Why focus on healthcare and social care for older adults?
The proportion of older adults in the population is increasing rapidly in the Nordic region and the rest of the world. In Sweden, Statistics Sweden has predicted that the proportion of people aged 80 years and older will increase by 60 per cent between 2018 and 2030 (Statistiska Centralbyrån, 2025). The increase is also expected to continue in the future. Although life expectancy is increasing over time (Enroth et al., 2022), social disparities are also increasing, not least in terms of income (Nordregio, 2024). The proportion of people aged 80 years and older in the population is sometimes seen as an indicator of the need for healthcare and medical care, as the incidence of illness increases with age. More people will have multiple illnesses simultaneously (multimorbidity) and thus need good, local care, delivered in collaboration between healthcare and social care services. This pattern is evident throughout the Nordic region. The text in this essay is based on research on Sweden, but given the many similarities between the Nordic countries, it can hopefully contribute to learning for the entire region.
The COVID-19 pandemic exposed long-standing shortcomings in the healthcare and social care systems for older adults in need of complex care. According to the Swedish Coronavirus Commission (SOU 2020:80), the social care sector for older adults was unprepared and ill-equipped when the pandemic hit, despite the presence of structural shortcomings being known in advance, and the then government, as well as previous governments, should have taken action to address this. The shortcomings in the preparedness of social care for older adults were due to, among other things, fragmented organisation, a lack of staff, low competence, and unreasonable working conditions, an inadequate regulatory framework, obstacles for municipalities to employ doctors and gain access to medical equipment, and late and sometimes poor decision-making and ineffective measures. The Coronavirus Commission also sharply criticised the late and inadequate measures taken to prevent the spread of infection early in the pandemic, which increased the general spread of infection and thus also the risk of infection among older adults. Furthermore, the government should have been clearer in its leadership in terms of managing the crisis (SOU 2022:10).
This pandemic, which hit older adults particularly hard, is perhaps the clearest example of the need for resilience in healthcare and social care systems. In Sweden, as in the other Nordic countries, the majority of those who died between 2020 and 2022 were aged 70 years or older (Socialstyrelsen, 2024a). Most of them (72 per cent) lived in care homes for older adults (long-term accommodation, living in their own flat, staffed around the clock). The proportion of the population that died from COVID-19 was significantly higher in Sweden than in the other Nordic countries. However, our study on excess mortality paints a more complex picture. To calculate excess mortality, the number of deaths for a specific period is compared with a previous period. In Sweden, excess mortality was elevated in 2020. However, the results showed that excess mortality during 2020-2022 was comparable to Denmark and Norway, while Finland had twice the excess mortality of Sweden (Burström et al., 2024).
The fragmented organisation of social care for older adults cited by the Coronavirus Commission refers to the division of responsibilities. In Sweden, social care for older adults is a municipal responsibility, while medical and nursing care is a regional responsibility. Municipalities are also responsible for home help and can employ nurses for this purpose. Medical involvement requires an agreement with the region. The fact that older adults receiving home help and living in care homes were at highest risk of dying reflects the vulnerability of these individuals but also suggests that there is potential for the system to be improved at the strategic level (e.g. improved facilities), tactical level (staff) and operational level (e.g. cohort care and personal protective equipment). In turn, there may be significant potential for cross-organisational learning, both nationally and through the exchange of knowledge and information with other Nordic countries, which have similarly designed healthcare and social care systems albeit with slight variations (Szebehely, 2020). The Swedish COVID-19 Committee’s interim report clearly described the shortcomings of the Swedish healthcare and social care system for older adults and the measures that would be needed. More extensive and effective collaboration, as well as greater involvement of doctors in municipal healthcare and medical care, is needed, but no comprehensive measures have yet been taken. According to the final report from the inquiry God och nära vård (High-quality and local healthcare; SOU 2019:29), a greater proportion of care should be provided locally as primary care (general medical care through health centres), which is expected to cover the majority of care needs (Myndigheten för vård- och omsorgsanalys, 2025). Similar trends can be seen across the Nordic countries, which are all experiencing challenges in recruiting staff (Larsen et al., 2020). Healthcare and social care is a female-dominated sector, both among professional staff and those who provide care within the family. Particularly in social care, not least home help (care provided in the home), many women are underpaid compared to male-dominated sectors such as construction (Nordic Council of Ministers, 2019). There are also gender aspects with regard to care recipients within healthcare and social care for older adults: a large proportion of vulnerable older adults who receive healthcare and social care are women. Additionally, there are also socio-economic differences in health and in the need for healthcare and social care (Jämställdhetsmyndigheten, 2022).
With a rapidly ageing population and the experience of a widespread crisis that primarily affected older adults, there is reason to study the concept of resilience in relation to healthcare and social care for older adults. When discussing the concept of resilience in this text, we are referring to the need for the healthcare and social care system, rather than older individuals, to develop the resilience to cope with crises such as a pandemic. Furthermore, we see resilience as an ongoing process rather than a one-off phenomenon. Through restoring, maintaining and improving, the system can be developed to function in the long term and thus be sustainable (Helmen Borge, 2005). In terms of restoring, we are referring to a short-term process by which the system returns to normal after a crisis. In the meantime, its function must be maintained to allow for improvements to be made, for example, after a crisis. By asking questions and exploring them, we can gain insight into how resilience can be expressed and develop guidance on how healthcare and social care systems could be designed (Helmen Borge, 2005).
What is the current situation regarding healthcare and social care for older adults?
The Nordic countries have similar systems in terms of healthcare and social care for older adults, but there are some variations in the design and delivery of services (Vabø & Szebehely, 2012). Common to all is the demographic challenge of an increasing proportion of older adults and difficulties recruiting staff. The coverage rate, i.e. the proportion of older adults covered by comprehensive social care for older adults (those receiving home help or in care homes), is highest in Denmark, while Norway has the highest proportion of older adults in care homes and Sweden has the highest proportion of older adults receiving home help. Finland has the lowest overall coverage rate but also has a higher proportion of older adults receiving formal (paid) social care from family members or other close friends or relatives. Informal care is common in all Nordic countries (Myndigheten för vård- och omsorgsanalys, 2021).
The Nordic countries invest a large proportion of their GDP into social care for older adults. In 2018, the proportion was 2.4 per cent in Sweden, 2.3 per cent in Norway, 2.0 per cent in Denmark and 1.7 per cent in Finland (Myndigheten för vård- och omsorgsanalys, 2021). Previous reports have shown that Iceland has a lower expenditure than the other Nordic countries (0.5 per cent in 2012 compared to 2.3 per cent in Sweden in the same year; Nordic Social Statistical Committee, 2013). In all five countries, social care is provided by a mix of public and private providers. In Sweden, the proportion of profit-making providers is highest, while other countries have a larger proportion of non-profit providers. In Denmark and Norway, municipalities may be exempt from competition with for-profit operators and award contracts directly to non-profit organisations. There are shortcomings in the coordination of medical and nursing services in all Nordic countries, despite the slight organisational variances between the countries (Larsen et al., 2020). In Iceland, the state and municipalities collaborate on the provision of social care for older adults. In Finland and Norway, municipalities are responsible for both social care for older adults and primary care, which can facilitate collaboration. In Sweden, services are divided between municipalities and regions, which can complicate delivery of medical care and social care for older adults (Myndigheten för vård- och omsorgsanalys, 2021).
Despite the ongoing increase in the proportion and number of older adults among the Swedish population, the number of people in care homes decreased from 82,626 in 2017 to 77,173 in 2021 (Socialstyrelsen, 2023). However, the cost per person per year increased by approximately SEK 100,000 during the same period, to SEK 1,020,427. The total costs for municipalities for care homes, home help and home nursing care increased by 3.9 per cent between 2017 and 2021, mainly driven by increased costs for home help (9 per cent). However, care homes account for the largest share (57 per cent) of costs. In 2021, a total of 227,400 people aged 65 years and older received municipally funded home nursing care. Approximately half of these also received home help services. More than half of those who received home nursing care were aged 80 years and older, and 60 per cent also received home help services.
It has long been known that there are problems with understaffing and recruitment within primary care, not only in Sweden but in several Nordic countries (Nordic Council of Ministers, 2014). Similarly, in social care, there is a growing need and uncertainty with regard to future recruitment opportunities, which will be necessary to meet the growing needs of an ageing population. In Sweden, an additional 59,000 people will need to be employed in social care for older adults by 2031 to meet increased need. Factoring in retirement, the total recruitment need will be 110,000 people. Of the 191,000 people employed in social care for older adults in 2022, 45 per cent were nursing assistants and 24 per cent were care assistants. Among care assistants, 60 per cent had fixed-term contracts, while among nursing assistants the figure was 16 per cent. Almost half of both occupational categories worked part-time (Socialstyrelsen, 2023). It is therefore worrying that the number of nurses in social care for older adults is declining slightly, as is the proportion of specialist doctors in geriatrics. During the pandemic (2020), inspections were carried out at 98 care home facilities in Sweden, which found that one-fifth of residents had not received an individual medical assessment. A follow-up survey in 2022 showed that, compared to 2021, 60 per cent of municipalities reported that access to doctors was unchanged, while 16 per cent reported that access had declined; only 10 per cent reported that access to doctors had increased. Among municipalities that employed specialist nurses, 81 per cent reported shortages in the availability of such staff. The shortages were said to be due to competition from other employers and a lack of specialist nurses.
In Sweden, municipalities have different user fees for social care. Most municipalities charge the maximum fee for round-the-clock care (SEK 2,139/month), but there are large variations in costs of food and home help hours (SEK 70-488/hour). Most municipalities charge SEK 200-400 per hour. High costs in a municipality affect access to home help for low-income earners (Socialstyrelsen, 2023). National insurance contributions in the Nordic countries vary between 5 and 8 per cent across Sweden, Norway and Denmark, while contributions are about 17 per cent in Finland (Myndigheten för vård- och omsorgsanalys, 2021). In summary, it can be said that healthcare and social care for older adults are facing major challenges in all five countries, both due to the increasing proportion of older adults and difficulties recruiting staff.
Women sustain healthcare and social care for older adults
Women outnumber men in the health and social care employment sector. The most common occupation among women in Sweden in 2023 was nursing assistant, a profession in which 112,100 women and 15,900 men were employed (Kindblom & Westholm, 2025). Female-dominated professions are characterised, on average, by lower pay and poorer working conditions compared to male-dominated professions. The shortage of staff in social care for older adults is partly due to poorer employment conditions, working environment and pay.