3. Nature based solutions offer significant potential for rapid, deep and sustained mitigation
The third key learning relates to fact that nature-based solutions have tremendous global potential in advancing the goals of the Paris Agreement by harnessing ecosystems to mitigate and adapt to climate change. These solutions include activities like forest conservation, reforestation, wetland restoration, and sustainable land management, all of which help sequester carbon and build climate resilience. In terms of mitigation, nature-based solutions can significantly contribute to reducing greenhouse gas emissions. For example, restoring forests and other natural ecosystems increases carbon sequestration by capturing CO2 from the atmosphere.
The Swedish nature-based solutions case presents a rewetting initiative that covered 115 hectares across different 35 sites. This project reduced emissions by 718 tons CO2 equivalents. It accounted for about 12 per cent of Sweden’s total rewetting efforts that year, which involved 2,100 hectares and reduced emissions by 6,100 tons CO2 equivalents. The initiative's long 50-year contract period makes it a significant measure for long-term climate mitigation.
The Icelandic initiative related to land restoration exemplifies that with existing measures (WEM) scenario projects a reduction of 266 kt of CO2 equivalents by 2040 compared to a business-as-usual (BAU) scenario. While research on carbon levels in reclaimed land under the specific project is limited, a study in Southwest Iceland showed that revegetation with trees and grass significantly enhances soil carbon.
Key enablers
1. Policy mixes, robust over time, are needed for successful implementation
The first key enabler for successfully implementing the climate initiatives highlighted in this study is that climate action needs to be based on numerous policies. These polices should include innovation and investment support at an early stage. Carbon pricing and subsidies can be used to scale up new technologies, and standards and regulation to make green products mainstream. The government also plays an important role in providing relevant infrastructure, for example energy supply, effective permitting procedures, transport infrastructure including electric vehicles (EV) charging and infrastructure for transport and storage of captured carbon dioxide (CCS). Particularly transformative technologies, such as green steel, EVs and hydrogen-based industries require broad policy mixes to develop and mature.
The Nordic initiatives illustrate that policies need to be robust over time to create predictability for investors and lower their risks. The Danish wind energy projects emphasize the importance of stable, long-term planning.
Denmark's policy framework on wind energy emphasizes public participation in renewable energy projects, particularly wind farms, through various schemes that enhance public acceptance. It includes compensation for property value loss, property sale options for affected homeowners, bonus schemes for residents based on wind energy production, and funds for local community development. These policies have been crucial in reducing local opposition to wind energy projects and encouraging public involvement in the green transition.
CCS has been demonstrated successfully in Norway since the 1990’s. Now, Denmark, Norway, and Sweden are implementing or preparing national policies to promote investments in Carbon capture and storage (CCS), Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), and Direct Air Capture with carbon capture and storage (DACCS). These investments require strong financial incentives, that are largely reliant on regulators. The current EU ETS price levels are insufficient to drive substantial CCS investments. Since 2019, when the Helsinki Declaration on Nordic Carbon Neutrality was adopted, all Nordic countries have acknowledged the important role of CCS, and thus are jointly collaborating to its development. Moreover, the Nordic countries are engaged in innovative work preparing capacity and business models for receiving and permanently sequestering CO2 as a service. However, the EU has not yet introduced specific policies to promote carbon removals via BECCS or DACCS.
2. Stakeholder and local engagement help build broad support
The second key enabler is the inclusive approach to stakeholder engagement in the Nordic countries, which has been essential in building widespread support for carbon pricing. This broad engagement has helped to address concerns and ensure that the transition to a low-carbon economy has received a wide public acceptance. The Nordics have a tradition of including stakeholders into policy development, through public hearings and round-table discussions. This approach has established a foundation for climate policy that is supported or at least accepted by industries and citizens. It's often important to engage the local stakeholders to build support and acceptancy, seeking transition pathways that consider a just transition and avoids grassroot protest movement campaigns that can disrupt policy implementation.
Many of the 13 climate action initiatives, such as Iceland’s land restoration and geothermal heating projects, Denmark’s wind energy projects, cross-Nordic case on carbon pricing and Finland’s sand battery initiative, highlight the importance of engaging a broad range of stakeholders. Another important aspect is related to transparency in project planning, communication and implementation, as it strengthens trust between stakeholders and enhances collaboration.
The success of the Norwegian initiatives, electric vehicle (EV) adoption and biowaste management, demonstrates the importance of national political consensus and long-term government support.
Several cases, such as Finland’s climate network of municipalities, show that empowering local actors is crucial for climate action success. Regular stakeholder support, knowledge exchange, and local-level innovation foster a sense of ownership and ensure practical, context-specific solutions are implemented.
In summary, successful climate action initiatives hinge on multi-level, inclusive engagement that spans from local communities to national governments and the private sector. Clear and transparent communication it builds trust and reduces opposition, particularly in projects like CCS and wind energy where local concerns may arise, while ensuring that stakeholders are motivated by the long-term economic and environmental benefits of each specific climate initiative.
3. Fostering collaboration across sectors is key
The third key enabler emphasises the numerous successful cross-Nordic collaborations between nations, industries, regions, and municipalities, as illustrated by the examples presented in this report. The success of the carbon pricing and green steel cases is built upon long-term, stable collaboration between the green steel, automotive industries, consultations with experts, environmental organizations, and the public. These partnerships, along with strong regional collaboration, has been essential in driving its success.
Many successful projects, including Sweden’s green steel and nature-based solutions thrive on strong partnerships between governments, private investors, and local authorities. These collaborations are essential, as they combine public sector resources and policy support with private sector innovation and funding, while ensuring that local authorities provide practical knowledge and implementation. Together, these stakeholders can effectively align interests, mobilize resources, and drive long-term, sustainable outcomes. By leveraging the strengths of each partner, such projects are better positioned to address complex challenges, scale up solutions, and deliver lasting impact.