2.3 Artificial Intelligence (AI) in public cross-border services
As the use of artificial intelligence (AI) continues to advance and artificial intelligence evolves, this phenomenon will have an effect on the Nordic and Baltic societies. AI is expected to play an increasingly prominent role in the use and provision of services and decision-making, respectively. Currently, AI is not a major theme in cross-border data exchange processes. Nevertheless, it is a topic to follow on a regular basis, as it may prove to become a specific point of interest to authority organisations and civil servants working with cross-border data exchange. The availability of digital public services is expected to develop and become more easily accessible to users across borders. Nevertheless, before AI can be utilised in any cross-border applications, the quality and completeness of the data, as well as its interface and semantics must be well defined. Cross-border data exchange aims to answer the needs of citizens, and to provide services which they require in their daily activities taking place across borders.
The development of AI is expected to have at least some impact on the way services are provided and used. The efficiency and accuracy of AI-driven, automated, or semi-automated decision making is expected to reduce errors and the time of the processes involved. Citizens could benefit from AI-driven services or decisions that are efficient, personalised, and responsive to their needs. Regardless of the processes of the public administration counterpart, the citizen may also choose to utilise an AI-based external service in formulating or generating their requests for services. Automated decisions could scale to handle large volumes of transactions, promoting consistent and equitable outcomes. AI’s ability to analyse complex data patterns could help to uncover insights that inform better decisions and policies.
On the other hand, AI systems can inherit biases from the data used in their training, leading to unfair outcomes, thus affecting the citizens’ trust and rights. Due to the nature of AI, the complexity of algorithms may also lead to unintended consequences. The lack of transparency in processes utilising AI can erode trust and it may prove difficult to explicitly follow how data belonging to a specific individual is being used within the process.
From the point of view of public administration, artificial intelligence technologies are tools and instruments. Artificial intelligence, or any other technology, does not call into question existing regulations, principles of good governance or civil servant ethics. Regardless of whether the authority organisation uses artificial intelligence or not, the authority is responsible for the systems it uses and their proper utilisation. Official activity must be impartial, objective, and appropriate, whether it is implemented with artificial intelligence or not. Artificial intelligence is not an independent actor comparable to a human, but a complex and learning support technology.
Within the Nordic and Baltic countries, the current national regulations set boundary conditions for the use of algorithms in the production of services and decision-making.