Go to content

Appendix A

Policy and Legislative Review

A comprehensive review of global, EU and national plastic legislation and strategies was conducted to extract relevant goals, targets, and reporting requirements compiling a list of required data to measure these objectives (see Table 6. Literature list for policy review). Each indicator was categorised by:
  • Geographical coverage (e.g. global, EU, national)
  • Type of formulation (law, goal, ambition, definition, etc.)
  • Legal accountability (mandatory or voluntary)
  • Validity (in force or under development)
  • Whether plastic-specific or more general
    Examples of general indicators—that is, indicators not specific to plastic—include those for e-waste. These relate to product streams that contain plastic, but the indicator itself does not capture plastic-specific information.
Table 6 Literature list for policy review
Ref
Geo
Type*
Year**
Title (including hyperlink)
[1]
NO
REV
2023
[2]
FI
STR
2022
[3]
NO
STR
2022
[4]
SE
STR
2021
[5]
DK
STR
2021
[6]
DK
STR
2020
[7]
IS
STR
2021
[8]
GL
STR
2021
[9]
SE
LAW
2022
[10]
GL
REV
2022
[11]
GL
STR
2023
[12]
NO
LAW
2024 (consol.)
[13]
EU
LAW
2021
[14]
FI
LAW
2021
[15]
EU
LAW
2015
[16]
DK
STR
2018
[17]
EU
LAW
2019
[18]
EU
LAW
2024
[19]
EU
STR
2018
[20]
EU
STR
2015
[21]
EU
LAW
1994
[22]
SE
LAW
2023
[23]
SE
LAW
2020
[24]
EU
LAW
2021
[25]
EU
LAW
2012
[26]
EU
LAW
2000
[27]
EU
Other
2024
[28]
EU
Other
2022
[29]
NO
LAW
2024 (update)
[30]
SE
LAW
2021
[31]
SE
LAW
2021
[32]
NO
LAW
2023
[33]
NO
Other
2024
[34]
SE
LAW
2024
[35]
SE
LAW
2021
[36]
SE
LAW
2021
[37]
GL
LAW
2019
[38]
EU
UPL
2022
[39]
GL
Other
2024
Interview with UNITAR
[40]
GL
Other
2024
Interview with Naturvårdsverket and Miljödirektoratet

* Type legend: STR = Strategy, LAW = Law, REV = Policy Review, COMM = Ambition / Communication, UPL = Upcoming Law
** Year = publication or adoption year of the document (consolidated/latest for laws; interview year for internal notes).

Breakdown into Indicators and Data Points

The identified policy goals were interpreted to measurable indicators and broken down into its corresponding data points. This process resulted in 125 unique data points, covering the full set of indicators.

Filtering of Unique Data Points

Redundant or overlapping data points were omitted to isolate the unique data needed across policies and targets.

Linking and Prioritisation

Each unique data point was linked to its respective indicator(s), and evaluated based on:
  • Legal mandate (e.g. required by law or reporting frameworks)
  • Nordic relevance (referenced by multiple countries)
  • Policy alignment (e.g. Basel Convention, Global Plastic Agreement, EU reporting)