Text Box 7.
Key insights from intermediary organisations
The insights below are based on interviews with intermediary organisations that operate in Denmark, Finland and Sweden. These include staffing agencies, NGOs and associations that serve as facilitators between jobseekers and employers. By focusing on immigrants and refugees, they help streamline the recruitment process, improve skills matching, and offer additional training or support when necessary. These organisations were asked about their observations and perspectives on the challenges that employers encounter when hiring immigrants, as well as the support that employers need during this process.
Partnership with the public sector. One interviewee noted that many companies have expressed interest in hiring refugees but found it difficult to locate them. According to the interviewee, there is a lack of trust in the public system to match employers with suitable refugees. Among the other potential hurdles to hiring immigrants were the slow responses from municipalities or employment services with regard to specific hiring requirements.
A positive shift in employers’ attitudes. According to intermediary organisations, there has been a noticeable shift in employers’ attitudes towards hiring immigrants following the influx of refugees from Ukraine. Moreover, in the case of refugees from Ukraine, employers have been generally more open to hiring individuals irrespective of language proficiency. This shift in attitude is also evident in the employers’ efforts towards diversity and inclusion, mirroring the growing global emphasis on social sustainability agendas, such as the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals.
Overqualified candidates. Based on staffing agencies’ observations, while many available jobs have low entry requirements, immigrant candidates applying for these positions are often overqualified. The language barrier is a significant challenge that makes it hard for immigrants to secure jobs that match their skills and experience.
Reassessing language criteria. Several intermediary organisations pointed out that some employers, perhaps unintentionally, might set language proficiency requirements that are higher than those demanded by the actual job. It may therefore be beneficial to reassess these language criteria. Lower language requirements have been particularly helpful for refugees from Ukraine.
Language barriers from the employers’ side. Some employers’ hesitation to hire individuals with limited proficiency in official languages stems not from concerns over the applicants’ language skills, but from the employers’ own difficulties with English.
Rural versus urban employers. The intermediary organisations have observed no significant geographical differences in employers’ hiring practices regarding immigrants. However, employers in small towns tend to emphasize the importance of immigrants settling into the community and contributing to the local economy and tax base.
Staffing agencies take on the ‘risk’. In Nordic countries like Sweden, strong employment protection laws, which make dismissing employees challenging, may deter employers from hiring immigrants. In such cases, staffing agencies can assume the ‘risk’ of hiring immigrants and then outsource them as consultants to employers. This provides employers with the flexibility to terminate the contract easily, thus offering a flexible and efficient solution.
Challenging negative narratives and enhancing knowledge-sharing. Highlighting success stories of employers who have thrived by hiring immigrants can inspire other employers to take similar steps. Knowledge-sharing among companies from the same sector or industry may be particularly impactful.
Developing guidelines. Several intermediary organisations observed a need for more structured guidelines and resources to support employers in navigating legislative requirements and providing accurate information on hiring in different languages.