The CR also included measures that enable member states to intervene in the price setting of electricity for households and small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).
The CR stipulated the measures that member states were to implement. However, there was some flexibility in how these measures could be implemented. One aim of this study is to describe how the emergency measures outlined in the CR were implemented in the Nordic countries. The second aim is to assess the impact of these measures on the Nordic wholesale power market in the short and long term.
The CR has been implemented in Denmark, Finland and Sweden. Iceland and Norway are not members of the EU, and since the CR is not EEA-relevant (and therefore not compulsory), Iceland and Norway have not implemented the CR. Hence, Iceland and Norway are outside the scope of this report.
1.1. Organization of the report
This report is organized as follows. We start by describing the three main measures in the CR in greater detail, after which we describe how the CR has been implemented in each country in Chapter 2. Chapter 2 also summarizes the market agents’ reactions to the measures.
After describing the measures and how they have been implemented, we turn to the impacts of the measures. We examine the impacts of the revenue cap in Chapter 3, the impacts of the measures to reduce electricity demand in Chapter 4 and the impacts of the fossil fuel solidarity contribution in Chapter 5. Our focus is on the short- and long-term impacts on the Nordic electricity market. Short-term impacts refer to production and consumption decisions, while long-term impacts refer to investment decisions. Finally, Chapter 6 concludes.