IUCN criteria for NBS | Indicator with guiding questions | Self-assessment (choosing one of the options) | Guiding text for each level per indicator | |
3. NBS result in net benefits to biodiversity and ecosystem integrity | 3.1 | Is the current state of relevant ecosystems assessed? … | Strong | Yes. An updated assessment of ecosystems at the appropriate spatial and temporal scales is in place … |
Adequate | There is available information about the current state of the ecosystems using secondary data and reference maps … | |||
Partial | General information about existing land cover and land use is used for assessing the status of the ecosystems … | |||
Insufficient | No. There is no information available about general conditions … | |||
3.2 | Are clear and measurable biodiversity conservation outcomes identified? … | Strong | Yes, they include specific and measurable indicator variables for biodiversity and ecosystem integrity, the direction … | |
Adequate | Yes, they include measurable indicators … related to biodiversity and ecosystem integrity, but may lack specific details related to the magnitude and timeframe … | |||
Partial | The NBS outcomes related to biodiversity and ecosystem integrity lack specificity. There is a general indication that … | |||
Insufficient | No. The NBS lacks identified outcomes related to biodiversity or ecosystem integrity … |