Covid-19 pandemic was a shock to the tourism industry in the Nordic countries. In the years before the pandemic, the number of tourists had grown in all the Nordic countries and autonomous areas, in some cases so much that there were concerns over tourism and visible decay in most popular tourism destinations. The focus of the sector was on increasing the number of inbound tourists, and developing domestic tourism was mostly low on list of priorities. The closure of borders in the Nordic countries in early 2020 and in subsequent loss of inbound tourists sent ripples through the tourism sector. Suddenly, the domestic tourists overlooked earlier were the most important target group for the tourism enterprises and organisations. With the international traveling being severely restricted during the 2020 and 2021, the tourism enterprises and development organisations had to adapt their products and services to meet the needs of domestic travellers.
In this report, we examine the domestic tourism sector, its significance and future in the Nordic countries, autonomous areas and in selected border regions between the Nordic countries. This is the final report of the research project ‘Exploring Domestic Tourism in the Nordics’, initiated by the Nordic Council of Ministers. The project stems from the increased role of domestic tourism during the Covid-19 pandemic and aims to gather insights into the recent and future developments in the Nordic domestic travel markets. This is done by exploring the best practices of developing and promoting domestic tourism in the Nordic countries during the Covid-19 pandemic in years 2020-2021. The purpose is to identify and describe operating models developed during the crisis that would be useful for developing both domestic and inbound tourism in the Nordic countries in the longer run and to strengthen the Nordic tourism cooperation.
The study was conducted by a research group with researchers from different Nordic countries. The group was led by research manager Juho-Matti Paavola from Innolink Research Oy. Paavola and research consultant Ilkka Tiensuu formed the core team of this project, and they were responsible for coordination of the project, organisation of the final report and the writing process. They were assisted in different parts of the study by Jens Holm, Simo Saari, Inna Jauhiainen, Maria Levola, and Mikael Rautamo from Innolink Research. Additionally, the research team included country researchers from different Nordic countries. Oxford Research AB was responsible for the country cases for Denmark, Norway, Sweden, the Faroe Islands and Greenland with a team consisting of Thomas Westerberg, Roe Langaas, Louise Fabricius, Klaramaria Pollak, Maja von Beckerath and Sally Andersson. Eyrún Jenný Bjarnadóttir, from the Icelandic Tourism Research Centre, was responsible for the Iceland case.
The project was funded by the Nordic Council of Ministers and coordinated by the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment of Finland. After the tendering process, a steering group was formed to guide the work in this study. The steering group was chaired by Sini Markoff and Ida Honkanen from the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment, and its other members included project manager Guðný Hrafnkelsdóttir (05/22-12/22) and Director of Development Elías Bj. Gíslason (12/22-04/23) from the Icelandic Tourism Board and Linnea Johansson from the regional government of Åland. Invitation to join the steering group was sent to all Nordic countries and autonomous areas, but no representation outside Finland, Iceland and Åland was received. The steering group discussed and commented on research questions, materials, initial findings and final form of this report. The main authors of this report were responsible for the incorporation of the comments into the report and the views represented in this report are only theirs. We want to thank the steering group for invaluable support throughout the process.
1.1. Methods and sources
The basis for this project is mixed-methods approach, where both qualitative and quantitative research methods are utilised extensively. This allows the triangulation of data in order to ensure higher validity and reliability of the conclusions. The methods utilised included a desk study, where relevant existing literature about domestic tourism on the Nordic level is analysed. The desk research also included statistical analysis of key indicators in each Nordic country. In addition to the statistical analysis, the quantitative research methods of the project included an online survey directed to SMEs and other tourism sector stakeholders.
Data received through quantitative methods were enriched with qualitative interviews with representatives of the business support organisations, that can be non-profit, public, or for-profit resource organizations that serve tourism sector businesses and support their growth and success. In addition, country case studies in each Nordic country and autonomous areas were conducted by local researchers, who interviewed key stakeholder representatives and conducted a desk study of the national literature and statistic. Finally, a workshop was organised online to engage and gather views from a wider network of stakeholders.
The Nordic literature review and the contextual framework of the study
At the beginning of the project, we conducted a literature review to form a basis for the study and its design. There is an ample number of empirical studies that have been done in the past two years about the impact of Covid-19 pandemic on tourism. The literature reviewed focused mostly on the effects of the decline in international tourism, but there are several studies that examine, for example, the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic or quarantine decisions had on the domestic tourism travel flows, the effect of interventions made to increase domestic tourism during the pandemic, the impact of domestic tourism on the economy during the Covid-19 pandemic or the effect of the pandemic on domestic tourism preferences and views. The empirical parts of these studies were mostly conducted with data gathered from outside Nordic countries. Review of the academic literature revealed some interesting theoretical insights. However, in this research project, our main aim was to find practical information about domestic tourism’s development in the Nordic countries and we were more interested in the Nordic perspective on the issue of domestic tourism and the Covid-19 pandemic.
There are a number of reports, policy papers and other grey literature found in each Nordic country that deal with domestic tourism nationally. These are included in the country reports. For the main report, we examined recent studies that covered all or most of the Nordic countries. Most of these wider reports have been mainly interested in inbound tourism, especially before the Covid-19 pandemic. For example, the Nordic Council of Minister’s report Nordic Tourism Policy Analysis offered insight into organisational frameworks and common thematic areas – digitalisation, sustainability and seasonality – in the Nordic countries and autonomous areas. Yet, the focus in the report is on inbound tourism and Nordic cooperation to promote it, and as such it was not very useful for our work, which is focused on domestic tourism.
After the Covid-19 pandemic domestic tourism, alongside inbound tourism, has been more prominent issue in the tourism-related literature covering several Nordic countries. In the State of the Nordic Region 2022 report, Karlsdóttir and Bogason make a statistics-based review about the impact of the pandemic on tourism, the decline of inbound tourism and the rise of domestic tourism, which inspired our statistical investigations. They also pointed out the possibility of a more transformative change in the tourism industry, a shift from high volume business model with inherent risk of overtourism towards a more moderate and less consuming mode of operation in the Nordics. Shorter traveling distances and increasing domestic tourism are part of this change.
This transformation and the role of domestic tourism in it are echoed in other recent reports examining the Arctic area. Arctic Tourism in Times of Change, a report issued by the Nordic Council of Ministers, calls for not only restarting or recovering tourism but also for reconsidering tourism in order to make it more sustainable by focusing on individualised services for smaller groups and on the domestic market. In the future, the report envisions normative tourism in the arctic, increased interest in nature-based tourism and an increased role for local, regional and domestic tourism in the industry.
In addition, the Ethical Tourism Recovery in Arctic Communities research programme – a collaboration between the University of the Highland and Islands, the University of Lapland and Karelia University of Applied Sciences – provides practical research-based tools for tourism entrepreneurs to develop more sustainable business models. In their survey-based study and strategy for ethical tourism recovery, an ‘increased focus on domestic tourism was identified as a potential pathway towards responsible and ethical tourism, with a focus on nature and cultural tourism’.
Another report looking into sustainable tourism development is Nordregio’s project Planning for sustainable tourism in the Nordic region. It focuses on exploring regional tourism development plans which are written before the pandemic. Hence, domestic tourism is less visible in the report, but the report still provided important insights into the economic significance of tourism, the collaboration and organisation of tourism development, and sustainability concerns in the Nordic countries.
Looking at the recent literature, we can summarise that there is a lack of comparative information about the domestic tourism in the Nordic countries in general and especially a need for more information about domestic tourism target groups, behaviour and how the Covid-19 pandemic affected the development and future outlook of domestic tourism in the Nordics. In this report, we aim to provide practical insights into the domestic tourism in the Nordic countries and how to develop it in the future. Yet, earlier research into the issue provides a contextual framework and starting point for our exploration. We will be examining domestic tourism in the time of a (possible) transformation of the industry and business models. Covid-19 served as a catalyst for change, but it was not the beginning nor the end of it.
Country reports
Five country reports were conducted in the autumn of 2022. They form the backbone of this study and were the main method of gathering the research material. The reports cover each Nordic country in detail. Additionally, country studies were conducted in autonomous areas.
The country reports were conducted by local research team members. A team consisting of Thomas Westerberg, Roe Langaas, Louise Fabricius, Klaramaria Pollak, Maja von Beckerath and Sally Andersson from Oxford Research AB were responsible for the country cases for Denmark, Norway, Sweden, the Faroe Islands and Greenland. Eyrún Jenný Bjarnadóttir, from the Icelandic Tourism Research Centre, was responsible for the Iceland case. Innolink Research Oy and a team consisting of Inna Jauhiainen and Ilkka Tiensuu conducted the Finnish country case and Mikael Rautamo the Åland case.
The country reports are based on a report template provided by the core team from Innolink Research in September 2022. The steering group also commented on the template before it was finalised. The country researchers then conducted desk research of literature and statistics and interviewed a minimum of three experts – and in some cases, several more – per country to answer the research questions posted in the template. The interviewees included representatives from the central government agency responsible for the development of domestic tourism, as well as representatives of national or regional business support organisations and destination management organisations (DMOs) and, in some cases, representatives from tourism enterprises. For the autonomous areas, a desk study and an interview with a representative of the main tourism development organisation per area were conducted. In total, 24 interviews were conducted for the country reports.
The initial findings and first drafts were presented to the steering group by the country researchers in a mid-way seminar in October 2022. The steering group and the core team from Innolink Research commented on the draft versions and then the country researchers made amendments to them. The finalised country reports were received in November 2022.
The country reports cover three main areas:
A general overview of domestic tourism in the country
This section aims to give an overview of the domestic tourism in the country – its size, share, significance and how domestic tourism has changed during Covid-19. A short section about same-day visitors is included. Additionally, this part also includes a short review of restrictions affecting tourism industry that were introduced during pandemic – including both restrictions in the borders and inside the country.
Additionally, this section includes subchapters about domestic tourism preferences and the future of tourism.
The main stakeholders and coordination of domestic tourism activities
This part explores the coordination and financing of domestic tourism activities in the country and maps the main stakeholders involved in developing domestic tourism.
Best practices
Each country researcher identified several concrete examples of good practices/programmes/activities/etc. that have been successfully used (or that are new and innovative approaches) in developing domestic tourism in the country in answer to the Covid-19-induced crisis. Then, in cooperation with the steering group, the core team chose two cases from each country for closer examination. Then the country researchers conducted a desk study and an interview with a case representative in order to fill out the description of the case, the activities included and the lessons learned. These cases are described in detail in the country reports.
The country reports are mainly used as source material in this final report. In some parts, especially in Chapter 2, we use direct excerpts from the country reports. Elsewhere information in country reports is used as research material and analysed together with other sources in this study. The full country reports are annexed to this main report, so for more detailed information about individual countries and autonomous areas, readers can refer to the original country reports.