The facilitator has provided alternative assessments for the geotechnical solutions that showed the large advantage of the planned solution instead of steel core piles (as expected). If the building had added several floors and thus weight, it would have increased the risk for needing steel piling. This shows how important the planning of height and weight (above and below ground) is for the total GHG emissions from foundations.
The facilitator investigated the impact of using glulam or CLT wood in the bearing columns and in the stairs/shafts. Shifting from steel columns to glulam columns would contribute significantly to emissions reductions. The steel columns contribute with approximately 6% of total emissions. These emissions could potentially be cut by around 90-95% by shifting to glulam.
Concrete has a very large contribution to total emissions, both in the ground floor slab, in walls and in the hollow core slabs. In situ cast concrete contribute with about 25% of total emissions which can be reduced by about 50% if choosing low-carbon concrete. Also, hollow decks can reduce emissions by using the best available low-carbon class.
Steel beams contribute in the reference building with around 11% of the emissions. Beams may not be necessary if using internal walls as bearing. The total concept of bearing must be further developed but this suggests a large benefit by using internal walls for bearing and avoiding beams.
More hotspots were identified, in particular mortar used for slab levelling and bricks in the façade. These calculations can easily be used for looking at the relative contribution from each building element and material, and to compare with alternative materials, providing information on possible emission reduction from each mitigation measure.
Key workshop challenges
Using CLT and glulam wood in slabs and load-bearing systems comes with challenges. It is still recommended to investigate possibilities related to glulam columns. A study of the implications for area demand in the apartments is needed. When the concepts have been selected there is still a large potential for emission reductions related to product selection. As a result of very high emissions from steel sheets, concrete and steel columns, the mitigation measures moving forward in the detailed design should be to look at the possibility of choosing a lower-carbon concrete and to compare EPDs before choosing steel columns and steel sheets.
Follow-up consultation
The client expressed interest in using the workshop findings to assess further measures regarding the selection of bearing element concepts and product selections. The calculations from the workshop will serve as a basis for future assessments and design optimisations.