Go to content

6. References

Aakre, S., Leiren, M.D., and Linnerud, K. (2020). Deliverable 2.3: Deliverable 2.3: Taxonomy of social acceptance drivers and barriers. WinWind Report. https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/documents/downloadPublic?documentIds=080166e5c8df6a74&appId=PPGMS
Aasen, M., Ytreberg, N., Bakkevoll, S.E. and Reed, E.U. (2023). CICEROs klimaundersøkelse på nett: Oppsummering årene 2018-2024. CICEROs Klimaundersøkelse. CICEROs Klimaundersøkelse
Aftenposten. (2019). Vindkraftplanen skrotes. Aftenposten. https://www.aftenposten.no/norge/i/QoK09A/vindkraftplanen-skrotes [Accessed 27.09.2024].
Aitken, M. (2010). Why We Still Don’t Understand the Social Aspects of Wind Power: A Critique of Key Assumptions Within the Literature. Energy Policy 38 (4): pp. 1834-1841.
Andersen, J., Andersen, J.G., Hede, A. and Danneris, S. (2023). Tryghedsmåling 2023 - Krigen i Ukraine – år 2.  TrygFonden smba.  Available at: https://www.tryghed.dk/viden/tryghedsmaalinger
Anshelm, J. and Simon, H. (2016). Power production and environmental opinions—Environmentally motivated resistance to wind power in Sweden. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 57: pp. 1545–1555.
Arler, F., Sperling, K., and Borch, K. (2023). Landscape Democracy and the Implementation of Renewable Energy Facilities. Energies 16(13).
Bajo-Buenestado, R. (2016). Evidence of asymmetric behavioral responses to changes in gasoline prices and taxes for different fuel types. Energy Policy, 96: pp.119–130. 
Batel, S., Devine-Wrigth, P. and Tangeland, T. (2013). Social acceptance of low carbon energy and associated infrastructures: A critical discussion. Energy Policy 58: pp. 1-5.
Bidwell, D. (2013). The role of values in public beliefs and attitudes towards commercial wind energy. Energy Policy 58: pp. 189–199.
Borch, K., Kirkegaard, J.K. and Nyborg, S. (2023) Three Wind Farm Developments, Three Different Planning Difficulties: Cases from Denmark. Energies 16(12): p. 4662.
Büchs, M., Bastianelli, E. and Schnepf, S.V. (2024). Public opposition to fuel taxes in Europe: how important is social disadvantage and how do welfare regimes compare? Journal of European Social Policy, 34(5): pp. 495–510.
Clausen, N.-E., Rudolph, D., Kirkegaard, J., & Larsen, S. V. (2021). Where to put wind farms? Challenges related to planning, EIA and social acceptance. In B. Holst Jørgensen, P. Hauge Madsen, G. Giebel, I. Martí, & K. Thomsen (Eds.), DTU International Energy Report 2021: Perspectives on Wind Energy (pp. 44-53). DTU Wind Energy.
Concito. (2018). Lokal accept og udvikling af vindmølleprojekter. Wind2050-projekt. Available at: https://concito.dk/files/dokumenter/artikler/lokal_accept_og_udvikling_af_vindmoelleprojekter_maj2018.pdf
Dansk Erhverv. (2023). To ud af tre danskere ønsker flere vindmøller på land i Danmark. Available at https://www.danskerhverv.dk/siteassets/mediafolder/dokumenter/03-overenskomster/to-ud-af-tre-danskere-onsker-flere-vindmoller-pa-land-i-danmark.pdf
Davidovic, D., and Harring, N. (2020). Exploring the cross-national variation in public support for climate policies in Europe: The role of quality of government and trust. Energy Research & Social Science 70.
De Økonomiske Råd. (2021). Økonomi og Miljø 2021. De Økonomiske Råd. https://dors.dk/files/media/rapporter/2021/m21/endelig_rapport/oekonomi_og_miljoe_2021_web.pdf
Devine-Wright P. (2008). Reconsidering public acceptance of renewable energy technologies: a critical review. In: Grubb M, Jamasb T, Pollitt MG, editors. Delivering a Low Carbon Electricity System: Technologies, Economics and Policy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dugstad, A., Grimsrud, K., and Lindhjem, H. (2024). Carbon pricing acceptance – the role of revenue recycling among households and companies in Norway. Climate Policy https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2024.2401853  
Eftestøl, S., Tsegaye, D., Flydal, K. and Colman, J.E. (2023). Effects of wind power development on reindeer: Global positioning system monitoring and herders’ experience. Rangeland Ecology & Management 87: pp. 55-68.                
Eikeland, P.O., Taranger, K.K, Inderberg, T.H.J., and Guldbrandsen, L.H. (2023). A wind of change in Norway: Explaining shifts in municipal stances on wind power by policy feedback and energy justice. Energy Research & Social Science 104.
Ekonomistikone. (2022). Ekonomistit tyrmäävät polttoaineveron alentamisen. STT Info. Available at: https://www.sttinfo.fi/tiedote/69943684/ek%20onomistit-tyrmaavat-polttoaineveron-alentamisen?publisherId=68391773
Energiateollisuus ry. (2023). Suomalaisten energia-asenteet 2023. Iro research Oy. Tutkimusraportti. https://energia.fi/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/energia-asenteet-2023-koko-aineisto.pdf
Energistyrelsen. (n.d.). Fremme af udbygning med vindmøller og solceller. Available at: https://ens.dk/ansvarsomraader/stoette-til-vedvarende-energi/fremme-af-udbygning-med-vindmoeller [Accessed 22.10.2024]
Energistyrelsen. (2024). Fra den 1. juli 2024 gælder der nye regler for VE-ordningerne. Available at: https://ens.dk/presse/fra-den-1-juli-2024-gaelder-der-nye-regler-ve-ordningerne
Fairbrother, M., Johansson Sevä, I., and Kulin, J. (2019). Political trust and the relationship between climate change beliefs and support for fossil fuel taxes: Evidence from a survey of 23 European countries. Global Environmental Change 59.
Fast, S. (2013). Social acceptance of renewable energy: trends, concepts, and geographies. Geography Compass 7(12): pp. 853-866.
Figari, H., et al. (2024). "After the Battle: Emergent Norms and the Silencing of Dissent in a Norwegian Wind Power Community." Energy Research & Social Science.
Finansministeriet. (2024). Eksterne omkostninger ved kørsel - Nye skøn for de gennemsnitlige marginale omkostninger ved kørsel. Available at: https://fm.dk/media/2ichlhig/eksterne-omkostninger-ved-koersel-a.pdf
Finnish Government. (2023). A strong and committed Finland: Programme of Prime Minister Petteri Orpo's Government 20 June 2023. PUBLICATIONS OF THE FINNISH GOVERNMENT 2023:60. Available at: https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/165044
Fjellheim, E.M. (2023). Wind Energy on Trial in Saepmie: Epistemic Controversies and Strategic Ignorance in Norway’s Green Energy Transition. Arctic Review on Law and Politics 14: pp. 140–168.
Gaia Consulting Oy. (2023). Merituulivoiman vuorovaikutusfoorumit loppuraportti. Available at: https://api.hankeikkuna.fi/asiakirjat/f2abcca7-500a-4bbc-98af-4980fcdab344/d430967e-793f-43bd-8d8b-7039654fa817/RAPORTTI_20240124120451.PDF
Green Power Denmark. (2019). V Solcellepark på vej: Godt samarbejde og grøn pulje gør positiv forskel. [online] Available at: https://greenpowerdenmark.dk/nyheder/vindmoeller-moeder-politisk-modstand-trods-lokal-opbakning [Accessed 14 Oct. 2024].
Green Power Denmark. (2024). Vindmøller møder politisk modstand trods lokal opbakning. [online] Available at: https://greenpowerdenmark.dk/nyheder/solcellepark-paa-vej-godt-samarbejde-groen-pulje-goer-positiv-forskel [Accessed 14 Oct. 2024].
Grimsrud, K. M., Lindhjem, H., Sem, I. V., and Rosendahl, K. E. (2020). Public acceptance and willingness to pay cost-effective taxes on red meat and city traffic in Norway. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 9(3): pp. 251-268.
Gulbrandsen, L. H., Inderberg, T.H.j., and Jevnaker, T. (2021). Is political steering gone with the wind? Administrative power and wind energy licensing practices in Norway. Energy Research & Social Science 74.
Harring, N., Jagers, S. C., and Matti, S. (2019). The significance of political culture, economic context and instrument type for climate policy support: a cross-national study. Climate Policy 19(5): pp. 636-650.
Heiskanen, E., Matschoss, K., Rinkinen, J. and Pyrhönen, T. (2024). Taking the car out of the countryside: Understanding opposition to climate policy in rural Finland. Energy Research & Social Science 117.
Hitzeroth, M. and Megerle, A. (2013). Renewable energy projects: Acceptance risks and their management. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 27: pp. 576–84.
Hübner, G. et al. (2023) Broadening the social acceptance of wind energy – An Integrated Acceptance Model. Energy Policy 173: p. 113360
Hytti, A., Ampuja, O., Auvinen, H., Suikula, J., Yousfi, S., Idman, M. (2023). Romutuspalkkiokampanja vuosina 2020-2021. Seurantatutkimus. Traficomin tutkimuksia ja selvityksiä 09/2023. https://www.traficom.fi/sites/default/files/media/publication/Romutuspalkkiokampanja%20vuosina%202020-2021%2C%20Seurantatutkimus.pdf (Accessed 24.10.2024)
Inderberg, T.H.J., Rognstad, H., Saglie, I., and Guldbrandsen, L.H. (2019). Who influences windpower licensing decisions in Norway? Formal requirements and informal practices. Energy Research & Social Science 52: pp. 181-191.              
Inderberg, T.H.J., Theisen, O.M., and Flåm, K.H. (2020). What influences windpower decisions? A statistical analysis of licensing in Norway. Journal of Cleaner Production 273.
Janhunen, S., Hujala, M., and Pätäri, S. (2014). Owners of second homes, locals and their attitudes towards future rural wind farm. Energy Policy 73: pp. 450-460.
Janhunen, S., Hujala, M., and Pätäri, S. (2018). The acceptability of wind farms: The impact of public participation. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 20(2): pp. 214–235.
Jones, C.R., Orr, B.J. and Eiser, J.R. (2011). When is enough, enough? Identifying predictors of capacity estimates for onshore wind-power development in a region of the UK. Energy Policy 39 (2011): pp. 4563–4577.
Jyllands-Posten. (2023). Kartofler på Storebælt splitter protest-støtter: »Det må siges at lave god blokade«. Available at: https://jyllands-posten.dk/indland/ECE15938143/kartofler-paa-storebaelt-splitter-proteststoetter-det-maa-siges-at-lave-god-blokade/  (Accessed 22.10.2024)
Jääskeläinen, S. (2021). Fossiilittoman liikenteen tiekartta. Valtioneuvoston periaatepäätös kotimaan liikenteen kasvihuonepäästöjen vähentämisestä. Liikenne- ja viestintäministeriön julkaisuja 2021:15. Liikenne- ja viestintäministeriö. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-243-588-0 (Accessed 24.10.2024)
Kallbekken, S., Garcia, J. H., & Korneliussen, K. (2013). Determinants of public support for transport taxes. Transportation Research Part A. Policy and Practice 58: pp. 67-78.
Kallbekken, S., Kroll, S., & Cherry, T. L. (2011). Do you not like Pigou or do you not understand him? Tax aversion and revenue recycling in the lab. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 62: pp. 53-64.
Kirkegaard, J.K. (2023) Jordejere og projektudviklere laver hemmelige kontrakter om, hvor vindmøllerne skal stå. Videnskab.dk. https://videnskab.dk/teknologi/jordejere-og-projektudviklere-laver-hemmelige-kontrakter-om-hvor-vindmoeller-skal-staa/ [Accessed: 12. 09.2024].
KLIMA (2022a). Helpful headwinds. KLIMA. CICERO. https://cicero.oslo.no/en/articles/helpful-headwinds     
KLIMA (2022b). Nyttige motkrefter. KLIMA. https://cicero.oslo.no/no/artikler/nyttige-motkrefter
Klima-, Energi- og Forsyningsministeriet. (n.d.). NEKST - den nationale energikrisestab. Available at: https://www.kefm.dk/klima/nekst-den-nationale-energikrisestab (Accessed 22.10.2024)
Krug, M. and Ohlhorst, D. (2020). Optimizing the Local Embedding of Renewable Energy Plants: The Role of Nature Conservation in Relation to other Acceptance Factors. Journal of Environmental Policy and Administration 27: pp. 77–102.
Kulin, J., Johansson Sevä, I., & Dunlap, R. E. (2021). Nationalist ideology, rightwing populism, and public views about climate change in Europe. Environmental Politics 30(7): pp. 1111-1134.
Kurronen, S. (2022). Tuskanhikeä bensapumpulla – Polttoaineen kallistuminen kärjistää kaupunkien ja maaseudun vastakkainasettelua. EVA Arvio No 37. Elinkeinoelämän valtuuskunta EVA. https://www.eva.fi/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/eva-arvio-037.pdf (Accessed 24.10.2024)
Kyselá, E., Ščasný, M. and Zvěřinová, I. (2019). Attitudes toward climate change mitigation policies: a review of measures and a construct of policy attitudes. Climate Policy 19(7): pp. 878-892.
Kårtveit, B. (2021). Green colonialism. The story of wind power in Sápmi. In Sørly, R., Ghaye, T., and Kårtveit, B. (eds.) Stories of Change and Sustainability in the Arctic Regions. Routledge.             
Ladenburg, J., Termansen, M., and Hasler, B. (2013). Assessing acceptability of two onshore wind power development schemes: A test of viewshed effects and the cumulative effects of wind turbines, Energy 54: pp. 45–54.
Larsen, S.V., Hansen, A.M., Lyhne, I., Aaen, S.B., Ritter, E., and Nielsen, H. (2015). Social impact assessment in Europe: A study of social impacts in three Danish cases. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy Management 17.
Leiren, M.D., Aakre, S., Linnerud, K., Julsrud, T.E., Di Nucci, M., and Krug, M. (2020). Community Acceptance of Wind Energy Developments: Experience from Wind Energy Scarce Regions in Europe. Sustainability 12(5).
le Maitre, J., Ryan, G., and Power, B. (2024). Do concerns about wind farms blow over with time? Residents’ acceptance over phases of project development and proximity. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 189, 113839.
Lind, A., Norn, P., Sørensen, T., Tynkkynen, O., Daviðsdottir, B., Ásgeirsson, E., Stefánsson, H., Torvanger, A., Skjeflo, S., Möllersten, K., and Zetterberg, L. (2023) Nordic Stocktake – Pathways to Climate Neutrality. Nordic Council of Ministers. TemaNord 2023:545. Available at: https://pub.norden.org/temanord2023-545/about-this-publication.html#id06913
Linnerud, K., Aakre, S. and Leiren, M.D. (2018b). Deliverable 2.1: Technical and socio-economic conditions. A literature review of social acceptance of wind energy development, and an overview of the technical, socioeconomic and regulatory starting conditions in the wind energy scarce target regions. WinWind Report https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/documents/downloadPublic?documentIds=080166e5bedea2a5&appId=PPGMS
Linnerud K., Aakre, S. and Leiren, M.D. (2018a). Deliverable 2.2: Conceptual framework for analysing social acceptance barriers and drivers in the WinWind target regions. WinWind Report. https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/documents/downloadPublic?documentIds=080166e5baf57012&appId=PPGMS
Luoma, E., Turunen, J-P., and Kettunen, A. (2022). Tuulivoiman sosiaalinen hyväksyttävyys ja Keski-Suomen maakuntakaava 2040. Selvitystyön tulokset . Akordi Oy julkaisuja. https://akordi.fi/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Keski-Suomen-liitto-selvitys-loppuraportti_AKORDI_0405023_09.pdf
Luoma, E. and Kangasoja, J. (2023). Tullaan tutuiksi ja tullaan toimeen. Yhteistoiminnallisten toimintatapojen vaikutukset tuulivoiman paikalliselle hyväksyttävyydelle poronhoitoalueella. Ympäristöministeriön tilaama selvitys. Akordi Oy julkaisuja. https://akordi.fi/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Akordi_Tullaan_tutuiksi_ja_tullaan_toimeen-selvitys_WEB.pdf
Mills, S.B., Bessette, D., and Smith, H. (2019). Exploring landowners’ post-construction changes in perceptions of wind energy in Michigan. Land Use Policy 82: pp. 754–762.
Metelinen, S. (2022). Energiajäristys - Suomalaiset ovat virittäytyneet energian säästötalkoisiin mutta haluavat lisää ydinvoimaa.EVA Analyysi No 116. EVA Elinkeinoelämän valtuuskunta. https://www.eva.fi/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/eva-analyysi-no-116.pdf (Accessed 24.10.2024)
Motiva. (2024). Ilmastosuunnitelman kansalaiskyselyn tuloksia. https://www.motiva.fi/julkinen_sektori/ilmastosuunnitelman_kansalaiskyselyn_tuloksia (Accessed 24.10.2024).
Motvind (2019). Motvind går styrket videre. Motvind. https://motvind.org/motvind-norge-gar-styrket-videre-2/
Muhammad, I., Hasnu, N.N. and Ekins, P. (2021). Empirical Research of Public Acceptance on Environmental Tax: A Systematic Literature Review. Environments 8(10).
Møller, S.B. (2023) Vi skal forstå modstanden mod vindmøller og solceller bedre. DTU. Available at: https://www.dtu.dk/newsarchive/2023/11/vi-skal-forstaa-modstanden-mod-vindmoeller-og-solceller-bedre (Accessed: 12. 09.2024).
NBER. (2024). Fighting Climate Change: International Attitudes Toward Climate Policies. Working Paper 30265. National Bureau of Economic Research. Available at: https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w30265/w30265.pdf
NEKST-arbejdsgruppe. (2024). Mere sol og vind på land. Available at: https://www.kefm.dk/klima/nekst-den-nationale-energikrisestab/nekst-arbejdsgruppe-mere-sol-og-vind-paa-land  (Accessed: 12.09.2024).
NVE. (2019). Nasjonal ramme for vindkraft. Norges vassdrags- og energidirektorat.  Oslo. https://publikasjoner.nve.no/rapport/2019/rapport2019_12.pdf
NVE. (2022). Oppdatert kunnskapsgrunnlag.  Available at: https://www.nve.no/energi/energisystem/vindkraft-paa-land/nasjonal-ramme-for-vindkraft/oppdatert-kunnskapsgrunnlag/ (Accessed 22.10.2024)
Palsberg, A., Schou, M. and Holm, N.-K.T. (2024). Fra modstand til medvind. Partnerskaber og inddragelse i den grønne omstilling. Fonden Teknologirådet. Available at: https://tekno.dk/app/uploads/2024/03/Magasinet-Fra-modstand-til-medvind.pdf  (Accessed: 12. 09.2024).
Peltonen, L., Donner-Amnell, J. and Nokelainen, S. (2024). Tuulivoiman hyväksyttävyyden nykytila ja näkymät Suomessa. Publications of the University of Eastern Finland. Reports and Studies in Social Sciences and Business Studies No 21. https://erepo.uef.fi/handle/123456789/31645
Petrova, M.A. (2013). NIMBYism revisited: Public acceptance of wind energy in the United States. Wires Climate Change 4: pp. 575–601.
Rajavuori, A. (2023). Vähemmän, reilummin, tehokkaammin - Miten fossiilittomaan tieliikenteeseen siirrytään oikeudenmukaisesti? Kalevi Sorsa -säätiö. https://sorsafoundation.fi/wp-content/uploads/kss-liikenteen-oikeudenmukainen-siirtyma-web.pdf
Rand, J., and Hoen, B. (2017). Thirty years of North American wind energy acceptance research: What have we learned? Energy Research and Social Science 29: pp. 135–148.
Ricci M., Bellaby P., and Flynn R. (2008). What do we know about public perceptions and acceptance of hydrogen? A critical review and new case study evidence. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 33(21): pp. 5868–80.
Rygg, B. J. (2012). Wind power – An assault on local landscapes or an opportunity for modernization? Energy Policy 48: pp. 167–175.
Saglie, I.-L., Inderberg, T.H., and Rognstad, H. (2020). What shapes municipalities’ perceptions of fairness in wind power developments? Local Environment 25: pp. 147–161.
Sahari, A. and Palanne, K. (2021). Finland’s fuel tax does not particularly fall upon low-income households. Blog. VATT Institute for Economic Research. Available at: https://vatt.fi/en/-/finland-s-fuel-tax-does-not-particularly-fall-upon-low-income-households
Sánchez Gassen, N., Rohrer, L., Berlina, A., Ögland, L., Tapia, C., Cavicchia, R. & Lundgren, A. (2024). Nordic Toolbox for a Just Green Transition. Stockholm: Nordregio. Available at: https://pub.nordregio.org/r-2024-21-nordic-toolbox-for-%20a-just-green-transition/checklist-for-policymakers.html
Sivonen, J. (2023). Public Attitudes on climate policy instruments. University of Turku. Available at: https://www.utupub.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/175830/Annales%20B%20638%20Sivonen%20DISS.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Sivonen, J. and Koivula, A. (2020). How do social class position and party preference influence support for fossil fuel taxation in Nordic countries? The Social Science Journal, pp.1–21.
Skatteministeriet. (2023). Ny aftale om kilometerbaseret vejafgift for lastbiler gør Danmark grønnere. Available at: https://skm.dk/aktuelt/presse-nyheder/pressemeddelelser/ny-aftale-om-kilometerbaseret-vejafgift-for-lastbiler-goer-danmark-groennere (Accessed 22.10.2024)
Skjærseth, J.B., Hansen, T., Donner-Amnell, J., Hanson, J., Inderberg, T.H.J., Nielsen, H.Ø., Nygaard, B., and Steen, M. (2023). Wind Power Policies and Diffusion in the Nordic Countries. Palgrave Macmilla.
Slattery, M.C., Johnson, B.L., Swofford, J.A., and Pasqualetti, M.J. (2012). The predominance of economic development in the support for large-scale wind farms in the U.S. Great Plains. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 16: pp. 3690–3701.
Standal, K., Leiren, M.D., Alonso, I., Azevedo, I., Kudrenickis, I., Maleki-Dizaji, P., Laes, E., Di Nucci, M.R. and Krug, M., (2023). Can renewable energy communities enable a just energy transition? Exploring alignment between stakeholder motivations and needs and EU policy in Latvia, Norway, Portugal and Spain. Energy Research & Social Science 106: p.103326.
Stjórnarráð Íslands. (2023). VINDORKA - VALKOSTIR OG GREINING. Umhverfis-, orku- og loftslagsráðuneytið. Available at: https://www.stjornarradid.is/library/02-Rit--skyrslur-og-skrar/URN/Vindorka_skyrsla_april-2023.pdf
Suomen uusiutuvat ry. (2024). Toiminnassa olevat ja puretut voimalat. https://tuulivoimayhdistys.fi/media/toiminnassa-olevat-ja-puretut-voimalat-6_2024.xlsx
Sælen, H., and Kallbekken, S. (2011). A choice experiment on fuel taxation and earmarking in Norway. Ecological Economics 70(11): pp. 2181-2190.
Sælen, H.G., and Aasen, M. (2023). Exploring public opposition and support across different climate policies: Poles apart? Ecological Economics 209.
Tatham, M., & Peters, Y. (2023). Fueling opposition? Yellow vests, urban elites, and fuel taxation. Journal of European Public Policy 30(3): pp. 574-598. doi:10.1080/13501763.2022.2148172
THEMA Consulting Group. (2024). Lokal aksept og offentlig eierskap i vindkraft. Available at: https://cdn.sanity.io/files/5kkqcpsz/production/06839bb2e668e9e6782b59af0ed6f27edd2151ec.pdf
Toke, D., Breukers, S., and Wolsink, M. (2008). Wind power deployment outcomes: How can we account for the differences? Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 12: pp. 1129–1147.
Tornbjerg, J. (2024). Verdens bedste vind, verdens største laug, verdens største mølle. Green Power Denmark. Available at: https://greenpowerdenmark.dk/nyheder/verdens-bedste-vind-verdens-stoerste-laug-verdens-stoerste-moelle [Acceded 20.10.2024]
TV2 Øst. (2023). Hans Ole og 100 andre vrede vognmænd protesterede foran Christiansborg. Available at: https://www.tv2east.dk/holbaek/hans-ole-og-100-andre-vrede-vognmaend-protesterede-foran-christiansborg [Accessed 22.10.2024].
Tønnesen, A., Krogstad, J.R., Christiansen, P. and Isaksson, K. (2019). National goals and tools to fulfil them: A study of opportunities and pitfalls in Norwegian metagovernance of urban mobility. Transport Policy, 81: pp.35–44.
Tønnesen, A., Knapskog, M., Rynning, M.K. and Groven, K. (2022). Planning for climate-friendly transport in Norwegian rural areas. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 102: pp. 1-16.
Upham, P., Oltra, C. and Boso, À. (2015). Towards a cross-paradigmatic framework of the social acceptance of energy systems. Energy Research and Social Science 8: pp. 100–112.
 Valencia, F.M., Mohren, C., Ramakrishnan, A., Merchert, M., Minx, J.C. and Steckel, J.C. (2024). Public support for carbon pricing policies and revenue recycling options: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the survey literature. npj Climate Action, [online] 3(1).  
Vejdirektoratet. (2024). Høje brændstofpriser får danskerne til at lette foden fra speederen. Vejdirektoratet. https://www.vejdirektoratet.dk/nyhed/2024/hoeje-braendstofpriser-faar-danskerne-til-lette-foden-fra-speederen (Accessed 27.09.2024)
Vågerö, O., Bråte, A., Wittemann, A., Robinson, J. Y., Zeyringer, M., and Sirotko-Sibirskaya, N. (2024). Machine learning of public sentiments towards wind energy in Norway. Wind Energy 27(6): pp. 583-611.
Wilson, G.A., and Dyke, S.L. (2016). Pre- and post-installation community perceptions of wind farm projects: The case of Roskrow Barton (Cornwall, UK). Land Use Policy 52: pp.287–296.
Windemer, R. (2023). Acceptance should not be assumed. How the dynamics of social acceptance changes over time, impacting onshore wind repowering, Energy Policy 173.
Wüstenhagen, R., Wolsink, M. and Bürer, M.J. (2007). Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept. Energy Policy 24: 2683–2691.
Ympäristöministeriö. (2024). Ilmastovuosikertomus 2024. Ympäristöministeriön julkaisuja 2024:25. https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/165736/YM_2024_25.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Zerrahn, A. (2017). Wind Power and Externalities, Ecological Economics 141: pp. 245–260. 
Nordic Council of Ministers I www.norden.org/publications I pub@norden.org