Go to content

Workshop objectives, outcomes products

Overall Objective: to advance the OECM Nordic project, including integration with the CAFF/​PAME OECM project.
Specific objectives for the workshop from both projects:
  • Provide an overview of the current range and understanding of international and national criteria used for the identification of “Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures” (OECM) in the Nordic regions and the Arctic marine environment.
  • Summarize concepts, methodologies, guidance and relevant tools for OECM development, implementation and assessment.
  • Identify and discuss differences and commonalities in OECM approaches among Nordic and other Arctic states and explore the case for a common approach.
  • Promote a common understanding and terminology around area-based conservation approaches to marine management and terrestrial management in the Nordic and wider Arctic region, where possible.
  • Share and discuss case studies that explore the role of Indigenous sustainable management practices, including Indigenous Protected and Conserved Areas (IPCAs), and other Indigenous management approaches, including advice and lessons learned and exploratory case studies.
  • Build upon and inform the development of other relevant activities in the Nordic and wider Arctic regions.
  • Discuss development of fact sheets on OECM best practice related to the Nordic project.
Outcome: By the end of the workshop participants will understand key concepts around OECMs and Indigenous-led management practices, including how OECMs can contribute to reaching global/​national conservation targets, and the wider benefits of OECMs for conservation in the Arctic Nordic and wider Arctic regions. Through presentations by experts and practitioners and existing case studies participants will learn about the process of identifying, recognizing and reporting OECMs, and discuss needs and opportunities for making progress on OECMs.
Workshop products:
  • Workshop report
  • List of case studies and examples of OECM and IPCA development and application in the marine and terrestrial environments in the Nordics and wider Arctic for further consideration in ongoing and future projects
  • Contributions to the Nordic report and broader PAME/CAFF OECM report, and insights into additional project development under the Arctic Council

Supporting documents

List of acronyms used in the report

  • ABFM: Area-based Fisheries Management Measures
  • ABNJ: Areas-beyond National Jurisdiction
  • AI: Artificial intelligence
  • BBNJ: Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction
  • BCB: Biodiversity Conservation Benefit
  • CAFF: Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna
  • CBD: Convention on Biological Diversity
  • CPAN: Circumpolar Protected Areas Network
  • EBSA: Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas (EBSAs)
  • EEZ: Exclusive Economic Zone
  • EU: European Union
  • FAO: Food and Administrative Organization
  • FJMC: Fisheries Joint Management Council
  • HELCOM: Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission – also known as the Helsinki Commission
  • ICC: Inuit Circumpolar Council
  • ICES: International Council for the Exploration of the Sea
  • IK: Indigenous Knowledge
  • IPCA: Indigenous Protected and Conserved Area
  • IMPAC5: Fifth International Marine Protected Areas Congress (IMPAC5)
  • IUCN: International Union for Conservation of Nature
  • LIFE IP: LIFE Integrated Project, LLIFE is the EU’s funding instrument for the environment and climate action
  • MPA: Marine Protected Area
  • MSP: Marine Spatial Planning
  • NAFO: Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization
  • NBSAP: National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans
  • NCM: Nordic Council of Ministers
  • NEAFC: North East Atlantic Fisheries Commission
  • NOAA: National Oceanic and Atmospheric
  • OECM: Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures
  • PAME: Protection of the Arctic Marine Environment
  • UN: United Nations
  • UNGA: United Nations General Assembly
  • WCPA: IUCN’s World Commission on Protected Areas
  • WKECOVME: ICES workshop to evaluate long-term biodiversity/ecosystem benefits of NEAFC closed and restricted areas
  • WKTOPS: ICES/IUCN-CEM Fisheries Expert Group Workshop on Testing OECM Practices and Strategies
  • WWF: World Wildlife Fund