Method and delimitations
This knowledge review is based on literature on the working life conditions of trans people in the Nordic countries and on dialogues conducted with civil society organisations and labour market actors. Interviews were conducted with representatives of civil society organisations in Greenland, the Faroe Islands and Åland to get a picture of the situation there.
Literature
In the process of collecting material, literature searches were carried out and civil society organisations consulted, with a particular focus on trans organisations and researchers in the field, as well as experts and officials in authorities and ministries.
The first inclusion criteria for material was that the information should be specifically and discernibly about trans people. Material that, for example, deals with the LGBTI community without such a differentiation was excluded. Other inclusion criteria were that the material should be based on the Nordic countries and related to working life issues. The search was limited to the last 15 years, i.e. 2008-2023.
Initially, a literature search using the Scopus database was tested. Search terms related to trans, working life and the Nordic countries were used. This search yielded few hits, and a scan of the articles’ abstracts revealed that only one of the articles fell within the inclusion criteria. Following this search, emails were sent to trans organisations and umbrella organisations for LGBTI issues in all the Nordic countries, researchers in the field and experts and officials in government authorities and ministries, with a request for any material on the theme that they knew of and to pass on the request to others working on the issue. This method resulted in a number of reports, scientific articles and ongoing projects being identified. When the project’s reference group were asked to read the first draft of the knowledge review, they were also asked to suggest additional material, if they knew of any. This provided some additional indicators for relevant publications.
This is a form of snowball method (see, for example, Browne, 2005), i.e. a method based on gathering relevant information and knowledge in a context of people with a high level of personal involvement. By identifying key people for a particular issue, the movement of the snowball can capture the knowledge needed. Our reference group – as well as other key people identified for us by the reference group – is one such context. This is particularly apparent when compared to the literature search, which yielded very few results and was therefore misleading. At the same time, it may of course be the case that relevant publications are not included in this review. However, we do not claim this to be a comprehensive compilation, rather the intention is to provide a picture of the various themes that appear in the literature collected through this method.
Texts in Danish, English, Norwegian and Swedish were read in the original language. In most cases, reports written in Finnish and Icelandic were also available in Swedish or English. In one case, a Finnish text was translated into Swedish. One Icelandic report was published after the material collection was completed; for the purpose of including the results, we read a summary of the findings in English and maintained a dialogue with participating actors.
Input from key actors
The knowledge review also includes documentation from discussions held with national actors to identify needs and propose measures to improve the working life conditions of trans people in the Nordic countries. Meetings were held with representatives of national civil society organisations, anti-discrimination ombudsmen and central trade union organisations. The civil society organisations were invited to a workshop in connection with the Nordic LGBTI Conference in Reykjavik 2023, which brought together many LGBTI and trans organisations. The Nordic anti-discrimination ombudsmen were consulted at a workshop in connection with a Nordic network meeting between the ombudsmen, to which NIKK was invited. All Nordic trade union confederations were invited to a meeting organised by NIKK with the support of NFS, the Council of Nordic Trade Unions. The views and discussions presented during the workshops are included in an aggregated form. Of course, different organisations have different approaches to the issues, and it is not necessarily the case that all organisations agree with the positions presented in the text.
NIKK has also sought to contact employer organisations in the Nordic countries. As there is no umbrella organisation for employer organisations in the Nordic countries, we instead contacted them by means of a short questionnaire sent out by e-mail. Few responses were received to the questionnaire. One employer organisation provided responses from its respective member organisations.