become less conservative over time, but the gap between Swedish and those with immigrant backgrounds remains constant. When it comes to attitudes towards gender roles, there is a slightly declining gap over time.
Regarding ethnic identity, researchers have found that it makes a difference where the parents of the children were born. At 16 years of age, almost half of those born in Sweden to foreign-born parents define themselves as having a dual identity, both Swedish and tied to their parents’ home country.
As for the psychological adaptation, individuals with migrant parents have the same mental well-being as others and higher self-related health, stronger beliefs in the future, greater life satisfaction, and greater self-confidence than youth with Swedish-born parents.
– The overall picture indicates selective integration. According to our survey, social integration is not as strong as structural integration. Young people from different backgrounds often move within separate social circles, shaped by differing socioeconomic conditions, values, and levels of everyday interaction.