Go to content

2. LGBTI-related reporting in official statistics

This session presented the state of the art and future directions of LGBTI-related reporting in official statistics. The session was chaired by Marjut Pietiläinen, Senior Researcher, Statistics Finland.

2.1. Eurostat equality and non-discrimination statistics task force:
A focus on SOGIESC and measures of discrimination

Eugenia de Rosa, Seconded National Expert in Equality and Non-Discrimination Statistics at Eurostat, European Commission
The session was started by a presentation on the work of Eurostat equality and non-discrimination statistics task force (TF EQUAL) by Eugenia de Rosa, Seconded National Expert in Equality and Non-Discrimination Statistics at Eurostat, European Commission. The presentation focused on the work of Eurostat's Equality and Non-Discrimination Statistics Task Force (TF EQUAL). Initially, an overview of EU policy and legal frameworks in this area was provided. This was followed by a discussion on the primary tasks of the task force, which was established in December 2023 with the main aim to enhance equality and discrimination statistics across the European Union.
TF EQUAL focuses on groups at risk of discrimination and experience of discrimination – considering the six protected characteristics (sex, age, disability, ethnic or racial origin, religion or belief, sexual orientation, extended to encompass all SOGIESC dimensions) and their intersectional dimension - within various areas of life or domains (such as employment, education, housing, healthcare, access to public services, social security, and safety, as highlighted in key EU anti-discrimination legislation and policies).
Eurostat provided an overview of the current status of SOGIESC data at the EU level. In terms of gender identity, expression, variations of sex characte­ristics, and sexual orientation, there is a lack of harmonized operational definitions and standards, both within the European Statistical System or internationally. However, some initiatives, like those by UNECE, the Subgroup on Equality Data, and Statistics Ireland, are underway. A similar situation exists for discrimi­nation data, although the UN Praia Group's core questionnaire is available. Further data sources include FRA, which conducts targeted surveys of groups at risk of discrimination, along with EIGE, Eurofound, Eurobarometer, and the European Social Survey, providing additional statistics on discrimination, prejudices, stereotypes, and attitudes.
Eurostat currently lacks data on the size of the LGBTIQ+ population and the overall prevalence of discrimination categorized by groups, reasons for discrimination, and life domains. Nonetheless, there are efforts to collect data on self-reported experiences of discrimination in specific domains. Various modules have already been incorporated into EU surveys, such as discrimination at work in the EU-LFS (2021), encountering hostile or de­grading online messages in the EU-ICT survey (2023), discrimination in access to services in the EU-SILC (2024). In addition, the next edition of EU-GBV will feature optional questions on gender-based hate speech.
At national level, some National Statistical Institutes (NSIs) conduct population discrimi­nation surveys including reasons of discrimination related to sexual orientation and gender identity and/or self-identification questions on sexual orientation and gender identity. There are a few cases of LGBTIQ+ dedicated surveys which provide an in-depth analysis linking outcome indicators with self-reported experiences, violence, prejudices, stereotypes, and social attitudes.
To gain deeper insights into NSIs practices across the EU, TF EQUAL mapped and analysed current measure­ment practices covering sex, gender identity, and related concepts during 2024–2025. Findings
Based on the stocktaking organised in the frame of TF EQUAL
indicate that gender identity has been included in national surveys in 9 out of 20 member states, sexual orientation in 9 out of 20, and experiences of discrimi­nation in 12 out of 20. Different measures and indicators have been used.
To gain deeper insights into the practices of National Statistical Institutes (NSIs) across the EU, Task Force EQUAL conducted a mapping and analysis of current measurement practices related to sex, gender identity, and discrimination during the period of 2024–2025. The findings reveal that gender identity has been incorporated into national surveys in 9 out of 20 member states, while sexual orientation is included in 9 out of 20, and experien­ces of dis­crimi­nation are reported in 12 out of 20. These studies utilize a variety of measures and indicators. Two main measurement approaches for measuring experience of discrimination have been mainly used: By an umbrella question (e.g., ‘have you ever been discriminated against?’) or via situation or incident-based approach (more factual), often used for harassment, violence, bullyism, and hate speech.
Although not exhaustive, these findings offer critical insights into the current landscape and serve as a foundation for future harmonization efforts. Ongoing consultations between the TF EQUAL and NSIs and civil society organizations focus on recommendations for creating more harmonised and inclusive measure­ment methods and reference questions addressing currently under­served or partially covered aspects in social statistics, such as gender identity, sexual orientation, and discrimination experiences.
These recommendations will also address methodological aspects, including sampling and estimation techniques, strategies to maximize response rates and minimize measure­ment errors, active engagement with civil society organizations, community involvement, and addressing main user needs in alignment with the EU-LGBTIQ+ strategy. Bridging data gaps necessitates collaboration with other statistical producers, further methodo­logical work, pilot studies, and voluntary data collection initiatives. 

2.2. LGBTI-related reporting in Finland

Marjut Pietiläinen, Senior Researcher, Statistics Finland
In Finland, the information on sex is obtained from the Population Information System maintained by the Digital and Population Data Services Agency. Only male or female can be entered as gender in the Population Information System. The gender entry can be changed upon application (Act on Legal Recognition of Gender 295/2023). In 2024, almost a thousand (987) applications for gender confirmation were submitted to the Digital and Population Data Services Agency, and more than 700 positive decisions were made.
Registered partnership became possible in 2002. After the Equal Marriage Act entered into force on 1 March 2017, new registered couples could no longer be formed. In 2024, there were 9,356 persons living in a registered partners­hip or a marriage of a same-sex couple (living in a same dwelling).
The common children of rainbow families became visible in statistics when adoption within the family became possible in a registered partnership in September 2009. Between 2009 and 2023, a total of 1,262 children were adopted into families with same-sex parents within the family. The Maternity Act, which entered into force in 2019, made it possible to confirm maternity without adoption within the family. As a result, inter-family adoptions in families of same-sex married couples and registered couples have decreased.
Legislation has had a major impact on the availability of data and the visibility of the LGBTI+ population in statistics. However, a lot remains hidden.
Population statistics that include information on LGBTI+ population are population structure, marital status, changes in marital status, families, and adoptions. However, information is mainly limited to those who have formalized their relationship, and their families. No infor­mation is available on gender identity, sexual orientation, or gender expression. 

LGBTI+ related reporting in Finnish survey data

Surveys usually use gender information in the register, but some surveys include self-identified questions on gender, for example the Gender Equality Baro­meter, Healthy Finland Survey and School Health Promotion Study.
The School Health Promotion Study includes questions on belonging to gender and sexual minorities and information on wellbeing of these minorities (The Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare). Belonging to a sexual minority is included e.g., in the Gender Equality Baro­meter, the Quality of Work Life Survey, and the EU Gender-based Violence Survey (GBV). In addition, several surveys provide information on discrimination obser­vations, experiences, perceptions or attitudes based on sexual orientation (e.g., EU SILC, Quality of Work Life Survey, Gender Equality Barometer, Eurobarometer, EU LGBTI survey, The Fundamental Rights Barometer). In The Fundamental Rights Barometer 2021, respondents' attitudes towards working life were investigated by asking how acceptable it is: Not to hire a transgender person or a trans person.
In surveys, there are more possibilities for the visibility of LGBTI+ people than in register-based statistics, although there are also limitations, like sample sizes, accessibility, trust, intersectional dimensions etc. 
While the visibility of LGBTI+ people in register-based statistics and surveys has improved in recent years, many aspects remain largely hidden, including intersectionality. Cooperation is needed at national and international level to improve the visibility of LGBTI+ people in statistics.

2.3. LGBTI-related reporting in Norway

Hanna Stangebye Arnesen, Coordinator for equality related statistics, Statistics Norway, SSB
Statistics Norway reports statistics on quality of life based on the national Quality of life survey. The indicators reported by sexual orientation in Statbank Norway include satisfaction with various areas of life, experience of meaning and mastery, and presence of positive and negative emotions. While the indicators in Statbank Norway can be examined according to three sexual orientation categories (heterosexual, non-heterosexual, don’t know or don’t want to answer), the survey itself contains more answering options (heterosexual, homo­sexual, lesbian, bisexual, pansexual, queer, asexual, fluid, other sexual orientation, don’t know, prefer not to answer). This revision was done based on a project which included focus group interviews; the results of this project were published as a guide for questions on sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, and sex characte­ristics in quantitative surveys. 
According to the Quality of life survey, non-heterosexual people experience poorer living conditions than hetero­sexual people. Fewer are employed, financial difficulties are more common, and more report poor housing conditions and poor health. However, the share experiencing living condition problems varies between different groups of non-heterosexual people.
Those most exposed to negative life events are individuals with low levels of education, recipients of social assistance, certain groups within the LGBTQ+ population, and people with disabilities.
Non-heterosexual individuals report lower life satisfaction than hetero­sexuals. They also experience more negative emotions and report a lower sense of meaning and engagement. Differences in life quality can partly be explained by variations in age, education, employment status, income, and relationship status.
Currently, a revision of the survey questionnaire is ongoing to identify trans persons.

2.4. LGBTQI-related reporting in Sweden

Malte Sundberg, LGBTQI Coordinator, The National Board of Health and Welfare
In 2014, the Swedish government presented a strategy for equal rights and opportunities regardless of sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression. The strategy aims at long-term and results-oriented work, partly to increase knowledge about the situation of LGBTQ people in Sweden, and partly to create the conditions for equal treatment of the group. One of the focus areas identified in the strategy is health, health care and social services. The Public Health Agency and the National Board of Health and Welfare have been assigned by the government to be strategic authorities for this focus area.
The presentation illustrated reporting in Sweden using two examples. The first example was mental health among people in same-sex marriages. This was a study based on linkage of several national registers. The results showed that there was an increased incidence of morbidity, mental disorders and risky use of substances or addiction among people in same-sex marriages com­pared to people in opposite-sex marriages. The limitation in the work is that it is not representative of all same-sex couples or all LGBTQ people.
The second example was gender affirming health care in Sweden. Since 2024, most of gender affirming health care in Sweden is Highly Specialized Care, and the clinics providing it report annually to the National Board of Health and Welfare.  Measures, avail­ability and perfor­mance is followed with established indicators, including for example average number of days from referral to first appointment, number of patients, proportion of patients who received an individual care plan, and proportion of operations with complications within 30 days.
Research on transgender population has been based on either ICD-10 F64* diagnosis or legal sex change. Con­cerning the legal change, it has previously required receiving a diagnosis and gender affirming care; the legislation changed in July 2025. Therefore, previous research using either the diagnostic code or legal sex change information has largely identified overlapping groups. Research has showed e.g., the socioeconomic vulnerability of transgender people in Sweden.
For future reporting, the presentation listed three challenges:
  • Can and will data be used to improve quality and access to health care?
  • How do we support a use of data that improves LGBTQ+ rights and lives?
  • How do we build trust?
Suggested ways forward included communication and transparency, patient involvement, and dialogue with organizations.