Denmark country sheet
Country context
The primary drivers for flexibility in Denmark are the increasing electrification of district heating, the growing demand from the transport sector, and new industrial loads. Additionally, the significant expansion of decentralised renewable energy sources poses challenges for the operation and development of the electricity grid at all voltage levels. These challenges vary among DSOs, depending on regional differences in consumption and generation patterns.
Electricity consumption in Denmark is expected to grow by 65% by 2030 compared to 2020, primarily driven by the transition to electric solutions in heating and transport. Decentralised generation has also increased, with annual renewable energy production reaching 19 TWh in 2020, creating a greater need for adaptation in local grids.
Trends and development
Electrification of district heating has added approximately 400 MW of flexibility capacity from electric boilers and large heat pumps between 2015 and 2020. These units can deliver up to 1,000 GWh of heat annually and are actively used to absorb surplus production from wind and solar energy.
The electrification of the transport sector, including the deployment of electric vehicles and charging infrastructure, creates new demands on the distribution grid. Smart charging has become a key method to reduce peak loads and make better use of surplus production from renewable energy sources.
The growing share of local wind and solar energy increases the need to manage variable energy flows and bidirectional power flow in the electricity grid. This requires optimisation of local grid capacity and more precise monitoring of grid loads.
Past experiences and current approach
In the years between 2005–2015, Denmark explored the potential for establishing local markets for flexibility through pilot projects such as EcoGrid and DREM. These experiences demonstrated that economic incentives alone, especially at the household level, were rarely sufficient to significantly change consumption patterns without advanced automation. Local flexibility markets were deemed complex and economically challenging to scale.
More recently, Denmark has focused on structural solutions. Limited grid access requires new connections to reduce or disconnect consumption during peak situations, minimising the need for grid expansion. Time-differentiated tariffs have been introduced to encourage shifting consumption away from high-load periods.
Current utilisation of DSR in Denmark
Denmark’s demand-side response (DSR) strategy has evolved through both structural measures and pilot projects, focusing on integrating flexibility to address grid challenges. However, the implementation of DSR in Denmark remains constrained by technical, regulatory, and practical barriers.
Denmark employs time-differentiated tariffs to encourage consumers to shift electricity usage to off-peak hours. These tariffs are designed to reduce grid strain during peak demand, providing economic incentives for more balanced electricity consumption patterns. A notable example is the exploration of tariff harmonisation between TSOs and DSOs to ensure cost-reflective and transparent pricing mechanisms. Such efforts aim to optimise socio-economic grid expansion and promote demand-side flexibility across various grid levels.
The concept of conditional grid connections has also been implemented to manage demand-side flexibility. New connections, including large-scale energy users such as electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure and industrial facilities, often face restrictions that allow grid operators to limit consumption during periods of high demand. These measures reduce the need for immediate grid upgrades while ensuring operational stability.
Several pilot projects have explored the feasibility of market-based local flexibility solutions. For instance, a project on Lolland tested geographically tagged bids in the existing balancing market to manage local congestion. The results revealed both potential and challenges, including issues with communication protocols, market liquidity, and the integration of local flexibility into existing market structures. Such projects have highlighted the need for further development of IT systems, better communication frameworks, and standardised operational procedures.
The FUSE project and other initiatives on smart EV charging have aimed to demonstrate the potential of integrating EVs as flexible grid resources. While these projects showed technical viability, they also uncovered significant barriers, including the lack of standardised data exchange protocols, high costs for advanced metering systems, and challenges in verifying billing accuracy, as verified in an interview with DTU Electro. These factors have prevented widespread adoption of smart charging solutions.
In practice, DSR in Denmark remains heavily reliant on structural measures, such as dynamic tariffs and restricted grid access, rather than fully developed local flexibility markets. Distribution system operators (DSOs) and the transmission system operator (TSO) continue to explore ways to enhance coordination and unlock the full potential of demand-side flexibility. However, significant work is required to overcome barriers, particularly in aligning regulatory frameworks, improving data accessibility, and addressing technical constraints.
Denmark’s approach reflects a pragmatic progression towards integrating DSR while balancing technical feasibility and socio-economic considerations. Continued investment in technology, regulatory development, and stakeholder collaboration will be crucial to further advancing demand-side response in the Danish electricity system.
Need for flexibility
DSO perspective
Increasing electrification, including heat pumps and EVs, puts pressure on grid capacity, while integration of decentralised renewable energy sources like wind and solar causes congestion and local bottlenecks.
Flexibility is prioritised to avoid costly grid expansions and to address voltage instability challenges in areas with high penetration of distributed generation.
Queue management
Connections are managed on a first-come, first-served basis, but prioritisation may apply for mature projects with secured financing and necessary permits.
For larger connections or those impacting grid stability, coordination with the TSO is required.
The TSO reports that it increasingly uses flexibility solutions to accommodate new connections and reduce delays in areas with congestion or limited capacity.
Applications to the transmission grid
There are no available data on the average waiting time for TSO connection. Data concerning TSO grid capacity is related to production only.
The agreement for grid connection is estimated to be 12 months or less. However, this is purely the agreement and not concerning the actual connection.
Current use of flexibility
TSO balancing markets: Energinet uses European platforms like PICASSO (aFRR) and MARI (mFRR) to manage imbalances in the transmission grid, integrating flexibility from large producers and industrial consumers.
DSO flexibility mechanisms: Danish DSOs are developing solutions like conditional connections in congested areas and pilot projects to leverage local flexibility and avoid costly grid expansions.
Interruptible loads: Conditional connections and interruptible contracts are increasingly used to manage high-demand periods, with some DSOs offering discounts to incentivise flexible consumption.
Local flexibility projects: Initiatives focus on integrating decentralised resources into flexibility markets, creating incentives for small and medium-sized actors to contribute to grid stability.
End-user grid tariffs
Incentive programs and tariffs: Energinet's previous discount program for interruptible loads ended in 2021. New efforts centre on dynamic tariffs and market models to encourage flexible energy use and production.
Context affecting the adaptation of new flexibility
Number of DSOs: 34 DSOs currently operate in Denmark, primarily managing low- and medium-voltage grids (<100 kV), with fewer handling high-voltage or transmission-connected grids.
Smart metering
100% rollout completed, providing 2-way communication.
1-hour time resolution is standard.
Customers can access historical data online.
Both summation meters and phase meters are used for billing purposes, ensuring accurate energy measurement.
Datahub: Fully implemented by Energinet, allowing third-party access to customer energy data with explicit customer consent.