This calls for consideration of other environmental indicators, likely with a larger-scale ‘footprint’ than just the Faroe Shelf itself. Acknowledging previously suggested links between ecological shifts in the NE Atlantic and indices like the subpolar gyre index, the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) index, and the Atlantic Multi-decadal Oscillation (AMO) (Hátún et al., 2009), we specifically discuss potential links to changes in SAW from the Icelandic tongue.
Guillemots (Uria aalge, hereafter guillemot) have historically constituted the largest and most exploited seabird population in the Faroe Islands (Nørrevang, 1977). A major decline in this species during the 1960s elicited concern (Olsen, 1990; Reinert, 1976) and initiated structured seabird counts in the Faroe Islands. The and the here discussed guillemot record is the longest if its kind from this shelf (Olsen et al., submitted). Cod has always been the main demersal commercial fish species, sustaining a considerable portion of the Faroese economy. This stock has therefore been closely monitored, providing extensive data material and long robust time series (ICES, 2023). Cod and guillemots share similar prey species (e.g. sandeel), and the piscivorous guillemots also prey directly on juvenile cod (Myksvoll et al., 2013), which makes the breeding performance of this seabird a useful indicator of the status and recruitment of the cod stock. Motivated by this expected ecological coupling, the economic and cultural significance, and large data availability, the total attendance of guillemots and the total cod biomass are employed as indicator records for upper trophic levels on the Faroe Shelf. With these records, we want to test the following hypothesis: the biomass of upper trophic levels on the Faroe shelf is driven by both on-shelf production and off-self food abundance.
The data material is described in
Section 2.2, spatial and temporal changes in the subarctic waters are illustrated in
Section 2.3.1 and updated oceanic zooplankton records are provided in
Section 2.3.2. Recruitment and biomass of cod is presented in
2.3.3, and guillemot attendance is in
2.3.4. A comparison with the Faroe Bank cod is provided in
2.3.5 and the results are discussed in
2.4.