Go to content

Appendix for Chapter 2: An evaluation of fish stocks lacking quantitative assessments in Skagerrak

Supplementary Section 1: Species

Table S1: Species with a quantitative stock assessment relevant to the Skagerrak area.
Aphia ID
Species
Family
ICES_ID
ICES_Category
Hauls_NOSS
Hauls_NS-IBTS
Hauls_Total
126417
Clupea harengus
Clupeidae
her.27.3a47d,­her.27.20-24
1,1.2
12294
77728
90022
126436
Gadus morhua
Gadidae
cod.27.47d20
1
4210
61012
65222
126444
Trisopterus esmarkii
Gadidae
nop.27.3a4
1
33687
23780
57467
126437
Melanogrammus aeglefinus
Gadidae
had.27.46a20
1
13580
35540
49120
127143
Pleuronectes platessa
Pleuronectidae
ple.27.420
1
1237
35372
36609
127136
Glyptocephalus cynoglossus
Pleuronectidae
wit.27.3a47d
1
5228
10872
16100
126441
Pollachius virens
Gadidae
pok.27.3a46
1
5361
6864
12225
126484
Merluccius merluccius
Merlucciidae
hke.27.3a46-­8abd
1
3690
7948
11638
127160
Solea solea
Soleidae
sol.27.20-24
1
5
3744
3749
127149
Scophthalmus maximus
Scophthalmidae
tur.27.3a
2.1
1
424
425
Table S2: Eighty-two species observed in the two surveys in the Skagerrak area. The “x” in column “L” indicates for which species species-specific landings are available. Similarly, the “x” in column “S” indicates for which species, a reliable (CV < 1.5) relative abundance index could be estimated.
Aphia ID
Species
Family
ICES ID
ICES Stock cat
# NOSS
# NS-IBTS
# total
Shape
Habitat
Gear
group
L
S
126438
Merlangius merlangus
Gadidae
whg.27.3a
3.23
11547
65044
76591
fusiform/­normal
near-bottom
6
x
x
127137
Hippoglossoides platessoides
Pleuronectidae
 
 
15111
54192
69303
short and/or deep
bottom
4
x
x
127139
Limanda limanda
Pleuronectidae
dab.27.3a4
3.22
274
35652
35926
short and/or deep
bottom
4
x
x
150637
Eutrigla gurnardus
Triglidae
gug.27.3a47d
3.23
474
18084
18558
elongated
bottom
2
x
x
126450
Enchelyopus cimbrius
Lotidae
 
 
1722
11352
13074
elongated
bottom
2
 
x
126446
Trisopterus minutus
Gadidae
 
 
1523
10476
11999
fusiform/­normal
near-bottom
6
 
x
127140
Microstomus kitt
Pleuronectidae
lem.27.3a47d
3.22
221
9048
9269
short and/­or deep
bottom
4
x
x
127312
Maurolicus muelleri
Sternoptychidae
 
 
6156
2824
8980
elongated
near-bottom
5
 
x
105824
Chimaera monstrosa
Chimaeridae
 
 
7278
1224
8502
elongated
bottom
2
x
x
127118
Lycodes vahlii
Zoarcidae
 
 
0
7792
7792
eel-like
bottom
1
 
x
127141
Platichthys flesus
Pleuronectidae
fle.27.3a4
3.2
4
7676
7680
short and/­or deep
bottom
4
x
x
154675
Lumpenus lampretaeformis
Stichaeidae
 
 
18
6716
6734
eel-like
bottom
1
 
x
126793
Callionymus maculatus
Callionymidae
 
 
32
6276
6308
elongated
bottom
2
 
x
126792
Callionymus lyra
Callionymidae
 
 
32
6040
6072
elongated
bottom
2
 
x
126439
Micromesistius poutassou
Gadidae
 
 
4712
476
5188
elongated
near-bottom
5
 
 
126715
Argentina silus
Argentinidae
aru.27.123a4
3.2
4964
156
5120
elongated
near-bottom
5
 
 
127214
Cyclopterus lumpus
Cyclopteridae
 
 
222
4440
4662
short and/or deep
near-bottom
7
x
x
158960
Coryphaenoides rupestris
Macrouridae
rng.27.3a
3.23
3983
20
4003
elongated
near-bottom
5
x
x
274100
Lycodes gracilis
Zoarcidae
 
 
1526
672
2198
elongated
bottom
2
 
x
126716
Argentina sphyraena
Argentinidae
 
 
35
1868
1903
elongated
bottom
2
 
x
127126
Arnoglossus laterna
Bothidae
 
 
0
1448
1448
fusiform/­normal
bottom
3
 
x
127150
Scophthalmus rhombus
Scophthalmidae
bll.27.3a47de
3.22
0
1176
1176
short and/or deep
bottom
4
x
x
126440
Pollachius pollachius
Gadidae
pol.27.3a4
5.2
79
892
971
fusiform/­normal
near-bottom
6
x
x
127379
Entelurus aequoreus
Syngnathidae
 
 
7
944
951
eel-like
bottom
1
 
 
127101
Lycenchelys sarsii
Zoarcidae
 
 
125
752
877
eel-like
bottom
1
 
 
126555
Lophius piscatorius
Lophiidae
anf.27.3a46
3.21
184
668
852
short and/or deep
bottom
4
x
x
127153
Buglossidium luteum
Soleidae
 
 
0
752
752
short and/or deep
bottom
4
 
x
126461
Molva molva
Lotidae
 
 
159
412
571
elongated
bottom
2
x
x
127082
Trachinus draco
Trachinidae
 
 
4
500
504
fusiform/­normal
bottom
3
 
x
127251
Helicolenus dactylopterus
Sebastidae
 
 
444
56
500
fusiform/­normal
bottom
3
 
x
127190
Agonus cataphractus
Agonidae
 
 
7
472
479
fusiform/­normal
bottom
3
 
x
126904
Lesueurigobius friesii
Gobiidae
 
 
0
432
432
fusiform/­normal
bottom
3
 
x
127255
Sebastes viviparus
Sebastidae
 
 
364
28
392
short and/or deep
bottom
4
 
x
126758
Anarhichas lupus
Anarhichadidae
 
 
3
364
367
elongated
bottom
2
x
x
126986
Mullus surmuletus
Mullidae
mur.27.3a47d
5
87
244
331
fusiform/­normal
bottom
3
 
 
126756
Hyperoplus lanceolatus
Ammodytidae
 
 
0
324
324
elongated
bottom
2
 
x
126928
Pomatoschistus minutus
Gobiidae
 
 
0
288
288
fusiform/­normal
bottom
3
 
 
126505
Gasterosteus aculeatus
Gasterosteidae
 
 
76
180
256
fusiform/­normal
near-bottom
6
 
 
127203
Myoxocephalus scorpius
Cottidae
 
 
3
212
215
fusiform/­normal
bottom
3
 
x
293018
Zeugopterus norvegicus
Scophthalmidae
 
 
10
160
170
short and/or deep
near-bottom
7
 
x
127389
Syngnathus rostellatus
Syngnathidae
 
 
0
160
160
eel-like
bottom
1
 
x
127138
Hippoglossus hippoglossus
Pleuronectidae
 
 
35
124
159
fusiform/­normal
bottom
3
x
x
127387
Syngnathus acus
Syngnathidae
 
 
0
124
124
eel-like
bottom
1
 
 
126751
Ammodytes marinus
Ammodytidae
 
 
8
108
116
elongated
near-bottom
5
 
 
126501
Phycis blennoides
Phycidae
 
 
90
24
114
fusiform/­normal
near-bottom
6
x
x
127427
Zeus faber
Zeidae
 
 
3
80
83
short and/or deep
near-bottom
7
x
x
127262
Chelidonichthys lucerna
Triglidae
 
 
0
80
80
elongated
bottom
2
 
x
126996
Pholis gunnellus
Pholidae
 
 
0
72
72
eel-like
bottom
1
 
 
127072
Leptoclinus maculatus
Stichaeidae
 
 
7
64
71
elongated
bottom
2
 
 
126448
Ciliata mustela
Lotidae
 
 
0
60
60
elongated
bottom
2
 
x
126281
Anguilla anguilla
Anguillidae
 
 
5
48
53
eel-like
bottom
1
 
 
126445
Trisopterus luscus
Gadidae
 
 
0
52
52
fusiform/­normal
near-bottom
6
 
x
127393
Syngnathus typhle
Syngnathidae
 
 
0
48
48
eel-like
bottom
1
 
 
126795
Callionymus reticulatus
Callionymidae
 
 
8
28
36
elongated
bottom
2
 
x
126929
Pomatoschistus norvegicus
Gobiidae
 
 
32
4
36
fusiform/­normal
bottom
3
 
x
150630
Echiichthys vipera
Trachinidae
 
 
1
32
33
elongated
bottom
2
 
 
293624
Liparis liparis
Liparidae
 
 
0
32
32
elongated
bottom
2
 
x
126752
Ammodytes tobianus
Ammodytidae
 
 
7
24
31
elongated
bottom
2
 
 
126447
Brosme brosme
Lotidae
usk.27.­3a45b6a7-912b
3.2
29
0
29
elongated
bottom
2
x
x
127205
Triglops murrayi
Cottidae
 
 
1
28
29
elongated
bottom
2
 
 
126459
Molva dypterygia
Lotidae
 
 
23
4
27
elongated
bottom
2
x
x
126975
Dicentrarchus labrax
Moronidae
 
 
0
20
20
fusiform/­normal
bottom
3
 
 
127146
Lepidorhombus whiffiagonis
Scophthalmidae
 
 
1
16
17
fusiform/­normal
bottom
3
 
 
126442
Raniceps raninus
Gadidae
 
 
0
16
16
fusiform/­normal
bottom
3
 
 
127201
Micrenophrys lilljeborgii
Cottidae
 
 
0
16
16
elongated
bottom
2
 
 
127151
Zeugopterus punctatus
Scophthalmidae
 
 
1
12
13
short and/or deep
bottom
4
 
 
126878
Crystallogobius linearis
Gobiidae
 
 
0
12
12
elongated
bottom
2
 
 
126451
Gaidropsarus argentatus
Lotidae
 
 
9
0
9
elongated
bottom
2
 
 
127071
Chirolophis ascanii
Stichaeidae
 
 
1
8
9
elongated
near-bottom
5
 
 
127419
Capros aper
Caproidae
 
 
1
8
9
short and/or deep
bottom
4
 
 
126458
Gaidropsarus vulgaris
Lotidae
 
 
0
8
8
elongated
bottom
2
 
 
127204
Taurulus bubalis
Cottidae
 
 
0
8
8
fusiform/­normal
bottom
3
 
 
127220
Liparis montagui
Liparidae
 
 
0
8
8
elongated
bottom
2
 
 
126892
Gobius niger
Gobiidae
 
 
0
4
4
fusiform/­normal
bottom
3
 
 
126977
Chelon labrosus
Mugilidae
 
 
0
4
4
elongated
bottom
2
 
 
127191
Leptagonus decagonus
Agonidae
 
 
4
0
4
elongated
bottom
2
 
 
127254
Sebastes mentella
Sebastidae
 
 
3
0
3
fusiform/­normal
near-bottom
6
 
 
126352
Arctozenus risso
Paralepididae
 
 
1
0
1
elongated
near-bottom
5
 
 
126472
Macrourus berglax
Macrouridae
 
 
1
0
1
elongated
near-bottom
5
 
 
127193
Artediellus atlanticus
Cottidae
 
 
1
0
1
elongated
bottom
2
 
 
127235
Cottunculus microps
Psychrolutidae
 
 
1
0
1
elongated
bottom
2
 
 
127259
Chelidonichthys cuculus
Triglidae
 
 
1
0
1
fusiform/­normal
bottom
3
 
 

Supplementary Section 2: Methodology

The survey data was cleaned and processed following the guidelines recommended by ICES (2023) procedures. Duplicate haul IDs and entries with missing values in exploratory variables were removed. Only valid hauls (HaulVal = A or V; SpecVal = 1,4,7,10) with complete species records (StdSpecRecCod = 1) were retained. The dataset was restricted to the years 1986–2023 in Q1 and the North Sea (ICES areas 4a, 4b, 4c) and Skagerrak (ICES area 3a.21). Categories with less than 2 hauls with positive observations were excluded to reduce the number of zeros and to help model convergence. For example, if a specific species was only observed in one haul for a specific survey or a specific vessel, then this survey or vessel was removed. The final dataset categorized gear as either GOV (used in NS-IBTS) or ST (Campelen shrimp trawl used in NOSS) to differentiate between the two surveys. This comprehensive data curation ensured that the analysis focused on species most relevant to Skagerrak's demersal ecosystem, providing a robust foundation for examining their trends and management needs.
To combine the two surveys with different gears into a single model, it was necessary to account for potentially different catchability of the two surveys. As the survey catchability likely depends on the body shape of the species, species with similar morphological features were combined similarly to Walker et al. (2014). In addition, species that are associated with the seabed, such as demersal species were differentiated from species that are near or above the surface, such as benthopelagic species. The information for both categories was derived from FishBase (Froese and Pauly, 2024). Furthermore, the estimation of the gear efficiency was restricted to a time period of 2006 to 2023, and the geographical area (ICES rectangles) and depth range (120-180m) with a good overlap and sufficient observations between the two surveys (Figure S1). The spatial-temporal model for the numbers per haul was described by:
g(\mu_i)=f_1(time_i)+f_2(lon_i,lat_i)+f_3(time_i,lon_i,lat_i)+\alpha+log(\beta+5)
where:
  • g(\mu_i)is the link function applied to the expected value  of the response variable, here the number of individuals in haul i,
  • f_1(time_i)is a smooth function of time,
  • f_2(lon_i,lat_i)is a smooth bivariate function of geographic coordinates (longitude and latitude),
  • f_3(time_i,lon_i,lat_i)is a tensor product smooth to capture the interaction between time and location,
  • \alphaIs the gear effect,
  • log(\beta+5)is an offset term accounting for the haul duration \left(\beta\right) of haul i plus 5 minutes according to the recommendation by Berg et al. (2024).
The estimated gear coefficients are based on groups with 3 to 20 species and are overall within a reasonable range but varied widely for 7 groups (range of 0.16-1.82, Table 1). Overall, the catchability is lower for the ST gear in comparison to the GOV gear, with the only exception of elongated species associated with the bottom having a coefficient above 1. These gear coefficients are used for the species-specific models. Supplementary Table S2 shows each species categorized by groups of habitat and body shape. 
Table S3: Estimated gear coefficients between the two surveys and gears (GOV and ST) for seven groups based on habitat and body shape. N indicates the number of species included in the group.           
Group
Habitat
Body shape
N
Estimate
1
bottom
eel-like
9
0.23
2
bottom
elongated
20
0.16
3
bottom
fusiform / normal
11
0.67
4
bottom
short and / or deep
8
0.45
5
near-bottom
elongated
5
1.82
6
near-bottom
fusiform / normal
6
0.22
7
near-bottom
short and / or deep
3
0.34
The temporal and spatial trends in abundance of the species were explored by means of spatio-temporal modelling, fitting Generalised additive models (GAMs) to a subset of the data representing the realised habitat for each species following the procedure described in Berg et al. (2014). The abundance was represented by the number of individuals Ni referring to the number of individuals in the ith haul. In the next step, the abundance and distribution were estimated for each species without estimating a gear effect but using the estimated gear coefficients as offsets (Table 1). Spatial-temporal GAMs were then used to estimate distribution maps for each species. The model describes the relationship of the numbers per haul for a specific species and external factors by:
g(\mu_i)=f_1(time_i)+f_2(lon_i,lat_i)+f_3(time_i,lon_i,lat_i)+f_4(\surd(depth_i)+log(\alpha\beta+5).
where:
  • g(μ_i ) is the link function applied to the expected value  of the response variable, here the number of individuals in haul i,
  • f_1 (time_i )is a smooth function of time,
  • f_2 (lon_i,lat_i )is a 2-dimensional Duchon spline on the geographic coordinates (longitude and latitude),
  • f_3 (time_i,lon_i,lat_i ) is a tensor product smooth to capture the interaction between time and location,
  • f_4(\surd(depth_i)is a smooth function of the square root of depth,
  • log(\alpha\beta+5).is an offset term accounting for the haul duration \left(\beta\right) of haul i plus 5 minutes according to the recommendation by Berg et al. (2024) and the estimated gear effect for that species \left(\alpha\right).
The model residuals were assumed to follow a negative binomial distribution, and a log link function was used for the dependent variable. An adequate number of knots was used for each independent term considering the dimensions of the variable. For instance, for f1 the number of knots were set equal to the number of years of available data, and the knots for f2 were defined based on the spatial dimensions of the area where the species was observed. If the most complex model did not converge, the model complexity was reduced in 4 steps within an iterative process, including reduction of the number of knots.
Based on the converged models for each species, the abundance was predicted for a fine spatial grid for the Skagerrak area with depth from bathymetric maps following a similar procedure as described in Berg et al. (2014): (i) dividing the realised habitat into small subareas of approximately equal size; (ii) taking the sum over all predicted abundances using the same reference gear and haul duration as well as the depth and coordinates of the grid cell. The standard deviation, coefficient of variation (CV), and 95% confidence intervals of the abundance indices were estimated based on bootstrapping. Given that ny denotes the number of hauls each year, a bootstrap data set is created by resampling the data set with replacement, taking ny hauls for each year from the data. All parameters (incl. smoothing parameters) and the abundance index is re-estimated for each bootstrap data set. The estimation of the standard deviation is based on 1000 bootstrap data sets. For more information about the prediction and bootstrapping procedure, please refer to Berg et al. (2014). The estimated relative abundance with 95% confidence intervals for four example species is shown in Figure 1 (please see Figure S2-4 for all 45 species).
Figure S1: Haul locations for the two surveys used to estimate the gear efficiency coefficients.
S1.jpg

Supplementary Section 3: Spatiotemporal abundance trends for 45 species

Figure S2. Relative abundance for species 1-15 of 45 species with reliable relative abundance trend in the surveys (CV < 150%) (species with “x” in column “S” in Table S2).
Figure S3: Relative abundance for species 16-30 of 45 species with reliable relative abundance trend in the surveys (CV < 150%) (species with “x” in column “S” in Table S2).
Figure S4: Relative abundance for species 31-45 of 45 species with reliable relative abundance trend in the surveys (CV < 150%) (species with “x” in column “S” in Table S2).
Figure S5: Average distribution over period 2013-2022 for species 1-15 of 45 species with reliable relative abundance trend in the surveys (CV < 150%) (species with “x” in column “S” in Table S2).
S5.jpg
Figure S6: Average distribution over period 2013-2022 for species 16-30 of 45 species with reliable relative abundance trend in the surveys (CV < 150%) (species with “x” in column “S” in Table S2).
S6.jpg
Figure S7: Average distribution over period 2013-2022 for species 31-45 of 45 species with reliable relative abundance trend in the surveys (CV < 150%) (species with “x” in column “S” in Table S2).
S7.jpg
Figure S8: Average coefficient of variation (CV) over period 2013-2022 for species 1-15 of 45 species with reliable relative abundance trend in the surveys (CV < 150%) (species with “x” in column “S” in Table S2).
s8.jpg
Figure S9: Average coefficient of variation (CV) over period 2013-2022 for species 16-30 of 45 species with reliable relative abundance trend in the surveys (CV < 150%) (species with “x” in column “S” in Table S2).
s9.jpg
Figure S10: Average coefficient of variation (CV) over period 2013-2022 for species 31-45 of 45 species with reliable relative abundance trend in the surveys (CV < 150%) (species with “x” in column “S” in Table S2).
s10.jpg

Supplementary Section 4: Landings

Table S4: Species that were observed in both survey catches and commercial landings. The list of species was developed with experts from all three countries (Sweden, Norway, and Denmark).
Species
Latin
Family
Order
Danish
Swedish
Norwegian
Whiting
Merlangius merlangus
Gadidae
Gadiformes
Hvilling
Vitling
Hvitting
American Plaice
Hippoglossoides platessoides
Pleuronectidae
Pleuronectiformes
Håising
Lerskädda
Gapeflyndre
Common Dab
Limanda limanda
Pleuronectidae
Pleuronectiformes
Ising
Sandskädda
Sandflyndre
Grey Gurnard
Eutrigla gurnardus
Triglidae
Perciformes
Knurhane
Knorrhane, knot
Knurr
Rabbit fish
Chimaera monstrosa
Chimaeridae
Chimaeriformes
Havmus
Havsmus
Havmus
Lemon Sole
Microstomus kitt
Pleuronectidae
Pleuronectiformes
Rødtunge
Bergskädda, Bergtunga
Lomre
European Flounder
Platichthys flesus
Pleuronectidae
Pleuronectiformes
Skrubbe
Skrubbskädda, Flundra
Skrubbe
Roundnose Grenadier
Coryphaenoides rupestris
Macrouridae
Gadiformes
Skolæst
Skoläst
Skolest
Lumpsucker
Cyclopterus lumpus
Cyclopteridae
Perciformes
Stenbider, kulso
Sjurygg, kvabbso, stenbit
Rognkjeks
Pollack
Pollachius pollachius
Gadidae
Gadiformes
Lyssej/lubbe
Bleka, lyrtorsk
Lyr
Brill
Scophthalmus rhombus
Scophthalmidae
Pleuronectiformes
Slethvarre
Slätvar
Slettvar
Anglerfish
Lophius piscatorius
Lophiidae
Lophiiformes
Havtaske
Marulk
Breiflabb
Ling
Molva molva
Lotidae
Gadiformes
Lange
Långa
Lange
Atlantic Wolffish
Anarhichas lupus
Anarhichadidae
Perciformes
Havkat
Havskatt
Gråsteinbit
Atlantic Halibut
Hippoglossus hippoglossus
Pleuronectidae
Pleuronectiformes
Helleflynder
Hälleflundra
Kveite
Greater Forkbeard
Phycis blennoides
Phycidae
Gadiformes
Skælbrosme
Fjällbrosme
Skjellbrosme
John Dory
Zeus faber
Zeidae
Zeiformes
Sankt Petersfisk
Sanktpersfisk
Sanktpetersfisk
Tusk
Brosme brosme
Lotidae
Gadiformes
Brosme
Lubb
Brosme
Blue Ling
Molva dypterygia
Lotidae
Gadiformes
Byrkelange
Birkelånga
Blålange
Figure S11: Landings (in tonnes) by species and country for 1987 to 2023 in Skagerrak. Note that due to the scale of the y-axes some of the lower landing's years appear to be zero, however, they are only small in comparison to historical landings as Figure SX shows.
Figure S12: Landings (in tonnes) by species and country for 2013 to 2023 in Skagerrak.

Supplementary Section 5: Cephalopods

Table S5: Twenty-nine Cephalopods observed in the two surveys.
Aphia_ID
Lowest taxonomic level
Family
Order
Hauls_NOSS
Hauls_NS-IBTS
Hauls_Total
138138
Alloteuthis
Loliginidae
Myopsida
12
48
60
153131
Alloteuthis subulata
Loliginidae
Myopsida
19
3188
3207
138265
Bathypolypus
Bathypolypodidae
Octopoda
19
20
39
140596
Bathypolypus arcticus
Bathypolypodidae
Octopoda
3
0
3
11707
Cephalopoda
 
 
222
0
222
11709
Coleoidea
 
 
29
0
29
140600
Eledone cirrhosa
Eledonidae
Octopoda
0
8
8
138036
Gonatus
Gonatidae
Oegopsida
4
0
4
138278
Illex
Ommastrephidae
Oegopsida
0
212
212
140621
Illex coindetii
Ommastrephidae
Oegopsida
73
136
209
11734
Loliginidae
Loliginidae
Myopsida
0
4
4
138139
Loligo
Loliginidae
Myopsida
49
12
61
140270
Loligo forbesii
Loliginidae
Myopsida
12
1748
1760
140271
Loligo vulgaris
Loliginidae
Myopsida
7
12
19
11718
Octopoda
 
Octopoda
8
0
8
140605
Octopus vulgaris
Octopodidae
Octopoda
2
0
2
11760
Ommastrephidae
Ommastrephidae
Oegopsida
4
0
4
141448
Rondeletiola minor
Sepiolidae
Sepiida
1
0
1
138481
Rossia
Sepiolidae
Sepiida
0
4
4
141449
Rossia macrosoma
Sepiolidae
Sepiida
1
0
1
153083
Rossia palpebrosa
Sepiolidae
Sepiida
2
0
2
138482
Sepietta
Sepiolidae
Sepiida
14
4
18
141450
Sepietta neglecta
Sepiolidae
Sepiida
1
0
1
141452
Sepietta oweniana
Sepiolidae
Sepiida
4
156
160
11723
Sepiidae
Sepiidae
Sepiida
0
8
8
138483
Sepiola
Sepiolidae
Sepiida
8
0
8
141454
Sepiola atlantica
Sepiolidae
Sepiida
0
60
60
140624
Todarodes sagittatus
Ommastrephidae
Oegopsida
3
0
3
140625
Todaropsis eblanae
Ommastrephidae
Oegopsida
18
136
154
Figure S13: Abundance by lower taxonomic levels (first row = Family; second and third row = Genus) for NS-IBTS survey.