1.2.3 Faroe Shelf
On the Faroe shelf, sea surface temperatures have also increased in recent decades (inverted values
Figure 1.3). Zooplankton abundances north of the Faroes in the southern Norwegian Sea were low from 2003 to 2018, thus mirroring the development in the MEIW. Puffin production seemed to follow a pattern that was influenced by both the SPG and MEIW. Sandeels were abundant in 2001–2003 and in 2017–2018 but were else infrequent. Puffin production seemed to follow a pattern that was influenced by both the SPG and MEIW. Cod and haddock recruitment fluctuated normally in the same way with peaks prior to 2002 and a poor period from 2003 to 2016.
1.2.4 Norwegian Shelf
On the Norwegian shelf, sea surface temperatures were highest between 2003 and 2017, but have decreased afterwards. Zooplankton biomass was high in the 1990s, followed by low values from 2004 to 2015, and somewhat higher afterwards. Cod recruitment was strong in the 1990s followed by low values from 2003 to 2019, after which an increase has been apparent. Puffin production has shown prominent on-off periods that match the year class strength of Norwegian spring-spawning herring).
1.2.5 Zooplankton
Zooplankton abundance values north of Faroe Islands and on the deep stations in the Svinøy section showed the same time development with high values in the 1990s and a poor period from 2003 to 2014 after which there was an increase. This development is similar to the SPG and MEIW. The zooplankton on the shallow Selvogsbanki in Iceland showed a different pattern, but some of the peaks overlapped.
1.2.6 Forage fish
Forage fish seemed to be linked to the oceanographic features, i.e., the SPG and MEIW, especially MEIW and capelin at Iceland. There was probably a signal that first occurred for capelin at Iceland, then in sandeels at Iceland, then sandeels at Faroes and lastly for the Norwegian spring spawning herring recruitment indicating a delayed timing of the effects of the environmental features moving eastwards (Appendix:
Figure A1.1).
1.2.7 Demersal fish recruitment
Demersal fish recruitment was somewhat different for the three shelves. While there was a low period from 2003 to 2014 for the Faroe and Norwegian shelves, the pattern was different for the Icelandic shelf that partly showed a more constant level, although with occasional peaks, after 1993.
1.2.8 Seabird production
Puffin production was quite similar for the Icelandic and Faroese populations with a prominent poor period from 2004 to 2013 that matched the development in SPG and MEIW. The Norwegian population showed a somewhat different pattern that, as already seen, matched the year class strength of Norwegian spring spawning herring (
Figure 1.2). The poor period on the Norwegian shelf started a few years later than in Iceland and the Faroes but also lasted a few years longer, with clear signs of improvement only in the last two years.
1.2.9 Assemblage of all trophic levels and common patterns among the Nordic shelves
All the trophic levels are assembled in a single figure in order to facilitate comparisons between the trophic levels as well as between the shelves (Appendix:
Figure A1.1). A cyclical pattern is apparent for most of the data series with probably exceptions of zooplankton at Iceland, cod and haddock recruitment at Iceland and puffin productivity at Røst, Northern Norway (
Figure 1.3).
A syncronous cyclical pattern was observed for most of the data series where the period from 2003 to 2014 was particularly poor, although an increase was observed afterwards. Comparing the variables with SPG or MEIW showed positive correlations, especially when SPG and MEIW were combined into a single index (
Figure 1.3), indicating that nutrient- or zooplankton-rich water may come from both these sources and stimulate the productivity on the three shelves. Interestingly, the recent increase in the MEIW may nearly be counterbalanced by the decrease in SPG. Comparing with SPG and MEIW 1–3 years before indicated that a lag of 1–3 years gave higher correlations (
Table 1.1). Combining the three Nordic shelves by taking the average of the productivity in the three shelves gave the strongest correlations (
Table 1.1).