Go to content

3 Introduc­tion

3.1 Marine monitoring in the Northeast Atlantic

Marine monitoring in the Northeast Atlantic is divided and substructured under several different international, national and institutional schemes as well as being performed with different objectives in mind. Three focus areas cover the major themes of marine research and monitoring in the Northeast Atlantic.  
  1. Management of marine resources includes monitoring and regular stock assessments of economically important species, mainly commercial fish stocks and shellfish, and analyses of the food web sustaining them. Capture statistics have been carried out for many decades in the Northeast Atlantic for marine resource management purposes. The monitoring efforts are supported by the adherence to a range of international agreements and conventions such as FAO, NAFO, NEAFC, etc. that the various countries are committed to. Marine Research Institutes perform the monitoring usually following a pre-planned schedule feeding year and decade long time series, which can support the administrative decisions for marine resource management.
  2. Impact assessment is a more fragmented or specialised segment mainly carried out or supervised by environmental agencies. These assessments usually relate to various industrial enterprises such as aquaculture or other human activities including construction and tourism. The involved industries also sometimes perform such impact assessments to live up to various international standards.
  3. The current focus on climate change and the pressure it enforces on the marine environment has also increased the awareness and importance of monitoring and maintaining biodiversity. Although, or perhaps because, these issues are overarching and universal, monitoring is often less structured or exclusively managed by any specific institution. It currently has high political focus and research and monitoring within this area is increasing.

3.2 Application of environmental DNA

Environmental DNA is a highly sensitive and efficient method for establishing the presence of species of any certain taxonomic group and for determining compositions of these communities (Pawlowski et al. 2021; Pascher et al. 2022). Therefore it can identify relatively rare species as well as circumvent potential difficulties in morphological identification of certain species.
In addition, eDNA is often a more non-intrusive and efficient sampling method (Ratcliffe et al. 2020). Therefore, eDNA sampling can potentially provide a higher sampling frequency, smaller grid size, and/or cover a larger geographical area. Sometimes, it can also be used in areas where other forms of sampling can be challenging. These characteristics of eDNA methods can support the vital efforts to produce time series estimated to be of vital importance for detecting changes in the marine ecosystems (Benway et al. 2019; Bianchi et al. 2022).
Because marine monitoring has been performed using other methods that can be time consuming and challenging, the notion that eDNA methods might be able to partially replace or complement some of these methods for a more efficient monitoring has interested both researchers and stakeholders (Hinz et al. 2022; Ramirez-Amaro et al. 2022). This has also resulted in the need of comparing eDNA methods to these more traditional methods (Closec et al. 2019; Fediajevaite et al. 2021; Keck et al. 2022).
In this process, misunderstandings have sometimes developed about the potential and application of eDNA. Essentially, it has resulted in a tendancy for some stakeholders to expect that eDNA methods could serve as a replacement for some of the traditional and more expensive methods, instead of evaluating how the methods complement each other and can together provide better monitoring, which many recommended (Ruppert et al. 2019; Rogers et al. 2022; Rourke et al. 2022; Suarez-Bregua et al. 2022).
Although eDNA methods often perform well in comparison with traditional surveys (Chavez et al. 2021; Fediajevaita et al. 2021; Keck et al. 2022), researchers also struggle to provide the clear-cut results that stakeholders need in order to justify investing in eDNA-based reasearch and monitoring. Improved communication is a key issue for stakeholders to gain the understanding that eDNA methods, as all other methods, have strenghts and challenges that need to be taken into consideration.
Therefore, the challenge for all parties is to get a common understanding of the great potential of eDNA methods and apply these to marine monitoring in a fruitful manner, without complicating the process of implementation with unrealistic expectations and requirements.

3.3 Global and large-scale initiatives

In marine resource management, the methods commonly used are based on observations, capture, or bulk sampling for morphological classification and enumeration. These traditional methods are and have been essential for providing data for knowledge-based management of the marine environment. However, these methods have some limitations such as the constraint on sample frequency and geographical area covered due to the nature of the sampling method and/or the time consuming process of morpho-taxonomic identification and enumeration. The application of eDNA can address these and other issues and can provide a valuable complementary approach.
The potential in the application of eDNA to supplement and improve environmental monitoring has despite standardization challenges inspired many large national and international institutions to start the process of implementation. As an example, the American Agency NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), renowned for its scientific work and services in climate monitoring and fisheries management amongst other things, has recognised the potential in eDNA methods to supplement other more traditional methods used to produce valuable survey data. Amongst other applications, the agency recommends commencing implementation of eDNA methods to support Ecosystem-Based Fisheries management (UNIG 2020)
The current loss of Biodiversity has also inspired UNESCO to launch a global eDNA project to study vulnerability of species to climate change at marine World Heritage sites, recognized for their unique biodiversity, outstanding ecosystems, or for representing major stages in Earth’s history (https://www.unesco.org/en/edna-expeditions). The aim is to measure the vulnerability of marine biodiversity to climate change and the impacts of that change on the distribution and migration patterns of marine life across marine World Heritage sites. This knowledge will help understand global trends and inform ongoing efforts to protect marine ecosystems and ensure future generations continue to enjoy the services they provide.
The Ocean Biomolecular Observing Network (OBON) also uses eDNA methods to greatly enhance coastal and open ocean biodiversity observations (https://www.obon-ocean.org/). The program utilizes biomolecular technologies to monitor, research and understand life in the sea at every trophic level and scale, how life varies in response to climate and anthropogenic impacts, including fisheries, and how these changes impact society.
Various other initiatives have also been made to instigate more coordinated efforts in implementation of eDNA methods. As an example, the European network DNAqua-Net (COST Action CA15219) presented a suggested roadmap for successful implementation of DNA-based biomonitoring for freshwater ecosystems (Blancher et al. 2022). Although focused on freshwater monitoring, it provides valuable reflections of relevance for the marine environment. Their paper gives an “overview of the forum discussions and common European views that emerged from them, while reflecting the diversity of situations in different countries”. They recognized that implementing DNA-based methods in biomonitoring will require significant technical and organisational changes and that their adoption will require coordinated actions at national and international levels.
Another initiative is the European Marine Omics Biodiversity Observation Network (EMO-BON), which focuses on marine monitoring and including eDNA methods in its approach (https://www.embrc.eu/emo-bon). EMO BON aims to establish a coordinated, long-term, marine biodiversity observatory. By bringing together individual biological observation stations, EMBRC provides the context and opportunity for partner institutions to participate in EMO BON and build a modern biodiversity observation framework for Europe. Currently, EMO BON includes 16 marine stations, located from the Arctic to the Red Sea.

3.4 Nordic initiatives

Nordic institutions and researchers are involved in many international initiatives applying eDNA methods to marine research and monitoring and in the recent years, there has been a steady increase in the application of eDNA methods to marine research in the Northeast Atlantic (Salter et al. 2019; Turon et al. 2022; Pampoulie et al. 2023). However, there has been little consistency in the methodology as different projects follow different protocols for sampling, storage, data management etc. that are estimated to be most appropriate at the time.
This is causing difficulties in conforming to a gold standard when initiating eDNA based monitoring of the marine environment since there are no standard guidelines to follow for the application of eDNA methods. It is also hampering fruitful collaboration between the Nordic countries in the process of implementation eDNA methods in marine monitoring.
Box 3.4.1

Nordic Marine Phytoplankton Group (NOMP) 

The Nordic Marine Phytoplankton Group (NOMP) consists of persons in Denmark, Iceland, Norway, Sweden and the Faroe Islands working with research and environmental monitoring related to phytoplankton, algal blooms and harmful algae. One aim of the group is to improve quality and intercomparability of results by using consistent names of organisms and algal groups. Other aims include collaboration through yearly meetings to share recent results, intercomparisons of methods, including molecular methods, and application of the Nordic microalgae website http://nordicmicroalgae.org , which is operated by the Swedish Meterological and Hydrological Institute and is a service part of the Swedish Biodiversity Data Infrastructure (SBDI), funded by SMHI and the Swedish Research Council.
Coordinator of the NOMP Group is Bengt Karlson at SMHI
Box 3.4.2

Extracts from Norway’s integrated occean management plans 2019–2020 

“There is a need to further develop several of the indicators used for environmental monitoring..”
“A closer focus on species composition is needed, including species at lower trophic levels, and more time series are needed on population size and habitat use.”
 “There are also gaps in the monitoring of benthic communities, alien species, threatened species and pollution. Monitoring of pressures and impacts associated with human activity needs to be further developed. We also need to improve our understanding of which changes are caused by pressures from human activity in the management plan areas or adjoining coastal waters and land, and which are related to climate change and other large-scale processes or to natural processes and variability in the oceans.”
“Better and more cost-effective methods also need to be developed for use in mapping and monitoring Norwegian waters.”
Norwegian Ministry of Climate and Environment – report to the Storting
However, there are some national and international initiatives in the Nordic region that are good examples of how researchers and stakeholders, directly or indirectly, work towards the standardisation and implementation of eDNA methods in marine monitoring. A few current examples illustrating the efforts of researchers and stakeholders are described in the information boxes.
The NOMP Group described in Box 3.4.1 includes researchers working with eDNA methods and is, through the induced knowledge sharing and cooperation, instrumental in the promotion of standardization and implementation of eDNA methods. It is also a good example of how interactions between an international scientific network and national scientific infrastructure can be benefical for both parties.
In Norway’s integrated ocean management plans 2019–2020, presented in Box 3.4.2, there are indications that stakeholders are positive towards the development and implementation of new methods to enhance the insight gained from marine monitoring. Although eDNA is not mentioned by name, it is a good fit for the ideas presented in the document. As such, it is a good demonstration of the discussions and decisions required by stakeholders when forming political schemes that can facilitate the implementation process of new methods such as eDNA. 
Box 3.4.3

Roadmap for implementing environmental DNA (eDNA) and other molecular molecular methods in Finland

In Finland, molecular monitoring methods have been tested and piloted by all major institutions responsible for environmental monitoring, and the methods are already applied routinely in the monitoring of individual game species. Other areas remain less developed, and national efforts and expertice are scattered across different organizations. In marine monitoring some pilot projects have been started but the field is fragmented with no national coordination.
The Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE) developed a Roadmap that:
  • Proposed an action plan for promoting coordinated implementation of eDNA methods
  • Launched a national discussion and provided actionable recommendations
  • Was tied to national environmental monitoring strategy framework and implementation program, National biodiversity strategy and action plan for 2035

Vision and Action Plan for 2022–2025 commissioned by the Finnish Ministry of the Environment
In the work performed by SYKE and described in Box 3.4.3, many of the primary areas identified for needed development and proposed actions require increased national and international coordination and communication across sectors and the involvement of both researchers and stakeholders.

3.5 The UNIFIeD project

The focus of UNIFIeD (Unifying Nordic Initiatives and Fostering Involvement on eDNA) was to estimate strengths, challenges and ambitions of the participating countries, Greenland, Iceland, the Faroe Islands and Norway, for standardization and implementation of eDNA methods in marine monitoring in the Northeast Atlantic. The project targeted these issues from the perspectives of both researchers in the field and stakeholders who can facilitate the implementation process. The aim of UNIFIeD was to lay a foundation for collaboration between researchers and stakeholders as well as between the Nordic countries countries based on this knowledge.
Following discussions between the UNIFIeD participants at the kick-off meeting it was decided to make the planned survey in two versions, one for researchers in the field and one for stakeholders. Using this approach, the survey for researchers could investigate details about fundamental issues such as sampling, storage and archiving for potential international alignment and probe into details about current status in project setup and challenges in standardization and implementation. without alienating stakeholders with irrelevant questions.
Likewise, the survey for stakeholders could be designed to investigate the interest and aspect of those public entities responsible for establishing the needed support and framework for implementation of eDNA methods in marine monitoring. This insight from stakeholders was estimated to be highly valuable as an important aspect of the UNIFIeD project is to determine the possibility of involvement of all participating countries in a unified process of standardization and alignment for Northeast Atlantic marine monitoring.
At the kick-off meeting it was also agreed to focus the surveys to centre around three essential areas of application. This would make the questions and answers more tangible in terms of potential implementation. The three focus areas cover the major themes of marine research and monitoring in the Northeast Atlantic:
1) Biodiversity/Climate Change,
2) Marine Resource Management,
3) Impact assessment
The survey for researchers was distributed to researchers in the Nordic countries working with eDNA in the marine environment in the Northeast Atlantic, while the stakeholder survey was limited to respondents from the UNIFIeD countries only.
The survey results were compiled in a report, which was sent to the project participants and was the basis for a following workshop. The report was organized in four sections reflecting the theme of the presentations that were on the agenda for the UNIFIeD online workshop scheduled for December 2022. The workshop was organized as an online event with the four presentations held by various UNIFIeD project participants, each presentation followed by discussions among all workshop attendees. All relevant stakeholders and researchers initially contacted in relation to the UNIFIeD survey were invited.
The project report including the survey results was distributed to all parties as soon as it was published.