Benway, H.M., Lorenzoni, L., White A.E., Fiedler, B., Levine, N.M., Nicholson, D.P.
et al. (2019). Ocean time series observations of changing marine ecosystems: An era of integration, synthesis, and societal applications.
Frontiers in Marine Science 6.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00393Bianchi, C.N, Azzola, A., Cocito, S., Morri, C., Oprandi, A., Peirano, A.
et al. (2022). Biodiversity monitoring in Mediterranean marine protected areas: scientific and methodological challenges.
Diversity 14:43.
https://doi.org/10.3390/d14010043Blancher, P., Lefrancois, E., Rimet, F., Vasselon, V., Argillier, C., Arle, J.
et al. (2022). A strategy for successful integration of DNA-based methods in aquatic monitoring.
Metabarcoding and Metagenomics 6: 215-226.
https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.6.85652Chavez, F.P., Min, M., Pitz, K., Truelove, N., Baker, J., LaScala-Grunewald, D.
et al. (2021). Observing life in the sea using environmental DNA.
Oceanography 34(2):102-119.
https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2021.218Closek, C.J., Santora, J.A., Starks, H.A., Schroeder, I.D., Andruszkiewicz, E.A., Sakuma, K.M.
et al. (2019). Marine vertebrate biodiversity and distribution within the central California Current using environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding and ecosystem surveys.
Frontiers in Marine Science 6.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00732Norros, V., Laamanen, T., Meissner, K., Iso-Touru, T., Kahilainen, A., Lehtinen, S.
et al. (2022). Roadmap for implementing environmental DNA (eDNA) and other molecular monitoring methods in Finland. Vision and action plan for 2022-2025.
Reports of the Finnish Environment Institute 20/2022. URI:
http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-11-5482-9.
Bruce, K., Blackman, R., Bourlat, S.J., Hellström, A.M., Bakker, J.
et al (2021).
A practical guide to DNA-based methods for biodiversity assessment. Sofia, Bulgaria: Pensoft Advanced Books. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3897/ab.e68634Fediajevaite, J., Priestley, V., Arnold, R. & Savolainen, V. (2021). Meta-analysis shows that environmental DNA outperforms traditional survey, but warrents better reporting standards.
Ecology and Evolution 11: 4803-4815.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7382Hellström, M., Andersson-Li, M., Brys, R., Halfmarten, D., Hänfling, B., Näslund, J.
et al. (2021a).
Riktlinjer för hantering av akvatiskt eDNA som verktyg inom svensk miljöanalys – Del I: Insamling i fält, filtrering och konservering. AquaBiota Report 2021:09
Hellström, M., Andersson-Li, M., Brys, R., Halfmarten, D., Hänfling, B., Näslund, J.
et al. (2021b).
Riktlinjer för hantering av akvatiskt eDNA som verktyg inom svensk miljöanalys – Del II: Laboratoriekrav och eDNA-extraktioner. AquaBiota Report 2021:10
Hinz, S., Coston-Guarini J., Marnane, M., Guarini, J-M. (2022). Evaluating eDNA for use within marine environmental impact assessments.
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 10(3):375.
https://doi.org/10.3390.jmse10030375Jerney, J., Hällfors, H., Oja, J., Reunamo, A., Suikkanen, S. & Lehtinen, S. (2022). Guidelines for using environmental DNA in Finnish marine phytoplankton monitoring. Improved biodiversity assessment through method complementation. Reports of the Finnish Environment Institute 40/2022.
Keck, F., Blackman, R.C.D., Bossart, R., Brantschen, J., Couton, M., Hürlemann, S.
et al. (2022). Meta-analysis shows both concruence and complementarity of DNA and eDNA metabarcoding to traditional methods for biological assessment.
Molecular Ecology 31: 1820-1835.
https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.16364UNIG (U.S.–Norway Intergovernmental Group on eDNA Implementation
for Fisheries Stock Assessments and Management). (2020). Implementation
of Environmental DNA (eDNA) as a Tool for Ecosystem-Based Fisheries
Management.
U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA White Paper NMFS-
NWFSC-WP-2020-01.
https://doi.org/10.25923/e736-vn83Pampoulie, C., Singh, W., Guðnason, K., Bárðarson, B., Ólafsdóttir, G., Þórarinsson, Þ.
et al. (2023). Detection and distribution of the North Atlantic capelin (
Mallotus villosus) using environmental DNA – comparison with data from the main fishery management survey.
Environmental DNA. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.415Pascher, K., Švara, V. & Jungmeier, M. (2022). Environmental DNA-based methods in biodiversity monitoring and protected areas: application range, limitations, and needs.
Diversity 14: 463.
https://doi.org/10.3390/d14060463Pawlowski, J., Bonin, A., Boyer, F., Cordier, T. & Taberlet, P. (2021). Environmental DNA for biomonitoring.
Molecular Ecology 30: 2931-2936.
https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.16023Ramirez-Amaro, S., Bassitta, M., Picornelli A., Ramon, C., Terrasa B. (2022). Environmental DNA: State-of-the-art of its application for fisheries assessment in marine environments.
Frontiers in Marine Science 9.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.1004671Ratcliffe, F.C., Webster, T.M.U., de Leaniz, C.G. & Consuegra, S. (2021). A drop in the ocean: Monitoring fish communities in spawning areas using environmental DNA.
Environmental DNA 3: 43-54.
https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.87Rogers, A.D., Appeltans, W., Assis, J., Ballance, L.T., Cury, P., Duarte, C.
et al. (2022). Chapter Two - Discovering marine biodiversity in the 21st century. Charles Sheppard (Ed.).
Advances in Marine Biology, Academic Press, Volume 93, Pages 23-115. ISSN 0065-2881, ISBN 9780323985895,
https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.amb.2022.09.002.
Rourke, M.L., Fowler, A.M., Hughes, J.M., Broadhurst, M.K., DiBattista, J.D., Fielder, S.
et al. (2022). Environmental DNA (eDNA) as a tool for assessing fish biomass: A review of approaches and future considerations for resource surveys.
Environmental DNA 4(1):9-33.
https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.185Ruppert, K.M., Kline, R.J. & Rahman, Md.S. (2019). Past, present, and future perspectives of environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding: Asystematic review in methods, monitoring, and applications of global eDNA.
Global Ecology and Conservation 17, e00547.
https://doi.org/j.gecco.2019.e00547Salter, I., Joensen, M., Kristiansen, R., Steingrund, P. & Vestergaard, P. (2019). Environmental DNA concentrations are correlated with regional biomass of Atlantic cod in oceanic waters.
Communications Biology 2:461.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-019-0696-8Suarez-Bregua P., Álvarez-González, M., Parsons, K.M., Rotllant, J., Pierce, G.J. Saavedra C. (2022). Environmental DNA (eDNA) for monitoring marine mammals: Challenges and opportunities.
Frontiers in Marine Science 9.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.987774Turon, M., Nygaard, M., Guri, G., Wangensteen, O.S., Præbel, K. (2021). Fine-scale differences in eukaryotic communities inside and outside salmon aquaculture cages revealed by eDNA metabarcoding.
Frontiers in Genetics 13.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.957251