Area | Permitting Processes | Project Funding | Price Volatility |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |
Challenge | Uncertain and lengthy permitting processes hinder development of projects and disincentivise investment. | Difficult to attract funding for mining developments due to project risks undermining investor confidence. | Volatile market prices with artificial price hikes and dumps by market leaders discourage investment. |
Nordic value-add | Aligned Nordic permitting processes can reduce uncertainty for investors exploring cross-border projects. | Public Nordic investment fund for mining and metal projects can de-risk investments and attract more private capital. | Together, the Nordics have a stronger voice and could induce change on EU-level and promote price stabilization mechanisms such as e.g. floor prices or offtake agreements. |
Industry voices | “Policymakers need to streamline permitting and support strategic projects for green transition and defence.” – Mine & Refinery Developer | “Capital and financing is a bottleneck for the mining industry in general in the Nordic countries.” – Exploration Company | “Price guarantees can protect producers from aggressive, politically driven price cuts by foreign competitors.” – Mine Operator |
Key takeaways | |||
|
Area | Opportunities | Challenges | Industry voices |
|---|---|---|---|
Cross-Border Extraction and Refining | Nordics can leverage complementary strengths – Sweden’s and Finland’s robust mining sectors and Norway’s processing competence – to create cross-border value chains for extraction and refining. Greatest potential for cross-border value chains notably in CRMs and other developing value chains; interviews specifically highlight potential for direct reduced iron, REEs and graphite. | Fragmented collaboration due to national silos and limited cross-border cooperation hinder the realisation of integrated value chains and economies of scale. Harmonisation of regulations and political ambitions could incentivise the industry and investors to pursue Nordic joint ventures and integrated projects. | “Green hydrogen is too expensive today; Norwegian natural gas and processing expertise with Swedish iron ore could produce direct reduced iron with 90% less CO₂ emissions.” – Mining Company “If we all start thinking about the Nordic region as one region and stop competing amongst ourselves, we will achieve a lot.” – Industry Expert |
Waste Stream Utilisation | Nordic potential to develop circular material supply, building on technological competence across the value chain and pooling supplies from urban mining and primary waste streams. | Recycling challenge is not technology readiness, but market and policy alignment – indirect subsidies and taxes favouring primary extraction over recycling, feedstock supply and regulatory barriers disincentivises circular value chains. Financial disparity between miners and recyclers: requested prices from miners for e.g. tailings are often too high for recyclers to develop commercially viable products from. | “Most companies only focus on 2–3 materials; we should learn from the Pulp & Paper industry and enable startups to access waste streams and create new products.” – Industry Expert “Significant potential exists in processing and utilising side streams (slags, tailings, etc.) for metal recovery, but the area is underdeveloped and could benefit from new technologies and JVs.” – Mining & Refining Company |
OEM Electrification and Digitalisation Cooperation | Nordic collaboration on BEV, AI and digital solutions can benefit all stakeholders by attracting component suppliers and developing joint technologies and help increase global competitiveness. | Lack of collaboration due to competitive environment across several business areas. | “Nordic equipment OEMs could collaborate further to develop battery solutions for mining equipment and counter Chinese competition.” – Equipment OEM |