Go to content

2. Nordic context


The Nordic countries have distinguished themselves through their ambitious emission reduction goals and actions, demonstrating a strong commitment to a sustainable, low-carbon future. Each nation has outlined bold plans for the coming decades, going beyond many global targets to set even higher standards. For example, while the EU aims for a 40% reduction in emissions by 2030 (from 1990 levels), many Nordic countries have set even more aggressive targets. The Danish government has proposed to move the net zero target forward to 2045 and set a new net-negative target of 110% in 2050. Iceland is aiming for carbon neutrality by 2040, Finland by 2035, and Sweden has committed to reaching net zero emissions by 2045. Norway’s carbon neutrality by 2030 is particularly remarkable, as it involves offsetting any remaining greenhouse gas emissions by investing in projects like renewable energy initiatives abroad.
However, beyond these national commitments, many Nordic cities have developed progressive and highly ambitious climate plans that surpass even these national targets. Cities like Copenhagen, Oslo, and Helsinki have been at the forefront of climate action over the past decade, driving innovation in sustainable urban development, transportation, and energy use. For example, Copenhagen has committed to becoming the world’s first carbon-neutral capital by 2025 in energy production and usage, through initiatives like expanding district heating systems, investing in offshore wind farms, and promoting cycling as the primary mode of transport. Meanwhile, Oslo’s climate budget has set a framework for the city to halve its emissions by 2023, with a strong focus on electrification of transportation and emission-free construction sites. These city-level plans are often more target-oriented and adaptable, responding directly to local challenges and opportunities. They offer a roadmap that is both pragmatic and visionary, setting milestones that not only align with but often exceed national goals. The successes of these cities demonstrate the critical role urban centers play in accelerating the transition to a low-carbon economy, and they offer scalable models for other regions to follow.
These national and city based strategies are not only ambitious but also deeply interconnected with efforts to enhance urban sustainability. As we transition to discussing the Mitigation Work Programme (MWP) topic for 2024 – focusing on Cities: Buildings and Urban Systems – the Nordic countries' national targets have significant implications for urban planning and infrastructure. Nordic countries are embedding their emission reduction goals into urban planning by developing low-carbon infrastructure, such as energy-efficient buildings and green spaces, to enhance quality of life and cut emissions. Central to these efforts is the electrification of urban systems and a shift to net-zero emission resources like renewable energy. For example, the City of Copenhagen's 2035 Climate Plan aims to extend the goal from the 2025 climate plan, becoming climate positive on energy production and usage and additionally halve the carbon emissions from citizens by 2035. The plan includes initiatives like retrofitting buildings for energy efficiency, expanding cycling infrastructure, and increasing the use of renewable energy sources, such as wind and solar power. It should be noted that 2035 Climate Plan is an update on the previously ambitious target from Copenhagen in their 2025 Climate Plan to reach carbon neutrality by 2025, but further extending the challenge by introducing scope 3 emissions for citizens and becoming energy positive.
Additionally, many Nordic cities are investing in green and blue infrastructure – such as parks, green roofs, and wetlands – to boost carbon storage and urban resilience. A notable initiative is Oslo’s policy called the Blue-Green Factor (Blågrønn Faktor), which requires new developments to include both green and blue infrastructure elements such as green roofs, water features, and permeable surfaces that enhance stormwater management and improve urban biodiversity. High energy and carbon taxes in the Nordics further support the transition to renewable energy and sustainable practices, such as Iceland’s carbon tax and Climate Action Plan focusing on reducing emissions from transportation and promoting renewable energy, primarily geothermal and hydropower, and promoting energy-efficient buildings and electric vehicles. Similarly, Sweden’s Climate Law and carbon tax, which is one of the highest in the world, has been pivotal in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The tax incentivizes industries and individuals to transition to renewable energy and adopt more sustainable practices.
By integrating these national targets with city planning, the Nordic countries demonstrate a holistic approach to climate goals and urban development. They encompass a wide array of measures, from tangible funding mechanisms for hard infrastructure to knowledge networking exchanges and practical tools or “urban labs” for experimentation. One example is through projects like Helsinki's Carbon-neutral 2035 plan which involves a range of measures, including promoting energy-efficient construction, transitioning to electric public transportation, and enhancing green spaces throughout the city. One specific project is the redevelopment of the Kalasatama district, a smart city project that integrates sustainable building practices and energy-efficient technologies.
And finally, although not explicitly included in the MWP, the incorporation of circular economy principles recognizes the importance of resource efficiency and waste reduction in urban development. The circular economy has emerged as a crucial component in the Nordic countries' approach to sustainability. Circular economy practices focus on maximizing resource use throughout the lifecycle of materials, promoting reuse, recycling, and reducing waste, which aligns well with the region's climate goals. As cities seek to transition to low-carbon infrastructures, integrating circular economy strategies can significantly enhance the effectiveness of existing policies and practices. For example, the perception that new construction is superior to circular practices, like reuse and modular building, often hinders progress. This challenge underscores the need for standardized regulations that prioritize functionality over prescriptive details and advocate for a cultural shift towards sustainable building practices. By fostering collaboration among stakeholders and emphasizing life-cycle analysis (LCA) in decision-making, Nordic cities can better evaluate the environmental impact of construction and embrace more sustainable solutions.
tag-familien-med-1200px.jpg
Photo: Yadid Levy/norden.org