Go to content

4. Technological barriers

Emission- and fossil-free construction sites are based in part on improved technologies in energy and waste handling. A promising development in the electrification of passenger cars prompted the transition from fossil fuel-powered vehicles to battery-electric technology. The technologies, batteries, and biofuels currently deployed do not meet all the demands of the construction industry for emission-free energy. Although biofuel has been an alternative to fossil fuel in construction for some time, it has limitations. Experience gained from the first years in the electrification of vehicles and machinery in construction shows there are barriers, such as limited availability and insufficient energy infrastructure. While there may be barriers, there is potential for improvement. Although energy usage on construction sites is generally not monitored closely, such measurements must be a basis for development in the area.
J. Palm and E. Bryngelson, ‘Energy efficiency at building sites: barriers and drivers’, Energy Effic., vol. 16, no. 2, p. 7, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s12053-023-10088-7.
The reduction of material waste and increased reuse come with technological issues and there are challenges to be overcome in this regard.

4.1 Limitations of biofuels

Fossil-free construction sites can use drop-in biofuels such as biodiesel and HVO for existing diesel engines.
Danish Energy Agency, ‘Technology Data – Renewable fuels’, Copenhagen, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://ens.dk/sites/ens.dk/files/Analyser/technology_data_for_renewable_fuels.pdf
Biofuels are very efficient for heating and drying. Wood chips are often used for heating in the Nordics. Biodiesel is also a good option for conventional diesel heaters. Although biofuels are not emission-free, greenhouse gas emissions are drastically reduced compared to fossil fuels. There are no technical issues associated with the use of HVO as it meets the same standards as conventional diesel. Biodiesel is preferred as a blend of fossil diesel. HVO and biodiesel are only sustainable alternatives when the raw material is waste, such as used cooking oil or waste animal fat.
Road vehicles and construction machinery have traditionally been available with natural gas powertrains. Biomethane is a direct replacement as a fuel in these vehicles. The production of biomethane is usually based on the fermentation of easily degradable biomass. The biodegradable fraction of municipal solid waste is often used as a raw material.
The current technology used in biofuel production requires biological raw material that is already limited in quantity.
E. Pavlovskaia, ‘Sustainability criteria: their indicators, control, and monitoring (with examples from the biofuel sector)’, Environ. Sci. Eur., vol. 26, no. 1, p. 17, Dec. 2014, doi: 10.1186/s12302-014-0017-2.
A massive increase in the use of biofuels in the construction industry is, therefore, not currently a viable option. Developments in biofuel technology may pave the way for using other raw material that is more abundant and can be sourced sustainably.

4.2 Availability of machinery and equipment

The availability of emission-free machinery is repeatedly mentioned in interviews with people in construction companies. The general opinion is that although battery electric lightweight machinery and trucks can be sourced, the lead times are long. Heavier equipment is still not available in emission-free variants.
Cleancon, a Nordic project on clean construction, collated experience from several pilot projects with low-emission machinery.
Cleancon, ‘Clean construction machinery. Erfarenheter från test- och demoprojekt i WP5’, Cleancon, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://cleancon.no/
One of many interesting results was that there is considerable demand for emission-free machinery, exacerbating the issue of poor availability. A similar conclusion was reached in a conference held by Leap to Zero in the Netherlands.
D. de Weger, B. Semeijn, and M. Bollen, ‘Leap To Zero conference report’, Rijkswaterstaat, Utrecht, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.nordicsustainableconstruction.com/knowledge/2024/may/leap-to-zero-2024-report
“The biggest challenge is the lack of production of zero-emission machinery in factories. Currently, there is limited availability of zero-emission equipment worldwide.”
Hydrogen is a promising fuel that can be used with fuel cells or in combustion engines. It is considered a better choice than batteries for heavy trucks and machinery as more energy can be stored on board. Commercial hydrogen equipment is generally limited to small power generators. Trucks and mobile machinery are generally available only as special test cases.

4.3 Uncertainty about performance and development

New technology brings change to established processes in the construction industry. New knowledge and experience have to be built up in all phases of construction. Added to this, there is uncertainty around what the new technology will be and how it will perform.
The construction industry normally does not have much room for experimentation. The same applies to investment in expensive equipment. The financial risk is typically the first barrier that contracting companies see when investing in emission-free equipment. Applying unfamiliar technology on a construction site can also cause unforeseen problems, resulting in additional costs and delays.
They also consider the likelihood of unforeseen problems with the technology if there is a slight chance that it will cause added problems.
Interviews with contractors highlight uncertainties that hinder the adoption of new emission-free technologies. They feel that the performance of the new equipment is not well-proven. Even if power and range are equal to conventional equipment, maintenance costs and practical lifespan are uncertain until more experience is gained.
D. de Weger, B. Semeijn, and M. Bollen, ‘Leap To Zero conference report’, Rijkswaterstaat, Utrecht, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.nordicsustainableconstruction.com/knowledge/2024/may/leap-to-zero-2024-report
One of these uncertainties is battery capacity; some manufacturers recommend that only about 80% to 90% of battery capacity is used in order to increase lifespan. Stakeholders are often uncertain about the effective usable range of new emission-free equipment, as well as cold weather performance.
Eric Rambech, Rebecca Briedis, and Sigrid Møyner Hohle, ‘Utslippsfri drift i bygg- og anleggsbransjen’, Endrava, Oslo, 2021. Accessed: Dec. 12, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://cleancon.no/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Markedsmuligheter-for-utslippsfri-drift-i-bygg-og-anleggsbransjen.pdf
‘MAN expands its zero-emission portfolio’, MAN expands its zero-emission portfolio. Accessed: Nov. 14, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://press.mantruckandbus.com/corporate/man-expands-its-zero-emission-portfolio/
There are also concerns about obsolescence, with new technologies rapidly replacing the first generation of emission-free machinery.
D. de Weger, B. Semeijn, and M. Bollen, ‘Leap To Zero conference report’, Rijkswaterstaat, Utrecht, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.nordicsustainableconstruction.com/knowledge/2024/may/leap-to-zero-2024-report
Distributors and other equipment specialists point out that batteries are not the final emission-free solution. An example of the fast pace of development is a pilot production run of 200 heavy trucks running on hydrogen. The majority of the trucks will be delivered to customers in Norway and Iceland in 2025.
‘MAN expands its zero-emission portfolio’, MAN expands its zero-emission portfolio. Accessed: Nov. 14, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://press.mantruckandbus.com/corporate/man-expands-its-zero-emission-portfolio/

4.4 Charging bottlenecks

Issues regarding the charging of battery electric vehicles and machinery on construction sites are a recurring theme in surveys and interviews.
Charging large battery electric machines and vehicles requires powerful grid connections and contractors often cite this as a limiting factor. Getting a connection to a new construction site can be problematic due to utility providers’ traditional processes. Construction in new areas can be delayed due to the development of grid infrastructure, while in older urban areas the electric grid may already be at full capacity.
D. de Weger, B. Semeijn, and M. Bollen, ‘Leap To Zero conference report’, Rijkswaterstaat, Utrecht, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.nordicsustainableconstruction.com/knowledge/2024/may/leap-to-zero-2024-report
Eric Rambech, Rebecca Briedis, and Sigrid Møyner Hohle, ‘Utslippsfri drift i bygg- og anleggsbransjen’, Endrava, Oslo, 2021. Accessed: Dec. 12, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://cleancon.no/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Markedsmuligheter-for-utslippsfri-drift-i-bygg-og-anleggsbransjen.pdf
High capacity chargers are used for battery electric machinery and the power drawn from the utility grid may be more than the building under construction will ultimately require.
Eric Rambech, Rebecca Briedis, and Sigrid Møyner Hohle, ‘Utslippsfri drift i bygg- og anleggsbransjen’, Endrava, Oslo, 2021. Accessed: Dec. 12, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://cleancon.no/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Markedsmuligheter-for-utslippsfri-drift-i-bygg-og-anleggsbransjen.pdf
It is important to plan grid connections and charging schedules carefully, which is difficult when combined with the introduction of new technology.
M. K. Wiik, K. Fjellheim, and R. Gjersvik, ‘Erfaringskartlegging av krav til utslippsfrie bygge- og anleggsplasser’, SINTEF, 86, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2837785

4.5 Hydrogen infrastructure

As mentioned above, hydrogen is a promising fuel for heavy construction equipment and the technology is already available. Heavy vehicles and equipment using hydrogen are available today. These are, however, not as numerous as their battery electric counterparts.
Simple access to existing grid infrastructure has helped battery electric vehicles to gain popularity and lowered production costs. Although hydrogen is produced in most of the Nordic countries, there is very limited distribution infrastructure for customers in transport and construction.
Cleancon, ‘Clean construction machinery. Erfarenheter från test- och demoprojekt i WP5’, Cleancon, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://cleancon.no/
Perhaps the most important barrier to the deployment of hydrogen trucks is the lack of infrastructure.
Jan Carsten Gjerløw et al., ‘Deployment of hydrogen trucks and infrastructure in the Nordic’, Nordic Innovation, Oslo, 2022.
The production of hydrogen is typically centralised in large units, employing electrolysis or methane reforming. Hydrogen is usually transported using trucks, either pressurised or liquified. Vehicles receive the fuel at hydrogen refuelling stations (HRS).
“It is likely that increased hydrogen infrastructure deployment and, in addition, the potential availability of mobile HRSs will be a key success criterion for the first deployment stage of NRMM” – Next Nordic Green Transport Wave - Large Vehicles
Jari Ihonen et al., ‘Prospectus of using hydrogen in heavy-duty equipment, including non-road mobile machinery’, Nordic Innovation, Oslo, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://norden.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1636720/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Road transport requires hydrogen refuelling stations at strategically chosen locations in the transport system. Non-road machinery at construction sites needs fuel to be delivered to the site. This requires solutions where hydrogen is transported to the site and dispensed directly to machinery.
Solutions/successful examples:

4.6 Waste infrastructure

Although design and planning before the start of a construction project can significantly reduce waste from construction sites, it cannot be eliminated entirely. Proper organisation and suitable facilities are crucial for minimising damage to materials on site, although various barriers often hinder these efforts. As a result, construction projects still produce waste such as packaging, leftover materials, off-cuts, and used auxiliary materials.
“In fact, building material is as valuable today as it was in ancient times. We just don’t respect it as much, and we find it easier to replace it with newly sourced material, even though we are surrounded by possibilities.”
Malin Zimm and Pernille Martiny Modvig, ‘Material hierarchies – shifting towards sustainable practices and material in construction’, Nordic Innovation, Jun. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.nordicsustainableconstruction.com/knowledge/2024/august/material-hierarchies
A major source of waste on construction sites comes from materials being damaged before they are even used. Materials often arrive too early or too late. When they arrive too early, they may need to be stored on site for extended periods, often in unsuitable conditions, increasing the risk of damage from weather such as rain, snow, or humidity. Late arrivals disrupt workflow, resulting in rushed handling and increasing the chance of damage. Many construction sites lack adequate storage space for materials. Without designated areas, materials are often left in open spaces where they can be damaged by construction machinery or accidental collisions. In some cases, materials must be moved repeatedly to make room for ongoing work, further increasing the likelihood of damage. Late arrivals are often due to logistical and organisational barriers, including poor communication and co-ordination between suppliers, transporters, and site managers, which can lead to mismatched schedules and improper handling. The lack of simple and accessible digital tools to track materials, ease communications, and ensure the quality and safety of stored materials is a significant barrier.
Once waste is generated, managing it effectively presents additional challenges. Materials that do not end up used in construction should, if possible, be reused. If reuse is not possible, recycling into a high-value product is preferred. The sorting and recycling of construction waste on site pose several challenges, particularly in terms of infrastructure and logistics. Construction sites often lack space for all the containers needed to sort different types of waste. Containers are typically large to minimise the frequency of pickups, but this creates spatial challenges, especially at smaller or more crowded sites. Without adequate sorting options, materials that could be recycled or reused are often mixed with general waste. The size and design of current sorting containers limit their usability on compact sites. There is a need for technical innovations, such as compact sorting systems or modular containers, which take up less space without requiring more frequent collections. Furthermore, many sites lack digital tools to track materials and organise waste effectively, making it difficult to monitor reusable items and ensure proper sorting.
Earthworks pose another challenge, as they generate large amounts of reusable construction aggregates as well as soil that is unsuitable for construction.
S. Magnusson, M. Johansson, S. Frosth, and K. Lundberg, ‘Coordinating soil and rock material in urban construction – Scenario analysis of material flows and greenhouse gas emissions’, J. Clean. Prod., vol. 241, p. 118236, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118236.
E.-S. Säynäjoki, P. Korba, E. Kalliala, and A.-K. Nuotio, ‘GHG Emissions Reduction through Urban Planners’ Improved Control over Earthworks: A Case Study in Finland’, Sustainability, vol. 10, no. 8, p. 2859, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.3390/su10082859.
The conventional solution is to transport materials to landfills and quarries that are understandably located outside urban construction areas. Research has shown that planning and organising stocks of earth materials locally can reduce transportation and resulting emissions.