In 2018 the Nordic Council of Ministers initiated a project focused on mapping educational policy concerning sustainability in the Nordic countries (see
chapter 2). More specifically, the mandate for that project was to map how the educational policies in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden reflected the demands of UN SDG 4.7 which states:
By 2030, ensure that all learners acquire the knowledge and skills needed to promote sustainable development, including, among others, through education for sustainable development and sustainable lifestyles, human rights, gender equality, promotion of a culture of peace and non-violence, global citizenship and appreciation of cultural diversity and of culture’s contribution to sustainable development.
The results of this project were published in the report Mapping Education for Sustainability in the Nordic Countries (Jónsson et al., 2021). What emerged was a complex picture of educational systems which all focus on various aspects of sustainability but often without explicit mention of the concept itself and, when mentioned, sometimes with a rather superficial understanding of it.
In the report Mapping Education for Sustainability in the Nordic Countries, the authors took the lead from the work of Sterling and others critical of the conventional educational paradigm to suggest framing of SE as involving three orders of change:
First order change and learning take place within accepted boundaries; it is adaptive learning that leaves basic values unexamined and unchanged ... By contrast, second order change and learning involve critically reflective learning, when we examine the assumptions that influence first-order learning ... At a deeper level still, when third order learning happens, we are able to see things differently. It is creative and involves a deep awareness of alternative worldviews and ways of doing things. It is ... this transformative level of learning, both at individual and whole society levels, that radical movement towards sustainability requires. (Sterling, 2001, p. 15)
The authors of the report then described these three orders of change as characteristic of learning that favoured compliance, criticality and radicality:
… first order learning values compliance; students are expected to comply with the values, practices, and evaluations of relevant knowledge already present. Second order learning values criticality; students are encouraged to be critical of the first order learning that takes place within the system. Meanwhile, third order learning not only values criticality but encourages radicality; students are encouraged and given space to not only be critical of the values and practices within the system but also to challenge those values and practices, pushing for new possibilities even against entrenched norms. (Jónsson et al., 2021, p. 7)
Looking into various policy documents, from laws and curricula to various green- and white books on education, it was evident that different countries built on different traditions and that sustainability had been incorporated into educational policy in different ways:
Inclusion of sustainability in educational policies in Finland, Norway, and Sweden builds on a long tradition of environmental education and has, in many ways, been more consistent than in Iceland or Denmark. However, neither the Finnish, Norwegian, nor the Swedish educational acts mention sustainability explicitly and, although the word ‘sustainability’ or its variants appear almost 200 times in the Finnish national core curriculum, the incorporation of sustainability as an educational aim or subject is often superficial. This superficial inclusion of sustainability in educational policy becomes even more evident when looking at teacher preparation in some of the Nordic countries where the importance of sustainability education is often better addressed in political rhetoric than in educational reality. (Jónsson et al., 2021, p. 64)
The report also reflected on the wider context for SE noting that public policy, such as appears in the strategy report Good Life in a Sustainable Nordic Region: Nordic Strategy for Sustainable Development 2013–2025 (Nordic Council of Ministers, 2019) was heavily geared towards increased growth, defining educational aims primarily in terms of employability within the business community (see Jónsson et al., p. 67; Nordic Council of Ministers, 2019, p. 45). This does not align well with the understanding of sustainability as presented in the various educational policies of the Nordic countries. Finally, the report also shed light on little, even no apparent, focus on sustainability in teacher education, with many teacher education programs not having any explicit focus on sustainability.
4.1 What Has Changed since 2020
As already mentioned, sustainability is implemented in various ways in education in the Nordic countries. The educational policy in general and curricula are steadily renewed and many tangible projects and practices that strive to implement them are going on in both schools and other contexts. In this chapter and the next we will present a few examples of what takes place in relation to sustainability education in the Nordic region starting from policy and continuing with practice.
Denmark
From the autumn of 2024, the content for the individual subjects in the primary school must be revised, and sustainability will no doubt be specifically mentioned in large parts of the subject descriptions. At the moment, commissions will be established to draft subject descriptions. This takes place with the participation of representatives from the Ministry of Education, schoolteachers, teacher educators, and stakeholder organisations. The task must be finished in 2027.
Since 2020, the concept of sustainability has gained a more prominent place in national education documents in Denmark. The Danish teacher training was thoroughly revised in 2023. Sustainability was specifically mentioned in the purpose of the new teacher training, just as sustainability is embedded in a large part of the subject descriptions. Now, sustainability is both taught in the teacher training courses, and must be lived out in daily campus life by teachers and students.
Finland
Since the last mapping report was published in 2021, there have been only a few changes to educational policy in Finland. For example, the same national core curriculum for basic education which was published in 2014 is still in use. The term ‘sustainable development’ appears right at the beginning of the curriculum, emphasising the responsibility of schools to cultivate a sustainable future. The curriculum views humans as integral to nature and dependent on essential ecosystems. It stresses the importance of adopting a sustainable lifestyle, with basic education serving as the foundation for global citizenship and culturally sustainable development. Students are expected to recognize the seriousness of climate change and commit to sustainability. “Participation, involvement, and building a sustainable future” is one of the seven key competencies that students are required to develop, integrating various fields of knowledge and skills to support personal growth, education, work, and future activities. Furthermore, sustainability is a central theme across the other six competencies and is a guiding principle in shaping the organisational culture of schools. Sustainability is also incorporated into most school subjects within the 2014 curriculum, where the word "sustainable" is mentioned nearly 200 times.
The Finnish National Agency for Education and the national Core Curriculum for Early Childhood Education and Care (2018) emphasise that all activities in early childhood education and care, as well as pre-primary education, are guided by the need for ecologically, culturally, and economically sustainable living. Ecological sustainability is fostered through practices such as sorting and recycling, mindful use of electricity and water, and monitoring plastic waste. Social sustainability involves fostering positive interactions, recognising children’s strengths and emotions, and ensuring their participation and influence in activities. Economic sustainability is reflected in making wise choices, including acquiring items from charity shops and recycling centres. Cultural sustainability is promoted by valuing traditional play and games, embracing cultural diversity, and respecting different values and perspectives. Additionally, public access rights, a unique aspect of Nordic culture, and appreciating the architecture of buildings, such as observing colours, forms, and symmetrical decorations, are also integral to cultural sustainability.
The Ministry of Education and Culture has launched a broad-based development project on futures work in comprehensive schools. The aim of the futures work is to create a vision for schools that enables meaningful life for young people and supports learning opportunities in a rapidly changing world. The futures work of comprehensive schools is organized around three themes. They are Artificial intelligence and technology, Basic skills and learning, and Ecological and social sustainability. The futures work will be carried out in 2024-2025. It will produce a written vision for the future by the end of 2025. A parliamentary monitoring group has been set up to support the work.
Finnish teacher education is research-based; theory and practice are interwoven throughout the learning process. This approach aims to develop educational experts who are prepared for continuous professional growth throughout their careers. A crucial part of this process includes the independent writing of a master’s thesis and studies in educational research methodology. However, despite the overall high standards of teacher education, sustainability is not always a prominent focus (Cockerell, 2020; Wolff et al., 2017).
Teacher educators at universities have autonomy in deciding how to implement sustainability topics in their programs. A 2012 study conducted by Maria Hofman found that no Finnish teacher education programs at the foundational level offered mandatory sustainability courses. The Teacher Student Union of Finland (SOOL) has advocated for the integration of SD into teacher education, highlighting teachers as role models for sustainable lifestyles. In 2019, SOOL demanded that teacher education institutions include climate change education in their programs, challenging them to incorporate climate change and sustainability topics. The response was promising, with nine participating institutions committing to improve their SE. For instance, the University of Helsinki has implemented a mandatory SE course for all teacher students, and there are also other new possibilities to study sustainability education in other teacher education programs.