MENU
This Nordic report represents part of the outcome of a project within the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Test Guidelines Programme (TGP). The project (4.97) was initiated by Sweden in 2015 (Helen Håkansson, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden) and coordinated by the Swedish Chemicals Agency under supervision of both a steering committee from the funding body (Nordic Co-ordination for the Development of Test Methods in Toxicology and Ecotoxicology, Nord-UTTE) and by the OECD Endocrine Disrupters Testing and Assessment Advisory Group (EDTA-AG).
The starting point of this project were ideas brought forward in the OECD Detailed Review Paper (DRP) 178 on endocrine disrupter testing[1]OECD (2012), Detailed Review Paper on the State of the Science on Novel In vitro and InVivo Screening and Testing Methods and Endpoints for Evaluating EndocrineDisrupters, OECD Series on Testing and Assessment, No. 178, OECD Publishing,Paris, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264221352-en, which addressed multiple aspects of the endocrine system, beyond estrogens, androgens, thyroid and steroidogenesis (EATS). The OECD DRP 178 suggests projects in several areas, and particularly mentions assays relevant to the retinoid system, such as retinoid X receptor (RXR) and retinoic acid receptor (RAR) reporter assays, aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) reporter assays, adipocyte differentiation, and retinoid serum levels. As identification of retinoid system modulation is not presently included in any OECD test guideline it is urgent to cover this knowledge gap.
The long-term aim of the present project, is to develop methods that facilitate early screening, to enhance existing in vivo test guidelines and to identify markers of biological effects for use in population studies, based on information from retinoid biology and disturbed retinoid signalling in several organ systems. The EU Commission funded the development of a draft-DRP[2]OECD (2017), “Detailed review paper on the retinoid system (draft)”, not published, OECD, Paris. on the retinoid system that covered e.g. overall biology of the retinoid system in human health and the environment. A section on retinoic acid and the reproductive system as well as a substantial annex on the retinoid system in male reproduction were also included. At that stage, it became apparent for all parties involved that the scope of the DRP was too broad, and that science was, in certain aspects, not mature enough for regulatory purposes. Consequently, the scope was narrowed down, and priority was given to reproduction, as female reproduction had been highlighted in the recommendations from the EU Commission prioritisation workshop 2017[3]Setting priorities for further development and validation of test methods and testing approaches for evaluating endocrine disruptors, in Brussels 2017 (Final Report European Commission Directorate-General for Environment Directorate B. (ISBN 978-92-79-83076-1), Available at https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/6b464845-4833-11e8-be1d-01aa75ed71a1/language-en. In addition, it was decided that the annex on male reproduction should be further developed. Broad support was also given to the decision of the lead country Sweden, to publish this TemaNord report as a first step in the Retinoid DRP process. This TemaNord report will be followed up in the upcoming DRP on retinoids, due to be published by the OECD in 2020–21.
In this report, the focus has been on mammalian organisms, with the majority of research data originating from studies in rodents. The report does not cover retinoid biology or retinoid disruption in non-mammalian organisms. In the present report, the term “reproduction” refers to the formation and development of the reproductive organs and their normal function. Teratogenic effects are only briefly covered in this report.
The report covers an overview of retinoid biology, the role of retinoids in the reproductive organs, the impact of chemicals on reproduction via the retinoid system, potential adverse outcome pathways, and an initial scoping effort for the possible role of chemical-induced retinoid disruption of the male and female reproductive systems.
The Nordic Working Group for Chemicals, Environment and Health (NKE) (in NKE Contracts 2016-023, 2017-003, 2018-026, 2019-003) and The Swedish Chemicals Agency, provided the main funding for this report. Furthermore, the European Commission (Framework Contract ENV.A.3/FRA/2014/0029) provided funding for the draft-DRP reported in 2017. The draft-DRP was authored by Alice Baynes and Edwin Routledge, Brunel University, London, and Sofie Christiansen and Ulla Hass, Technical University of Denmark. Parts of the draft-DRP have, with the permission of the European Commission, been incorporated in this report.
The main author of this TemaNord report is Dr. Charlotte Nilsson, RISE Research Institutes of Sweden. Dr. Miriam Jacobs (Public Health England) is the main author of the sections Heterodimerisation partners and cross-talk and Epigenetics and its role in the retinoid system. The in-kind contributions from scientific experts involved in writing and reviewing this document is gratefully acknowledged (see list of contributors).
This report is publicly available via the NKE website[4]https://www.norden.org/en/organisation/nordic-working-group-chemicals-environment-and-health-nke, and describes the status as of December 2019.
Alice Baynes and Edwin Routledge (Brunel University London); Sofie Christiansen and Ulla Hass (Technical University of Denmark; sub-contractors).
Miriam Jacobs (Public Health England); Alice Baynes (Brunel University, London); Pauliina Damdimopoulou and Astrud Tuck (CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden); Jodi Flaws (University of Illinois, USA); Sofie Christiansen and Terje Svingen (Technical University of Denmark). Nancy Baker and Tom Knudsen (United States Environmental Protection Agency); Josephine Bowles (The University of Queensland, Australia); Norbert Ghyselinck and Manuel Mark (Institute of Genetics and Molecular and Cellular Biology, France); Patience Browne and Anne Gourmelon (OECD Test Guidelines Programme, Environment Directorate, OECD); Stefano Lorenzetti and Alberto Mantovani (Instituto Superiore di Sanità, Italy); Helen Håkansson (Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden); Javier Esteban (Elche University, Spain); Elise Grignard and Sharon Munn (Joint Research Centre, DG Environment, European Commission); Peter Korytar (DG Environment, European Commission); Anne-Lee Gustafson and Margareta Halin Lejonklou (Swedish Chemicals Agency). Valuable comments have been received from the OECD Endocrine Disruptors Testing and Assessment Advisory Group, from the commenting round in the Working group for the National coordinators for the Test guidelines Programme, and from the OECD Retinoid Expert Group, as well as at the face-to-face retinoid expert group meeting at OECD in Paris in November 2019.
Nord-UTTE steering group, subgroup NKG (Nordic Chemicals Group) (later NKE) (2017-2019): Sjur Andersen (The Norwegian Environment Agency), Knud Ladegaard Pedersen, Henrik Tyle (until ultimo 2018) and Marie-Louise Holmer (until primo 2018) (The Danish Environmental Protection Agency); Sofie Christiansen (Technical University of Denmark); Matti Leppänen (The Finnish Environment Institute); Petteri Talasniemi (The Finnish Safety and Chemicals Agency); Anne-Lee Gustafson (The Swedish Chemicals Agency).
Retinoids are essential for vision, embryonic development, adult growth and development, as well as for reproduction in both males and females. In addition to being a nutrient-derived vitamin (vitamin A), retinoids are also considered as hormones, based on the hormonal-like signaling of retinoid-specific nuclear receptors which affect gene transcription. In general, all-trans retinoic acid (RA) is viewed as the physiologically active form. Tissue levels of RA are maintained via tightly regulated enzymatic synthesis and catabolism, and are also dependent on proper uptake, transport and storage of different form of RA precursors.
RA acts mainly by interacting with nuclear retinoid acid receptors, RARs, which forms heterodimers with retinoid X receptors, RXR. These heterodimers bind to specific DNA response elements. The RXR receptor type also heterodimerizes with other nuclear receptors (e.g. PPARs, VDR, CAR, PXR, LXR and FXR). Thus, extensive cross-talk between nuclear receptor pathways depend on RXR. RA has also been implicated in epigenetic regulation.
During embryonic formation of reproductive organs and sex differentiation of germ cells, RA is initially available from several possible enzymatic sources in or near the gonad. RA is believed to have an important role in meiosis initiation, however, this is currently a very active research field. Meiosis initiation occurs in utero in the female, and postnatally in males. Investigations in rodents have shown that temporal and spatial expression of specific enzymes, involved in RA metabolism, is critical for avoiding premature meiosis in males.
RA has been reported to be of importance for ovarian somatic cell development and function, as well as for the implantation of the fertilized embryo into the endometrium. In addition, altered retinoid signaling has been associated with endometriosis, as well as polycystic ovarian syndrome in women.
In the adult male, RA signaling is important for proper spermatogenesis. More specifically, correct RA levels must be maintained inside the seminiferous tubule for proper spermatogonia differentiation, meiosis initiation and release of spermatozoa. In addition, RA has been suggested to play a role in the formation and maintenance of secondary male reproductive organs (seminal vesicles, epididymis, prostate). However, many of these processes depend also on other endocrine pathways, and extensive cross-talk between these pathways exist. Consequently, for many of the processes described above, more research is needed to elucidate the exact role of RA signaling, the mechanisms controlling spatial and temporal availability of RA in reproductive tissues, and the influence of RXR-cross-talk in retinoid homeostasis.
Some chemicals have been demonstrated to interfere with the retinoid pathway. Chemicals, for which there are at least some data, include pharmaceutical compounds, conazole fungicides and organotins. However, there is a lack of studies investigating effects of chemicals, except a few pharmaceutical compounds, on reproduction, while simultaneously examining effects on retinoid related parameters in reproductive organs. This is a major data gap.
Four different visualizations of possible adverse outcome pathways, using available research, between effects on retinoid homeostasis and reproductive adversity, in males or females, is presented in this report. These visualization pathways can be used as starting points for future AOP development of retinoid disruption.
The initial scoping effort presented in this report identified that the RA-catabolizing CYP26 enzymes and the RA-synthesizing RALDH enzymes could be integrated at (CF) Level 1 and 2 in the OECD Conceptual Framework[1]OECD (2018), “Revised Guidance Document 150 on Standardised Test Guidelines for Evaluating Chemicals for Endocrine Disruption”, OECD Series on Testing and Assessment, No. 150, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304741-en. This could be possible with development of in silico methods, such as QSARs or molecular docking models for these enzymes, and/or in vitro assays. In the current in vivo test guidelines (CF level 3-5), already implemented histopathological analyses covers important reproduction-related parameters. However, as discussed in the present report, the regulation of reproduction involves many other endocrine modalities, and the interpretation of the observed effects is further impeded by extensive cross-talk between nuclear receptors. Consequently, no endpoints specifically relevant for retinoid disruption that could be added to the existing OECD test guidelines have been identified in this report.
In addition, no suitable reference chemicals, except for a few pharmaceutical compounds, known to affect fertility specifically via the retinoid pathway have been identified. Such chemicals will be needed in a future validation step.
In spite of these challenges, selected in vitro and/or in silico retinoid-related endpoints, presented in this report, could be part of a broader screening test battery aimed at developmental and reproductive toxicity. For in vivo studies, histopathological readouts of for example ovaries and testes, already included in the OECD test guidelines, can provide information to support regulatory decision-making, without depending on knowledge of exactly which pathway(s) that have been disturbed.
Retinoider är viktiga för synen, embryonal utveckling, tillväxt och utveckling hos barn och unga, liksom för till exempel reproduktion hos både män och kvinnor. I allmänhet anses all-trans retinsyra (RA) som den fysiologiskt aktiva formen. Retinoider kallas i vardagligt tal för vitamin A, och betraktas också vara ett hormon. Vävnadsnivåer av RA upprätthålls via en noggrant reglerad balans mellan enzymatisk bildning och nedbrytning, och är också beroende av korrekt reglerat upptag, transport och lagring av olika former av retinoider (RA-prekursorer).
RA utövar huvudsakligen sina effekter genom att binda till retinalsyrareceptorer, RARs, som bildar heterodimerer med retinoid X receptorer. Dessa heterodimerer binder till specifika gensekvenser (DNA-responselement). RXR-receptorerna heterodimeriserar också med andra nukleära receptorer (t.ex. PPAR, VDR, CAR, PXR, LXR och FXR). Alla dessa receptorer är inblandade i kärnreceptorsignalering, och således kan retinoidsignalering också påverkas av, och påverka, signalering via dessa andra kärnreceptorer. Detta kallas för cross-talk. RA har också visats vara inblandat i epigenetisk reglering.
Under utvecklingen av reproduktionsorganen, och den könsdifferentiering av könsceller som sker samtidigt, finns RA initialt tillgängligt från flera olika källor i, eller i närheten av, gonaden. RA anses vara viktigt vid initiering av meiosen, dock, är detta ett mycket aktivt forskningsfält. Meiosinitiering sker under fosterutvecklingen hos kvinnor och efter födseln hos män. Studier på gnagare har visat att reglering av det temporala och rumsliga uttrycket av specifika enzymer, involverade i RA-metabolism, är avgörande för att meiosen ska initieras embryonalt hos honor, men också för att förhindra för tidig meios hos hannar.
RA har även rapporterats vara av betydelse för somatisk (det vill säga, ej könsceller) cellutveckling i reproduktionsorganen, för äggstockarnas funktion, och för implantering av embryot i livmoderslemhinnan (endometriet). Hos kvinnor, har dessutom förändrad retinoidsignalering associerats med endometrios, liksom med polycystiskt ovariesyndrom.
Hos den vuxne individen är RA-signalering viktig för korrekt spermiebildning. Mer specifikt måste korrekta RA-nivåer upprätthållas inuti de sädesförande kanalerna (seminiferous tubules) för korrekt spermatogonie-differentiering, meios-initiering och frisättning av spermier (spermatozoer). Dessutom har RA föreslagits vara viktigt för de sekundära manliga reproduktionsorganens utveckling och funktion (sädesblåsan, bitestiklarna, prostata). Många av dessa processer styrs också av andra endokrina system, och mellan dessa system finns det omfattande samreglering. Mer kunskap behövs om många av de ovan beskrivna processerna, för att förstå vilken betydelse RA-signalering har för reproduktionen i förhållande till andra endokrina signalvägar, och på vilket sätt cross-talk mellan olika kärnreceptorer påverkar RA-signalering.
Några få kemikalier har visats störa retinoidsignalering. Kemikalier, för vilka det finns åtminstone vissa data, inkluderar farmaceutiska retinoider, konazol-fungicider och organiska tennföreningar. Dock saknas studier som undersökt en specifik kemikalies effekter, förutom några läkemedel, på honlig och/eller hanlig fortplantning, samtidigt som man för samma kemikalie undersökt effekten på retinoidsystemets reglering i reproduktionsorganen. Avsaknad av sådan information är en stor kunskapslucka, som behöver fyllas.
I denna rapport presenteras fyra olika visualiseringar av möjliga ogynnsamma utfallsvägar (possible adverse outcome pathways; AOPs), som beskriver möjliga samband mellan effekter på retinoidbalansen i fortplantningsorganen, och påverkan på fortplantningen. Vår förhoppning är att dessa visualiseringar kan användas som utgångspunkt vid framtida arbete med att utveckla och förfina dessa AOP-utkast.
Det inledande arbetet med inhämtning av kunskap för identifiering av möjliga metoder (initial scoping effort) som presenteras i denna rapport identifierar att de RA-nedbrytande CYP26-enzymerna och de RA-syntetiserande RALDH-enzymerna skulle kunna integreras på nivå 1 i OECDs konceptuella ramverk (CF nivå 1 och 2). Detta kan vara möjligt med hjälp av utveckling av in silico-metoder, såsom (Q)SAR (kvantitativa struktur-aktivitetssamband) eller molekylära dockningsmodeller, och/eller in vitro-metoder, för dessa enzymer. I de nuvarande riktlinjerna för in vivo-testmetoder (CF nivå 3-5), omfattas viktiga reproduktionsrelaterade parametrar, identifierade som känsliga för störningar av retinoidbalansen, redan nu av befintliga histopatologiska undersökningar. Som diskuteras i denna rapport regleras dock reproduktionen av många andra endokrina signaleringsvägar, och tolkningen av observerade effektsamband försvåras dessutom av omfattande cross-talk mellan nukleära receptorer. Följaktligen har inga utvärderingsmått identifierats i denna rapport som är specifikt relevanta för retinoidstörning, och som kan läggas till OECDs befintliga testriktlinjer för in vivo-studier.
Inga lämpliga referenskemikalier, med undantag för ett fåtal läkemedelssubstanser, kända för att påverka fertiliteten enbart via påverkan på retinoidsignalering, har identifierats i denna rapport. För framtida validering av retinoidspecifika metoder, kommer sådana kemikalier att behövas.
Trots dessa utmaningar kan utvalda in vitro- och in silico-metoder utgöra en del av ett bredare screeningtestbatteri som syftar till identifiering av substanser som potentiellt, via retinoidsignalering, kan påverka reproduktionen. För regulatoriskt beslutsfattande kan till exempel histopatologiska undersökningar av äggstockar och testiklar i in vivo-studier, som redan beskrivs i OECDs testmetoder, ge tillräcklig information, även utan vetskap om exakt vilken endokrin signaleringsväg som har påverkats.
ADH | Alcohol dehydrogenase |
AhR | Aryl hydrocarbon receptor |
ALDH | Aldehyde dehydrogenase |
AMH | Anti-müllerian hormone |
AO | Adverse outcome |
AOP | Adverse outcome pathway |
ARAT | Acyl CoA:retinol acyltransferase |
BMP | Bone morphogenic protein |
BTB | Blood-testis barrier |
CAR | Constitutive androstane receptor |
CF | Conceptual framework |
CRABP | Cellular retinoic acid-binding protein |
CRBP | Cellular retinol-binding protein |
CYP | Cytochrome P450 hydroxylase |
CYP17 | 17,20-lyase, 17α-hydroxylase |
Cyp2b10 | Cytochrome P450, Family 2, subfamily b, polypeptide 10 |
CYP26 | Cytochrome P450, Family 26 |
Dazl | Deleted in azoospermia-like |
DEHP | Diethyl hexyl phthalate |
DHRS3 | Retinaldehyde reductase 3 |
DMRT1 | Doublesex and mab-3 related transcription factor 1 |
dpc | Days post coitum |
DRP | Detailed Review Paper |
Foxl2 | Forkhead box protein L2 |
FSH | Follicle stimulating hormone |
FXR | Farnesoid X receptor |
GR | Glucocorticoid receptor |
GW | Gestational week |
HSD | Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase |
KE | Key event |
LH | Luteinizing hormone |
LRAT | Lecithin:retinol acyltransferase |
LXR | Liver X receptor |
MEHP | Monoethyl hexyl phthalate |
MIE | Molecular initiating event |
MMP | Matrix metalloproteinases |
Nanos2 | Nanos C2HC-Type Zinc Finger 2 |
NOAEL | No observed adverse effect level |
OECD | Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development |
PCOS | Polycystic ovarian syndrome |
PGC | Primordial germ cells |
PND | Post-natal day |
PPAR | Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor |
PXR | Pregnane X receptor |
(Q)SAR | (Quantitative) structure-activity relationship |
RA | All-trans retinoic acid |
RALDH | Retinaldehyde dehydrogenase |
RAMBA | RA metabolism blocking agents |
RAR | Retinoic acid receptor |
RARE | Retinoic acid response element |
RBP4 | Retinol-binding protein 4 |
RDH10 | Retinol dehydrogenase 10 |
RDH11 | Retinol dehydrogenase 11 |
RE | Retinyl esters |
Rec8 | Meiotic recombination component gene Rec8 |
REH | Retinyl ester hydrolase |
RIP140 | Nuclear receptor interacting protein 1 |
ROH | Retinol |
RXR | Retinoid X receptor |
P450scc | Cytochrome P450 cholesterol side-chain cleavage enzyme |
SDR | Short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase |
Sox9 | SRY -Box Transcription Factor 9 |
SRC-1; Ncoa1 | Nuclear receptor coactivator 1 |
SREBP-1c | Sterol regulatory element binding protein-1c |
Sry | Sex-determining region Y protein |
Stra6 | Stimulated by retinoic acid, gene 6 |
Stra8 | Stimulated by retinoic acid, gene 8 |
TG | Test guideline |
TTR | Transthyretin |
VAD | Vitamin A deficiency |
VDR | Vitamin D receptor |
Wnt4 | Wnt Family Member 4 |
Retinoids[1]The term “retinoids” originally had a structural basis, referring to isoprene-derived compounds (IUPAC 1982), but currently the term refers to compounds (natural or synthetic) capable of activating a set of receptors (Sporn and Roberts 1985)., a chemically related group of compounds which includes vitamin A, can exist in several different forms (see Figure 1). As the name “vitamin” implies, they are essential micronutrients that must be supplied from the diet, either in the form of carotenoids (orange, red and yellow fat-soluble pigments) from vegetable sources, or retinol (ROH) and retinyl esters (RE) from animal sources (reviewed by Harrison 2012, Al Tanoury et al. 2013). Retinoids from animal sources are originally derived from carotenoids (reviewed in O’Byrne and Blaner 2013). The liver, an organ found in all vertebrate organisms, can be a rich source of retinoids and may have been used by the ancient Egyptians as a cure for night blindness, a typical symptom of retinoid deficiency (Wolf 1996). Conversely, Arctic cultures have long known to avoid eating polar bear liver, which can contain extremely high levels of retinoids, in order to avoid adverse effects such as blurred vision, nausea, skin loss, coma and even death (Rodahl and Moore 1943). Thus, both hypovitaminosis A and hypervitaminosis A can be detrimental.
In addition to being a nutrient-derived vitamin, retinoids can also be considered as hormones, based on their nuclear receptor signaling (Giguère et al. 1987, Petkovich et al. 1987). In contrast to classical hormones, there is no endocrine gland that synthesizes retinoids, controlled via feedback by the hypothalamus and pituitary gland. Instead, the levels of the active form of vitamin A (all-trans retinoic acid; RA) are tightly regulated via local cellular enzymatic mechanisms; a regulation that is critical for correct signaling via the nuclear receptors (reviewed in Ghyselinck and Duester 2019).
The requirement for retinoids in normal physiological functions has been studied for more than a century, by examining the effects of retinoid deficiency or excess in different species, and, more recently, in genetically modified mice (reviewed in Clagett-Dame and Knutson 2011). The importance of retinoids and the retinoid signaling pathways is reflected in both the ancestry and the conservation of genes and pathways among both vertebrates and invertebrates (André et al. 2014).
Retinoids are essential for vision, reproduction, embryo-fetal development, adult growth and development, and maintenance of immunity and epithelial barriers (reviewed in O’Byrne and Blaner 2013). Most diets contain sufficient amounts of retinoids, and the most fat-soluble forms, retinyl esters, can be stored within the body at relatively high levels, thereby counteracting periods of low dietary retinoid intake (reviewed in O’Byrne and Blaner 2013). In spite of this, vitamin A deficiency (VAD) is common in some parts of the world (WHO 2009), and VAD is the main cause of preventable blindness in the world (West 2003, Bastos Maia et al. 2019). It has also been hypothesized that one reason for hearing loss among humans in the developing world is gestational VAD (Emmett and West 2014). In addition, new metabolic functions for retinoids have been reported, in e.g. lipid metabolism and insulin response (reviewed in Napoli 2017, Cione et al. 2016).
For several decades, retinoids have been used for pharmaceutical purposes (reviewed in Theodosiou et al. 2010). For example, retinoids can be prescribed for treatment of cystic acne, where they have favorable effects on epithelial cell differentiation. In acute promyelocytic leukemia, retinoids can induce terminal differentiation in cancerous cells, and thereby proliferation ceases.
Figure 1: Chemical structures of various forms of naturally occurring retinoids and retinoid precursors. R (in the retinyl ester) represents an acyl chain of variable length (reviewed in Goodman 1984
The vast majority, approximately 80–85%, of retinoids in the body are stored in the liver (reviewed in O’Byrne and Blaner 2013). Two main cell types, hepatocytes and hepatic stellate cells, have been identified as being central to metabolism and storage of retinoids. Hepatocytes contain 10–20% of hepatic retinoids, and they are also involved in the initial uptake of retinoids into the liver (Blomhoff et al. 1982). Hepatocytes are also the site of synthesis and secretion of the serum transport protein of ROH; retinol-binding protein type 4 (RBP4; Sauvant et al. 2001). Thus, hepatocytes are important both in the uptake and the mobilization of vitamin A into, and out of, the liver. Hepatic stellate cells have been found to contain 80–90% of hepatic retinoids (reviewed in Blaner and Li 2015). Studies in mice using radiolabeled RE have shown dietary retinoids to be initially taken up by the hepatocytes and then rapidly transferred to hepatic stellate cells for storage (Blomhoff et al. 1982). Smaller RE stores are also found in a number of other organs or tissues, including the lung, brain, skin, muscle, kidney, spleen, white and brown adipose tissue, and testis (reviewed in Blaner and Li 2015).
Another retinoid storage organ is the eye (reviewed in Palczewski 2012). Retinaldehyde has long been known to play a vital role in vision and eye function. The retina and retinal pigmented epithelium contain 11-cis and all-trans-isomers of retinaldehyde, but also ROH and RE. The retinal pigmented epithelium is the main ocular site of RE storage, while the photoreceptors of the retina contain large amounts of retinaldehyde (reviewed in Palczewski 2012).
Figure 2: Overview of retinoid uptake, transport, metabolism, and nuclear signaling (as described in detail in the note below)
Note:
In the intestinal lumen, RE are hydrolyzed into ROH, which after uptake into enterocytes is re-esterified to RE. RE together with carotenoids are incorporated into chylomicrons and exported to the circulation. Eventually, the chylomicron remnants are taken up by the liver. Here, RE are again hydrolysed into ROH. ROH is either re-esterified for hepatic storage or bound to RBP4 for release into the circulation. In the bloodstream, the ROH-RBP4 complex associates with transthyretin (TTR). After uptake (possibly aided by STRA6) into target cells, ROH is reversibly oxidized to retinaldehyde by RDH10. Retinaldehyde may then be irreversibly oxidized to RA by retinal dehydrogenases (RALDHs), or be reduced back to ROH by DHRS3. RA is degraded to non-active polar metabolites by CYP26 enzymes, but can also be shuttled to the nucleus by cellular RA-binding proteins (CRABP), where RA acts as a ligand to nuclear receptors (NR). Non-liganded receptors interact with co-repressors (CoR), repressing transcription, while RA liganded receptors- binds co-activators (CoA), subsequently activating transcription, thereby modulating expression of Retinoic Acid Response Element (RARE)-regulated target genes. Additional abbreviations: ARAT, acyl CoA:retinol acyltransferase); CRBP, cellular retinol-biding protein; CYP26; cytochrome P450 hyroxylase type 26; DHRS3, retinaldehyde reductase 3; LRAT, lecithin:retinol acyltransferase; RA, retinoic acid; RE, retinyl esters; REH, retinyl ester hydrolase; RBP, retinol-binding protein 4; ROH, retinol; SDR, short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase; Stra6, stimulated by retinoic acid, gene 6; RDH10, retinol dehydrogenase 10.
A number of enzymes are required for the balance of storing and re-mobilizing of retinoids during times of abundance and insufficiency, respectively (see Figure 2). The most important enzymes are those synthesizing RE (the physiologically important enzyme is LRAT; lecithin:retinol acyltransferase) and hydrolyzing RE to ROH (REH; retinyl ester hydrolase). These enzymes, along with accumulation of RE in lipid droplets (chylomicrons) within cells and tissues, manage the natural fluctuations in dietary retinoid intake (O’Byrne and Blaner 2013). The process of remobilization of stored RE into circulating ROH seems reliant on interactions with RBP4, based on observations in RBP4-deficient mice (Quadro et al. 1999).
Intestinal uptake of retinoids in the diet (reviewed in Harrison 2012) involves hydrolysis of RE (by REH) into ROH in the intestinal lumen, followed by re-esterification of ROH into RE after absorption of ROH into the enterocytes. In addition to LRAT, the enzyme acyl CoA:retinol acyltransferase (ARAT) can play an important role when the levels of ROH exceed normal physiological levels (as after a meal rich in retinoids). The resulting RE, together with carotenoids, are released into the circulation as part of chylomicron particles.
In the circulation, a range of retinoid forms are found in fasting and/or non-fasting states. ROH bound to RBP4 and chylomicron-RE are considered the most important transport forms. Circulating RE levels are highly dependent on the dietary content of RE and carotenoids. During fasting, ROH is the main circulating form of retinoids. Serum ROH levels are maintained within a narrow range, unless the RE levels in liver and other tissues are very low (Green and Green 1994, and reviewed in Tanumihardjo et al. 2016).
Both circulating and intracellular ROH is generally bound to chaperone proteins. Of these, RBP4 transports ROH in the blood, and cellular retinol-binding protein types 1 and 2 (CRBP1, CRBP2) and inter-photoreceptor retinoid-binding protein are believed to manage intracellular transport (reviewed in Blaner and Li 2015). In contrast, there is no specific binding protein for the transport of RA in the plasma, as it is synthesized locally in target cells. Intracellular retinoic acid-binding proteins (CRABPs) are involved in RA transport from the cytoplasm to the nuclear retinoic acid receptors (RAR), and also play a role in determining intracellular RA levels by controlling the amount of RA that is available for degradation (reviewed in Napoli 2012, and in Napoli 2017).
Retinoids are delivered to tissues in a similar manner as vitamin D and thyroid hormone (reviewed in Blaner and Li 2015), i.e., by transport of large quantities of the biologically-inactive form (in this case ROH), and relatively low quantities of the biologically-active form (RA) in the blood (reviewed in Blaner and Li 2015). ROH, bound to RBP4, forms a larger complex with the T4 transporting protein transthyretin (TTR) in the blood (See Figure 2). Both TTR and RBP4 are mainly synthesized in the liver and choroid plexus, secreted into plasma by the liver, and into cerebrospinal fluid by the choroid plexus, respectively (Shirakami et al. 2012).
Transport of ROH (bound to RBP4) across membranes may be facilitated in both directions by the membrane protein, Stimulated by retinoic acid, gene 6 (STRA6) (reviewed in Kelly and von Lintig 2015). ROH uptake by STRA6 seems to be enhanced by the presence of LRAT and CRPB1 on the intracellular side of the membrane, in a manner that appears to depend on the availability of ROH inside the cell. Alternatively, with the exception of the eye, the role of STRA6, even under VAD conditions, may not be mandatory for ROH availability to tissues (Berry et al. 2013).
The most abundant forms of retinoids in the body are ROH and RE. A number of conversion steps are required to transform relatively inactive forms of retinoids into the biologically active RA form within target cells (reviewed in Shannon et al. 2017). Once ROH-RBP4 has been bound to STRA6 and taken up into a target cell, ROH is converted to RA via a two-step oxidation process (See Figure 2). ROH is first converted into retinaldehyde; this conversion is carried out by a short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase (SDR; a complex consisting of retinol dehydrogenase 10 [RDH10], and retinaldehyde reductase 3 [DHRS3]), and possibly also by the less specific cytosolic alcohol dehydrogenases (ADH) (reviewed in Shannon et al. 2017). The predominant fraction of intracellular ROH is bound to CRBP and directed towards SDR (reviewed in Napoli 2017). The formed retinaldehyde can subsequently either be reduced back to ROH by SDR, or, under VAD conditions, by retinol dehydrogenase 11 (RDH11) (Belyaeva et al. 2018). In a second RA-conversion step retinaldehyde can be irreversibly oxidized into RA by retinaldehyde dehydrogenases RALDH 1, 2 or 3 (also known as aldehyde dehydrogenases ALDH1A1-3, reviewed in Shannon et al. 2017). The ratio of holo-CRBP to apo-CRBP[1]Ratio: holo-CRBP (CRBP-ROH/retinaldehyde) to apo-CRBP (CRBP without ROH/retinaldehyde). appears to signal whether retinaldehyde should be reduced back to ROH or further oxidized to RA (reviewed in Napoli 2017). The fate of the retinaldehyde also depends on a negative feedback response to available RA (reviewed in Shannon et al. 2017).)
RA has a short half-life (approximately one hour), and RA tissue levels are governed in a spatially and temporally controlled manner, mainly by a balance of local synthesis and metabolic breakdown with RA feedback loops (reviewed in Kedishvili 2013, and Teletin et al. 2017). Some tissue-specific uptake of RA from serum appears to take place, via a still unestablished mechanism (Kurlandsky et al. 1995). RA is catabolized mainly by cytochrome P450 hydroxylases (CYP) 26A1, B1 and C1 (Topletz et al. 2015). A large number of other CYP enzymes have also been shown to degrade RA in vitro, although the relevance of these enzymes in normal retinoid homeostasis in vivo is unclear (reviewed in Laudet et al. 2015). In the adult human, CYP26A1 is mainly expressed in the liver, and is responsible for more than 90% of the hepatic clearance of RA (Thatcher et al. 2010). CYP26A1 is also expressed in e.g. testis, epididymis, uterus, endometrium and placenta, while CYP26B1-expression is more dispersed and found e.g. in the brain, testes, placenta, ovaries and endometrium (Human Protein Atlas[2]https://www.proteinatlas.org/ (accessed in May 2019).). In the human fetus, CYP26A1 is the form predominantly expressed in the brain, whereas CYP26B1 is expressed in all tissues except the brain (reviewed in Kedishvili 2013). At least in humans, CYP26C1 is mainly expressed during embryonic development, but is also expressed at low levels in adult tissues, e.g. in testis (reviewed in Ross and Zolfaghari 2011).
The physiological role of RA in cell differentiation has motivated its use in cancer treatment, including reproductive organ malignancies (Siddikuzzaman et al. 2011). The treatment increases the normal serum nM (nanomolar) levels of RA up to μM (micromolar) levels, which over time leads to autoinduction of RA clearance via upregulation of CYP26 enzymes (Jing et al. 2017). Attempts have been made to counteract therapy resistance by developing e.g. CYP26 inhibitors (Nelson et al. 2013). However, side effects and low potency has limited the use of these inhibitors (Jing et al. 2017). Similar efforts to maintain RA homeostasis has also been observed in models of teratogenicity, and it has been speculated that some of the teratogenic effects of RA may be due to a prolonged local RA deficiency, caused by differential induction of genes coding for enzymes synthesizing (Raldh1-3) or breaking down (Cyp26a1 and Cyp26b1) RA (Lee et al. 2012).
RA acts mainly by interacting with nuclear retinoic acid receptors, RARs, which form heterodimers with retinoid X receptors (RXRs) and ultimately regulate gene transcription, thereby influencing a variety of cellular processes (reviewed in Germain et al. 2006). The receptor dimers bind to retinoic acid response elements (RARE), and, in the absence of ligand, recruit a co-repressor complex that suppress transcription (Vilhais-Neto and Pourquié 2008). In the presence of ligand, the co-repressor complex dissociates and is replaced by a co-activator complex, leading to transcription of the target gene (Germain et al. 2002). While RAR can be activated both by RA and 9-cis-RA as well as synthetic ligands, RA is considered to be the only endogenous RAR ligand (Allenby et al. 1993, Mouchon et al. 1999). RARs in an unliganded state are also known to act as transcriptional repressors (reviewed in Weston et al. 2003). The endogenous ligand for RXR was initially suggested to be 9-cis-RA, and other forms such as 9-cis-13,14-dihydro-RA have been put forth more recently (de Lera et al. 2016). However, the physiological relevance of the suggested ligands is still unclear (reviewed in Krężel et al. 2019). Non-enzymatic isomerization between different forms is likely to be important (reviewed in Blaner 2001), which impedes conclusions regarding endogenous ligands. In RAR-RXR heterodimers, RXR is a “silent partner”, meaning that the RAR ligand is both necessary and sufficient for dissociating the corepressor complex (Mangelsdorf and Evans 1995, le Maire et al. 2019).
RARs and RXRs belong to the same nuclear hormone receptor family as steroid hormones, thyroid hormone and vitamin D receptors, as well as various orphan receptors and receptors activated by intermediary metabolites (e.g. PPAR; peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor, LXR; liver X receptor, FXR; farnesoid X receptor and PXR; pregnane X receptor) (Szanto et al. 2004). RXR is also the essential heterodimerization partner to these receptors. Some of these nuclear receptors may also be involved in retinoid signaling responses. For example, PPARα, β/δ and γ heterodimerize with RXR and function as transcription factors (Mangelsdorf et al. 1995; see also section on cross-talk below). RA has been reported to serve as a ligand for PPAR β/δ, but with a much lower affinity than for RAR (Al Tanoury et al. 2013).
Three of the retinoid receptors (RARα, RXRα and RXRβ) have widespread expression patterns, whereas RARβ, RARγ and RXRγ show a more restricted, tissue-specific expression. Therefore, most tissues are potential targets of retinoid signalling, although different heterodimeric complexes can transduce the RA signal (reviewed in Rhinn and Dollé 2012). Many tissues will also be indirect targets via RXR heterodimerization with receptors (see Figure 3). Receptors mediate and interpret the information provided in the chemical structure and energy of a nuclear receptor ligand, in the context of the cell and its physiology, converting it into a sequence of receptor-protein and receptor DNA interactions. This can be via ligand binding, receptor phosphorylation, induction of allosteric changes in receptor docking surfaces including subunits of transcription, epigenetic machinery and enzyme induction. The next section explores these latter molecular aspects of retinoid mechanisms related to receptor cross-talk.
In addition to the classical genomic effects, RA has been found to have a number of non-genomic mechanisms such as kinase activation (reviewed in Rochette-Egly 2015, Park et al. 2019). More specifically, these effects may include activation by RA of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase(PI3K)/Akt signalling during neural differentiation, rapid activation of p38 mitogen activated protein kinase (p38MAPK)/mitogen and stress-activated kinase 1 (MSK) pathways (reviewed in Laudet et al. 2015). Such effects are not further discussed in this report.
Members of the same nuclear receptor family share a common heterodimerisation partner, RXR. There is cross talk with other nuclear receptors and with a broad range of intracellular signaling pathways. Consequently, there may be competition for RXR for the dimerization stage of receptor activation of DNA. There may even be a cascade effect, in which metabolites produced through the activities of one receptor act as specific signaling molecules and ligands to modulate the next receptor, a link in the nuclear receptor intercommunication web of the body (See Figure 3).
Figure 3: Schematic diagram showing differences in tissue distribution of nuclear receptors
Note:
RXR; retinoid X receptor, is the heterodimerisation partner essential to the normal functioning of the main xenobiotic metabolizing receptors including CAR, PXR, PPARs, LXR, FXR. Furthermore, cross-talk with ERα and ERβ is established. In addition, RXR is also the heterodimerization partner for VDR and the thyroid stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR) (not included in the Figure). Abbreviations: AhR; Aryl hydrocarbon receptor, AR; androgen receptor, CAR; constitutitive androstane receptor, ERα and ERβ; estrogen receptors α and β, FXR; farnesoid X receptor, GR; glucocorticoid receptor, LXR; liver X receptor, PPARs; peroxisome proliferator activated receptors, PXR; pregnane X receptor, VDR; vitamin D receptor. (Jacobs 2005, reprinted with kind permission from the publisher: Taylor and Francis Inc.)
The ubiquitous RXRα is the necessary heterodimerization partner for many receptors, and is essential for xenobiotic metabolism in vivo. The receptors include the thyroid receptor, PXR, CAR, where retinoic acid has also been noted to repress CAR induction of the Cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily b, polypeptide 10 (Cyp2b10) gene in mouse hepatocytes (Kakizaki et al. 2002), as well as LXR, FXR, GR, PPARα (Cai et al. 2002) and PPAR gamma (Dubuquoy et al. 2002) to bind to DNA. Crystal structure data of the PPARγ and RXRα heterodimer shows the asymmetric conservation heterodimerization interfaces between both receptors (Gampe et al. 2000). RXRα dimerizes through a 40-amino acid subregion within the ligand binding domain, known as the ‘identity box’. Mutation of two important determinants (alanine 416 and arginine 421) within this box has been shown to impair the actions of receptor dimerization partners. RXRα is well established as a heterodimeric integrator of multiple physiological processes in the liver, and is a regulatory component of cholesterol, fatty acid, bile acid steroid and xenobiotic metabolism and homeostasis.
The retinoid ligands of RXR have distinct effects in different contexts and have been reported to significantly alter the response of the CAR-RXR heterodimer to CAR ligands (Tzameli et al. 2003) for example. Suppression of RXRα has a concomitant effect upon the heterodimerization partner. For example LXR is reported in this way to inhibit PPARα signaling in the nutritional regulation of fatty acid metabolism. PPARα has a counter-inhibitory action repressing LXR/RXR binding through the sterol regulatory element binding protein-1c (SREBP-1c) (Ide et al. 2003, Yoshikawa et al. 2003).
RXRα also has cofactors in common with other nuclear receptors, for instance, over 20 years ago Wiebel and co-authors described a competitive element between nuclear receptor interacting protein 1 (RIP140) and nuclear receptor coactivator 1 (SRC-1; Ncoa1) in binding with OR-1 with RXR to heterodimers of a novel orphan receptor (Wiebel et al. 1999). RIP140 is also implicated in the potentiation of endocrine disrupting compounds in vitro (Sheeler et al. 2000). SRC-1 RXR phosphorylation can also be induced through stress pathway activation (Lee et al. 2000), which would reduce RXR availability for other receptor heterodimerization partners. Hua and co-authors have demonstrated competition between RAR/RXR heterodimers and ERα for binding sites in a breast cancer MCF-7 cell line. Indeed, the experimental work suggested that there may be antagonistic transcriptional regulation for up to 71% of the target genes that they evaluated (Hua et al. 2009).
As with many nuclear receptors, ERα- and RAR-binding sites appear to have co-evolved on a large scale throughout the human genome, often resulting in competitive binding activity at nearby or overlapping cis-regulatory elements. The intersection between these two critical nuclear hormone receptor signaling pathways is highly coordinated to give a unifying mechanism for balancing gene expression output via local regulatory interactions dispersed throughout the genome. This selection or competition of dimerization partners determines tissue/organ and biological system level outcomes. It can be affected by genetic, nutritional, and environmental factors, which for the latter can include both beneficial and adverse nutrient and chemical exposure.
An example for the RXR-PXR downstream activation of CYP3A4 is given in Figure 4.
Figure 4: Illustration of chemical-nuclear receptor-, and epigenetic, transcription factor regulation
Abbreviations:
PXRre; pregnane X receptor response element, RNA poly II; RNA polymerase II, TFs; transcription factors. (Adapted from Jacobs et al. 2005.)
Not only are the heterodimerization receptor cross-talk aspects of retinoid biology, via RXR, essential for many xenobiotic metabolic processes in the body, but they are also essential in the steroidogenic pathway, for the production of sex steroids that are prototype ligands for androgen and oestrogen receptor activity, and thus affect the pool of circulating sex steroid hormones (See Figure 5).
Figure 5: The steroidogenic pathway indicating RAR; retinoic acid receptor, RXR; retinoid X receptor, and heterodimerization partner interactions
Note:
RXR and RAR play a pivotal role at the outset of the pathway, that affects the entire subsequent cascade, whilst RXR also play a key role in the subsequent pathway steps as a heterodimerization partner for PPAR, LXR, FXR, GR, PXR and CAR. Abbreviations: AhR; Aryl hydrocarbon receptor, AR; androgen receptor, CAR; constitutitive androstane receptor, ER; estrogen receptor, FXR; farnesoid X receptor, GR; glucocorticoid receptor, LXR; liver X receptor, PPARs; peroxisome proliferator activated receptors, PXR; pregnane X receptor, VDR; vitamin D receptor, PR; progesterone receptor. (Adapted from Jacobs 2004.)
Furthermore, these molecular initiating event level processes each have pathway outcomes that in the case of the PPARs is associated with lipid homeostasis, adiposity and obesity. For example, the delivery of retinoic acid to either RAR or PPARβ/δ/VDR determines its biological effects on adipose development (Wang B et al. 2016). In fibroblasts for example, binding with a ligand-activated VDR stimulates non-adipogenic gene transcription, whilst in adipocytes ligand activation of PPAR gamma together with heterodimerization with RXR stimulates adipogenic gene transcription.
Other retinoic acid regulation consequences include insulin stimulated glucose secretion, regulation of continuous asynchronous spermatogenesis (Chung et al. 2004, Chung and Wolgemuth 2004, Hogarth and Griswold 2013), and immunomodulatory roles in inflammation and cancer (Stevison et al. 2015), as well as RXR and RAR expression in tumours (Li et al. 2014).
In addition, cross-talk has also been reported with androgenic signaling (Long et al. 2019), as well as with xenobiotica-related receptor pathways, via e.g. the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR), PXR and AhR, has been demonstrated; possible responses include triggering or suppression of induction of xenobiotica-metabolizing enzymes (Murphy et al. 2007, Shmarakov et al. 2019).
Cross-talk has additionally been shown on the level of regulating expression of e.g. RA-catabolizing enzymes in the CYP26 family. It has been demonstrated that in human liver cells, PPARγ agonists rosiglitazone and pioglitazone induce CYP26A1 as well as the normally less abundant CYP26B1 (Tay et al. 2010). The non-endocrine sonic hedgehog (SHH) pathway is reported to regulate expression of the Cyp26a1 and Cyp26b1 genes, thereby preventing excessive RA levels during mouse embryonic development (El Shahawy et al. 2019). In the testicular Leydig cells, cross-talk between the retinoid signaling system and testosterone signaling has been shown to be crucial for steroidogenic cell function (Jauregui et al. 2018). Mechanistically this can be understood through the steroidogenic pathway, shown in Figure 5.
Epigenetic changes are changes in gene expression that a) do not involve gene sequence alterations and b) may persist after the initial trigger is long gone (reviewed in Greally and Jacobs 2013, Villota-Salazar et al. 2016, and Jacobs et al. 2017). Epigenetic processes regulate gene expression without mutating DNA, and the dynamics are essential for normal development. They can be modified by environmental chemicals, potentially leading to developmental and later life adverse health outcomes across multiple generations. Epigenetic processes include DNA methylation, histone modifications and microRNA (miRNA) signaling.
Histone deacetylation/methylation and DNA methylation are usually associated with repression of gene transcription, while histone acetylation/demethylation and lack of DNA methylation instead leads to transcriptional activation.
miRNAs are small noncoding RNAs that also act as endogenous regulators of gene expression. RA regulates the expression of many different miRNAs, with multiple fundamental biological roles. miRNAs have been extensively studied as targets and mediators of the biological activity of RA during embryonic development, as well as in normal and neoplastic cells. However, a recent review article reports that relatively few studies have experimentally explored the direct contribution of miRNA function to the RA signalling pathway. The tissue-specific roles of miRNAs modulated by RA include stem cell pluripotency, maintenance and regeneration, embryonic development, hematopoietic and neural differentiation, therefore playing a major general role in human disease pathogenesis (reviewed in Nervi and Grignani 2014).
Environmental factors, including nutrients and diet, can alter the epigenetic cell signaling pathways, including the recruitment of transcription factors which regulate epigenetic modifications, and a good and topical example for this, is adipogenesis. Retinoic acid enhances adipogenic commitment in progenitor cells through altering epigenetic modifications in the promoters of key adipogenic genes, such as Zinc Finger Protein 423 (Zfp423), Extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), Delta Like Non-Canonical Notch Ligand 1 (Dlk1)/Pre-adipocyte factor 1 (Pref1), SRY-Box Transcription Factor 9 (Sox9) and Kruppel Like Factor 2 (Klf2) in the development of preadipocytes. Epigenetic regulation of PPARγ and CCAAT Enhancer Binding Protein Alpha (C/EBPα) expression during adipogenesis has been reported (Ngo et al. 2014), and the PPARγ2 promoter for DNA demethylation has been detected in in vitro studies of a chemical flame retardant, BDE 47, using a 3T3-L1 model of adipogenesis (Kamstra et al. 2014).
As noted in the cross-talk section, retinoic acid can alter the partnership of RXRs with other nuclear receptors, and this has been mechanistically demonstrated for the regulation of adipogenesis in the current scientific literature.
RA is known to mediate cell differentiation also via epigenetic mechanisms (reviewed in Urvalek et al. 2014). Epigenetic changes are also involved in, e.g., the process of transient induction of the Cyp26a1 gene by RA (Yuan et al. 2012). RA itself is a significant regulator of miRNA expression, and there are several recent relevant studies using RA for the induction of proliferation or differentiation, or as a treatment, that also reveal which miRNAs RA can up- or down-regulate (e.g. Shen et al. 2016, Czaika et al. 2016, Wang JH et al. 2016, Ouimet et al. 2015 ). Identification of pivotal miRNA markers are presently being used in diagnostic clinical treatment, and such markers have potential for possible development of in vitro assay study designs and inclusion in in vivo test methods. However, the resulting downstream consequences do not necessarily then go through the retinoid pathway, but have multiple roles in various metabolic activities of the body such as ERK Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) signaling (Shen et al. 2016), apoptosis (Wang B et al. 2016) and macrophage metabolism (Oiumet et al. 2015) in specific and highly varied disease outcomes. Additionally, it has been experimentally confirmed that miRNA-34-1 down regulates CYP3A4 by targeting RXR alpha (Pan et al. 2009), whilst miR-30c-1-3p (Vachirayonstien et al. 2016) and miR-27b (Oda et al. 2014) downregulate CYP3A4 via PXR and VDR, as both receptors need RXR as their heterodimer partner. In some cases, epigenetic actions of RARs appear to be independent of the ligand, i.e., RA (Laursen et al. 2012).
The formation of the female and male reproductive organs is initiated early in fetal life.
The genital ridges (the presumptive gonads) first appear around halfway through gestation in mice, or at 10.5 days post coitum (dpc) (Spiller et al. 2017), whereas they appear during the first trimester in humans (Johansson et al. 2017, Mamsen et al. 2017). The somatic cell progenitors of the genital ridges are initially bipotential, i.e., they are capable of developing into either Sertoli and Leydig cells (in males) or granulosa and theca cells (in females) (reviewed in Svingen and Koopman 2013). The Sertoli and granulosa cells are the first somatic cells to differentiate in testes and ovaries, respectively, and they are important for supporting the germ cells and also for orchestrating the subsequent differentiation of somatic cell progenitors into the steroidogenic Leydig and theca cells (Rotgers et al. 2018).
Soon after they are formed, the genital ridges begin to differentiate either as testes, in the presence of the Y-chromosomal gene, Sex-determining region Y protein (Sry), or as ovaries, in the absence of Sry (reviewed in Svingen and Koopman 2013). The transcription factor SRY upregulates the expression of the gene SRY-Box Transcription Factor 9 (Sox9), which in turn governs the expression of several male-specific genes, leading to differentiation of the bipotential somatic cell progenitors into Sertoli cells (Kashimada et al. 2011). In the absence of Sry, as in females, a different set of genes are expressed by default, such as Wnt Family Member 4 (Wnt4) and Forkhead box protein L2 (Foxl2), leading to differentiation of somatic progenitor cells into granulosa cells and subsequently to ovarian development (Kashimada et al. 2011). During early testis differentiation, Sertoli cells encircle clusters of gonocytes and form testis cords; the future seminiferous tubules. Shortly thereafter, fetal Leydig cells emerge in the interstitial space and start producing testosterone, which is essential for masculinization of the male fetus (reviewed in Svingen and Koopman 2013).
At the time of gonad formation, RA appears to be available from several possible sources. In mice, the adjacent mesonephros has been suggested as an important source, where both dehydrogenase 10 (Rdh10) and retinaldehydrogenase 2 (Raldh2) are expressed, as well as Raldh3 at a lower level, (Niederreither et al. 2002a, Niederreither et al. 2002b, Bowles et al. 2006, Spiller and Bowles 2015, Bowles et al. 2018). Using a RARE-controlled LacZ reporter gene system, RA was demonstrated to be localized in the anterior part (nearest the mesonephros) of the mouse ovary (Bowles et al. 2006).
An alternative RA source is the coelomic epithelium, which covers the embryonic gonad, and where Raldh2 is also expressed (Niederreither et al. 1997, Teletin et al. 2017). Species differences appear to exist: RA-producing (retin)aldehyde dehydrogenases are present in both female and male fetal gonads in humans (Childs et al. 2011, Le Bouffant et al. 2010), suggesting a capacity for de novo RA synthesis in the gonad proper. Gonadal RA synthesis in the rabbit appears similar to the one in the human gonad (Diaz-Hernandez et al. 2019). Species differences are evident when it comes to gonadal architecture; the human and rabbit gonads both develop a well-defined cortex and medulla, where somatic and germ cells can interact differently than in the mouse, for example, which has a different gonadal architecture (Diaz-Hernandez et al. 2019).
In mice, Cyp26-dependent degradation of endogenous RA appears to be critical for somatic testis development, as evident from observations of mild ovotestes, impaired steroidogenesis and a feminized reproductive tract in Cyp26b1-null C57/BL6 13.5 dpc/14.5 dpc male mouse embryos (later time-point not examined as the embryos are not viable after ~15 dpc) (Bowles et al. 2018). However, in an earlier study using Cyp26b1-null mice on a different genetic background, testis formation and somatic cell differentiation in neonatal pups appeared normal, although some germ cells had prematurely entered meiosis while others appeared apoptotic. Germ cells were essentially absent in testes from neonatal Cyp26b1-/- pups (MacLean et al. 2007). In an ex vivo model using rat fetal testis, exogenous RA disrupted the proper formation of seminiferous cords, as well as the maintenance of the testicular cell fate of the somatic cells; following RA exposure, expression of ovarian-specific marker Foxl2 was observed (Spade et al. 2019a). In a human ex vivo testis model, exogenous RA appeared to disrupt the seminiferous cords and altered the expression of somatic cell markers (Jørgensen et al. 2015). Thus, there appears to be differences between rodents and humans with regard to where and how RA is synthesized and regulated in the developing gonads, although it is clear that RA influences both germ and somatic cell lineages in both species.
Even in adulthood, the sexual fate of the male gonads must be maintained, probably via the active presence of the transcription factor Doublesex and mab-3 related transcription factor 1 (DMRT1) (Minkina et al. 2014). The role of DMRT1 in the testes appears to be to prevent RA-initiated activation of specific potential feminizing genes (Foxl2 and Estrogen receptor β; Esr2) in Sertoli cells; without DMRT1 present, male-to-female transdifferentiation of somatic cells was observed in the pre- and postnatal mouse testes (Minkina et al. 2014), or even complete male-to-female sex reversal (Zhao et al. 2015).
In contrast, based on observations in mice with deletions/disruptions of either RARs or RA-synthesizing enzymes, suggest that RA signaling is not critical for correct ovarian development in the female mouse embryo (Minkina et al. 2017), although earlier studies have suggested that RA might maintain ovarian differentiation and development (Minkina et al. 2014, Suzuki et al. 2015). Additional studies suggest that abnormal endogenous RA levels may be able to influence somatic cell differentiation and/or function in mice (Bowles et al. 2018). Further research is needed to clarify the role of RA in ovarian development and function.
Most of our current understanding of meiosis initiation and early sex differentiation is derived from studies in mice. Data from humans are sparse (See Table 1 and text below).
Table 1: Sensitive windows in males and females, comparing rodents and humans (information obtained from Le Bouffant et al. 2010, Grive and Freiman 2015, Johansson et al. 2017, Mamsen et al. 2017, Teletin et al. 2017)
Process | Time period in females | Time period in males |
Early gonadal development | Mice: 11.5 dpca. Rats: 13.5 dpc. Humans: just beyond GWb 7 | Mice: just beyond 11 dpc. Rats: just beyond 12 dpc. Humans: just beyond GW 7 |
Meiosis initiation | Mice: 13.5 dpc. Rats: 16.5 dpc. Humans: GW 10 -12 | Mice: end of first post natal week at puberty. Humans: at puberty |
Follicular assembly | Rodents: post-natally (mice: primordial follicle formation initiated 2-3 days before birth, follicle assembly continues until PND 6). Humans: pre-natally (during mid-gestation stage) | - |
Early follicle recruitmentc | Rodents post-natally. Humans: initiated pre-natally | - |
Spermatogenesis | - | Mice: beginning at puberty. Humans: beginning at puberty |
Note:
a dpc: days post coitum.
b GW: gestational week.
c Takes place immediately after follicular assembly.
In both male and female mouse embryos, a cluster of pluripotent primordial germ cell (PGC) precursors arise under the influence of bone morphogenic protein (BMP) at 6.25 dpc at the base of the allantois of the embryo (reviewed in Yadu and Kumar 2019). Subsequently, the PGCs migrate through the presumptive hindgut to the genital ridges (formed at 10.5 dpc), which will differentiate into testes or ovaries (see section 5). During the migration and colonization period, epigenetic reprogramming (genome-wide demethylation) occur in PGCs, which allows transcription of genes that are suppressed epigenetically in somatic cells. This may explain why only germ cells are capable of responding to the meiosis-inducing signal from RA (reviewed in Yadu and Kumar 2019).
In both males and females, the haploid gametes are produced from primordial germ cells via meiosis in the gonads, following a similar process of events, although the timing differs. In the mouse ovaries, germ cells enter the prophase of the first meiotic division (at around 13 dpc), whereas in the testes, germ cells (now situated in the testis chords) instead enter quiescence by 12.5 dpc; they slow down their proliferation towards mitotic arrest as GO/G1-arrested gonocytes (Kashimada et al. 2011). Thus, in the fetal gonad the commitment of germ cells towards oogenesis involves entry into meiosis, whereas commitment to spermatogenesis involves the inhibition of meiotic initiation, suppression of pluripotency and mitotic arrest. This mitotic arrest is maintained until after birth (Spiller and Bowles 2015, Spiller et al. 2017) and consequently meiosis initiation occurs postnatally in males. Thus, all oocytes are produced before birth, while spermatocytes are produced continuously during post-pubertal life in males.
Meiotic entry during fetal development seems to be regulated by two master genes: Stimulated by retinoic acid, gene 8 (Stra8), required for the initiation of meiosis in female fetal germ cells, and Nanos C2HC-Type Zinc Finger 2 (Nanos2), expressed in male fetal germ cells (Rossitto et al. 2015). Nanos2 is required to prevent Stra8 expression and meiosis initiation in male fetal germ cells (Rossitto et al. 2015). Other genes, such as the one coding for Fibroblast growth factor 9 (Fgf9), have been implicated as being of importance for proper control of meiotic entry; Figure 6 is an attempt to summarize this information. STRA8 appears to be critical for several meiotic cellular processes such as DNA replication, condensation of chromosomes and double-stranded DNA breaks (reviewed in Yadu and Kumar 2019). The role of Stra8 in meiosis is also evident in Stra8-/- mice, as both females and males are infertile, while heterozygotes of both sexes are fertile (Baltus et al. 2006). Stra8-/- females display smaller ovaries lacking oocytes and follicles, and in Stra8-/- males, testes are smaller and testicular germ cell numbers are severely reduced (Baltus et al. 2006). In addition, spermatocytes in Stra8-/- males undergo apoptosis before reaching the leptotene and zygotene stages of meiotic prophase (Baltus et al. 2006). The Stra8 gene contains putative retinoid acid response elements (RAREs) and its expression is activated by RA (Spiller et al. 2017). RA-signaling is implied in Stra8 signaling in vivo, as evidenced by the lack of Stra8 induction in ex vivo cultured mouse fetal ovaries, exposed to the RAR antagonist BMS-204493. (Koubouva et al. 2006). In line with these hypotheses, it has been demonstrated that exogenous RA added to ex vivo cultures of 12.5 dpc mouse testes induces expression of the meiois marker Stra8 (Bowles et al. 2006, Koubouva et al. 2006). Very low concentrations of RA (10 nM) has been shown to induce Stra8 expression in 11.5 dpc germ cells in vitro (Bowles and Koopman 2007). The Stra8 locus in non-germ cells appears to be epigenetically silenced, thus, only pre-meiotic germ cells respond to RA by Stra8 induction (Wang and Tilly 2010, Spiller and Bowles 2015).
The sex-specific timing of Stra8 expression is conserved between mice and humans (Childs et al. 2011). If STRA8 has other roles, they are still largely unknown (Griswold 2016). Interestingly, in humans, spermatogenic impairment, evident as azoospermia or oligozoospermia, was associated with a specific STRA8 single nucleotide polymorphism (Lu et al. 2013).
Another gene essential for meiosis, Rec8 meiotic recombination component gene (Rec8), also contains a RARE, and is activated by RA independently of Stra8 (Kuobova et al. 2014). Rec8 encodes a meiosis-specific component of the cohesion complex, and is required for several steps in meiotic chromosomal activities, e.g. chromatid cohesion and chiasmata formation (Kuobova et al. 2014). Neither female nor male Rec8‑/- mice that survive to reach sexual maturity are fertile (Xu et al. 2005). At 18.5 dpc, fetal ovaries of female Rec8-/- mice displayed apparently normal prophase I germ cells, but also abnormal germ cells with compacted chromosomes, while at PND5 and older (up to adult), no oocytes or ovarian follicles were present (Xu et al. 2005). Findings of involuted genital tracts in the same females were interpreted as being a consequence of ovarian hormone failure, due to the lack of (steroidogenic) follicles.
In both male and female mouse embryos, a cluster of pluripotent primordial germ cell (PGC) precursors arise under the influence of bone morphogenic protein (BMP) at 6.25 dpc at the base of the allantois of the embryo (reviewed in Yadu and Kumar 2019). Subsequently, the PGCs migrate through the presumptive hindgut to the genital ridges (formed at 10.5 dpc), which will differentiate into testes or ovaries (see section 5). During the migration and colonization period, epigenetic reprogramming (genome-wide demethylation) occur in PGCs, which allows transcription of genes that are suppressed epigenetically in somatic cells. This may explain why only germ cells are capable of responding to the meiosis-inducing signal from RA (reviewed in Yadu and Kumar 2019).
In both males and females, the haploid gametes are produced from primordial germ cells via meiosis in the gonads, following a similar process of events, although the timing differs. In the mouse ovaries, germ cells enter the prophase of the first meiotic division (at around 13 dpc), whereas in the testes, germ cells (now situated in the testis chords) instead enter quiescence by 12.5 dpc; they slow down their proliferation towards mitotic arrest as GO/G1-arrested gonocytes (Kashimada et al. 2011). Thus, in the fetal gonad the commitment of germ cells towards oogenesis involves entry into meiosis, whereas commitment to spermatogenesis involves the inhibition of meiotic initiation, suppression of pluripotency and mitotic arrest. This mitotic arrest is maintained until after birth (Spiller and Bowles 2015, Spiller et al. 2017) and consequently meiosis initiation occurs postnatally in males. Thus, all oocytes are produced before birth, while spermatocytes are produced continuously during post-pubertal life in males.
Meiotic entry during fetal development seems to be regulated by two master genes: Stimulated by retinoic acid, gene 8 (Stra8), required for the initiation of meiosis in female fetal germ cells, and Nanos C2HC-Type Zinc Finger 2 (Nanos2), expressed in male fetal germ cells (Rossitto et al. 2015). Nanos2 is required to prevent Stra8 expression and meiosis initiation in male fetal germ cells (Rossitto et al. 2015). Other genes, such as the one coding for Fibroblast growth factor 9 (Fgf9), have been implicated as being of importance for proper control of meiotic entry; Figure 6 is an attempt to summarize this information. STRA8 appears to be critical for several meiotic cellular processes such as DNA replication, condensation of chromosomes and double-stranded DNA breaks (reviewed in Yadu and Kumar 2019). The role of Stra8 in meiosis is also evident in Stra8-/- mice, as both females and males are infertile, while heterozygotes of both sexes are fertile (Baltus et al. 2006). Stra8-/- females display smaller ovaries lacking oocytes and follicles, and in Stra8-/- males, testes are smaller and testicular germ cell numbers are severely reduced (Baltus et al. 2006). In addition, spermatocytes in Stra8-/- males undergo apoptosis before reaching the leptotene and zygotene stages of meiotic prophase (Baltus et al. 2006). The Stra8 gene contains putative retinoid acid response elements (RAREs) and its expression is activated by RA (Spiller et al. 2017). RA-signaling is implied in Stra8 signaling in vivo, as evidenced by the lack of Stra8 induction in ex vivo cultured mouse fetal ovaries, exposed to the RAR antagonist BMS-204493. (Koubouva et al. 2006). In line with these hypotheses, it has been demonstrated that exogenous RA added to ex vivo cultures of 12.5 dpc mouse testes induces expression of the meiois marker Stra8 (Bowles et al. 2006, Koubouva et al. 2006). Very low concentrations of RA (10 nM) has been shown to induce Stra8 expression in 11.5 dpc germ cells in vitro (Bowles and Koopman 2007). The Stra8 locus in non-germ cells appears to be epigenetically silenced, thus, only pre-meiotic germ cells respond to RA by Stra8 induction (Wang and Tilly 2010, Spiller and Bowles 2015).
The sex-specific timing of Stra8 expression is conserved between mice and humans (Childs et al. 2011). If STRA8 has other roles, they are still largely unknown (Griswold 2016). Interestingly, in humans, spermatogenic impairment, evident as azoospermia or oligozoospermia, was associated with a specific STRA8 single nucleotide polymorphism (Lu et al. 2013).
Another gene essential for meiosis, Rec8 meiotic recombination component gene (Rec8), also contains a RARE, and is activated by RA independently of Stra8 (Kuobova et al. 2014). Rec8 encodes a meiosis-specific component of the cohesion complex, and is required for several steps in meiotic chromosomal activities, e.g. chromatid cohesion and chiasmata formation (Kuobova et al. 2014). Neither female nor male Rec8‑/- mice that survive to reach sexual maturity are fertile (Xu et al. 2005). At 18.5 dpc, fetal ovaries of female Rec8-/- mice displayed apparently normal prophase I germ cells, but also abnormal germ cells with compacted chromosomes, while at PND5 and older (up to adult), no oocytes or ovarian follicles were present (Xu et al. 2005). Findings of involuted genital tracts in the same females were interpreted as being a consequence of ovarian hormone failure, due to the lack of (steroidogenic) follicles.
Figure 6: Comparison of male and female germ cell development and meiotic progression in mice
Note:
The summary is adapted from Figure 3 inClagett-Dame & Knutson, 2011; Figure 1 in Feng and co-authours, 2014; Rossitto and co-authours, 2015 and Figure 1 in Spiller & Bowles, 2015. Blue indicates male-specific events, red/pink indicates female-specific events and grey, events shared by both sexes. Numbers indicate days post coitum (dpc). Arrows and bars indicate rough timing of gene expression, solid arrows indicate direct effect, and broken arrows indicate an incompletely characterized or likely indirect effect. Plus (+) or minus (-) indicate supportive/additive or inhibitory action on other genes. Abbreviations: GC; germ cell, PGC; primordial germ cells, RA; retinoic acid, DAZL; deleted in azoospermia-like, BMP; bone morphogenic protein, mitotic pro; mitotic proliferation. (Printed, with kind permission of the EU Commission; OECD 2017; draft DRP, not published).
RA has been implicated in controlling the onset of meiosis in both males and females (Bowles et al. 2006, Koubova et al. 2006). RA-treatment of cultured fetal mouse ovaries from 14.5 dpc, increases the number of meiotic cells (Livera et al. 2000b). Any response to RA in both male and female germ cells must be preceeded by expression of the gene Deleted in azoospermia-like (Dazl), which is present in the post-migratory germ cells after their arrival in the gonad (Lin et al. 2008). The RA necessary for meiosis initiation is synthesized locally in both fetal testes and ovaries. As mentioned in Section 5, several sources for RA in mouse fetal gonads have been suggested: the mesonephros (near the anterior part of the fetal gonads), the coelomic epithelium, and the fetal gonads themselves. In fact, an anterior-posterior pattern of Stra8 expression has been demonstrated in mouse female fetal gonads (reviewed in Bowles et al. 2006), implying that the mesonephros may be the most important source of RA for the mouse gonad. Germ cell meiosis initiation in human gonads is asynchronous, as compared to the anterior-posterior wave observed in mice, which suggests a less important role for the mesonephros in humans (Le Bouffant et al. 2010, Childs et al. 2011). In the rabbit, contrary to the mouse, meiosis onset occurs after termination of the connection between the gonad and the mesonephros (Hayashi et al. 2000). It should also be noted that in a human fetal testis ex vivo model, RA was capable of inducing Stra8 but not other meiosis-associated genes (Childs et al. 2011). Species differences are also evident from studies using rabbits, where both meiosis initiation and mitotic arrest occurs postnatally, and the gonadal expression profiles of e.g. Raldh1, Raldh2, Stra8 and Cyp26b1 suggest both similarities and differences when compared to humans and mice (Diaz-Hernandez et al. 2019).
An important difference between female and male mice is that the RA-catabolizing enzyme Cyp26b1, which is expressed in mouse fetal gonads of both sexes at 11.5 dpc, is no longer expressed in the female gonad from 12.5 dpc (Bowles et al. 2006). Consequently, RA is degraded in the fetal testis, and thereby meiotic entry is blocked (MacLean et al. 2007). In contrast, RA levels are maintained in the fetal ovary, Stra8 and Rec8 is expressed, and female gonocytes will subsequently enter meiosis I (Rossitto et al. 2015).
Anomalous meiosis initiation takes place in fetal mouse testes as a result of exogenous RA exposure (Bowles et al. 2006, Koubova et al. 2006). The expression of Stra8 is upregulated in Cyp26b1-/- fetal testis (Bowles et al. 2006). Furthermore, increased Stra8 expression has been observed in ex vivo cultured 12.5 dpc mouse fetal testes treated with either ketoconazole (a non-specific CYP inhibitor) or R115866 (a more CYP26-specific inhibitor) (Koubova 2006). Ketoconazole has no effect in the presence of the RAR antagonist BMS-204493, which further proves the role of RA in Stra8 induction (Koubouva et al. 2006). In concordance with these ex vivo studies, the absence of Cyp26b1 in male mouse embryos would lead to sustained concentrations of RA in the testes, as well as subsequent induction of Stra8 expression followed by meiosis. In line with this, suppressed induction of meiosis is observed when Stra8 is knocked-out concomitantly with Cyp26b1 (Saba et al. 2014).
Species differences may exist for the expression of gonadal CYP26B1, as suggested by the higher than expected expression in human fetal ovaries at GW 14-16 (Childs et al. 2011). It has also been suggested that in the human fetal gonad, RA levels are regulated primarily via synthesis mediated by RALDH-subtypes rather than by CYP26B1 catabolism (Le Bouffant et al. 2010). This could explain the asynchronous initiation of meiosis in human ovaries. It has been noted that while the roles of RA and STRA8 in meiosis initiation appear to be conserved between humans and several animal species, the role for CYP26B1 differs between mice and other species such as humans and marsupials (Hickford et al. 2017). In mice, ovarian Cyp26b1 expression is known to be downregulated prior to meiosis initiation, while such downregulation is not observed in the human ovaries (Hickford et al. 2017).
As discussed in the previous paragraph, RA levels are maintained in both male and female mouse gonads alike in the absence of Cyp26b1. In a Cyp26b1-/- mouse model, germ cell development was studied in ovaries and testes from embryos at 13.5 dpc and from neonatal pups (MacLean et al. 2007). In that study, ovarian germ cells at both stages appeared unaffected by the lack of Cyp26b1. In the embryonic Cyp26b1-/- testes, some germ cells had prematurely entered meiosis while others appeared apoptotic. Increased levels of RA were demonstrated in the embryonic Cyp26b1-/- testes. Germ cells were essentially absent in testes from neonatal Cyp26b1-/- pups. Premature germ cell meiosis could also be observed in male wildtype genital ridges cultured in the presence of a synthetic retinoid (Am580, which is resistant to Cyp26b1 metabolism), suggesting that excess RA was responsible for the effect (MacLean et al. 2007).
RA has been widely accepted to be important), for the induction of meiosis (Bowles et al. 2016, Spiller et al. 2017, Teletin et al. 2017. However, it has been suggested that the role of RA in the induction of meiosis may be facilitating rather than critical (Kumar et al. 2011, Teletin et al. 2019, Bellutti et al. 2019). Kumar and coworkers reported that meiosis occurred normally in mouse fetal ovaries lacking RA due to ablation of Aldh1a2 and Aldh1a3 (Kumar et al. 2011). It was subsequently shown that in 11.5 dpc cultured mouse urogenital ridges with chemically inhibited Raldh2 and Raldh3, levels of the third RA-producing enzyme, Raldh1, were elevated (Bowles et al. 2016). Thus, at least in mouse ovarian germ cells, RA appears indeed to be an inducer of meiosis (Yadu and Kumar 2019). This is currently a very active area of research and the exact role of RA in meiosis induction needs to be further clarified.
The ovary is the site for differentiation and release of mature oocytes for fertilization. It is also where sex hormones (necessary for follicle development, estrous cyclicity, maintenance and function of the reproductive tract) are synthesized and released (Barnett et al. 2006).
Retinoids are known to play an important role in the reproductive organs of females, including sex differentiation (as previously described in Chapters 5 and 6), and oogenesis/folliculogenesis during embryogenesis, and potentially also in adult pathologies such as endometriosis.
Oogenesis is the formation of haploid mature gametes from diploid oocytes, and the entire process begins in utero with primary oocytes eventually arresting at prophase I (the first phase in meiosis) in primordial follicles, which then can grow to full maturity after puberty (Barnett et al. 2006, Teletin et al. 2017). In more detail, PGCs differentiate into oogonia upon arrival at the developing female gonad and then undergo mitotic proliferation to create a stock of millions of oogonia that form germ cell nests/cysts, i.e., clusters of cells connected by intercellular bridges (reviewed in Johansson et al. 2017). These nests break down when some of the oogonia within the nest undergo apoptosis, thus breaking the connections between the cells and thereby allowing somatic cells to enter and surround the germ cells. This rearrangement results in the creation of primordial follicles each containing a primary oocyte arrested in prophase I and surrounded by a single layer of flattened somatic (granulosa) cells. The breakdown of germ cell nests, constituting the beginning of primordial follicle formation (initiating folliculogenesis, see next section), results in a decrease in oocyte number. The oogonia will enter meiosis I around 13.5 dpc in mice, and between 10 and 12 weeks of gestation in humans (Grive and Freiman 2015). By entering meiosis I, the cells can no longer divide mitotically. Thus, when all oogonia have entered the first meiotic division, the size of the ovarian reserve is fixed.
As the genital ridges begin to differentiate into ovaries in female fetuses (at approximately 11 dpc in mice), a subset of gonadal somatic cells will differentiate into granulosa cells, after which meiosis will commence in the oogonia (Minkina et al. 2017). The germ cell nests with the proliferating oogonia will break down and somatic cells will enter and surround the germ cells, thereby forming the primordial follicles. The processes of nest breakdown, germ cell death and formation of primordial follicles are similar in mice and humans, but more sequentially organized in mice (Johansson et al. 2017). Nest breakdown takes place around the time of birth in mice and begins during mid-gestation (around GW 16) in humans (Grive and Freiman 2015). In addition, follicle assembly takes place prenatally in humans and postnatally in rodents (Johansson et al. 2017). These differences may suggest different initiating mechanisms. The primordial follicles, each of which contains an oocyte surrounded by a single layer of somatic pre-granulosa cells, represent the adult ovarian reserve (Grive and Freiman 2015).
Folliculogenesis, the process of follicle maturation (See Figure 7), primarily takes place from the onset of puberty (Johansson et al. 2017). The first (primordial) follicles each consist of a single oocyte surrounded by a layer of flat granulosa cells. Granulosa cells progressively form several layers around the oocyte with an outer layer of androgen-producing theca cells. The granulosa cells subsequently convert androgens to estrogens. As granulosa cells continue to proliferate, the antrum is formed. At this stage, selection occurs between growing follicles, so that only one or a limited number of follicles continue growing to the preovulatory stage, while others undergo atresia. After ovulation, luteinized theca cells and mural granulosa cells produce progesterone.
Figure 7: Overview of folliculogenesis
Note:
After breakdown of the germ cell nests (in the figure referred to as ovigerous cords), flat granulosa cells form a single layer around oocytes, thereby forming primordial follicles; this step is considered as the start of folliculogenesis. More layers of granulosa cells form around the oocytes and eventually also an outer layer of theca cells surrounds the follicles. The granulosa cells continue to proliferate and are separated by the antrum into two populations: cumulus and mural granulosa cells. A small selection of these antral follicles grow (while others undergo atresia) and are eventually released by ovulation. Up until ovulation, theca cells synthesize androgens that are metabolized into estrogens by granulosa cells. After ovulation (triggered by FSH; Follicle-Stimulating Hormone, and LH; Luteinizing Hormone), progesterone is produced in the corpus luteum by theca cells and mural granulosa cells. (Georges et al. 2014, reprinted with kind permission from the publisher: Bioscientifica Ltd.)
RA has been considered to be required to maintain ovarian differentiation and development (Minkina et al. 2014, Suzuki et al. 2015). RA is also believed to regulate mouse ovarian follicle development in the adult; this phenomenon has been studied e.g. in vitro by stimulating granulosa cell proliferation (Demczuk et al. 2016). Using cat ovarian cortices in an ex vivo experiment, RA was shown to activate the development of primordial follicles into primary and secondary follicles, possibly via differential regulation of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) (Fujihara et al. 2018). It has been shown that mouse theca cells and granulosa cells express the enzymes necessary for conversion of ROH to RA (different forms of ADH and RALDH), or degradation of RA (Cyp26b1). Further, in these experiments by Kawai and co-workers, these enzymes were demonstrated to be differentially regulated after injection of equine chorionic gonadotropin, an analogue of Luteinizing hormone (LH)/Follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) (Kawai et al. 2016, Kawai et al. 2018). As demonstrated in vitro, ovarian de novo synthesis of RA is required for follicular expression of the LH receptor in granulosa cells of mouse ovaries and for their ability to respond to the ovulatory LH surge; oocytes appear to negatively regulate RA synthesis in pre-ovulatory follicles, impacting LH receptor expression in follicular somatic cells possibly via an epigenetic mechanism (Kawai et al. 2016, Kawai et al. 2018). Cultured human ovarian cumulus granulosa cells (obtained during oocyte retrieval during the course of in vitro fertilization) produce RA from ROH in the media. RA causes de-phosphorylation of connexin 43, involved in gap junction intercellular communication (GJIC) between the granulosa cells in the cumulus-oocyte complex. De-phosphorylation of connexin 43 increases GJIC, which plays an important role in oogenesis and successful fertilization (Best et al. 2015).
Minkina and co-authors however demonstrated that RA may not be required for ovarian granulosa cell specification, differentiation or function. No significant effects were found on ovarian differentiation, follicle development or female fertility in geneticially manipulated mouse models, in which all three RARs were deleted in the female somatic gonad at the time of sex determination (Minkina et al. 2017). Nor did the knockout of all three RA-producing aldehyde dehydrogenase genes (Aldh1a1-3) at the same timepoint appear to masculinize the mouse ovaries. Additionally, an RAR antagonist (BMS-189453) was capable of blocking meiotic initiation in the germ cells of 10.5 dpc wild-type female mouse gonads cultured ex vivo, but had little effect on the expression of markers for either granulosa or Sertoli cells; thus, disruption of RA signaling does not appear to disrupt early somatic differentiation in the female fetus (Minkina et al. 2017). Notably, the triple knockout model was based on tamixofen-inducible Cre, whereby the mice are administered tamoxifen to silence the genes; however, tamoxifen is itself an estrogenic compound known to affect gonadal sex differentiation (Patel et al. 2017).
In mouse ovaries, RBP4 is expressed before puberty but increases significantly in the peripubertal period. In adult mice, RBP4 expression increased at pro-estrous and peaked at estrous and was localized mainly in the granulosa and theca cells of follicles. Expression is also induced by FSH, alone or in combination with LH, while LH alone had no effect (Jiang et al. 2018b).
Ovarian steroidogenesis, or the production of sex steroid hormones, is regulated by the pituitary hormones LH and FSH; LH stimulates the ovarian thecal cells to produce androgens and FSH stimulates the granulosa cells to convert these androgens to estrogens (Hannon and Flaws 2015). The process of synthesizing the ovarian steroids from cholesterol is complex, and requires the action of several enzymes (see Figure 8).
Figure 8: Overview of ovarian steroidogenesis
Note:
Prior to ovulation, enzymatic conversion of cholesterol to estradiol occurs initially in the theca cells and subsequently in the granulosa cells, primarily in the mature antral follicles. After ovulation, conversion of cholesterol to progesterone occurs in the corpus luteum. Hormones: listed in the white text boxes; steroidogenic enzymes: listed adjacent to the arrows. Abbreviations: DHEA; dehydroepiandrosterone, STAR; steroidogenic acute regulatory protein. (Hannon and Flaws 2015, reprinted under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY), from frontiers in Endocrinology.)
Ovarian steroidogenesis is reported to be regulated by RA in several systems (recently reviewed in Damdimopoulou et al. 2019). For example, in rats, low levels of RA and ROH stimulate the formation of progesterone (Bagavandoss and Midgley 1987). In a human ovarian surface epithelium cell line, RA significantly induces production of progesterone (Papacleovoulou et al. 2009). In women, ROH in plasma is associated with higher estradiol and testosterone levels (Mumford et al. 2016). It is likely that RA regulates either the expression or the activity (or both) of the steroidogenic enzymes (Wickenheisser et al. 2005). This hypothesis is supported by data from retinoid-deficient rats, in which ovarian activity of the cytochrome P450 cholesterol side-chain cleavage enzyme (P450SCC) decreased along with the progression of retinoid deficiency (Jayaram et al. 1973). In addition, RA may modulate the pituitary gonadotropins, which in turn regulate steroidogenesis (Minegishi et al. 2000).
In the endometrial epithelial cells, estradiol is locally inactivated through conversion to the less potent estrone by the enzyme 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 (HSD17B2). RA produced in the stromal cells may act as a paracrine factor capable of stimulating the production of HSD17B2 (Taylor et al. 2015, Jiang et al. 2018a).
A connection between ROH/RA and ovarian function has been hypothesized based on the observation that serum ROH levels in women vary with the stages of the estrous cycle (highest levels in the proestrus and estrus phases), and that RBP4 serum levels are positively correlated with gonadotropin levels (such as FSH and LH) (Jiang et al. 2017). Similarly, ovarian expression of RBP4 mRNA and protein in adult female mice increased at proestrus and peaked at estrus (Jiang et al. 2018b). In ovaries from mice treated with FSH, increased levels of RA (and other retinoid forms) and RBP4, as well as increased expression levels of RA-synthesizing enzymes (Adh1, Raldh1), were observed (Jiang et al. 2018b, Liu et al. 2018). Similar effects were observed in FSH-treated mouse granulosa cells, in addition to increases in e.g. STRA6 (the specific receptor for RBP4) and CRBP1, suggesting that gonadotropin FSH modulates the pathways for ROH uptake and its metabolism to RA in the mouse ovary (Liu et al. 2018).
In the female fetus, the Müllerian ducts differentiate into the oviduct, uterus and upper vagina, with the resulting epithelia having distinct and separate organ-specific morphology and function (Nakajima et al. 2016). At least in the mouse, RA signaling via RAR during embryo development may determine the fate of Müllerian duct stroma into either uterus or upper vagina, as seen ex vivo after treatment of Müllerian ducts with RA (leading to uterine epithelial differentiation) or treatment with RAR-inhibitors (leading to vaginal epithelial differentiation) (Nakajima et al. 2016).
The structure and function of the mucosal inner lining of the uterus, the endometrium, is regulated by the ovarian sex steroid hormones estradiol and progesterone. In humans, the endometrium undergoes major changes during the menstrual cycle. During the proliferative phase, ovarian estrogen stimulate proliferation and growth, and during the secretory phase, progesterone prepares the endometrium for potential implantation. A number of retinoid-related genes (ALDH1A1, ALDH1A2, CYP26A1, CRABP2, RARα, RARγ, and RXRα) are expressed in the endometrium of both rodents and humans, and their expression is regulated by estrogen and/or progesterone (Jiang et al. 2017). As reviewed by Jiang and co-workers, expression of these and other retinoid-related genes have been noted in either stromal or epithelial cells (Jiang et al. 2017).
Following fertilization, the implanting blastocyst first attaches to the epithelial cells and then invades the endometrium by displacing the epithelial cells. It is finally embedded in the endometrium, where the formation of the placenta is initiated (Su and Fazleabas 2015). The details of these processes can be species-specific.
RA regulates expression of MMPs, which are produced by endometrial stromal cells during decidualization (i.e.,the process of endometrial changes in preparation for pregnancy). RARs are expressed in the uterine stroma of mice and uterine epithelium of rats. In rats, RAR protein expression is influenced by ovarian steroids; RAR expression increases under the influence of estradiol, suggesting involvement of retinoids in growth and proliferation of endometrial epithelia. In postmenopausal women taking estrogen, uterine RAR expression is reported to increase. Increased RAR levels have also been observed in premenopausal women during the proliferative phase; a phase which is associated with elevated estradiol levels (Sayem et al. 2018).
In the mouse uterine epithelium, Cyp26a1 (both mRNA and protein) is expressed during the blastocyst implantation period. Removing or inactivating Cyp26a1 in mice led to a decreased pregnancy rate, and reduced numbers of implantation sites (Han et al. 2010). It appears that the Cyp26a1 enzyme, by degrading RA, might prevent the otherwise inhibitory effects of RA on implantation-related genes in the endometrial epithelium during mouse embryo implantation (Ma et al. 2012). RA treatment of mouse blastocysts in vitro inhibited cell proliferation and caused retarded growth (Huang et al. 2005). Following implantation, these RA-treated blastocysts were resorbed to a greater degree than untreated blastocysts (Huang et al. 2005). During preimplantation development of the blastocyst, RA signaling appears not to be involved (Rout and Armant 2002).
Via the PPAR/RXR heterodimer, the retinoid signaling pathway is involved in human placental processes such as the invasion of the uterine epithelium by extraembryonic trophoblasts. Both trophoblasts and decidual cells appear to be capable of synthesizing RA as well as the presumed RXR agonist ligand, 9-cis-RA (Tarrade et al. 2001). At least in vitro, trophoblast invasion is inhibited by PPAR and RXR agonists, while PPAR and RXR antagonists increases invasion. Functional retinoid signaling pathways have also been demonstrated in human amniotic membranes (Marceau et al. 2006).
RA concentration in follicular fluid (obtained during oocyte retrieval during the course of in vitro fertilization) was found to be positively correlated with embryo quality (scored on day 3 after fertilization). RA levels in follicular fluid also correlated moderately with plasma RA. Women with endometriosis had significantly lower concentration of RA in follicular fluid and in plasma than women with no endometriosis (Pauli et al. 2013).
The genital tubercle is a tissue present during embryonic development of the reproductive system; it later develops into either the glans clitoris or the glans penis in humans. RA appears to be involved in genital tubercle development, along with Rarb, Raldh2 and Cyp26b1 (Liu et al. 2012).
Endometriosis is defined as the presence of endometrial tissue outside of the uterus, usually on the ovaries, fallopian tubes, and the peritoneum; a state which can cause severe pain. In addition, endometriosis is associated with fertilization problems (Taylor et al. 2015, Jiang et al. 2018a).
Several studies have demonstrated altered retinoid pathway signaling associated with endometriosis. In human normal premenopausal endometrial tissue, mRNA expression of the RA-catabolizing enzyme CYP26A1 increases substantially during the progesterone-dominated secretory phase (leading to degradation of RA and therefore diminished RA signaling) when compared to the estrogen-dominated proliferative phase, during which RA-synthesizing enzymes such as RALDHs are increased (Deng et al. 2003). At least in vitro, RA has been shown to inhibit the decidualization of stromal cells; thus, reduced concentration of RA in the endometrial tissue during the secretory phase could be necessary for successful implantation (Deng et al. 2003). In the mouse uterus, endogenous RA levels appear to be controlled both by estrogen-dependent expression of RALDH enzymes and by progesterone-dependent expression of CYP26A1 (Fritzsche et al. 2007). Expression of CYP26A1 is down-regulated in both the secretory and proliferative phases in endometrial biopsies from women with moderate or severe endometriosis, when compared to healthy women (Burney et al. 2007). The availability of RA may therefore be increased in the endometrial tissue of women with endometriosis. In endometriosis, there is evidence for progesterone resistance, and cultured stromal fibroblasts originating from endometriotic lesions have decreased ability to decidualize (which is necessary for a successful blastocyst implantation) (Burney et al. 2007).
Reduced STRA6, CRBP1 and ALDH1A2 expression have been demonstrated to reduce RA in endometrial stromal cells (Jiang et al. 2018a). Transcriptional activation via the RA-CRABP2-RAR pathway has been reported to trigger cell cycle arrest and apoptosis; thus, reduced signaling can cause endometrial cells to escape apoptosis and contribute to survival of ectopic cells (Jiang et al. 2018a). Since RA appears to stimulate the production of HSD17B2, which inactivates estradiol in the endometrium, an abnormal RA pathway in endometriosis may explain the aberrant HSD17B2 expression and the high local estradiol concentrations in endometriosis. In addition, altered retinoid action may cause decreased expression of gap junctional protein connexin 43 along with decreased gap junctional intercellular communication, reducing the decidualization capacity of the stromal cells in endometriosis, which could contribute to progression of endometriotic lesions and the associated subfertile uterine phenotype (Taylor et al. 2015, Jiang et al. 2018a).
Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is a heterogenous disorder, characterized both by signs of androgen excess and ovarian dysfunction (such as irregular ovulation and/or polycystic ovarian morphology) (Escobar-Morreale 2018). In PCOS, an increased ovarian androgen production from theca cells, an elevated LH:FSH hormone ratio, and enlarged ovaries containing many antral follicles are often observed (reviewed in Jiang et al. 2017). The associated arrest in follicular growth and anovulation can cause subfertility or infertility.
When comparing the response to RA, 9-cis-RA and ROH in cultured theca cells isolated from normal-cycling women and women with PCOS, only RA led to increased testosterone production (possibly via increased expression of 17,20-lyase; Cyp17) in normal theca cells, while in the theca cells of PCOS patients, all three tested retinoid variants (RA, ROH, and 9-cis-RA) had the same effect (Wickenheisser et al. 2005). Thus, in PCOS, theca cells may be sensitized to retinoid signaling stimulation. Moreover, mRNA expression of RA-synthesizing enzymes retinol dehydrogenase (RoDH2) and ALDH6 was increased in PCOS theca cells (Wood et al. 2003), and PCOS ovaries show enhanced expression of RoDH2 (Marti et al. 2017). These data suggest an increased rate of RA synthesis in the thecal cells of PCOS women (reviewed in Jiang et al. 2017).
In women of reproductive age with acne and PCOS, treatment with oral isotretinoin (13-cis-retinoic acid) decreased ovarian volume (Acmaz et al. 2019).
As reviewed in Clagett-Dame and Knutson 2011 (citing publications going back to the 1920s), retinoids are required for successful fertilization, implantation, placentation, embryogenesis and full-term pregnancy: in severely retinoid-deficient female rats, reproduction fails prior to implantation, while in less severe deficiency, fertilization and implantation occur, but embryonic death at mid-gestation is often observed. Retinoid deficiency has adverse effects on placental morphology in rats (Noback and Takahashi 1978). In female pregnant VAD rats, RA supplementation maintains normal implantation and early embryogenesis (White et al. 1998), but unless supplementation is sufficiently high by 8.5 dpc, fetuses will be reabsorbed (White et al. 2000). Retinoids are also required for the normal onset of meiosis in the developing embryo (discussed in detail in Chapter 6), and germ cells in rat embryos with severe retinoid deficiency fail to enter meiosis. This is accompanied by an observed failure of Stra8 induction. Supplementation of small amounts of RA to dams was sufficient to initiate meiosis (Li and Clagett-Dame 2009). Retinoid-deficient mice have a prolonged estrous cycle, and display a decreased rate of oocyte maturation and number of ovulated oocytes after gonadotropin treatment (Kawai et al. 2016).
Pregnancy is an absolute contraindication for all oral treatment with retinoid drugs in the EU[1]https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/referral/retinoid-article-31-referral-prac-assessment-report_en.pdf (accessed in November 2019). as it is teratogenic (Lammer et al. 1985). The pattern of birth defects that can be observed in several organ systems, however, does not appear to specifically target the female reproductive organs (Azais-Braesco and Pascal 2000, Pennimpede et al. 2010), although RA signaling has been shown to be involved in development of the genital tubercle (Liu et al. 2012).
The testis produces large numbers of gametes (sperm, or spermatozoa) throughout the reproductive life of the male, and is also the primary source of androgens, which are required for spermatogenesis and the development and maintenance of male secondary sex characteristics throughout the body (reviewed in Bittman 2015).
RA plays several critical roles in the development and/or function of both Sertoli and Leydig cells (Jauregui et al. 2018, and reviewed in Lucas et al. 2014) as well as in spermatogenesis (reviewed in Mark et al. 2015, Griswold 2016, Teletin et al. 2017). In addition, RA signaling appears to be necessary for proper development of the testis itself (Spade et al. 2019a). As will be discussed below, testicular RA is not derived from the circulation, as a catabolic barrier is formed by Cyp26 enzymes present in the peritubular myoid cells (Vernet et al. 2006). The testicular site of RA synthesis (using ROH taken up from the circulation) varies with age (see Spermatogenesis section below). Stra6 expressed in Sertoli cells may play a role in ROH uptake from the circulation, at least under VAD conditions (Kelly et al. 2016).
In the adult testis, LH stimulates the production of testosterone in Leydig cells. Steroidogenesis itself takes place in both fetal and adult Leydig cells and depends on several steroidogenic enzymes, such as CYP11A1, HSD3B1 and CYP17A1 (Jauregui et al. 2018). Testosterone secreted from the Leydig cells regulates the end of meiosis, the establishment and maintenance of the blood-testis barrier (BTB), and spermiation (Jauregui et al. 2018). Sertoli cells both create the BTB (via e.g. tight junctions and gap junctions) and play an active role in translocating the male germ cells within the seminiferous tubule epithelium (reviewed in Xiao et al. 2014).
RA signaling, via RAR/RXR, appears to be necessary for development and function of the Sertoli cells (Lucas et al. 2014). In primary rat Sertoli cells isolated on PND 10 and 20, RA suppressed proliferation and initiated tight junction formation (Nicholls et al. 2013). Leydig cells express proteins for RA synthesis, breakdown and signaling (Griswold and Hogarth 2018). Based on impairments observed in VAD mice, proper differentiation of Leydig cells appears to depend on sufficient retinoid levels (Yang et al. 2018). Fertility studies using conditional transgenic adult mice lacking functional Leydig cell RARα, show that RA signaling via RAR/RXR is required for normal Leydig cell function (Jauregui et al. 2018). The same conditional knockouts also had altered steroidogenic enzyme expression levels in Leydig cells, increased BTB permeability, as well as apoptotic pachytene spermatocytes, and were infertile (Jauregui et al. 2018). The observed phenotype is similar to mice with low or no levels of testosterone (discussed in Jauregui et al. 2018). Increased BTB permeability has also been demonstrated in neonatal mice after treatment with the RALDH2 inhibitor WIN 18,466 (Amory et al. 2011, Kent et al. 2016). The mechanism behind effects on the BTB, and the possible role of RA on its maintenance, still needs to clarified.
In an ex vivo model using mouse fetal testes, RA treatment increased testosterone production (Bellutti et al. 2019). In contrast, RA has been shown to decrease testosterone production in the developing rat testis (Livera et al. 2000a). In ex vivo cultured human fetal testes, RA treatment increased testosterone production and expression of steroidogenic enzymes such as cholesterol side-chain cleavage enzyme (P450scc), Cyp17, and steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) (Lambrot et al. 2006). Interestingly, testicular P450scc activity in retinoid-deficient rats decreased concomitantly with the progression of retinoid deficiency (Jayaram et al. 1973). Thus, RA appears to be capable of influencing steroidogenesis in both rodents and humans.
Spermatogenesis (described in Figure 9, and in more detail in Figure 10) is the formation of haploid gametes (spermatozoa) from the diploid stem spermatogonia, and includes the process of spermatogonia differentiation, meiosis, differentiation of spermatids (spermiogenesis) and spermatid release (spermiation) (reviewed in Mark et al. 2015). Spermatogenesis takes place inside the seminiferous tubules in a rigidly structured process ensuring continuous, life-long sperm production (reviewed in Griswold 2016). As will be described below, the process in pubertal animals differs from that in adult animals. The human testis produces sperm in a continuous manner similar to rodents, and it is reasonable to assume that similar regulatory patterns of sperm production also exist in the human testis (Jørgensen et al. 2015, Griswold 2016) although more research is needed for a better understanding of human spermatogenesis.
Figure 9: Schematic of a cross-section of an adult mouse seminiferous tubule, surrounded by peritubular cells
Note:
The spermatogonia are located on the inside of the basal membrane of the seminiferous tubule, and are completely surrounded by Sertoli cells. The primary spermatocytes and round spermatids are located closer to the lumen. The elongated spermatids will eventually be shed into the lumen as spermatozoa. (de Rooij and Mizrak 2008, reprinted with kind permission from the publisher: The Company of Biologists Ltd., Cambridge UK.)
Figure 10: Spermatogenesis in the adult mouse
Note:
In mice, spermatogonia in the single-cell state (AS) are considered as the true stem cells of the spermatogenic lineage. As spermatogonia divide to maintain a stem cell population (As) and expand the population of cells (Apr and Aal4–16; ) which enter the differentiation pathway (Stages A1–A4, Int and B, collectively referred to as differentiating spermatogonia (the previous stages, As – Aal16, are collectively also referred to as undifferentiated spermatogonia). In the meiotic phase, the primary spermatocytes undergo recombination and segregation of homologous chromosomes during the meiotic divisions to generate secondary spermatocytes (2S) and subsequently step 1 spermatids (St1). The spermiogenesis phase, is subdivided into 16 steps based on morphological criteria (round spermatids, steps 1 to 8; elongating spermatids, steps 9 to 16). The first 12 steps span the entire cycle of the seminiferous epithelium. Step 16 spermatids are released into the lumen of the seminiferous tubules as spermatozoa, during a process called spermiation. Abbreviations: PR; preleptotene, L; leptotene, Z; zygotene, P; pachytene, D; diplotene (the stages of the first meiotic prophase), 2S; secondary spermatocytes. (Mark et al. 2015. Reprinted with kind permission from the publisher: Elsevier.)
At least in mice, RA is considered to be critically involved in several steps of spermatogenesis: spermatogonia differentiation specifically during the Aal – A1 transition, for spermiation, and in regulation of the seminiferous epithelium cycle (see Figure 11 and e.g. Teletin et al. 2019). RA is indispensable in vivo to trigger the Aal – A1 transition (Teletin et al. 2019) and is also required for the survival of some Aundiff spermatogonia (reviewed in Teletin et al. 2017). Synthesis of both mRNA and protein STRA8 occurs exclusively in two distinct phases of spermatogonia differentiation; in differentiating type A spermatogonia (A1-A4), as well as in spermatocytes in the preleptotene (PR) and leptotene (L) phase at meiosis entry (Griswold 2016). See section Meiosis in the post-natal male below, for further discussion about meiotic regulation.
Figure 11: Steps in germ cell differentiation and spermatogenesis thought to be controlled by RA in mice
Note:
Once the first/pubertal wave (during which differentiating spermatogonia develop directly from prospermatogonia) has been initiated, the subsequent rounds of differentiating spermatogonia arise from a subset of A single-state spermatogonia (As) acting as spermatogenic stem cells. Stem cells divide and form A paired spermatogonia (Apr) that in turn divide and form an aligned cell syncytia of 4, 8, and 16 cells (also called ”transit amplifying progenitor cells”), which transition without cell division into A1 differentiating spermatogonia. After five cell divisions (synchronized to the cycle of the seminiferous epithelium), B spermatogonia are formed, followed by another mitotic division resulting in the formation of preleptotene spermatocytes. The preleptotene spermatocytes proceed through the rest of the meiosis, forming haploid spermatids that are eventually elongated. (Griswold 2016, reprinted with kind permission from the publisher: American Physiological Society, Rockville, MD, USA.)
In the juvenile mouse, the mitotically quiescent gonocytes (also termed pro-spermatogonia) re-enter the cell cycle at approximately PND 1-2, and turn into spermatogonia at PND 3-6 as they migrate to the periphery of the testis cords, where they are surrounded by Sertoli cells (reviewed in Teletin et al. 2017 Teletin et al. 2019). During this first post-natal week in mice, a sub-population of gonocytes differentiates directly (without passing through the undifferentiated spermatogonia stages) into differentiating spermatogonia that support the so-called first wave of pubertal spermatogenesis. After the first wave of spermatogenesis (completed by PND 35 in the mouse), subsequent waves derive from the undifferentiated spermatogonia that have acquired self renewal capacity, the spermatogonial stem cells (Yoshida et al. 2006).
During the onset of puberty in mice, sperm development is initiated by RA produced in Sertoli cells, since these, at this stage, are the only cells in the seminiferous epithelium with RALDH activity (Raverdeau et al. 2012). The earliest reported presence of a germ cell derived source of RA in the postnatal mouse is at PND 9 in zygotene spermatocytes (Teletin et al. 2019). The RA produced in the Sertoli cells acts in a paracrine manner on the spermatogonia, to regulate the Aal – A1 transition. Spermatogenesis is blocked in juvenile male mice deficient in RDH10 in Sertoli cells and germ cells, leading to a local lack of RA (Tong et al. 2013).
In juvenile male mice with arrested spermatogonia differentiation, due to either vitamin A deficiency or genetic knockout of Sertoli cell Aldh1a, a single injection of RA will resume the Aal – A1 transition, with preleptotene spermatocytes expressing Stra8 and Rec8 appearing synchronously in all seminiferous tubules (reviewed in Griswold 2016). The same effect is observed in mice first treated with the RALDH inhibitor WIN 18,446, and subsequently treated with RA (Hogarth et al. 2013). RA administration to vitamin A-deficient mice or rats further results in truncation of the normal 12 (mouse) or 14 (rat) stages of the seminiferous epithelium cycle to only three or four stages (still enabling sperm production). Additionally, the normally asynchronous wave of spermatogenesis is synchronized, leading to a pulsatile rather than continuous sperm production (Teletin et al. 2017).
Once the first wave of spermatogenesis has progressed beyond a certain point, it appears, based on data from mice in which all three Aldh1a genes were deleted in Sertoli cells, that Raldh activity in Sertoli cells is no longer needed for spermatogonia differentiation to proceed (Raverdau et al. 2012). Thus, Raverdeau suggested that RA must be produced elsewhere, most likely by RALDH2 in spermatocytes and spermatids. Interestingly, Beedle and co-workers reported that in the testis of mice genetically engineered to have a postnatal severe deficiency of Aldh1a2 gene expression in germ cells (via Stra8-Cre), or globally (via a tamoxifen-inducible Cre), no adverse effects on male fertility or health are noted (Beedle et al. 2018). In addition, in other mouse studies, where Aldh1a1-3 genes have been ablated, it is suggested that spermatocyte-synthesized RA is dispensable for spermatogenesis, and that the Sertoli and spermatocyte RA sources are redundant in maintenance of spermatogenesis (reviewed in Ghyselinck and Duester 2019). Species differences may exist; studies using human testis biopsies suggest that RALDH1 is the predominant form that synthesizes RA in the Sertoli cells, while RALDH2 has the corresponding role in developing sperm (Arnold et al. 2015). As mentioned above, blocked spermatogenesis is observed in juvenile male mice deficient in RDH10 in Sertoli cells and germ cells; however, in adult age, these mice appear to have normal spermatogenesis (Tong et al. 2013), suggesting that in the adult animal, RDH10 is not important for control of RA availability in the testis.
The seminiferous epithelium cycle covers the development from spermatogonia to spermatozoa, as they move from the basal compartment of the seminiferous tubule to the lumen. The stages are usually illustrated using Roman numerals (See Figure 12). The number of stages are species specific; e.g., mice have twelve stages, and humans six. In the mouse, four seminiferous epithelium cycles are required to complete the development from spermatogonia to spermatozoa.
The timing of the progenitor cell commitment and subsequent differentiation and maturation of spermatogonia along the seminiferous tubule is staggered, forming a spermatogenic wave (Griswold 2016). The cycle of the seminiferous epithelium is initiated by the precisely timed transition of undifferentiated Aal spermatogonia into A1 spermatogonia, which subsequently will divide to generate successively differentiating A2, A3, and A4 spermatogonia (Figure 11 and e.g. Griswold 2016, Teletin et al. 2019).
The spermatogonia continue to divide mitotically to produce cells that replenish the stem cell pool and cells that undergo a series of mitotic divisions to increase the number of spermatocytes, that subsequently progress through meiotic sub-stages. In addition, in mice, it takes 8.6 days for the A1 spermatogonia to become preleptotene spermatocytes and enter meiosis and an additional 8.6 days ×3 to form elongated spermatids ready for spermiation. The net result is that once the spermatogenic cycle is fully established, the same cell associations or the same group of cell types appear every 8.6 days (Griswold 2016). The length of the spermatogenic wave is species-specific, e.g., 8.6 days in mice, 13 days in rats and 16 days in humans (reviewed by Bittman 2016, Griswold 2016).
Figure 12: Overview of the spermatogenic wave
Note:
Under normal physiological conditions, spermatogenesis is asynchronous, with a wave generated by RA pulses (red patches, stages VIII and IX in mice) along the tubules. These RA pulses drive the spermatogonial transition from Aal to A1. Red, undifferentiated A spermatogonia; teal, differentiating A1 spermatogonia; green, preleptotene spermatocytes; purple, pachytene spermatocytes; orange, round or elongating spermatids; blue, elongated spermatids. (Griswold 2016, reprinted with kind permission from the publisher: American Physiological Society Rockville, MD, USA.)
During the seminiferous epithelium cycle, pulses of RA are observed at stages VIII-IX (Griswold 2016; see Figure 12). During these stages the three RA-dependent steps of spermatogenesis is described to occur, namely the transition from undifferentiated to differentiated spermatogonia, meiosis initiation, and spermiation (Griswold 2016). Further, RA may play a role in the initiation of spermatid elongation, which also occurs at stage VIII (Endo et al. 2017). The expression of the RA regulated genes Stra8 (in spermatocytes) and Stra6 (in Sertoli cells) peak at stages VII-VIII of the seminiferous epithelium cycle (Teletin et al. 2017, Griswold and Hogarth 2018). However, at least in adult mice, RALDH enzymes (RALDH1A1-3 and ALDH8A1) were not expressed in a stage-specific manner (Kent et al. 2016).
For the regulation of spermatogonial exposure to RA, two hypotheses have been presented: 1) all spermatogonia are primed to respond to RA, but the exposure to RA is periodic and tightly controlled, and 2) all spermatogonia are exposed to RA but only some can respond (Busada and Geyer 2016). The differential expression of RARγ between spermatogonia subpopulations could explain how the As spermatogonia (with no RARγ expressed) remain undifferentiated and maintain self-renewal capabilities even in the presence of high RA concentrations, which induce differentiation in the (RARγ-expressing) Aal progeny populations (Teletin et al. 2017). Observations from cell-specific conditional knockout mouse studies of RA receptor isomers suggest that the RA signal in spermatogonia is transduced via RAR/RXR heterodimers (Gely-Pernot et al. 2015). Another suggestion is that RA signaling also operates via Sertoli cells, as germ cell differentiation can proceed in the absence of functional RAR and RXR isotypes in spermatogonia (Teletin et al. 2017). RA may also act via non receptor-mediated pathways, such as via kinase signaling (Busada and Geyer 2016).
Conditional knockout studies in mice show that despite the critical role of RA in spermatogonia differentiation and in male germ cell meiosis, both differentiation and meiosis can occur in germ cells where RAR or RXR are absent, although a fraction of the A1 spermatogonia are adversely affected (Gely-Pernot et al. 2015). Initiation and progression of meiosis also proceeded in these mice. The conclusion was that the RA signaling pathway was not autocrine, but rather operated in Sertoli cells (Gely-Pernot et al. 2015; see also previous sections Post-pubertal RA synthesis and The seminiferous epithelium cycle and the spermatogenic wave).
Spermatogonia exposure to RA is also regulated by the presence of the RA-catabolizing CYP26 enzymes; Cyp26a1 and Cyp26b1 form a catabolic barrier against any RA present in the immediate environment of the seminiferous tubules. All three CYP26 isoforms are present in the mouse postnatal testis, although observations after conditional deletion of the Cyp26a1 and/or Cyp26b1 genes in germ and/or Sertoli cells reveal that Cyp26b1 is the critical isoform (Hogarth et al. 2015). In the fetal mouse testis, elimination of RA by Cyp26b1 is necessary not only to prevent premature meiosis, but also for normal mitotic arrest of male PGCs and for preventing germ cell apoptosis (Rossitto et al. 2015). Cyp26b1 is initially produced by the Sertoli and Leydig cells and/or interstitial somatic cells, although after birth, Cyp26b1 transcripts are confined to the peritubular myoid cells (Rossitto et al. 2015). No variations in the expression of Cyp26 enzymes exist across the seminiferous epithelium cycle, unlike several proteins involved in retinoid storage (e.g. LRAT) and RA synthesizing Raldh1 in Sertoli cells and Raldh2 in germ cells) which are regulated in a periodic manner along the seminiferous tubule (Teletin et al. 2017).
Just as for oocytes, RA may play a role in the entry of the spermatocytes into meiosis (Raverdeau et al. 2012), possibly via control of replication-dependent core histone gene expression necessary for entry into S phase (Chen et al. 2016). However, recent findings by Teletin and co-workers suggest that RA may act only as a facilitator in the initiation of meiosis (Teletin et al. 2019). See chapter 6 for further discussion on the role of RA in meiosis.
Cell-cell junctions between spermatozoa and late-stage spermatids are degraded in a process facilitated by Sertoli cells, and thereby immature spermatozoa (step 16 spermatids) are released into the tubular lumen. The released spermatozoa are subsequently transported by peristaltic movements of the tubule, via rete testis to epididymis, where the spermatozoa acquire motility and fertilization potential (reviewed in Xiao et al. 2014).
In early studies using VAD rats, a delayed release of late spermatids was observed (Huang and Marshall 1983). In the mouse, RA is now known to be required to disengage spermatozoa from the Sertoli cell cytoplasm during spermiation; in male mice genetically modified to lack RALDH1-3 in their Sertoli cells, spermatids were retained in the seminiferious epitithelium (Raverdeau et al. 2012). Spermiation failure was also observed in Rbp4-null mice rendered VAD (Ghyselinck et al. 2006). Similar observations made in Rarα-null mice (Chung et al. 2005) suggest that the effect of RA on spermatid release is mediated by RARα.
The prostate produces slightly alkaline prostate fluid that makes up approximately 30% of the volume of semen in humans and is critical for male reproductive health (Verze et al. 2016). The retinoid signaling pathway has several functions in differentiation and maintenance of secondary male reproductive organs. RA is necessary for prostate formation from the urogenital sinus during sexual differentiation (Vezina et al. 2008, Bryant et al. 2014). Genetic deletion studies in mice have demonstrated the importance of RA signaling via Rarγ in the prostate and in the seminal vesicles (Lohnes et al. 1993).
RA signaling appears to be necessary for the function of epididymis, into which sperm are released after spermiation, undergo maturation, and are stored until ejaculation (Jauregui et al. 2018). In a conditional transgenic model with a dominant negative form of RARα expressed in Leydig cells and in the epididymis, the resulting abnormal epididymis phenotype may contribute to the infertility observed in these mice (Jauregui et al. 2018). These observations support previous findings that lack of RA signaling in the epididymis results in squamous metaplastic epididymal epithelium; alternatively, the abnormal epididymal phenotype may be due to lack of testosterone (Jauregui et al. 2018).
Impaired RA signaling may play a role in several male reproductive pathologies. The transition from PGCs to differentiating spermatogonia is impaired in the absence of RA in the testis cords (Teletin et al. 2017). PGCs that fail to differentiate into spermatogonia may be the source of carcinoma in situ, which in humans may develop into testicular germ cell cancer (Busada and Geyer 2016, Teletin et al. 2017).
In prostate tumor tissue, RA concentrations are lower than in normal prostate tissue (reviewed in Nelson et al. 2013). Since it has been hypothesized that this is due to increased RA catabolism, inhibitors of CYP26 enzymes, called RA metabolism blocking agents (RAMBAs) have been used in the treatment of prostate cancer (Nelson et al. 2013). RAMBA therapy promotes differentiation and inhibits proliferation by increasing endogenous RA in tumors (Denis et al. 1998). Some RAMBAs also inhibit estrogen synthesis via inhibition of aromatase/CYP19 and testicular androgen synthesis via inhibition of 17,20-lyase/CYP17 (Bryson and Wagstaff 1996). The RALDH2 enzyme expression is also altered in prostate cancer. The expression of the ALDH1A1 gene is lower and its promoter region is hypermethylated in epithelia from malignant prostate tumors (Kim et al. 2005).
Cryptorchidism, or non-descended testis, is a congenital malformation that is associated with an increased risk of testicular cancer and infertility in adult life (Bay et al. 2011). Complete testicular descent is necessary for normal testicular function in adult males, and the process of testis descent is regulated by the Leydig cell hormones insulin-like peptide 3 (INSL3) and testosterone (Bay et al. 2011). The spectrum of reproductive system malformations caused by VAD in rats includes cryptorchidism (See et al. 2008). Both RA levels and Stra8 expression were significantly lower in the rat cryptorchid testis (induced by in utero exposure to the anti-androgen flutamide) compared to the normal testis (Peng et al. 2016). In an in vitro system, RA upregulated the expression of the gene Relaxin family peptide receptor 2 (RXFP2; LGR8), which encodes the receptor for INSL3 (Klonish et al. 2005).
Animal studies measuring effects of experimentally increased or decreased levels of retinoids have demonstrated the importance of narrowly regulated retinoid levels for normal male reproduction. Adverse effects on the male reproductive system following experimental limitations of RA have been demonstrated in multiple in vivo studies (discussed in previous sections of this report, and reviewed in Clagett-Dame and Knutson 2011). In rodents maintained on a vitamin A-deficient diet, testicular degeneration with impaired spermatogenesis and a complete disappearance of all meitotic and postmeiotic cells has been observed (Coward et al. 1969, Morales and Griswold 1987, van Pelt and de Rooij 1990). Spermatogenesis is arrested at the preleptotene spermatocyte stage in VAD rats and at the spermatogonia stage in VAD mice; however, spermiation failure is observed in both species under VAD conditions (Ghyselinck et al. 2006). Vitamin A deficiency also leads to replacement of normal glandular epithelium in the epididymis, prostate and seminal vesicles, by a stratified squamous keratinizing epithelium, resulting in inhibited seminal fluid production (Wiseman et al. 2017).
It has been known for almost a century that male rats maintained on a retinol-deficient diet supplemented with RA will be sterile, possibly because the testis cannot take up RA from the circulation (Kurlandsky et al. 1995).
In human populations with retinoid deficiency, symptoms such as blindness are well-known, but information on reproductive parameters such as sperm production or fertility is lacking (Hogarth and Griswold 2010). However, observations made in testicular tissue samples obtained in different clinical situations, suggest a correlation between adverse reproductive parameters and disturbed retinoid signaling. Significantly lower levels of in 13-cis-RA was observed in testis tissue biopsies in men with abnormal sperm production undergoing scrotal surgerydue to various benign indications (Nya-Ngatchou et al. 2013). In a different study, lower levels of the RALDH2 enzyme in testicular tissue were associated with male infertility (Amory et al. 2017). In follow-up studies, treatment with 13-cis-RA (used in the treatment of acne) appeared to increase sperm production (Çinar et al. 2016, Amory et al. 2017).
Exposure to chemicals early in life may affect both female and male reproductive organs and their functions, most likely via several mechanisms, with effects via estrogen, androgen and/or steroidogenic pathways being the most frequently discussed. A testicular dysgenesis syndrome (Skakkebaek et al. 2001) as well as an ovarian dysgenesis syndrome (Buck Louis et al. 2006, reviewed in Johansson et al. 2017) have been described. Both dysgenesis syndromes are defined as early (fetal) alterations in testicular or ovarian structure or function that cause an impairment of reproductive parameters in adulthood. One of the mentioned fetal alterations in the ovarian dysgenesis syndrome was disruption of the RA-dependent meiosis initiation (reviewed in Johansson et al. 2017). For embryonic males, it has been suggested that testicular toxicity could result from disruption of local RA homeostasis or signaling (Spade et al. 2019b). In the adult organism, chemicals may interfere with e.g. normal sperm production (Sharpe 2010) and normal function and morphology of female reproductive tissue (reviewed in Johansson et al. 2017).
Table 2 summarizes some observed effects and mechanisms by which compounds, or chemicals, could interfere with the retinoid pathway in (and also in e.g. Nilsson and Håkansson 2002, Novak et al. 2008, Shmarakov 2015). In brief, chemicals have been shown to deplete tissue retinoid levels by affecting retinoid metabolism, also after in utero exposure. Chemicals can also cause activation or inactivation of retinoid receptors. As described in this report, the retinoid pathway is important, or even critical, in several aspects of both female and male reproduction and during fetal development. It is thus conceivable that chemicals capable of interfering with the retinoid pathway may, as a result, cause adverse effects on reproductive parameters, assuming that such chemicals reach target cells during critical windows.
There were publications retrieved, during the course of this project, describing a general effect by compounds on RA-content and enzyme or receptor expression (e.g. in the liver), but none of these animal studies (with the exception of some pharmaceutical compounds) also describe effects on retinoid parameters in reproductive organs, such as RA-synthesizing/metabolizing enzymes. For the male reproductive system, there are in vivo studies, where brominated flame retardants causes decreased liver retinoid stores in male Wistar rats, and where slight effects on reproductive organ weights is reported. However, no adverse effects on reproductive organ histopathology, or on reproductive outcome, was found, and no retinoid-related parameters were measured in the reproductive organs (see van der Ven et al. 2008, and van der Ven et al. 2009 in Table 2).
While most data originate from animal studies, there is human data as well. For example, in the 1960s, it was demonstrated that the pharmaceutical compound WIN 18,446 could reversibly inhibit spermatogenesis in men (Heller et al. 1961). More recently, the same compound was shown to inhibit the conversion of retinal to RA, most likely by inhibiting ALDH1A2 (Paik et al. 2014), and this finding has led researchers to suggest the use of of retinoid metabolism inhibition as an approach to male contraception (Hogarth et al. 2011). Acne treatment with 13-cis-RA (isotretionin) appeared to increase sperm production (Çinar et al. 2016, Amory et al. 2017), which is in line with earlier observations of reduced testicular concentrations of 13-cis-RA in men with low sperm production (Nya-Ngatchou et al. 2013). An important species difference between humans and rodents is that male rodents produce a large surplus of sperm, so decreases in sperm count or quality may not lead to decreased fertility. The situation is very different in humans, where sperm counts/quality are often so low, that any additional decrease would have direct adverse effects on fertility (reviewed in Working 1988).
Table 2: Examples of chemicals interfering with the retinoid system in different models
Chemical(s) | Model system | Endpoint | Observed effect | Reference |
2,3,7,8- tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) | Male rats, single dose | Retinoid levels in several organs, including testes and epididymis | ↓Retinyl esters in liver, testes, epididymis. ↑Retinyl esters in kidney | Håkansson et al. 1991 |
2,3,7,8- tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) | Pregnant rats and PND 7 pups, single dose in utero | Retinoid levels in liver, lung and kidney | ↓Retinyl esters in maternal and perinatal liver and lung. ↑Retinyl esters in maternal and perinatal kidney | Kransler et al. 2007 |
2,3,7,8- tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) | Male rats, single dose | RA and retinyl ester levels and LRAT expression in liver and kidney | ↑ RA in liver and kidney. ↓Retinyl esters in liver. ↑Retinyl esters in kidney. ↑ LRAT in kidney | Hoegberg et al. 2003 |
Technical pentabromodiphenyl ether mixture | Female and male rats (enhanced 28d TG407 study) | Retinoid levels in liver | ↓Retinyl esters in liver | van der Ven et al. 2008a |
Hexabromocy- clodecane | Female and male rats (enhanced 1-gen TG415 study) | Retinoid levels in liver | ↓Retinyl esters in liver | van der Ven et al. 2009b |
Fluconazole | Mice (exposed in utero) | mRNA induction of CYP26A1 and CYP26B1. Organ development (not repro) | Upregulation of CYP26A1 and CYP26B1. Abnormal branchial arch development. | Tiboni et al. 2009 |
Ketoconazole | Mouse testis organ cultures | Meiosis markers | Meiosis induction in fetal testes | Bowles et al. 2006 |
Bisphenol A | Mice (exposed in utero) | Retinoid and mRNA levels in liver | ↑RA. ↓RXRβ | Esteban et al. 2019 |
Organochlorine pesticides (chlordane, dieldrin, aldrin, endrin, endosulfan) | Reporter cell lines (RARE & RARα, β, γ). CYP26A1 | Activation of RARs. Induction of CYP26A1 | Activation was observed. CYP26A1 induction was observed. | Lemaire et al. 2005 |
543 environmental chemicals | Yeast cells transfected with the human RARγ | RARγ agonistic activity | 85 of the 543 chemicals had RARγ agonistic effects (especially monoalkylphenols and styrene dimers). | Kamata et al. 2008 |
309 environmental chemicals | HepG2 cells transfected with cis/trans-reporter transcription units for RARα, β, γ | Transcription factor activity | Maximum responders were lindane, oxadiazon and imazalil | Martin et al. 2010 |
28 environmental and other compounds | Human uterus and prostate cytosol | Chemical displacement; inhibition of 3H-RA binding to cytosol | A number of the chemicals could displace 3H-RA. MEHP most potent. | Paganetto et al. 2000 |
PPARγ agonists rosiglitazone and pioglitazone | HepG2 cells | mRNA induction of CYP26B1 and CYP26A1 | mRNA induction of CYP26B1 and (to a lesser extent) CYP26A1 | Tay et al. 2010 |
Phenobarbital | Human hepatocytes | mRNA induction of CYP26B1 | Weak induction of CYP26B1 | Finkelstein et al. 2006 |
Tributyltin | Human and mice ovarian theca cells | Cholesterol homeostasis via RXR pathway | Impaired cholesterol homeostasis | Pu et al. 2019 |
Tributyltin, triphenyl tin | Mouse adipocytes | Cell differentiation into adipocytes | Agonist activity via PPARγ/RXR | Kanayama et al. 2005 |
Note:
a Also observed in males: decreased weight of epididymis, and an increased weight of the seminal vesicles, however, no histopathological changesRE were noted; in females: induced adrenal activity of the steroidogenic CYP17 enzyme.
b Also observed in F1-males: decreased weight of testis and prostate (concomitant with a reduction in body weight, however, no histopathological changes were observed). Epididymal sperm count or sperm morphology were not affected, except for the observation of a decreased ratio of separated sperm heads. Note that no significant dose–response effects on endpoints of reproduction, i.e. mating success, time to gestation, gestation duration, number of implantation sites and litter size, were observed.
It should be pointed out that effects of chemicals on retinoid homeostasis can be indirect, since some metabolic enzymes are used both for detoxification and for retinoid homeostasis, such as RALDH/ALDH class 1 (Alnouti and Klaassen 2008). Induction of Aldh isomers, as studied in mouse livers, was isomer- and activator-specific after in vivo administration of several activators of different nuclear receptors (such as CAR, PXR, PPAR, AhR) (Alnouti and Klaassen 2008). The well-known induction of CYP enzymes via AhR after exposure to dioxins and dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) may be relevant since some of these P450 enzymes are believed to be involved in either synthesis or oxidation of RA (Murphy et al. 2007). If the end result is altered RA concentrations in fetal or adult reproductive organs, correct development and/or function of these organs could be compromised.
Since RXR can heterodimerize with several other nuclear receptors, it is also conceivable (and has indeed been shown; see e.g. Tarrade et al. 2001) that any interference with the retinoid system can also have effects on other signaling pathways, via e.g. PPAR, PXR, CAR and VDR (see earlier section on cross-talk). Also, interactions with AhR signaling pathways on several levels have been shown (Murphy et al. 2007, Vezina et al. 2008). From a functional/endpoint perspective, cross-talk with the other endocrine systems (estrogen, androgen, thyroid) is important to consider.
Exposure to the analgesic drugs acetaminophen (paracetamol) and indomethacin appeared to give rise to delayed entry into meiosis in female rats after in utero exposure, with changes in ovarian Stra8 levels reflecting this delay (Dean et al. 2016). Other effects, not currently linked to Stra8 or RA, included decreased fetal ovarian germ cell numbers and (in adult females exposed in utero) reduced ovarian size and female fertility (measured as number of pups per litter) were observed (Dean et al. 2016).
In a mouse study with in utero exposure to paracetamol, both fertility, follicle numbers and germ cell numbers (as indicated by decreased mRNA levels of the germ cell marker mouse Vasa homologue; Mvh) decreased (Holm et al. 2016). In ovaries dissected at 12.5 dpc and exposed to 100 µM paracetamol for three days in culture, no effect of paracetamol on ovarian Stra8 levels was observed. Paracetamol did not cause the same decrease of the germ cell marker Mvh ex vivo as it did in vivo; the authors suggested that the sensitive window for the paracetamol effect occurred earlier than 12.5 dpc (Holm et al. 2016).
In mice, in utero exposure to bisphenol A has been associated with a delay in meiotic prophase I, hypothesized to be due to a decreased expression of Stra8 in fetal oocytes (Zhang et al. 2012). In the same experiment, it was observed at PND 3 that an increase in bisphenol A dose levels were associated with an increased number of oocytes in germ cell cysts and fewer oocytes in primordial follicles (Zhang et al. 2012). Increased DNA methylation may be a mechanism for how bisphenol A affects Stra8 expression meaning that the effect of bisphenol A appears to be independent of any direct effect on retinoid metabolism or homeostasis, although it exerts (one of) its effects on the RA-regulated gene Stra8 (Zhang et al. 2012).
Not all data support an effect of bisphenol A on Stra8. In human fetal oocytes cultured in bisphenol A-containing media, the expression pattern of Stra8 was similar to that in control cultures (Brieño-Enriquez et al. 2012). In fetal ovaries originating from pregnant mice exposed to bisphenol A, the observed increase in Stra8 expression did not differ from that in unexposed mice (Lawson et al. 2011).
Diethyl hexyl phthalate (DEHP) causes a delay in meiosis in mouse fetal germ cells following in utero exposure, and the concomitant decrease in mRNA and protein expression of Stra8 was suggested to be related (Zhang et al. 2015). The DNA methylation level of Stra8 in oocytes of the F1 generation increased as a result of DEHP exposure, and these changes were inherited by the F2 generation (Zhang et al. 2015).
DEHP may also exert effects via PPAR-RXR. In vitro, the DEHP metabolite monoethylhexyl phthalate (MEHP) suppressed expression of CYP19 , the rate-limiting enzyme for conversion of testosterone to estradiol, via activation of PPAR-RXR heterodimers in rat ovarian granulosa cells (Lovekamp-Swan et al. 2003).
Phthalates can target many aspects of ovarian development and normal function (reviewed by Hannon and Flaws 2015); the exact mechanisms are unknown.
In marine gastropods, tributyltin, found as a contaminant of dibutyltin in vinyl plastics and also used in antifouling paints for ships and fishing nets, induces imposex (the development of male genitals in females) via binding RXR, thereby activating the RXR-RAR heterodimer (Nishikawa et al. 2004).
In human placental choriocarcinoma cells, trialkyltins stimulate human chorionic gonadotropin production and CYP19/aromatase activity by acting as RXR agonists (Nakanishi et al. 2005).
The RXR signaling pathway may be involved in the observed increase in progesterone production in human placental cells (in vitro) following organotin exposure (reviewed in Macejova et al. 2016).
No RXR activation was observed in rodent or human placenta tissue in which ng-mg/kg levels of organotin levels were present (de Araújo et al. 2018).
In ovarian theca cells from humans, mice and other mammalian species, tributyltin stimulated cholesterol extracellular efflux via the RXR pathway (Pu et al. 2019).
This triazole-containing molecule is a CYP26 inhibitor, more potent than liarozole, and largely without the inhibitory ability of liarozole on the CYP-dependent formation of estradiol and testosterone (Stoppie et al. 2000). R115866 administration leads to increased endogenous levels of RA, with subsequent RA-like effects such as inhibition of vaginal keratinization in estrogen-stimulated rats (Stoppie et al. 2000).
This retinoid, used for e.g. treatment of acne, has been found to lead to reduced antral follicle count, ovarian volume and levels of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH; a marker of ovarian follicle number) in humans (Aksoy et al. 2015). Similar effects have been observed in rats (Abali et al. 2013). The effects appear to be transient both in humans (Çinar et al. 2017) and in rats (Korkmaz et al. 2017) once treatment ceases. Isotretinoin administered to rats at doses up to five times higher than clinical doses used for acne treatment reportedly had no adverse effects on fertility, conception rate, gestation or parturition, as summarized in an US FDA Pharmacology Review of isotretinoin[1]https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2012/021951Orig1s000PharmR.pdf, downloaded 4 September 2018.. The ICH[2]International Council for Harmonization of technical requirements for pharmaceuticals for Human use; https://www.ich.org/ reproductive toxicology guideline for registrations of pharmaceuticals for human use does not require histopathological examination of ovaries in reproductive toxicity studies, and therefore it is not possible to draw any firm conclusions on possible effects of isotretinoin on ovarian volume or follicle count from the US FDA summary of this study.
Molinate, a known testicular toxicant in the rat, is also an inhibitor of RALDH and has been shown to inhibit the conversion of retinal to RA; decreased testicular levels of RA were observed in rats dosed with molinate (Zuno-Floriano et al. 2012).
Conazole fungicides are triazole-based compounds used both in agriculture and pharmaceuticals, and which exert their fungicidal effects via broad inhibition of CYP enzymes (reviewed in Sheehan et al. 1999). CYP26 inhibition has been suggested to be specifically involved in the teratogenic effects of triazoles (reviewed in Menegola et al. 2006). Triazole-containing conazoles have been shown to cause decreased hepatic RA levels in mice (Chen et al. 2009), and the ability of the triazole compound flusilazole to modulate RA homeostasis has been hypothesized to be an important
mechanism underlying its developmental toxicity (Tonk et al. 2015). Reprotoxic effects have been observed following in vivo exposure (Vickery et al. 1985, Taxvig et al. 2007, Schwartz et al. 2019).
In the pharmaceutical industry, structurally related compounds such as liarozole and talarozole have been considered for treatment of some cancers and dermatological diseases (Stevison et al. 2017). One mechanism of action of these compounds is the blocking of RA catabolism via inhibition of CYP26. Transient increased testicular RA levels have been observed in mice given talarozole (Stevison et al. 2017). In VAD mice administered liarozole after a dose of RA, the RA-induced proliferative effects on A spermatogonia were less than in VAD mice given RA but not liarozole (Gaemers et al. 1997). Ketoconazole was used to suppress Cyp26 activity in fetal mouse testis and thereby preventing degradation of RA; the result was induction of Stra8 expression which was followed by a premature meitotic entry in male germ cells (Bowles et al 2006). Although ketoconazole blocks CYP enzymes without specificity for CYP26B1, the observation that ketoconazole, if used in combination with the RAR antagonist BMS-204493, has no effect on Stra8 expression in ex vivo cultured mouse fetal testis further proves the role of RA for Stra8 induction (Koubouva et al. 2006). This indicates that the ketoconazole effect was due to Cyp26b1-inhibition.
In mice, neonatal exposure to bisphenol A has been shown to cause a decrease in sperm number and damage to sperm motility and morphology in adult mice.. The effect was, to some extent, ameliorated by vitamin A supplementation and aggravated under vitamin A-deficient conditions (Nakahashi et al. 2001, Aikawa et al. 2004). The authors suggested that the development and functional differentiation of the reproductive tract and the gonads may be controlled by a balance between levels of estrogen and retinoids.
In mouse embryonic stem cells, bisphenol A was found to upregulate the expression of Stra8 (amongst other genes) in a manner that appeared to be consistent with a feminizing effect, but bisphenol A seemed to act via a non-RA and non-RAR mediated mechanism (Aoki et al. 2012).
Triorganotins are considered endocrine-disrupting compounds and have been shown to bind RXR. Macejova and co-workers reviewed effects of triorganotin compounds on male reproductive organs in rats, but it was unclear if these effects were the result of a disrupted retinoid pathway (reviewed in Macejova et al. 2016). Several studies have shown that organotins act via PPARγ/RXR heterodimers (see e.g. Kanyama et al. 2005, reviewed in Grün and Blumberg 2006). However, since RXR is a silent partner in the PPARγ/RXR heterodimer (Mangelsdorf and Evans 1995), involvement of the retinoid pathway is uncertain.
Some phthalate esters are anti-androgenic, and thus considered potential causing agents in the “testicular dysgenesis syndrome” (Skakkebæck et al. 2001). These compounds have now been shown to also interfere with RA synthesis, both in vitro (Chen and Reese 2016) and ex vivo (Spade et al. 2019b). It has been suggested that a dual mechanism of both anti-androgen and retinoid disruption may lead to developmental effects in humans and rodents (Chen and Reese 2016).
Lindane administration caused atrophy of the epididymidis and seminal vesicles, along with decreased sperm count in the epididymis and reduced activities of steroidogenic enzymes, in VAD rats but not in rats given a diet with a sufficient amount of retinoids (Pius et al. 1990).
BMS-189453 is a synthetic RARα-, β- and γ-antagonist. Following oral administration to rats and rabbits for up to one month, BMS-189453 caused testicular degeneration and atrophy (Schulze et al. 2001). In later studies using lower doses, this compound was shown to reversibly inhibit spermatogenesis in rats, without other adverse testicular effects (Chung et al. 2016).
While the BMS synthetic retinoid above inhibits RA signaling, WIN 18,466 (a bisdichloroacetyl diamine) acts by lowering local RA concentration via inhibition of RALDH2 (Kogan et al. 2014). WIN 18,466 administration to neonatal mice caused meiotic defects in spermatocytes (Kent et al. 2016). In WIN 18,466-treated rodents, the progression of progenitor cells from A spermatogonia into A1 spermatogonia is blocked (Griswold and Hogarth 2018).
In an in vitro dog testis model, treatment with the triazole CYP26 inhibitor R115866, caused an upregulation of e.g. Stra8 both at the mRNA and protein level (Kasimanickam and Kasimanickam 2014). Increased Stra8 expression has also been observed in ex vivo cultured mouse fetal testes treated with R115866 (Bowles et al. 2006).
High doses of the synthetic retinoid Ro 23-2895, presumably a RAR agonist, administered to rats caused testicular degeneration, decreased testicular weight, delayed sperm release and retention, and disorganization/desquamination of the tubular epithelium accompanied by reduced numbers of mature elongated spermatids (Bosakowski et al. 1991). These effects resemble those caused by vitamin A deficiency. In a parallel study, plasma and testis ROH levels were lower compared to controls, suggesting that Ro 23-2895 caused testicular degeneration by interfering with normal retinoid homeostasis (Bosakowski et al. 1991).
Results from a pilot study suggest that treatment with 13-cis-RA (used for e.g. acne treatment) can increase sperm production (Amory et al. 2017). The mechanism behind this possible effect is not known, but it can be noted that reduced testicular concentrations of 13-cis-RA have been observed in men with abnormal sperm production (Nya-Ngatchou et al. 2013).
Adverse Outcome Pathways (AOPs) form a framework for organizing data on the relationships between a molecular initiating event (MIE) induced by the interaction of a stressor (i.e. a chemical) with a molecular target and the resulting sequence of key events (KE), leading to an adverse outcome (AO). AOPs can establish a rationale for the use of particular assays or in vivo endpoints, and/or highlight the need for developing assays or exploring existing test guidelines to cover one or more components of an AOP.
Currently, there are no AOPs focusing on the disruption of the retinoid pathway published in the OECD series on Adverse Outcome Pathways[1]https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/environment/oecd-series-on-adverse-outcome-pathways_2415170x . In the AOP Wiki database[2]https://aopwiki.org/aops (accessed in September 2019). one AOP (Id 297) is under development, linking RALDH inhibition with visual impairment in fish (not open for citing). Additional AOPs (AOP Id 37, 107, and 149) mention either “retinoic” or “retinoid”. Retinoid-relevant KE in these AOPs include “retinaldehyde dehydrogenase inhibition”, “retinoic acid (RA) synthesis decreased”, “plasma RA levels decreased”. In addition, the Belgian SPF Santé Publique Sécurité de la Chaîne Alimentaire et Environnement recently published a call for tender to develop an AOP for inhibition of retinol dehydrogenase leading to urogenital and cardiovascular malformations.[3]https://enot.publicprocurement.be/enot-war/preViewNotice.do?noticeId=356068&saveSearchParams=true&useWorkingOrganisationId=%66%61%6C%73%65&allLanguages=%66%61%6C%73%65&selectAllChildren=%74%72%75%65&isPopup=&advancedSearch=&publicationDateBDATo=&publicationNumberBDA=&versionReferenceNumber=&tenderSubmissionDeadline=&title=&marketPlaceType=%65%4D%61%72%6B%65%74&publicationDateBDAFrom=%31%35%2F%31%30%2F%32%30%31%39¬iceStatus=%31&purchaseAuthority=& In the scientific literature, several attempts to build AOPs and other frameworks to understand RA-dependent effects on embryogenesis have been published (Tonk et al. 2015, Baker et al. 2018, Battistoni et al. 2019, Di Renzo et al. 2019, Piersma et al. 2019[4]Abstract SOT 2019: https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_record_Report.cfm?dirEntryId=345956&Lab=NCCT), with disruption of CYP26 enzymes and RALDH2 suggested to be important KEs. Previous efforts have not focused specifically on the reproductive system per se, even though embryo development of several other organ systems is discussed.
Since there is substantial cross-talk between the retinoid system and other nuclear hormone systems (see section 4), there are additional AOPs that may be involved with retinoid pathway effects on reproduction. For example, activation of PPARα may impair steroidogenesis, and could lead to impaired fertility in males (AOP18[5]https://aopwiki.org/aops/18). RXR is a PPAR heterodimer partner (see section on cross-talk), and it is possible that RXR may be involved in this AOP.
The following illustrations are not complete AOPs, neither in terms of how they are constructed, whether or not KEs are measurable, nor in terms of the amount or type of data supporting the AOPs. Rather, they are attempts to visualize possible pathways between effects on retinoid homeostasis and reproductive adversity, as covered in this report. Hopefully, these illustrations can be a starting point for future efforts to develop AOPs in this area.
The role for RA for meiosis initiation, oogenesis and folliculogenesis in the female fetus is discussed in Chapter 6 and 7. In female fetal offspring of VAD rats, a delay or failure of meiosis initiation was observed in oogonia (Li and Clagett-Dame 2009). Although RA levels were not measured, the low Stra8 expression suggest lower than normal RA levels in the ovaries. The critical role of Stra8 in meiosis, oogenesis and follicular development is also evident in Stra8-/- female mice, which are infertile and have smaller ovaries with no oocytes or follicles, while heterozygotes are fertile (Baltus et al. 2006). Since Stra8 expression is regulated by RA, it is plausible that lack of Stra8 expression could be caused by insufficient fetal ovarian RA levels, which in turn could be the result of a decrease in the synthesis of RA (see Figure 13 below); alternatively, RAR antagonists could lead to the same effect without affecting RA levels. Animal experiments with bisphenol A and DEHP have connected lack of increased Stra8 expression with impaired female fertility; however, the effects of bisphenol A (Zhang et al. 2012) and DEHP (Zhang et al. 2015) appear to by-pass the retinoid system and instead affect Stra8 expression via epigenetic mechanisms.
Figure 13: Proposed AOP for absence of ovarian Stra8 induction in utero possibly leading to impaired female fertility
Note:
The proposed AOP is an attempt to visualize possible pathways between effects on retinoid homeostasis and reproductive adversity.
In endometrial tissue, RA appears to inhibit the decidualization of stromal cells, which is a prerequisite for blastocyst implantation after fertilization; thus, reduced concentration of RA in the endometrial tissue seems to be necessary for successful implantation (Deng et al. 2003). As discussed in Chapter 7, CYP26A1 catabolizes endometrial RA, and its expression normally increases during the endometrial secretory phase (lowering the RA levels) when compared to the proliferative phase, during which RA-synthesizing enzymes such as RALDHs are increased (Deng et al. 2003).
When compared to healthy women, expression of CYP26A1 is down-regulated in both the secretory and proliferative phases in endometrial biopsies from women with moderate or severe endometriosis (Burney et al. 2007). The availability of RA may therefore be increased in endometrial tissue of women with endometriosis (see Figure 14).
Figure 14: Proposed AOP for lack of CYP26A1 increase in the adult human endometrium possibly leading to impaired female fertility
Note:
The proposed AOP is an attempt to visualize possible pathways between effects on retinoid homeostasis and reproductive adversity.
As described in Chapters 5 and 6, temporally and spatially regulated RA concentrations in the fetal gonads appear to play a role both in the proper development of the testis and in the differentiation of gonocytes into either oogonia or spermatogonia. In the fetal testis, perturbed RA catabolism caused by inhibition of Cyp26b1 (putative MIE) could disrupt the normal RA signaling pathway, which would lead to the AO impaired male fertility (See Figure 15). Disturbed RA-signalling has been observed after exposure of adult mice to chemicals acting as RAR antagonists (Schulze et al. 2001) and it is reasonable to assume that RAR agonists would also disturb RA signaling.
Following inhibition of the Cyp26b1 enzyme or complete knockout of the cyp26b1 gene in the male mouse fetus, aberrant meiotic and apoptotic germ cells are observed in the testis (Bowles et al. 2006, MacLean et al. 2007, Teletin et al. 2017), and McLean and co-workers observed that virtually no germ cells are present in testes from neonatal pups (McLean et al. 2007). It has also been shown that ketoconazole can act, at least in an ex vivo mouse model, to inhibit Cyp26b1 activity and thereby induce abberant meiotic entry in fetal testes (Bowles et al. 2006). In vitro, Cyp26 inhibition prevents the normal mitotic arrest of the male germ cells and induces apoptosis (Teletin et al. 2017).
Male cyp26b1-/- homozygote 13.5 dpc mouse embryos display a mild ovotestis phenotype, with an “ovarian component” at the anterior end of the gonad which is where RA levels are expected to be higher due to the connection to the mesonephric tubules at this end (Bowles et al. 2018). In addition, abnormal development of the Leydig cells and of the Müllerian and Wolffian ducts was observed in the same male mouse embryos (Bowles et al. 2018). Thus, it is possible that the observed effects on the germ cells and on testis development may potentially lead to adverse effects on spermatogenesis and malfunctioning testes, which would eventually lead to impaired male fertility (see Figure 15 below).
Figure 15: Proposed AOP for how Cyp26b1 inhibition in the fetal mouse testis may lead to impaired male infertility
Note:
Studies looking at Cyp26b1 inhibition were based on gene deletion or chemical inhibition of the enzyme. The proposed AOP is an attempt to visualize possible pathways between effects on retinoid homeostasis and reproductive adversity.
As described in Chapter 8, a tight regulation by RA-synthesizing (Raldh) and RA-catabolizing (Cyp26) (putative MIEs) is required for maintaining spermatogenesis, implying that chemicals that affect these enzymes may cause adverse effects on the spermatogenic process, leading to the AO impaired male fertility (see Figure 16 below). It is conceivable that exposure to chemicals acting as RAR antagonists could have the same effect; in such cases, altering of endogenous RA levels would not be needed.
At least in the mouse, RA is also required to disengage spermatozoa from the Sertoli cell cytoplasm during spermiation (Spiller and Bowles 2015, Teletin et al. 2017). It seems possible that increased RA testis levels via chemically-induced CYP26B1 inhibition (putative MIE) could lead to similar adverse effects on spermatogenesis.
Figure 16: Proposed AOP for how Raldh inhibition in the adult mouse testis may lead to impaired male infertility
Note:
Studies looking at Raldh-inhibition were based on gene deletion, rather than chemical inhibition of the enzymes. The proposed AOP is an attempt to visualize possible pathways between effects on retinoid homeostasis and reproductive adversity.
Several existing OECD test guidelines can provide information on endpoints relevant to the estrogen, androgen, steroidogenesis, and thyroid hormone pathways, but currently, no OECD test guidelines include endpoints specifically indicative of retinoid system modulation. Some reproductive parameters already included in existing test guidelines, would also provide information on adverse effects stemming from retinoid disruption. However, due to extensive cross-talk with other pathways, there is no endpoint identified that will give information specifically on disruption of retinoid signaling. The information assembled in this report regarding the role of retinoids in female and male reproduction indicates possible in vitro/ex vivo assays that could associate adverse reproductive outcomes to disruption of retinoid signaling.
Some of the proposed assays are suitable for screening larger numbers of chemicals (e.g. in silico/in vitro, OECD Conceptual Framework [CF] levels 1, 2), while in vivo test methods address more complex mechanistic and organ system effects (CF level 3, 4, 5). One other option could be to include ex vivo models.
In silico methods, such as molecular docking models and quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models for binding to e.g. CYP26, RALDH, RAR and RXR, could, if available, be integrated into CF Level 1. Also, homology modeling and computational docking simulations for CYP26A1 and CYP26B1 have been performed to identify inhibitors for these enzymes (Foti et al. 2016). Several studies describe QSAR models for binding to and activating PXR (an RXRα-heterodimerizing partner) and CYP3A4 (Rosenberg et al. 2017b), thyroperoxidase (TPO; Rosenberg et al. 2017a) and AhR (Klimenko et al. 2019). Similar models for RARs and RXRs would be valuable, and should be developed.
Temporal and spatial regulation of local availability of RA is critical for normal reproductive development. Thus, in addition to nuclear receptor activation assays, assays measuring expression and/or activity of the enzymes involved in the metabolism of RA can be considered as candidate in vitro assays (Piersma et al. 2017; see also section 10).
Considering the complex RA modulation of both female and male reproduction, a panel of in vitro assays with the following endpoints is suggested:
The proposed top candidate enzyme for fetal exposure to chemicals is the RA-catalyzing CYP26B1 enzyme. Inhibition of CYP26B1 in the fetal testis (leading to increased RA levels) would cause serious adverse effects on normal development of testicular somatic and germ cells, while induction of the CYP26B1 enzyme in the female fetus could potentially lead to decreased RA tissue levels and subsequent adverse effects on initiation of germ cell meiosis. For evaluating adult females, CYP26A1 might be the more relevant enzyme, considering its role in the endometrium.
Inhibition of the RA-synthesizing RALDH enzymes could decrease RA levels, and assays measuring RALDH inhibition may therefore be considered for screening purposes. In the postnatal male, RALDH inhibition and the subsequent decrease in RA levels would interfere with spermatogenesis.
Stra8 is regulated by RA, and is expressed only in germ cells (Oulad-Abdelghani et al. 1996, Mark et al. 2008). Stra8 is required for germ cells to enter meiosis (Baltus et al. 2006). Therefore, an in vitro screening assay for Stra8 expression could be used to identify substances that, through disturbed RA signaling, affect meiosis initiation.
The different RAR and RXR transcription factors mediate the retinoid signal when activated by RA or 9-cis-RA RXRs can also act as a silent partner, i.e. no RXR ligand is necessary for RXR to bind and activate genes. Activation or inactivation of these transcription factors by chemicals could lead to different effects on the cellular level, which may be translated to effects on tissue/organ level.
For any in vitro assay, the choice of cellular system is important in terms of both relevance and technical considerations. Ovarian stem cell test systems have been described, in which pre-meiotic oogonia in the post-natal ovary are used (Bhartiya and Patel 2018). However, the existence of such cells is highly controversial (Frydman et al. 2017, Wagner et al. 2019). For screening large numbers of chemicals, gonadal cell or tissue models (preferably of human origin) would probably be necessary. Given the sex-specific effects of RA pathways, using two model systems in parallel (ovarian/follicular and testicular) is recommended. Any in vitro model should be characterized in terms of expression and function of e.g. CYP26, RoDH2, and RALDH.
Ex vivo model systems consisting of rodent follicular cells or whole rodent neonatal ovaries (Hannon and Flaws 2015) could generate valuable information on chemical disruption of the possible association between RA and the formation and maturation of follicles (Minkina et al. 2017, Damdimopoulou et al. 2019). Pre-meoitic germ cells, which can be obtained from fetal rodent ovaries and cultured in vitro (Sun et al. 2010, Paczkowski et al. 2012) can possibly provide information on chemical effects on RA-mediated meiotic induction. Both human and rat fetal testis cultures have been used to study the effects of hormone disrupting chemicals on the development of human fetal testis (Lambrot et al. 2006, Spade et al. 2019b).
Detection of of e.g. CYP26, RoDH2, RALDH, and Stra8 expression using immunohistochemistry or in situ hybridization could be performed on tissues from in vivo studies, for obtaining information on the mechanistic level.
Retinoid pathway signaling is highly variable by life stage, tissue type, and sex. Additionally, in animal studies, measuring retinoids in different tissues (including serum) is problematic in many aspects since the polyene chain of retinoids make them vulnerable to light, oxidation, acids and heat (reviewed in Gundersen 2006). In addition, the existence of more relevant endpoints such as the histopathological endpoints mentioned below, and methods that indirectly informs of retinoid levels (e.g., mRNA expression of RARE-controlled genes such as Stra8) makes measurements of tissue retinoid levels a lower priority.
The detailed histopathological examination of reproductive organs/organ structures that are part of animal studies performed according to OECD reproductive development guideline studies could add valuable information when evaluating a possible retinoid-disrupting impact of the test chemical on these organs (Table 3 and 4; CF Level 3 or 4). In TGs 421 and 422, evaluating the value of addition of ovary histopathology of pups, could be valuable. Although it is not an endpoint specific for retinoids, retinoids are important for female meiosis, and could thus consequently also affect the size of the ovarian reserve. This is currently a data gap in these screening studies. Serum levels of AMH in the adult female as a proxy for follicle counting, could potentially be evaluated, although it currently appears unclear if serum AMH levels reflect fertility status in women (see e.g. Kahn et al. 2019). In addition, measurements of male and female steroid serum levels could potentially add value considering the extensive RXR cross-talk (Jacobs 2005). In females, examined organs should include ovaries, as well as uterus and vagina. In males, parameters such as sperm number and sperm quality, cryptorchidism and the presence of PGC in the adult testis is relevant.
Table 3: Current OECD TG endpoints which might capture possible retinoid effects on mammalian female reproductive health, at CF level 4 and 5
Retinoid effects | OECD Test Guidelines (TG)* | Comments |
Reproductive development (female rodents) | ||
Oogenesis, follicular count | Extended one-generation reproductive toxicity study (TG 443); 2-Generation reproduction toxicity study (TG 416). | TG 443: Quantitative (most sensitive). Histopathological examination should be aimed at detecting a quantitative evaluation of primordial and small growing follicles, as well as corpora lutea, in F1 females. TG 416: only qualitative (limited sensitivity). A quantitative evaluation of primordial follicles should be conducted for F1 females. |
Oestrus cycles | Extended one-generation reproductive toxicity study (TG 443); Reproductive screening test (TG 421); Combined 28- day/reproductive screening assay (TG 422); 2-Generation reproduction toxicity study (TG 416 most recent update). | TG 443: Vaginal smears should be examined daily for all F1 females in cohort 1A, after the onset of vaginal patency, until the first cornified smear is recorded, in order to determine the time interval between these two events. Oestrous cycles for all F1 females in cohort 1A should also be monitored for a period of two weeks, commencing around PND 75. TG 421/422: Not included in the offspring and also not possible due to, termination of the offspring on PND 14, i.e. before puberty. TG 416: Oestrous cycle length and normality are evaluated in F1 females by vaginal smears prior to mating, and optionally during mating, until evidence of mating is found. |
Vagina, uterus with cervix, and ovaries | Extended one-generation reproductive toxicity study (TG 443); Reproductive screening test (TG 421); Combined 28- day/reproductive screening assay (TG 422); 2-Generation reproduction toxicity study (TG 416 most recent update). | TG 443: Uterus (with oviducts and cervix), ovaries will be weighed (F1). Full histopathology is performed for all high-dose and control F1 animals. All litters should be represented by at least 1 pup per sex. Organs and tissues demonstrating treatment-related changes and all gross lesions should also be examined in all animals in the lower dose groups to aid in determining a NOAEL. TG 421/422: Not included and not possible due to termination on PND 14 (F1). TG 416: Vagina, uterus with cervix, and ovaries (preserved for histopathology (parental F1 animals) determining a NOAEL. TG 421/422: Not included and not possible due to termination on PND 14, although follicular counts can be made at this age (F1). TG 416: Vagina, uterus with cervix, and ovaries (preserved for histopathology (parental F1 animals). |
Adult exposure (female rodents) | ||
Vagina, uterus with cervix and ovaries (histopathology) | Extended one-generation reproductive toxicity study (TG 443); Reproductive screening test (TG 421); Combined 28- day/reproductive screening assay (TG 422); 2-Generation reproduction toxicity study (TG 416 most recent update). | TG 443: Uterus (with oviducts and cervix), ovaries will be weighed. Full histopathology is performed for all high- dose and control P animals. Organs demonstrating treatment-related changes should also be examined in all animals at the lower dose groups to aid in determining a NOAEL. Additionally, reproductive organs of all animals suspected of reduced fertility should be subjected to histopathological evaluation. TG 421/422: optional: paired ovaries (wet weight) and uterus (including cervix) in females (P). TG 416: Examination of the ovaries of the P animals is optional. |
Oestrus cycles | Extended one-generation reproductive toxicity study (TG 443); Reproductive screening test (TG 421); Combined 28- day/reproductive screening assay (TG 422); 2-Generation reproduction toxicity study (TG 416 most recent update). | TG 443: Normally the assessment of oestrous cyclicity (by vaginal cytology) will start at the beginning of the treatment period and continue until confirmation of mating or the end of the 2-week mating period. TGs 421/422: Oestrous cycles should be monitored before treatment to select study females with regular cyclicity. Vaginal smears should also be monitored daily from the beginning of the treatment period until evidence of mating. TG 416: Oestrous cycle length and normality are evaluated in P females by vaginal smears prior to mating, and optionally during mating, until evidence of mating is found. |
Note:
Also indicated are limitations and data gaps (adapted from the draft DRP)
* All OECD test guidelines are available via https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/environment/oecd-guidelines-for-the-testing-of-chemicals-section-4-health-effects_20745788
Table 4: Current OECD TG endpoints which might capture possible retinoid effects on mammalian male reproductive health, at CF level 4 and 5
Retinoid effects | OECD Test Guidelines (TG) * | Comments |
Reproductive development (male rodents) | ||
Hypospadias, dysgenesis of external reproductive organs, cryptorchidism | Extended one-generation reproductive toxicity study (TG 443); Reproductive screening test (TG 421); Combined 28- day/reproductive screening assay (TG 422); 2-Generation reproduction toxicity study (TG 416 most recent update); Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study (TG 414). | TG443: Most sensitive design due to 20 litters per group, 2 or more males per litter and termination after puberty. TG 421/422: Limited sensitivity due to limited group size (n~8-10) and termination before puberty (hypospadia should be detectable at birth). TG416: Sensitive design due to 20 litters per group and termination after puberty, but only 1 male per litter decreases the sensitivity compared to TG443. TG 414: Sensitive design due to 20 litters per group, but limited/unknown sensitivity as the offspring is terminated before birth (although e.g. hypospadia should still be detectable). |
Testes development (weight and histopathology) | Extended one-generation reproductive toxicity study (TG 443); Reproductive screening test (TG 421); Combined 28- day/reproductive screening assay (TG 422); 2-Generation reproduction toxicity study (TG 416 most recent update). | TG443: Most sensitive design due to 20 litters per group and 2 adult male offspring per litter. TG 421/422: Not included but could be assessed at termination on PND 14. Limited sensitivity due to limited group size (n~8-10) and termination well before puberty. TG416: Sensitive design due to 20 litters per group and termination after puberty, but only 1 male per litter decreases the sensitivity compared to TG443. |
Spermatogenesis (sperm quality and testicular histology) | Extended one-generation reproductive toxicity study (TG 443); Reproductive screening test (TG 421); Combined 28- day/reproductive screening assay (TG 422); 2-Generation reproduction toxicity study (TG 416 most recent update). | TG443: sensitive design due to 20 litters per group, 1 adult male offspring per litter examined. TG 421/422: Not included and not possible due to termination on PND 14. TG416: Sensitive design due to 20 litters per group, 1 adult male offspring per litter examined (only included in the most recent update in 2001). |
Adult exposure (male rodents) | ||
Spermatogenesis (sperm quality, testis weight and testicular histopathology) | Extended one- generation reproductive toxicity study (TG 443); Reproductive screening test (TG 421); Combined 28- day/reproductive screening assay (TG 422); 2-Generation reproduction toxicity study (TG 416 most recent update);, Repeated Dose 90-day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents (TG 408); Repeated Dose 28-Day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents (TG 407). | TG 443: Sperm parameters assessed in around 20 parental males unless there is existing data to show that sperm parameters are unaffected in a 90-day study. TG 421/422: Limited sensitivity due to limited group size (n~8-10) and assessment of sperm quality is not required; TG416: Sperm parameters assessed in around 20 parental males (sperm quality only included in the most recent update in 2001). TG 408, 90-day study: Limited sensitivity due to limited group size (n~10) and assessment of sperm quality is not required. TG407, 28 day study: Very limited sensitivity due to limited group size (n~5), assessment of epididymal sperm parameters are optional. |
Note:
Also indicated are limitations and data gaps (adapted from the draft DRP).
* All OECD test guidelines are available via https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/environment/oecd-guidelines-for-the-testing-of-chemicals-section-4-health-effects_20745788
Potential endpoints for studying effects on female and male reproduction caused by chemical exposure, possibly affecting the retinoid pathway, have been identified and are described in this report.
In silico methods, such as QSAR and molecular docking models for e.g. CYP26, RALDH, RAR, RXR could be integrated into OECD CF Level 1. A small number of in silico tools for retinoid signaling pathways (all focusing on CYP26) have been developed (Battistoni et al. 2019, Foti et al. 2016). Such tools exist for other signaling pathways (Rosenberg et al. 2017a, Rosenberg et al. 2017b, Klimenko et al. 2019), which suggests that they could be developed further also for the retinoid pathway. It should be recognized that large amounts of data are needed to build QSAR models.
Some in vitro assays are available (See Chapter 14) that measure retinoid-relevant endpoints such as RAR/RXR activation. Other assays (e.g. CYP26, Stra8, RALDH) that might be suitable for integration into OECD CF Level 2 remains to be developed (see section 14 for more information). The CYP26 and RALDH isomers appear to be the best candidates at present, since they play a critical role in regulating RA concentrations in several reproductive tissues in both males and females. RAR antagonists and agonists could lead to the same effects as altered RA concentrations. CYP26 isomer expression and activity appears to be well studied in many laboratories, suggesting that these assays might be mature enough for further development. Assays focusing on steroidogenesis should also be considered. However, a more comprehensive analysis has to be performed in order to identify the most suitable candidate assay. Recent development of models such as the human female reproductive tract-on-a-chip (Xiao et al. 2017) needs to be evaluated for possible regulatory use in the future.
Regarding current mammalian in vivo OECD TG studies, no endpoint specifically relevant for retinoid-disruption have been identified that could be added to already existing test methods (such as TG 443 which has the most sensitive design). One exception could be evaluating the value of addition of ovary histopathology of pups in OECD TGs 421/422, although not an endpoint specific for retinoids, retinoids are important for meiosis, and this could consequently also affect the size of the ovarian reserve. This is currently a datagap in these screening test guidelines. Serum levels of AMH in adult females, as a proxy for follicle counting, could potentially also be evaluated, although it is currently unclear if serum AMH levels reflect the fertility status in women. Certain already existing endpoints (in studies covering sensitive windows; see Table 1) could be informative regarding retinoid disruption. For females, ovaries uterus and vagina are of particular interest, and for males, testes and sperm parameters. Serum level measuments of steroids could add value considering the extensive RXR cross-talk. However, no endpoints that would provide information specifically on retinoid disruption have been identified, since the control of male and female reproduction involves many other endocrine pathways.
The initial scoping effort in this report highlights that there are several challenges before in silico or in vitro screening assays, for identifying retinoid disruption, could be added to the test guidelines programme, or in vivo endpoints added to already existing test guidelines:
Finally, the pathway visualizations in the proposed AOPs of this report point to similar early events, i.e., dysregulated RA levels in target reproductive tissues. RA levels are controlled by a set of enzymes under physiological conditions, but it should be recognized that other enzymes capable of affecting RA levels could become relevant after exposure to chemicals. While it is currently unclear which degree of RA dysregulation that is necessary for adverse effects to occur, the suggestion of these KEs can be useful for guiding future work. Currently, the level of knowledge on cross-talk in RA-signaling is limited, and thus RAR/RXR activation was not included in the proposed AOPs in the present report. When the understanding of cross-talk in RA-signaling has matured, RAR/RXR activation should be taken into account when AOPs are developed.
Abali, R., Yuksel, M. A., Aktas, C., Celik, C., Guzel, S., Erfan, G., & Sahin, O. (2013). Decreased ovarian reserve in female Sprague–Dawley rats induced by isotretinoin (retinoic acid) exposure. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 27(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.04.010
Acmaz, G., Cmar, L., Acmaz, B., Aksoy, H., Kafadar, Y. T., Madendag, Y., . . . Muderris, I. (2019). The Effects of Oral Isotretinoin in Women with Acne and Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. BioMed Research International, 2019, 5. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2513067
Agrimson, K. S., Oatley, M. J., Mitchell, D., Oatley, J. M., Griswold, M. D., & Hogarth, C. A. (2017). Retinoic acid deficiency leads to an increase in spermatogonial stem number in the neonatal mouse testis, but excess retinoic acid results in no change. Developmental Biology, 432(2), 229–236. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2017.10.002
Aikawa, H., Koyama, S., Matsuda, M., Nakahashi, K., Akazome, Y., & Mori, T. (2004). Relief effect of vitamin A on the decreased motility of sperm and the increased incidence of malformed sperm in mice exposed neonatally to bisphenol A. Cell and Tissue Research, 315(1), 119–124. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-003-0806-1
Aksoy, H., Cinar, L., Acmaz, G., Aksoy, U., Aydin, T., Vurdem, U. E., . . . Kartal, D. (2015). The Effect of Isotretinoin on Ovarian Reserve Based on Hormonal Parameters, Ovarian Volume, and Antral Follicle Count in Women with Acne. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, 79(2), 78–82. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1159/000371551
Al Tanoury, Z., Piskunov, A., & Rochette-Egly, C. (2013). Vitamin A and retinoid signaling: genomic and nongenomic effects. Journal of Lipid Research, 54(7), 1761–1775. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.R030833
Allenby, G., Bocquel, M. T., Saunders, M., Kazmer, S., Speck, J., Rosenberger, M., . . . Chambon, P. (1993). Retinoic acid receptors and retinoid X receptors: interactions with endogenous retinoic acids. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 90(1), 30. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.90.1.30
Alnouti, Y., & Klaassen, C. D. (2008). Tissue Distribution, Ontogeny, and Regulation of Aldehyde Dehydrogenase (Aldh) Enzymes mRNA by Prototypical Microsomal Enzyme Inducers in Mice. Toxicological Sciences, 101(1), 51–64. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfm280
Amory, J. K., Muller, C. H., Shimshoni, J. A., Isoherranen, N., Paik, J., Moreb, J. S., . . . Griswold, M. D. (2011). Suppression of Spermatogenesis by Bisdichloroacetyldiamines Is Mediated by Inhibition of Testicular Retinoic Acid Biosynthesis. Journal of Andrology, 32(1), 111–119. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2164/jandrol.110.010751
Amory, J. K., Ostrowski, K. A., Gannon, J. R., Berkseth, K., Stevison, F., Isoherranen, N., . . . Walsh, T. (2017). Isotretinoin administration improves sperm production in men with infertility from oligoasthenozoospermia: a pilot study. Andrology, 5(6), 1115–1123. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.12420
André, A., Ruivo, R., Gesto, M., Castro, L. F. C., & Santos, M. M. (2014). Retinoid metabolism in invertebrates: When evolution meets endocrine disruption. General and Comparative Endocrinology, 208, 134–145. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2014.08.005
Aoki, T., & Takada, T. (2012). Bisphenol A modulates germ cell differentiation and retinoic acid signaling in mouse ES cells. Reproductive Toxicology, 34(3), 463–470. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2012.06.001
Arnold, S. L., Kent, T., Hogarth, C. A., Schlatt, S., Prasad, B., Haenisch, M., . . . Isoherranen, N. (2015). Importance of ALDH1A enzymes in determining human testicular retinoic acid concentrations. Journal of Lipid Research, 56(2), 342–357. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.M054718
Azaïs-Braesco, V., & Pascal, G. (2000). Vitamin A in pregnancy: requirements and safety limits. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 71(5), 1325S–1333S. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/71.5.1325s
Bagavandoss, P., & Midgley, A. R. J. (1987). Lack of Difference Between Retinoic Acid and Retinol in Stimulating Progesterone Production by Luteinizing Granulosa Cells in Vitro. Endocrinology, 121(1), 420–428. Avaivable at: https://doi.org/10.1210/endo-121-1-420
Baker, N., Boobis, A., Burgoon, L., Carney, E., Currie, R., Fritsche, E., . . . Daston, G. (2018). Building a developmental toxicity ontology. Birth Defects Res. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/bdr2.1189
Baltus, A. E., Menke, D. B., Hu, Y.-C., Goodheart, M. L., Carpenter, A. E., de Rooij, D. G., & Page, D. C. (2006). In germ cells of mouse embryonic ovaries, the decision to enter meiosis precedes premeiotic DNA replication. Nature Genetics, 38, 1430. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1919 Supplementary information: https://www.nature.com/articles/ng1919#supplementary-information
Barnett, K. R., Schilling, C., Greenfeld, C. R., Tomic, D., & Flaws, J. A. (2006). Ovarian follicle development and transgenic mouse models. Human Reproduction Update, 12(5), 537–555. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dml022
Bastos Maia, S., Rolland Souza, A. S., Costa Caminha, M. d. F., Lins da Silva, S., Callou Cruz, R. d. S. B. L., Carvalho Dos Santos, C., & Batista Filho, M. (2019). Vitamin A and Pregnancy: A Narrative Review. Nutrients, 11(3), 681. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11030681
Battistoni, M., Di Renzo, F., Menegola, E., & Bois, F. Y. (2019). Quantitative AOP based teratogenicity prediction for mixtures of azole fungicides. Computational Toxicology, 11, 72–81. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comtox.2019.03.004
Bay, K., Main, K. M., Toppari, J., & Skakkebæk, N. E. (2011). Testicular descent: INSL3, testosterone, genes and the intrauterine milieu. Nature Reviews Urology, 8, 187. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2011.23
Beedle, M.-T., Stevison, F., Zhong, G., Topping, T., Hogarth, C., Isoherranen, N., & Griswold, M. D. (2018). Sources of all-trans retinal oxidation independent of the aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A isozymes exist in the postnatal testis†. Biology of Reproduction, 100(2), 547–560. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/biolre/ioy200
Bellutti, L., Abby, E., Tourpin, S., Messiaen, S., Moison, D., Trautmann, E., . . . Livera, G. (2019). Divergent Roles of CYP26B1 and Endogenous Retinoic Acid in Mouse Fetal Gonads. Biomolecules, 9(10). Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/biom9100536
Belyaeva, O. V., Wu, L., Shmarakov, I., Nelson, P. S., & Kedishvili, N. Y. (2018). Retinol dehydrogenase 11 is essential for the maintenance of retinol homeostasis in liver and testis in mice. The Journal of biological chemistry, 293(18), 6996–7007. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA117.001646
Berry, D. C., Jacobs, H., Marwarha, G., Gely-Pernot, A., O'Byrne, S. M., DeSantis, D., . . . Ghyselinck, N. B. (2013). The STRA6 receptor is essential for retinol-binding protein-induced insulin resistance but not for maintaining vitamin A homeostasis in tissues other than the eye. The Journal of biological chemistry, 288(34), 24528–24539. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M113.484014
Best, M. W., Wu, J., Pauli, S. A., Kane, M. A., Pierzchalski, K., Session, D. R., . . . Sidell, N. (2015). A role for retinoids in human oocyte fertilization: regulation of connexin 43 by retinoic acid in cumulus granulosa cells. Molecular Human Reproduction, 21(6), 527–534. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/molehr/gav017
Bhartiya, D., & Patel, H. (2018). Ovarian stem cells—resolving controversies. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 35(3), 393–398. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-017-1080-6
Bittman, E. L. (2015). Timing in the Testis. Journal of Biological Rhythms, 31(1), 12–36. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0748730415618297
Blaner, W. S. (2001). Cellular metabolism and actions of 13–cis-retinoic acid. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 45(5), S129–S135. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1067/mjd.2001.113714
Blaner, W. S., & Li, Y. (2015). Vitamin A Metabolism, Storage and Tissue Delivery Mechanisms. In P. Dollé & K. Neiderreither (Eds.), The Retinoids: Biology, Biochemistry and Disease (pp. 1–34). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118628003.ch1
Blomhoff, R., Helgerud, P., Rasmussen, M., Berg, T., & Norum, K. R. (1982). In vivo uptake of chylomicron [3H]retinyl ester by rat liver: evidence for retinol transfer from parenchymal to nonparenchymal cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 79(23), 7326. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.79.23.7326
Bosakowski, T., Levin, A. A., & Durham, S. K. (1991). Time course of testicular degeneration in rats induced by a synthetic retinoid (Ro 23–2895) and evidence for induction of hypovitaminosis A in the testes. Toxicology, 66(1), 105–118. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-483X(91)90182-Z
Bowles, J., Knight, D., Smith, C., Wilhelm, D., Richman, J., Mamiya, S., . . . Koopman, P. (2006). Retinoid Signaling Determines Germ Cell Fate in Mice. Science, 312(5773), 596. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1125691
Bowles, J., & Koopman, P. (2007). Retinoic acid, meiosis and germ cell fate in mammals. Development, 134(19), 3401–3411. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.001107
Bowles, J., Feng, C.-W., Miles, K., Ineson, J., Spiller, C., & Koopman, P. (2016). ALDH1A1 provides a source of meiosis-inducing retinoic acid in mouse fetal ovaries. Nature Communications, 7, 10845. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10845 Supplementary information: https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms10845#supplementary-information
Bowles, J., Feng, C.-W., Ineson, J., Miles, K., Spiller, C. M., Harley, V. R., . . . Koopman, P. (2018). Retinoic Acid Antagonizes Testis Development in Mice. Cell Reports, 24(5), 1330–1341. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2018.06.111
Brieño-Enríquez, M. A., Reig-Viader, R., Cabero, L., Toran, N., Martínez, F., Roig, I., & Garcia Caldés, M. (2012). Gene expression is altered after bisphenol A exposure in human fetal oocytes in vitro. MHR: Basic science of reproductive medicine, 18(4), 171–183. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/molehr/gar074
Bryant, S. L., Francis, J. C., Lokody, I. B., Wang, H., Risbridger, G. P., Loveland, K. L., & Swain, A. (2014). Sex specific retinoic acid signaling is required for the initiation of urogenital sinus bud development. Developmental Biology, 395(2), 209–217. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.09.016
Bryson, H. M., & Wagstaff, A. J. (1996). Liarozole. Drugs & Aging, 9(6), 478–484. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2165/00002512-199609060-00010
Buck Louis, G. M., Lynch, C. D., & Cooney, M. A. (2006). Environmental Influences on Female Fecundity and Fertility. Seminars In Reproductive Medicine, 24(3), 147–155. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-944421
Burney, R. O., Talbi, S., Hamilton, A. E., Vo, K. C., Nyegaard, M., Nezhat, C. R., . . . Giudice, L. C. (2007). Gene Expression Analysis of Endometrium Reveals Progesterone Resistance and Candidate Susceptibility Genes in Women with Endometriosis. Endocrinology, 148(8), 3814–3826. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2006-1692
Busada, J. T., & Geyer, C. B. (2016). The Role of Retinoic Acid (RA) in Spermatogonial Differentiation1. Biology of Reproduction, 94(1), 10, 11–10–10, 11–10. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.115.135145
Cai, Y., Konishi, T., Han, G., Campwala, K. H., French, S. W., & Wan, Y.-J. Y. (2002). The role of hepatocyte RXR alpha in xenobiotic-sensing nuclear receptor-mediated pathways. European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences, 15(1), 89. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-0987(01)00211-1
Chen, P.-J., Padgett, W. T., Moore, T., Winnik, W., Lambert, G. R., Thai, S.-F., . . . Nesnow, S. (2009). Three conazoles increase hepatic microsomal retinoic acid metabolism and decrease mouse hepatic retinoic acid levels in vivo. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 234(2), 143–155. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2008.10.004
Chen, Y., Ma, L., Hogarth, C., Wei, G., Griswold, M. D., & Tong, M.-H. (2016). Retinoid signaling controls spermatogonial differentiation by regulating expression of replication-dependent core histone genes. Development, 143(9), 1502. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.135939
Chen, Y., & Reese, D. H. (2013). A screen for disruptors of the retinol (vitamin A) signaling pathway. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol, 98(3), 276–282. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/bdrb.21062
Chen, Y., & Reese, D. H. (2016). Disruption of Retinol (Vitamin A) Signaling by Phthalate Esters: SAR and Mechanism Studies. PLOS ONE, 11(8), e0161167-e0161167. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161167
Childs, A. J., Cowan, G., Kinnell, H. L., Anderson, R. A., & Saunders, P. T. K. (2011). Retinoic Acid Signalling and the Control of Meiotic Entry in the Human Fetal Gonad. PLOS ONE, 6(6), e20249. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020249
Chung, S. S. W., Sung, W., Wang, X., & Wolgemuth, D. J. (2004). Retinoic acid receptor α is required for synchronization of spermatogenic cycles and its absence results in progressive breakdown of the spermatogenic process. Developmental Dynamics, 230(4), 754–766. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.200830020
Chung, S. S. W., Wang, X., & Wolgemuth, D. J. (2005). Male sterility in mice lacking retinoic acid receptor α involves specific abnormalities in spermiogenesis. Differentiation, 73(4), 188–198. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-0436.2005.00018.x
Chung, S. S. W., Wang, X., & Wolgemuth, D. J. (2016). Prolonged Oral Administration of a Pan-Retinoic Acid Receptor Antagonist Inhibits Spermatogenesis in Mice With a Rapid Recovery and Changes in the Expression of Influx and Efflux Transporters. Endocrinology, 157(4), 1601–1612. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2015-1675
Chung, S. S. W., & Wolgemuth, D. J. (2004). Role of retinoid signaling in the regulation of spermatogenesis. Cytogenetic and Genome Research, 105(2–4), 189–202. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1159/000078189
Çinar, L., Kartal, D., Ergin, C., Aksoy, H., Karadag, M. A., Aydin, T., . . . Borlu, M. (2016). The effect of systemic isotretinoin on male fertility. Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology, 35(4), 296–299. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3109/15569527.2015.1119839
Cinar, S. L., Kartal, D., Aksoy, H., Cinar, E., Aydin, T., Öz, L., . . . Borlu, M. (2017). Long-term effect of systemic isotretinoin on female fertility. Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology, 36(2), 132-134. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3109/15569527.2016.1172234
Cione, E., Maria Cristina, C., Roberto, C., Mariarita, P., Attilio, P., & Giuseppe, G. (2016). Vitamin A and Diabesity: New Insight for Drug Discovery. Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry, 16(9), 738–742. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2174/1389557515666150709112822
Clagett-Dame, M., & Knutson, D. (2011). Vitamin A in reproduction and development. Nutrients, 3(4), 385–428. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu3040385
Coward, W. A., Howell, J. M., Thompson, J. N., & Pitt, G. A. J. (1969). The retinol requirements of rats for spermatogenesis and vision. British Journal of Nutrition, 23(3), 619–626. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19690069
Czajka, A. A., Wójcicka, A., Kubiak, A., Kotlarek, M., Bakuła-Zalewska, E., Koperski, Ł., . . . Jażdżewski, K. (2016). Family of microRNA-146 Regulates RARβ in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma. PLOS ONE, 11(3), e0151968-e0151968. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151968
Damdimopoulou, P., Chiang, C., & Flaws, J. A. (2019). Retinoic acid signaling in ovarian folliculogenesis and steroidogenesis. Reproductive Toxicology, 87, 32–41. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2019.04.007
de Araújo, J. F. P., Podratz, P. L., Merlo, E., Sarmento, I. V., da Costa, C. S., Niño, O. M. S., . . . Graceli, J. B. (2018). Organotin Exposure and Vertebrate Reproduction: A Review. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 9(64). Available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2018.00064
de Rooij, D. G., & Mizrak, S. C. (2008). Deriving multipotent stem cells from mouse spermatogonial stem cells: a new tool for developmental and clinical research. Development, 135(13), 2207. Avialable at: https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.015453
de Lera, Á. R., Krezel, W., & Rühl, R. (2016). An Endogenous Mammalian Retinoid X Receptor Ligand, At Last! ChemMedChem, 11(10), 1027–1037. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/cmdc.201600105
Dean, A., van den Driesche, S., Wang, Y., McKinnell, C., Macpherson, S., Eddie, S. L., . . . Sharpe, R. M. (2016). Analgesic exposure in pregnant rats affects fetal germ cell development with inter-generational reproductive consequences. Scientific Reports, 6, 19789. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19789 Supplementary information: https://www.nature.com/articles/srep19789#supplementary-information
Demczuk, M., Huang, H., White, C., & Kipp, J. L. (2016). Retinoic Acid Regulates Calcium Signaling to Promote Mouse Ovarian Granulosa Cell Proliferation1. Biology of Reproduction, 95(3), 70, 1–10. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.115.136986
Deng, L., Shipley, G. L., Loose-Mitchell, D. S., Stancel, G. M., Broaddus, R., Pickar, J. H., & Davies, P. J. A. (2003). Coordinate Regulation of the Production and Signaling of Retinoic Acid by Estrogen in the Human Endometrium. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 88(5), 2157–2163. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2002-021844
Denis, L., Debruyne, F., De Porre, P., & Bruynseels, J. (1998). Early clinical experience with liarozole (Liazal™) in patients with progressive prostate cancer. European Journal of Cancer, 34(4), 469–475. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-8049(97)10120-4
Di Renzo, F., Metruccio, F., Battistoni, M., Moretto, A., & Menegola, E. (2019). Relative potency ranking of azoles altering craniofacial morphogenesis in rats: An in vitro data modelling approach. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 123, 553–560. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2018.12.004
Díaz-Hernández, V., Caldelas, I., & Merchant-Larios, H. (2019). Gene Expression in the Supporting Cells at the Onset of Meiosis in Rabbit Gonads. Sexual Development, 13(3), 125–136. Available at: https://Doi.org/:10.1159/000502193
Dubuquoy, L., Dharancy, S., Nutten, S., Pettersson, S., Auwerx, J., & Desreumaux, P. (2002). Role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor [gamma] and retinoid X receptor heterodimer in hepatogastroenterological diseases. The Lancet, 360(9343), 1410. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11395-X
El Shahawy, M., Reibring, C.-G., Hallberg, K., Neben, C. L., Marangoni, P., Harfe, B. D., . . . Gritli-Linde, A. (2019). Sonic Hedgehog Signaling Is Required for Cyp26 Expression during Embryonic Development. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 20(9), 2275. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20092275
Emmett, S. D., & West, K. P., Jr. (2014). Gestational vitamin A deficiency: a novel cause of sensorineural hearing loss in the developing world? Medical hypotheses, 82(1), 6–10. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2013.09.028
Endo, T., Freinkman, E., de Rooij, D. G., & Page, D. C. (2017). Periodic production of retinoic acid by meiotic and somatic cells coordinates four transitions in mouse spermatogenesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(47), E10132–E10141. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1710837114
Escobar-Morreale, H. (2018). Polycystic ovary syndrome: definition, aetiology, diagnosis and treatment. Nature Reviews Endocrinology, 14(5), 270–284. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2018.24
Esteban, J., Serrano-Maciá, M., Sánchez-Pérez, I., Alonso-Magdalena, P., Pellín, M. d. l. C., García-Arévalo, M., . . . Barril, J. (2019). In utero exposure to bisphenol-A disrupts key elements of retinoid system in male mice offspring. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 126, 142–151. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2019.02.023
Feng, C.W., Bowles, J., Koopman, P. (2014). Control of mammalian germ cell entry into meiosis. Molecular Cell Endocrinology, 382, 488–497. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2013.09.026
Finkelstein, D., Lamba, V., Assem, M., Rengelshausen, J., Yasuda, K., Strom, S., & Schuetz, E. (2006). ADME transcriptome in Hispanic versus White donor livers: Evidence of a globally enhanced NR1I3 (CAR, constitutive androstane receptor) gene signature in Hispanics. Xenobiotica, 36(10–11), 989–1012. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00498250600861769
Foti, R. S., Diaz, P., & Douguet, D. (2016). Comparison of the ligand binding site of CYP2C8 with CYP26A1 and CYP26B1: a structural basis for the identification of new inhibitors of the retinoic acid hydroxylases. Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry, 31(sup2), 148–161. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14756366.2016.1193734
Fritzsche, B., Vermot, J., Neumann, U., Schmidt, A., Schweigert, F. J., Dollé, P., & Rühl, R. (2007). Regulation of expression of the retinoic acid metabolizing enzyme CYP26A1 in uteri of ovariectomized mice after treatment with ovarian steroid hormones. Molecular Reproduction and Development, 74(2), 258–264. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.20526
Frydman, N., Poulain, M., Arkoun, B., Duquenne, C., Tourpin, S., Messiaen, S., . . . Livera, G. (2017). Human foetal ovary shares meiotic preventing factors with the developing testis. Human Reproduction, 32(3), 631–642. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew343
Fujihara, M., Yamamizu, K., Comizzoli, P., Wildt, D. E., & Songsasen, N. (2018). Retinoic acid promotes in vitro follicle activation in the cat ovary by regulating expression of matrix metalloproteinase 9. PLOS ONE, 13(8), e0202759. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202759
Gaemers, I. C., van Pelt, A. M. M., van der Saag, P. T., Hoogerbrugge, J. W., Themmen, A. P. N., & de Rooij, D. G. (1997). Effect of Retinoid Status on the Messenger Ribonucleic Acid Expression of Nuclear Retinoid Receptors α, β, and γ, and Retinoid X Receptors α, β, and γ in the Mouse Testis*. Endocrinology, 138(4), 1544–1551. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1210/endo.138.4.5051
Gampe, R. T., Montana, V. G., Lambert, M. H., Miller, A. B., Bledsoe, R. K., Milburn, M. V., . . . Xu, H. E. (2000). Asymmetry in the PPARgamma/RXRalpha crystal structure reveals the molecular basis of heterodimerization among nuclear receptors. Molecular cell, 5(3), 545. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80448-7
Gely-Pernot, A., Raverdeau, M., Teletin, M., Vernet, N., Féret, B., Klopfenstein, M., . . . Ghyselinck, N. B. (2015). Retinoic Acid Receptors Control Spermatogonia Cell-Fate and Induce Expression of the SALL4A Transcription Factor. PLOS Genetics, 11(10), e1005501. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005501
Georges, A., Auguste, A., Bessière, L., Vanet, A., Todeschini, A.-L., & Veitia, R. A. (2014). FOXL2: a central transcription factor of the ovary. Journal of Molecular Endocrinology 52(1), R17-R33. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1530/JME-13-0159
Germain, P., Chambon, P., Eichele, G., Evans, R. M., Lazar, M. A., Leid, M., . . . Gronemeyer, H. (2006). International Union of Pharmacology. LX. Retinoic Acid Receptors. Pharmacological Reviews, 58(4), 712–725. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.58.4.4
Germain, P., Jaya, I., Christina, Z., & Hinrich, G. (2002). Co-regulator recruitment and the mechanism of retinoic acid receptor synergy. Nature, 415(6868), 187. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/415187a
Ghyselinck, N. B., & Duester, G. (2019). Retinoic acid signaling pathways. Development (Cambridge, England), 146(13). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.167502
Ghyselinck, N. B., Vernet, N., Dennefeld, C., Giese, N., Nau, H., Chambon, P., . . . Mark, M. (2006). Retinoids and spermatogenesis: Lessons from mutant mice lacking the plasma retinol binding protein. Developmental Dynamics, 235(6), 1608–1622. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.20795
Giguere, V., Ong, E. S., Segui, P., & Evans, R. M. (1987). Identification of a receptor for the morphogen retinoic acid. Nature, 330(6149), 624–629. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/330624a0
Goodman, D. S. (1984). Vitamin A and retinoids in health and disease. The New England journal of medicine, 310(16), 1023. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198404193101605
Greally, J. M., & Jacobs, M. N. (2013). In vitro and in vivo testing methods of epigenomic endpoints for evaluating endocrine disruptors. ALTEX Alternatives to animal experimentation, 30(4), 445–471. Available at: https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.2013.4.445
Green, M. H., & Green, J. B. (1994). Vitamin A Intake and Status Influence Retinol Balance, Utilization and Dynamics in Rats. The Journal of Nutrition, 124(12), 2477–2485. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/124.12.2477
Griswold, M. D. (2016). Spermatogenesis: The Commitment to Meiosis. Physiological reviews, 96(1), 1–17. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00013.2015
Griswold, M. D., & Hogarth, C. (2018). Beyond stem cells: Commitment of progenitor cells to meiosis. Stem Cell Research, 27, 169–171. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scr.2018.01.032
Grive, K. J., & Freiman, R. N. (2015). The developmental origins of the mammalian ovarian reserve. Development, 142(15), 2554. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.125211
Grün, F., Blumberg, B. (2006) Environmental obesogens: organotins and endocrine disruption via nuclear receptor signaling. Endocrinology, 147(6 Suppl), S50-S55. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2005-1129
Gundersen, T. E. (2006). Methods for detecting and identifying retinoids in tissue. Journal of Neurobiology, 66(7), 631–644. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/neu.20243
Han, B. C., Xia, H. F., Sun, J., Yang, Y., & Peng, J. P. (2010). Retinoic acid‐metabolizing enzyme cytochrome P450 26a1 (cyp26a1) is essential for implantation: Functional study of its role in early pregnancy. Journal of Cellular Physiology, 223(2), 471–479. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.22056
Hannon, P. R., & Flaws, J. A. (2015). The Effects of Phthalates on the Ovary. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 6, 8. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2015.00008
Harrison, E. H. (2012). Mechanisms involved in the intestinal absorption of dietary vitamin A and provitamin A carotenoids. Biochimica et biophysica acta, 1821(1), 70–77. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbalip.2011.06.002
Hayashi, T., Kageyama, Y., Ishizaka, K., Kihara, K., & Oshima, H. (2000). Sexual dimorphism in the regulation of meiotic process in the rabbit. Biology of Reproduction, 62(6), 1722. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod62.6.1722
Heller, C. G., Moore, D. J., & Paulsen, C. A. (1961). Suppression of spermatogenesis and chronic toxicity in men by a new series of bis(dichloroacetyl) diamines. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 3(1), 1–11. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-008X(61)90002-3
Hickford, D. E., Wong, S. F. L., Frankenberg, S. R., Shaw, G., Yu, H., Chew, K. Y., & Renfree, M. B. (2017). Expression of STRA8 is conserved in therian mammals but expression of CYP26B1 differs between marsupials and mice. Biology of Reproduction, 97(2), 217–229. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/biolre/iox083
Hoegberg, P., Schmidt, C. K., Nau, H., Catharine Ross, A., Zolfaghari, R., Fletcher, N., . . . Håkansson, H. (2003). 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin induces lecithin: retinol acyltransferase transcription in the rat kidney. Chemico-Biological Interactions, 145(1), 1–16. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2797(02)00157-6
Hogarth, C. A., & Griswold, M. D. (2010). The key role of vitamin A in spermatogenesis. J Clin Invest, 120(4), 956–962. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI41303
Hogarth, C. A., Amory, J. K., & Griswold, M. D. (2011). Inhibiting vitamin A metabolism as an approach to male contraception. Trends Endocrinol Metab, 22(4), 136–144. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2011.01.001
Hogarth, C. A., Evanoff, R., Mitchell, D., Kent, T., Small, C., Amory, J. K., & Griswold, M. D. (2013). Turning a spermatogenic wave into a tsunami: synchronizing murine spermatogenesis using WIN 18,446. Biology of Reproduction, 88(2), 40–40. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.112.105346
Hogarth, A. C., and Griswold, D. M. (2013). Retinoic acid regulation of male meiosis. Current Opinion in Endocrinology & Diabetes and Obesity, 20(3), 217–223. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1097/MED.0b013e32836067cf
Hogarth, C. A., Evans, E., Onken, J., Kent, T., Mitchell, D., Petkovich, M., & Griswold, M. D. (2015). CYP26 Enzymes Are Necessary Within the Postnatal Seminiferous Epithelium for Normal Murine Spermatogenesis1. Biology of Reproduction, 93(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.115.129718
Holm, J. B., Mazaud-Guittot, S., Danneskiold-Samsøe, N. B., Chalmey, C., Jensen, B., Nørregård, M. M., . . . Kristensen, D. M. (2016). Intrauterine Exposure to Paracetamol and Aniline Impairs Female Reproductive Development by Reducing Follicle Reserves and Fertility. Toxicological Sciences, 150(1), 178–189. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfv332
Hua, S., Kittler, R., & White, K. P. (2009). Genomic Antagonism between Retinoic Acid and Estrogen Signaling in Breast Cancer. Cell, 137(7), 1259–1271. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.04.043
Huang, F.-J., Hsuuw, Y.-D., Lan, K.-C., Kang, H.-Y., Chang, S.-Y., Hsu, Y.-C., & Huang, K.-E. (2005). Adverse effects of retinoic acid on embryo development and the selective expression of retinoic acid receptors in mouse blastocysts. Human Reproduction, 21(1), 202–209. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dei286
Huang, H. F. S., & Marshall, G. R. (1983). Failure of Spermatid Release under Various Vitamin A States – An Indication of Delayed Spermiation. Biology of Reproduction, 28(5), 1163–1172. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod28.5.1163
Håkansson, H., Manzoor, E., & Ahlborg, U. G. (1991). Interaction between dietary vitamin A and single oral doses of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) on the TCDD-induced toxicity and on the vitamin A status in the rat. Journal of nutritional science and vitaminology, 37(3), 239. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3177/jnsv.37.239
Ide, T., Shimano, H., Yoshikawa, T., Yahagi, N., Amemiya-Kudo, M., Matsuzaka, T., . . . Yamada, N. (2003). Cross-talk between peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) alpha and liver X receptor (LXR) in nutritional regulation of fatty acid metabolism. II. LXRs suppress lipid degradation gene promoters through inhibition of PPAR signaling. Molecular endocrinology (Baltimore, Md.), 17(7), 1255. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1210/me.2002-0191
IUPAC-IUB Joint Commission on Biochemical Nomenclature (JCBN) Recommendations 1981 (1982). Nomenclature of Retinoids. European Journal of Biochemistry, 129(1), 1–5. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1982.tb07013.x
Jacobs, M. N., Marczylo, E. L., Guerrero-Bosagna, C., & Rüegg, J. (2017). Marked for Life: Epigenetic Effects of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 42(1), 105–160. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102016-061111
Jacobs, M. N. (2004). In silico tools to aid risk assessment of endocrine disrupting chemicals. Toxicology, 205(1–2), 43–53. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2004.06.036
Jacobs, M. N., Nolan, G. T., & Hood, S. R. (2005). Lignans, bacteriocides and organochlorine compounds activate the human pregnane X receptor (PXR). Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 209(2), 123–133. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2005.03.015
Jacobs, M. N (2005) ‘Nuclear receptors and dietary ligands’ in ‘Nutrients and Cell Signaling’, editors: J Zemplini and K Dakshinamurti, ‘Oxidative Stress and Disease’ series. pp 35–90. publ. CRC Taylor and Francis Inc, New York Spring 2005. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420028362.ch2
Jauregui, E. J., Mitchell, D., Topping, T., Hogarth, C. A., & Griswold, M. D. (2018). Retinoic acid receptor signaling is necessary in steroidogenic cells for normal spermatogenesis and epididymal function. Development. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.160465
Jayaram, M., Murthy, S. K., & Ganguly, J. (1973). Effect of vitamin A deprivation on the cholesterol side-chain cleavage enzyme activity of testes and ovaries of rats (Short Communication). Biochemical Journal, 136(1), 221–223. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1042/bj1360221
Jiang, Y., Chen, L., Taylor, R. N., Li, C., & Zhou, X. (2018a). Physiological and pathological implications of retinoid action in the endometrium. J Endocrinol, 236(3), R169–R188. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1530/JOE-17-0544
Jiang, Y., Li, C., Chen, L., Wang, F., & Zhou, X. (2017). Potential role of retinoids in ovarian physiology and pathogenesis of polycystic ovary syndrome. Clin Chim Acta, 469, 87–93. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2017.03.025
Jiang, Y., Zhao, Y., Chen, S., Chen, L., Li, C., & Zhou, X. (2018b). Regulation by FSH of the dynamic expression of retinol-binding protein 4 in the mouse ovary. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 16(1), 25. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-018-0348-8
Jing, J., Nelson, C., Paik, J., Shirasaka, Y., Amory, J. K., & Isoherranen, N. (2017). Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model of All-trans-Retinoic Acid with Application to Cancer Populations and Drug Interactions. The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 361(2), 246–258. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.117.240523
Johansson, H. K. L., Svingen, T., Fowler, P. A., Vinggaard, A. M., & Boberg, J. (2017). Environmental influences on ovarian dysgenesis - developmental windows sensitive to chemical exposures. Nat Rev Endocrinol, 13(7), 400–414. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2017.36
Jørgensen, A., Nielsen, J. E., Perlman, S., Lundvall, L., Mitchell, R. T., Juul, A., & Rajpert-De Meyts, E. (2015). Ex vivo culture of human fetal gonads: manipulation of meiosis signalling by retinoic acid treatment disrupts testis development. Human Reproduction, 30(10), 2351–2363. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev194
Kakizaki, S., Karami, S., & Negishi, M. (2002). Retinoic acids repress constitutive active receptor-mediated induction by 1,4-bis2-(3,5-dichloropyridyloxy)benzene of the CYP2B10 gene in mouse primary hepatocytes. Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, 30(2), 208. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.30.2.208
Kamata, R., Shiraishi, F., Nishikawa, J.-i., Yonemoto, J., & Shiraishi, H. (2008). Screening and detection of the in vitro agonistic activity of xenobiotics on the retinoic acid receptor. Toxicology in Vitro, 22(4), 1050–1061. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2008.01.002
Kamstra, J. H., Hruba, E., Blumberg, B., Janesick, A., Mandrup, S., Hamers, T., & Legler, J. (2014). Transcriptional and epigenetic mechanisms underlying enhanced in vitro adipocyte differentiation by the brominated flame retardant BDE-47. Environmental Science & Technology, 48(7), 4110–4119. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1021/es405524b
Kanayama, T., Kobayashi, N., Mamiya, S., Nakanishi, T., & Nishikawa, J.-I. (2005). Organotin compounds promote adipocyte differentiation as agonists of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma/retinoid X receptor pathway. Molecular pharmacology, 67(3), 766. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.104.008409
Kashimada, K., Svingen, T., Feng, C.-W., Pelosi, E., Bagheri-Fam, S., Harley, V. R., . . . Koopman, P. (2011). Antagonistic regulation of Cyp26b1 by transcription factors SOX9/SF1 and FOXL2 during gonadal development in mice. FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 25(10), 3561–3569. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.11-184333
Kasimanickam, V., & Kasimanickam, R. (2014). Exogenous Retinoic Acid and Cytochrome P450 26B1 Inhibitor Modulate Meiosis‐Associated Genes Expression in Canine Testis, an In Vitro Model. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 49(2), 315–323. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.12276
Kawai, T., Richards, J. S., & Shimada, M. (2018). The Cell Type–Specific Expression of Lhcgr in Mouse Ovarian Cells: Evidence for a DNA-Demethylation–Dependent Mechanism. Endocrinology, 159(5), 2062–2074. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2018-00117
Kawai, T., Yanaka, N., Richards, J. S., & Shimada, M. (2016). De Novo-Synthesized Retinoic Acid in Ovarian Antral Follicles Enhances FSH-Mediated Ovarian Follicular Cell Differentiation and Female Fertility. Endocrinology, 157(5), 2160–2172. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2015-2064
Kedishvili, N. Y. (2013). Enzymology of retinoic acid biosynthesis and degradation. Journal of Lipid Research, 54(7), 1744–1760. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.R037028
Kelly, M., Widjaja-Adhi, M. A. K., Palczewski, G., & von Lintig, J. (2016). Transport of vitamin A across blood–tissue barriers is facilitated by STRA6. The FASEB Journal, 30(8), 2985–2995. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.201600446R
Kelly, M., & von Lintig, J. (2015). STRA6: role in cellular retinol uptake and efflux. Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition, 4(4), 229–242. Available at: https://10.3978/j.issn.2304-3881.2015.01.12
Kent, T., Arnold, S. L., Fasnacht, R., Rowsey, R., Mitchell, D., Hogarth, C. A., . . . Griswold, M. D. (2016). ALDH Enzyme Expression Is Independent of the Spermatogenic Cycle, and Their Inhibition Causes Misregulation of Murine Spermatogenic Processes1. Biology of Reproduction, 94(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.115.131458
Khan, H. L., Bhatti, S., Suhail, S., Gul, R., Awais, A., Hamayun, H., . . . Asif, W. (2019). Antral follicle count (AFC) and serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) are the predictors of natural fecundability have similar trends irrespective of fertility status and menstrual characteristics among fertile and infertile women below the age of 40 years. Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 17(1), 20–20. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-019-0464-0
Kim, H., Lapointe, J., Kaygusuz, G., Ong, D. E., Li, C., van de Rijn, M., . . . Pollack, J. R. (2005). The retinoic acid synthesis gene ALDH1a2 is a candidate tumor suppressor in prostate cancer. Cancer research, 65(18), 8118. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-4562
Klimenko, K., Rosenberg, S. A., Dybdahl, M., Wedebye, E. B., & Nikolov, N. G. (2019). QSAR modelling of a large imbalanced aryl hydrocarbon activation dataset by rational and random sampling and screening of 80,086 REACH pre-registered and/or registered substances.(Research Article)(quantitative structure-activity relationship)(Report). PLOS ONE, 14(3), e0213848. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213848
Klonisch, T., Muller-Huesmann, H., Riedel, M., Kehlen, A., Bialek, J., Radestock, Y., . . . Hombach-Klonisch, S. (2005). INSL3 in the benign hyperplastic and neoplastic human prostate gland. Int J Oncol, 27(2), 307–315. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.27.2.307
Kogan, P., & Wald, M. (2014). Male Contraception: History and Development. Urologic Clinics of North America, 41(1), 145–161. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2013.08.012
Korkmaz, E., Cetinkaya, N., Oz, M., Ozgu, E., Bas, S., Isikalan, M., . . . Gungor, T. (2017). The Possibly Reversible Isotretinoin Effect of Decreased Ovarian Reserve in Sprague-Dawley Albinos: Part I, Biochemical Analyses. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, 82(1), 72–77. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1159/000445294
Koubova, J., Hu, Y.-C., Bhattacharyya, T., Soh, Y. Q. S., Gill, M. E., Goodheart, M. L., . . . Page, D. C. (2014). Retinoic acid activates two pathways required for meiosis in mice. PLOS Genetics, 10(8), e1004541-e1004541. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004541
Koubova, J., Menke, D. B., Zhou, Q., Capel, B., Griswold, M. D., & Page, D. C. (2006). Retinoic acid regulates sex-specific timing of meiotic initiation in mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(8), 2474. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0510813103
Kransler, K. M., Tonucci, D. A., McGarrigle, B. P., Napoli, J. L., & Olson, J. R. (2007). Gestational exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin alters retinoid homeostasis in maternal and perinatal tissues of the Holtzman rat. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 224(1), 29–38. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2007.06.006
Krężel, W., Rühl, R., & de Lera, A. R. (2019). Alternative retinoid X receptor (RXR) ligands. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, 491, 110436. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2019.04.016
Kumar, S., Chatzi, C., Brade, T., Cunningham, T. J., Zhao, X., & Duester, G. (2011). Sex-specific timing of meiotic initiation is regulated by Cyp26b1 independent of retinoic acid signalling. Nature Communications, 2, 151–151. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1136
Kurlandsky, S. B., Gamble, M. V., Ramakrishnan, R., & Blaner, W. S. (1995). Plasma Delivery of Retinoic Acid to Tissues in the Rat. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 270(30), 17850–17857. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.270.30.17850
Lambrot, R., Coffigny, H., Pairault, C., Donnadieu, A.-C., Frydman, R., Habert, R., & Rouiller-Fabre, V. (2006). Use of Organ Culture to Study the Human Fetal Testis Development: Effect of Retinoic Acid. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 91(7), 2696–2703. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2005-2113
Lammer, E. J., Chen, D. T., Hoar, R. M., Agnish, N. D., Benke, P. J., Braun, J. T., . . . Sun, S. C. (1985). Retinoic Acid Embryopathy. New England Journal of Medicine, 313(14), 837–841. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198510033131401
Laudet, V., Zieger, E., & Schubert, M. (2015). Evolution of the Retinoic Acid Signaling Pathway. In P. Dollé & K. Neiderreither (Eds.), The Retinoids: Biology, Biochemistry and Disease (pp. 75–90). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118628003.ch4
Laursen, K. B., Wong, P.-M., & Gudas, L. J. (2012). Epigenetic regulation by RARα maintains ligand-independent transcriptional activity. Nucleic acids research, 40(1), 102–115. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr637
Lawson, C., Gieske, M., Murdoch, B., Ye, P., Li, Y., Hassold, T., & Hunt, P. A. (2011). Gene Expression in the Fetal Mouse Ovary Is Altered by Exposure to Low Doses of Bisphenol A1. Biology of Reproduction, 84(1), 79–86. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.110.084814
Le Bouffant, R., Guerquin, M. J., Duquenne, C., Frydman, N., Coffigny, H., Rouiller-Fabre, V., . . . Livera, G. (2010). Meiosis initiation in the human ovary requires intrinsic retinoic acid synthesis. Human Reproduction, 25(10), 2579–2590. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deq195
le Maire, A., Teyssier, C., Balaguer, P., Bourguet, W., & Germain, P. (2019). Regulation of RXR-RAR Heterodimers by RXR- and RAR-Specific Ligands and Their Combinations. Cells, 8(11), 1392. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8111392
Lee, H. Y., Suh, Y. A., Robinson, M. J., Clifford, J. L., Hong, W. K., Woodgett, J. R., . . . Kurie, J. M. (2000). Stress pathway activation induces phosphorylation of retinoid X receptor. The Journal of biological chemistry, 275(41), 32193. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M005490200
Lee, L. M. Y., Leung, C.-Y., Tang, W. W. C., Choi, H.-L., Leung, Y.-C., McCaffery, P. J., . . . Shum, A. S. W. (2012). A paradoxical teratogenic mechanism for retinoic acid. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(34), 13668-13673. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1200872109
Lemaire, G., Balaguer, P., Michel, S., & Rahmani, R. (2005). Activation of retinoic acid receptor-dependent transcription by organochlorine pesticides. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 202(1), 38–49. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2004.06.004
Li, H., & Clagett-Dame, M. (2009). Vitamin A Deficiency Blocks the Initiation of Meiosis of Germ Cells in the Developing Rat Ovary In Vivo1. Biology of Reproduction, 81(5), 996–1001. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.109.078808
Li, M., Sun, Y., Guan, X., Shu, X., & Li, C. (2014). Advanced progress on the relationship between RA and its receptors and malignant tumors. Critical Reviews in Oncology / Hematology, 91(3), 271–282. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2014.04.001
Lin, Y., Gill, M. E., Koubova, J., & Page, D. C. (2008). Germ cell-intrinsic and -extrinsic factors govern meiotic initiation in mouse embryos. Science (New York, N.Y.), 322(5908), 1685. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1166340
Liu, L., Suzuki, K., Nakagata, N., Mihara, K., Matsumaru, D., Ogino, Y., . . . Yamada, G. (2012). Retinoic acid signaling regulates sonic hedgehog and bone morphogenetic protein signalings during genital tubercle development. Birth defects research. Part B, Developmental and reproductive toxicology, 95(1), 79–88. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/bdrb.20344
Liu, Z., Sun, Y., Jiang, Y., Qian, Y., Chen, S., Gao, S., . . . Zhou, X. (2018). Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) promotes retinol uptake and metabolism in the mouse ovary. Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 16(1), 52–52. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-018-0371-9
Livera, G., Rouiller-Fabre, V., Durand, P., & Habert, R. (2000a). Multiple effects of retinoids on the development of Sertoli, germ, and Leydig cells of fetal and neonatal rat testis in culture. Biology of Reproduction, 62(5), 1303. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod62.5.1303
Livera, G., Rouiller-Fabre, V., Valla, J., & Habert, R. (2000b). Effects of retinoids on the meiosis in the fetal rat ovary in culture. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, 165(1–2), 225–231. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0303-7207(00)00271-9
Lohnes, D., Kastner, P., Dierich, A., Mark, M., Lemeur, M., & Chambon, P. (1993). Function of retinoic acid receptor γ in the mouse. Cell, 73(4), 643–658. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(93)90246-M
Long, M. D., Singh, P. K., Russell, J. R., Llimos, G., Rosario, S., Rizvi, A., . . . Campbell, M. J. (2019). The miR-96 and RARγ signaling axis governs androgen signaling and prostate cancer progression. Oncogene, 38(3), 421–444. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-018-0450-6
Lovekamp-Swan, T., Jetten, A. M., & Davis, B. J. (2003). Dual activation of PPARα and PPARγ by mono-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate in rat ovarian granulosa cells. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, 201(1), 133–141. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0303-7207(02)00423-9
Lu, C., Xu, M., Wang, Y., Qin, Y., Du, G., Wu, W., . . . Wang, X. (2013). Genetic variants in meiotic program initiation pathway genes are associated with spermatogenic impairment in a Han Chinese population. PLOS ONE, 8(1), e53443-e53443. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053443
Lucas, T. F., Nascimento, A. R., Pisolato, R., Pimenta, M. T., Lazari, M. F. M., & Porto, C. S. (2014). Receptors and signaling pathways involved in proliferation and differentiation of Sertoli cells. Spermatogenesis, 4, e28138-e28138. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4161/spmg.28138
Ma, J.-j., Han, B.-c., Yang, Y., & Peng, J.-p. (2012). Retinoic acid synthesis and metabolism are concurrent in the mouse uterus during peri-implantation. Cell and Tissue Research, 350(3), 525–537. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-012-1507-4
Macejova, D., Toporova, L., & Brtko, J. (2016). The role of retinoic acid receptors and their cognate ligands in reproduction in a context of triorganotin based endocrine disrupting chemicals. Endocr Regul, 50(3), 154–164. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/enr-2016-0018
Maclean, G., Li, H., Metzger, D., Chambon, P., & Petkovich, M. (2007). Apoptotic Extinction of Germ Cells in Testes of Cyp26b1 Knockout Mice. Endocrinology, 148(10), 4560–4567. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2007-0492
Mamsen, L. S., Ernst, E. H., Borup, R., Larsen, A., Olesen, R. H., Ernst, E., . . . Andersen, C. Y. (2017). Temporal expression pattern of genes during the period of sex differentiation in human embryonic gonads. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 15961. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15931-3
Mangelsdorf, D. J., & Evans, R. M. (1995). The RXR heterodimers and orphan receptors (Vol. 83, pp. 841–850). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(95)90200-7
Mangelsdorf, D. J., Thummel, C., Beato, M., Herrlich, P., Schütz, G., Umesono, K., . . . Evans, R. M. (1995). The nuclear receptor superfamily: the second decade. Cell, 83(6), 835–839. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(95)90199-X
Marceau, G., Gallot, D., Borel, V., Lémery, D., Dastugue, B., Dechelotte, P., & Sapin, V. (2006). Molecular and metabolic retinoid pathways in human amniotic membranes. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 346(4), 1207–1216. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.06.024
Mark, M., Jacobs, H., Oulad-Abdelghani, M., Dennefeld, C., Féret, B., Vernet, N., . . . Ghyselinck, N. B. (2008). STRA8-deficient spermatocytes initiate, but fail to complete, meiosis and undergo premature chromosome condensation. Journal of Cell Science, 121(19), 3233. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.035071
Mark, M., Teletin, M., Vernet, N., & Ghyselinck, N. B. (2015). Role of retinoic acid receptor (RAR) signaling in post-natal male germ cell differentiation. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms, 1849(2), 84–93. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2014.05.019
Marti, N., Galván, J. A., Pandey, A. V., Trippel, M., Tapia, C., Müller, M., . . . Flück, C. E. (2017). Genes and proteins of the alternative steroid backdoor pathway for dihydrotestosterone synthesis are expressed in the human ovary and seem enhanced in the polycystic ovary syndrome. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, 441, 116–123. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2016.07.029
Martin, M. T., Dix, D. J., Judson, R. S., Kavlock, R. J., Reif, D. M., Richard, A. M., . . . Houck, K. A. (2010). Impact of Environmental Chemicals on Key Transcription Regulators and Correlation to Toxicity End Points within EPA’s ToxCast Program. Chemical Research in Toxicology, 23(3), 578–590. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1021/tx900325g
McLaren A. Primordial germ cells in the mouse. 2003 Developmental Biology 262, 1–15. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0012-1606(03)00214-8
Menegola, E., Broccia, M. L., Di Renzo, F., & Giavini, E. (2006). Postulated pathogenic pathway in triazole fungicide induced dysmorphogenic effects. Reproductive Toxicology, 22(2), 186–195. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2006.04.008
Minegishi, T., Hirakawa, T., Kishi, H., Abe, K., Tano, M., Abe, Y., & Miyamoto, K. (2000). The mechanisms of retinoic acid-induced regulation on the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor in rat granulosa cells. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research, 1495(3), 203–211. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4889(00)00003-3
Minkina, A., Lindeman, R. E., Gearhart, M. D., Chassot, A. A., Chaboissier, M. C., Ghyselinck, N. B., . . . Zarkower, D. (2017). Retinoic acid signaling is dispensable for somatic development and function in the mammalian ovary. Dev Biol, 424(2), 208–220. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2017.02.015
Minkina, A., Matson, Clinton K., Lindeman, Robin E., Ghyselinck, Norbert B., Bardwell, Vivian J., & Zarkower, D. (2014). DMRT1 Protects Male Gonadal Cells from Retinoid-Dependent Sexual Transdifferentiation. Developmental Cell, 29(5), 511–520. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2014.04.017
Morales, C. R., & Griswold, M. D. (1987). Retinol Induces Stage Synchronization in Seminiferous Tubules of Vitamin A Deficient Ratsa. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 513(1), 292–293. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1987.tb25018.x
Mouchon, A., Delmotte, M. H., Formstecher, P., & Lefebvre, P. (1999). Allosteric regulation of the discriminative responsiveness of retinoic acid receptor to natural and synthetic ligands by retinoid X receptor and DNA. Molecular and cellular biology, 19(4), 3073–3085. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.19.4.3073
Mumford, S. L., Browne, R. W., Schliep, K. C., Schmelzer, J., Plowden, T. C., Michels, K. A., . . . Schisterman, E. F. (2016). Serum Antioxidants Are Associated with Serum Reproductive Hormones and Ovulation among Healthy Women. The Journal of Nutrition, 146(1), 98–106. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.115.217620
Murphy, K. A., Quadro, L., & White, L. A. (2007). The Intersection Between the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor (AhR)‐ and Retinoic Acid‐Signaling Pathways Vitamins & Hormones (Vol. 75, pp. 33–67): Academic Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0083-6729(06)75002-6
Nakahashi, K., Matsuda, M., & Mori, T. (2001). Vitamin A Insufficiency Accelerates the Decrease in the Number of Sperm Induced by an Environmental Disruptor, Bisphenol A, in Neonatal Mice. Zoological Science, 18(6), 819–821. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.18.819
Nakajima, T., Iguchi, T., & Sato, T. (2016). Retinoic acid signaling determines the fate of uterine stroma in the mouse Müllerian duct. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(50), 14354–14359. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1608808113
Nakanishi, T., Nishikawa, J.-i., Hiromori, Y., Yokoyama, H., Koyanagi, M., Takasuga, S., . . . Tanaka, K. (2005). Trialkyltin Compounds Bind Retinoid X Receptor to Alter Human Placental Endocrine Functions. Molecular Endocrinology, 19(10), 2502–2516. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1210/me.2004-0397
Napoli, J. L. (2012). Physiological insights into all-trans-retinoic acid biosynthesis. BBA - Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids, 1821(1), 152–167. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbalip.2011.05.004
Napoli, J. L. (2017). Cellular retinoid binding-proteins, CRBP, CRABP, FABP5: Effects on retinoid metabolism, function and related diseases. Pharmacology & therapeutics, 173, 19–33. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2017.01.004
Nelson, C. H., Buttrick, B. R., & Isoherranen, N. (2013). Therapeutic potential of the inhibition of the retinoic acid hydroxylases CYP26A1 and CYP26B1 by xenobiotics. Current topics in medicinal chemistry, 13(12), 1402–1428. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2174/1568026611313120004
Nervi, C., & Grignani, F. (2014). RARs and MicroRNAs. In M. A. Asson-Batres & C. Rochette-Egly (Eds.), The Biochemistry of Retinoic Acid Receptors I: Structure, Activation, and Function at the Molecular Level (pp. 151–179). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9050-5_8
Ngo, S., Li, X., O’Neill, R., Bhoothpur, C., Gluckman, P., & Sheppard, A. (2014). Elevated S-Adenosylhomocysteine Alters Adipocyte Functionality With Corresponding Changes in Gene Expression and Associated Epigenetic Marks. Diabetes, 63(7), 2273. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2337/db13-1640
Nicholls, P. K., Harrison, C. A., Rainczuk, K. E., Wayne Vogl, A., & Stanton, P. G. (2013). Retinoic acid promotes Sertoli cell differentiation and antagonises activin-induced proliferation. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, 377(1–2), 33–43. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2013.06.034
Niederreither, K., Fraulob, V., Garnier, J.-M., Chambon, P., & Dollé, P. (2002a). Differential expression of retinoic acid-synthesizing (RALDH) enzymes during fetal development and organ differentiation in the mouse. Mechanisms of Development, 110(1), 165–171. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4773(01)00561-5
Niederreither, K., McCaffery, P., Dräger, U. C., Chambon, P., & Dollé, P. (1997). Restricted expression and retinoic acid-induced downregulation of the retinaldehyde dehydrogenase type 2 (RALDH-2) gene during mouse development. Mechanisms of Development, 62(1), 67–78. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4773(96)00653-3
Niederreither, K., Vermot, J., Fraulob, V., Chambon, P., & Dolle, P. (2002b). Retinaldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (RALDH2)- independent patterns of retinoic acid synthesis in the mouse embryo. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99(25), 16111–16116. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.252626599
Nilsson, C. B., & Håkansson, H. (2002). The Retinoid Signaling System — A Target in Dioxin Toxicity. Critical Reviews in Toxicology, 32(3), 211–232. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/20024091064228
Nishikawa, J.-i., Mamiya, S., Kanayama, T., Nishikawa, T., Shiraishi, F., & Horiguchi, T. (2004). Involvement of the Retinoid X Receptor in the Development of Imposex Caused by Organotins in Gastropods. Environmental Science & Technology, 38(23), 6271–6276. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1021/es049593u
Noback, C. R., & Takahashi, Y. I. (1978). Micromorphology of the placenta of rats reared on marginal vitamin-A-deficient diet. Cells Tissues Organs, 102(2), 195–202. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1159/000145637
Novak, J., Benisek, M., & Hilscherova, K. (2008). Disruption of retinoid transport, metabolism and signaling by environmental pollutants. Environ Int, 34(6), 898–913. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2007.12.024
Nya-Ngatchou, J. J., Arnold, S. L. M., Walsh, T. J., Muller, C. H., Page, S. T., Isoherranen, N., & Amory, J. K. (2013). Intratesticular 13-cis retinoic acid is lower in men with abnormal semen analyses: a pilot study. Andrology, 1(2), 325–331. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2047-2927.2012.00033.x
O'Byrne, S. M., & Blaner, W. S. (2013). Retinol and retinyl esters: biochemistry and physiology. Journal of Lipid Research, 54(7), 1731–1743. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.R037648
Oda, Y., Nakajima, M., Tsuneyama, K., Takamiya, M., Aoki, Y., Fukami, T., & Yokoi, T. (2014). Retinoid X receptor α in human liver is regulated by miR-34a. Biochemical pharmacology, 90(2), 179–187. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2014.05.002
Ouimet, M., Ediriweera, H. N., Gundra, U. M., Sheedy, F. J., Ramkhelawon, B., Hutchison, S. B., . . . Moore, K. J. (2015). MicroRNA-33-dependent regulation of macrophage metabolism directs immune cell polarization in atherosclerosis. The Journal of clinical investigation, 125(12), 4334–4348. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI81676
Oulad-Abdelghani, M., Bouillet, P., Décimo, D., Gansmuller, A., Heyberger, S., Dollé, P., . . . Chambon, P. (1996). Characterization of a premeiotic germ cell-specific cytoplasmic protein encoded by Stra8, a novel retinoic acid-responsive gene. The Journal of Cell Biology, 135(2), 469. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.135.2.469
Paganetto, G., Campi, F., Varani, K., Piffanelli, A., Giovannini, G., & Borea, P. A. (2000). Endocrine-Disrupting Agents on Healthy Human Tissues. Pharmacology & Toxicology, 86(1), 24–29. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0773.2000.pto860105.x
Paik, J., Haenisch, M., Muller, C. H., Goldstein, A. S., Arnold, S., Isoherranen, N., . . . Amory, J. K. (2014). Inhibition of Retinoic Acid Biosynthesis by the Bisdichloroacetyldiamine WIN 18,446 Markedly Suppresses Spermatogenesis and Alters Retinoid Metabolism in Mice. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 289(21), 15104–15117. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M113.540211
Palczewski, K. (2012). Chemistry and biology of vision. The Journal of biological chemistry, 287(3), 1612. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R111.301150
Pan, Y.-Z., Gao, W., & Yu, A.-M. (2009). MicroRNAs regulate CYP3A4 expression via direct and indirect targeting. Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, 37(10), 2112–2117. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.109.027680
Papacleovoulou, G., Edmondson, R. J., Critchley, H. O. D., Hillier, S. G., & Mason, J. I. (2009). 3β-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases and pre-receptor steroid metabolism in the human ovarian surface epithelium. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, 301(1), 65–73. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2008.08.010
Park, S. W., Nhieu, J., Persaud, S. D., Miller, M. C., Xia, Y., Lin, Y.-W., . . . Wei, L.-N. (2019). A new regulatory mechanism for Raf kinase activation, retinoic acid-bound Crabp1. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 10929. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47354-7
Patel, S. H., O'Hara, L., Atanassova, N., Smith, S. E., Curley, M. K., Rebourcet, D., . . . Smith, L. B. (2017). Low-dose tamoxifen treatment in juvenile males has long-term adverse effects on the reproductive system: implications for inducible transgenics. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 8991–8991. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09016-4
Pauli, S. A., Session, D. R., Shang, W., Easley, K., Wieser, F., Taylor, R. N., . . . Sidell, N. (2013). Analysis of follicular fluid retinoids in women undergoing in vitro fertilization: retinoic acid influences embryo quality and is reduced in women with endometriosis. Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 20(9), 1116–1124. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719113477487
Peng, J., Shen, L., Chen, J., Cao, X., Zhou, Y., Weng, H., . . . Wei, G. (2016). New discovery of cryptorchidism: Decreased retinoic acid in testicle. Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society, 24(3), 279–285. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2016.04.020
Pennimpede, T., Cameron Don, A., MacLean Glenn, A., Li, H., Abu-Abed, S., & Petkovich, M. (2010). The role of CYP26 enzymes in defining appropriate retinoic acid exposure during embryogenesis. Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology, 88(10), 883–894. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/bdra.20709
Petkovich, M., Brand, N. J., Krust, A., & Chambon, P. (1987). A human retinoic acid receptor which belongs to the family of nuclear receptors. Nature, 330(6147), 444–450. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/330444a0
Piersma, A. H., Hessel, E. V., & Staal, Y. C. (2017). Retinoic acid in developmental toxicology: Teratogen, morphogen and biomarker. Reprod Toxicol, 72, 53–61. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2017.05.014
Pius, J., Shivanandappa, T., & Krishnakumari, M. K. (1990). Protective role of vitamin A in the male reproductive toxicity of Hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) in the rat. Reproductive Toxicology, 4(4), 325–330. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/0890-6238(90)90045-W
Pu, Y., Pearl, S., Gingrich, J., Jing, J., Martin, D., Murga-Zamalloa, C., & Veiga-Lopez, A. (2019). Multispecies study: low-dose tributyltin impairs ovarian theca cell cholesterol homeostasis through the RXR pathway in five mammalian species including humans. Archives of Toxicology, 93(6), 1665–1677. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-019-02449-y
Quadro, L., Blaner, W. S., Salchow, D. J., Vogel, S., Piantedosi, R., Gouras, P., . . . Gottesman, M. E. (1999). Impaired retinal function and vitamin A availability in mice lacking retinol‐binding protein. EMBO Journal, 18(17), 4633–4644. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/18.17.4633
Raverdeau, M., Gely-Pernot, A., Féret, B., Dennefeld, C., Benoit, G., Davidson, I., . . . Ghyselinck, N. B. (2012). Retinoic acid induces Sertoli cell paracrine signals for spermatogonia differentiation but cell autonomously drives spermatocyte meiosis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(41), 16582. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1214936109
Rhinn, M., & Dollé, P. (2012). Retinoic acid signalling during development. Development (Cambridge, England), 139(5), 843. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.065938
Rochette-Egly, C. (2015). Retinoic acid signaling and mouse embryonic stem cell differentiation: Cross talk between genomic and non-genomic effects of RA. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids, 1851(1), 66–75. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbalip.2014.04.003
Rodahl, K., & Moore, T. (1943). The vitamin A content and toxicity of bear and seal liver. The Biochemical journal, 37(2), 166–168. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1042/bj0370166
Rosenberg, S. A., Watt, E. D., Judson, R. S., Simmons, S. O., Paul Friedman, K., Dybdahl, M., . . . Wedebye, E. B. (2017a). QSAR models for thyroperoxidase inhibition and screening of U.S. and EU chemical inventories. Computational Toxicology, 4, 11–21. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comtox.2017.07.006
Rosenberg, S. A., Xia, M., Huang, R., Nikolov, N. G., Wedebye, E. B., & Dybdahl, M. (2017b). QSAR development and profiling of 72,524 REACH substances for PXR activation and CYP3A4 induction. Computational Toxicology, 1, 39–48. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comtox.2017.01.001
Ross, A. C., & Zolfaghari, R. (2011). Cytochrome P450s in the regulation of cellular retinoic acid metabolism. Annual review of nutrition, 31, 65–87. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nutr-072610-145127
Rossitto, M., Philibert, P., Poulat, F., & Boizet-Bonhoure, B. (2015). Molecular events and signalling pathways of male germ cell differentiation in mouse. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology, 45, 84–93. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2015.09.014
Rotgers, E., Jørgensen, A., & Yao, H. H.-C. (2018). At the Crossroads of Fate—Somatic Cell Lineage Specification in the Fetal Gonad. Endocrine Reviews, 39(5), 739–759. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2018-00010
Rout, U. K., & Armant, D. R. (2002). Expression of genes for alcohol and aldehyde metabolizing enzymes in mouse oocytes and preimplantation embryos. Reproductive Toxicology, 16(3), 253–258. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6238(02)00022-9
Saba, R., Wu, Q., & Saga, Y. (2014). CYP26B1 promotes male germ cell differentiation by suppressing STRA8-dependent meiotic and STRA8-independent mitotic pathways. Developmental Biology, 389(2), 173–181. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.02.013
Sauvant, P., Sapin, V., Alexandre-Gouabau, M.-C., Dodeman, I., Delpal, S., Quadro, L., . . . S-Braesco, V. (2001). Retinol mobilization from cultured rat hepatic stellate cells does not require retinol binding protein synthesis and secretion. International Journal of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, 33(10), 1000–1012. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1357-2725(01)00066-8
Sayem, A. S. M., Giribabu, N., Karim, K., Si, L. K., Muniandy, S., & Salleh, N. (2018). Differential expression of the receptors for thyroid hormone, thyroid stimulating hormone, vitamin D and retinoic acid and extracellular signal-regulated kinase in uterus of rats under influence of sex-steroids. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, 100, 132–141. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2018.02.008
Schulze, G. E., Clay, R. J., Mezza, L. E., Bregman, C. L., Buroker, R. A., & Frantz, J. D. (2001). BMS-189453, a Novel Retinoid Receptor Antagonist, Is a Potent Testicular Toxin. Toxicological Sciences, 59(2), 297–308. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/59.2.297
Schwartz, C., Christiansen, S., Vinggaard, A., Axelstad, M., Hass, U., & Svingen, T. (2019). Anogenital distance as a toxicological or clinical marker for fetal androgen action and risk for reproductive disorders. Archives of Toxicology, 93(2), 253–272. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-018-2350-5
See, A. W.-M., Kaiser, M. E., White, J. C., & Clagett-Dame, M. (2008). A nutritional model of late embryonic vitamin A deficiency produces defects in organogenesis at a high penetrance and reveals new roles for the vitamin in skeletal development. Developmental Biology, 316(2), 171–190. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.10.018
Shannon, S. R., Moise, A. R., & Trainor, P. A. (2017). New insights and changing paradigms in the regulation of vitamin A metabolism in development. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology, 6(3), Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/wdev.264
Sharpe, R. M. (2010). Environmental/lifestyle effects on spermatogenesis. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 365(1546), 1697–1712. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0206
Sheehan, D. J., Hitchcock, C. A., & Sibley, C. M. (1999). Current and Emerging Azole Antifungal Agents. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 12(1), 40. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.12.1.40
Sheeler, C. Q., Dudley, M. W., & Khan, S. A. (2000). Environmental estrogens induce transcriptionally active estrogen receptor dimers in yeast: activity potentiated by the coactivator RIP140.(Statistical Data Included). Environmental health perspectives, 108(2), 97. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0010897
Shen, C.-T., Qiu, Z.-L., Song, H.-J., Wei, W.-J., & Luo, Q.-Y. (2016). miRNA-106a directly targeting RARB associates with the expression of Na(+)/I(-) symporter in thyroid cancer by regulating MAPK signaling pathway. Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR, 35(1), 101–101. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-016-0377-0
Shirakami, Y., Lee, S.-A., Clugston, R. D., & Blaner, W. S. (2012). Hepatic metabolism of retinoids and disease associations. BBA - Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids, 1821(1), 124–136. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbalip.2011.06.023
Shmarakov, I. O. (2015). Retinoid-xenobiotic interactions: the Ying and the Yang. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr, 4(4), 243–267. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2304-3881.2015.05.05
Shmarakov, I. O., Lee, Y. J., Jiang, H., & Blaner, W. S. (2019). Constitutive androstane receptor mediates PCB-induced disruption of retinoid homeostasis. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 381, 114731. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2019.114731
Siddikuzzaman, Guruvayoorappan, C., & Berlin Grace, V. M. (2011). All Trans Retinoic Acid and Cancer. Immunopharmacology and Immunotoxicology, 33(2), 241–249. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3109/08923973.2010.521507
Skakkebæk, N. E., Rajpert-De Meyts, E., & Main, K. M. (2001). Testicular dysgenesis syndrome: an increasingly common developmental disorder with environmental aspects: Opinion. Human Reproduction, 16(5), 972–978. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/16.5.972
Spade, D. J., Dere, E., Hall, S. J., Schorl, C., Freiman, R. N., & Boekelheide, K. (2019a). All-Trans Retinoic Acid Disrupts Development in Ex Vivo Cultured Fetal Rat Testes. I: Altered Seminiferous Cord Maturation and Testicular Cell Fate. Toxicological Sciences, 167(2), 546–558. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfy260
Spade, D. J., Hall, S. J., Wortzel, J. D., Reyes, G., & Boekelheide, K. (2019b). All-trans Retinoic Acid Disrupts Development in Ex Vivo Cultured Fetal Rat Testes. II: Modulation of Mono-(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate Toxicity. Toxicological Sciences, 168(1), 149–159. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfy283
Spiller, C., Koopman, P., & Bowles, J. (2017). Sex Determination in the Mammalian Germline. Annu Rev Genet, 51, 265–285. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-120215-035449
Spiller, C. M., & Bowles, J. (2015). Sex determination in mammalian germ cells. Asian J Androl, 17(3), 427–432. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.150037
Sporn, M. B., & Roberts, A. B. (1985). Introduction: What is a retinoid? Retinoids: differentiation and disease.
Stevison, F., Hogarth, C., Tripathy, S., Kent, T., & Isoherranen, N. (2017). Inhibition of the all trans-retinoic acid hydroxylases CYP26A1 and CYP26B1 results in dynamic, tissue-specific changes in endogenous atRA signaling. Drug Metabolism and Disposition. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.117.075341
Stevison, F., Jing, J., Tripathy, S., & Isoherranen, N. (2015). Role of Retinoic Acid-Metabolizing Cytochrome P450s, CYP26, in Inflammation and Cancer. Advances in pharmacology (San Diego, Calif.), 74, 373. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.apha.2015.04.006
Stoppie, P., Borgers, M., Borghgraef, P., Dillen, L., Goossens, J., Sanz, G., Van Wauwe, J. (2000). R115866 inhibits all-trans-retinoic acid metabolism and exerts retinoidal effects in rodents. The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 293(1), 304.
Su, R.-W., & Fazleabas, A. T. (2015). Implantation and Establishment of Pregnancy in Human and Nonhuman Primates. Advances in anatomy, embryology, and cell biology, 216, 189–213. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15856-3_10
Sun, L. L., Sun, Z. Y., Zhang, P., Zhai, X. W., Tang, J., Pan, Q. J., . . . Shen, W. (2010). Effect of insulin on oogenesis from mouse fetal germ cells in a serum-free 3D culture system. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 20(1), 11–25. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.11.001
Suzuki, H., Kanai-Azuma, M., & Kanai, Y. (2015). From Sex Determination to Initial Folliculogenesis in Mammalian Ovaries: Morphogenetic Waves along the Anteroposterior and Dorsoventral Axes. Sex Dev, 9(4), 190–204. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1159/000440689
Svingen, T., & Koopman, P. (2013). Building the mammalian testis: origins, differentiation, and assembly of the component cell populations. Genes & development, 27(22), 2409–2426. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.228080.113
Szanto, A., Narkar, V., Shen, Q., Uray, I. P., Davies, P. J. A., & Nagy, L. (2004). Retinoid X receptors: X-ploring their (patho)physiological functions. Cell death and differentiation, 11 Suppl 2, S126. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.cdd.4401533
Tanumihardjo, S. A., Russell, R. M., Stephensen, C. B., Gannon, B. M., Craft, N. E., Haskell, M. J., . . . Raiten, D. J. (2016). Biomarkers of Nutrition for Development (BOND)-Vitamin A Review. The Journal of Nutrition, 146(9), 1816S-1848S. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.115.229708
Tarrade, A., Schoonjans, K., Pavan, L., Auwerx, J., Rochette-Egly, C. c., Evain-Brion, D. l., & Fournier, T. (2001). PPARγ/RXRα Heterodimers Control Human Trophoblast Invasion. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 86(10), 5017–5024. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.86.10.7924
Taxvig, C., Hass, U., Axelstad, M., Dalgaard, M., Boberg, J., Andeasen, H. R., & Vinggaard, A. M. (2007). Endocrine-Disrupting Activities In Vivo of the Fungicides Tebuconazole and Epoxiconazole. Toxicological Sciences, 100(2), 464–473. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfm227
Tay, S., Dickmann, L., Dixit, V., & Isoherranen, N. (2010). A comparison of the roles of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor and retinoic acid receptor on CYP26 regulation. Molecular pharmacology, 77(2), 218–227. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.109.059071
Taylor, R. N., Kane, M. A., & Sidell, N. (2015). Pathogenesis of Endometriosis: Roles of Retinoids and Inflammatory Pathways. Semin Reprod Med, 33(4), 246–256. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1554920
Teletin, M., Vernet, N., Ghyselinck, N. B., & Mark, M. (2017). Roles of Retinoic Acid in Germ Cell Differentiation. Curr Top Dev Biol, 125, 191–225. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.ctdb.2016.11.013
Teletin, M., Vernet, N., Yu, J., Klopfenstein, M., Jones, J. W., Féret, B., . . . Mark, M. (2019). Two functionally redundant sources of retinoic acid secure spermatogonia differentiation in the seminiferous epithelium. Development, 146(1), dev170225. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.170225
Thatcher, J. E., Zelter, A., & Isoherranen, N. (2010). The relative importance of CYP26A1 in hepatic clearance of all-trans retinoic acid. Biochemical pharmacology, 80(6), 903–912. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2010.05.023
Theodosiou, M., Laudet, V., & Schubert, M. (2010). From carrot to clinic: an overview of the retinoic acid signaling pathway. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 67(9), 1423–1445. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-010-0268-z
Tiboni, G. M., Marotta, F., & Carletti, E. (2009). Fluconazole alters CYP26 gene expression in mouse embryos. Reproductive Toxicology, 27(2), 199–202. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2009.01.001
Tong, M.-H., Yang, Q.-E., Davis, J. C., & Griswold, M. D. (2013). Retinol dehydrogenase 10 is indispensible for spermatogenesis in juvenile males. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(2), 543–548. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1214883110
Tonk, E. C. M., Pennings, J. L. A., & Piersma, A. H. (2015). An adverse outcome pathway framework for neural tube and axial defects mediated by modulation of retinoic acid homeostasis. Reproductive Toxicology, 55, 104–113. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2014.10.008
Topletz, A. R., Tripathy, S., Foti, R. S., Shimshoni, J. A., Nelson, W. L., & Isoherranen, N. (2015). Induction of CYP26A1 by metabolites of retinoic acid: evidence that CYP26A1 is an important enzyme in the elimination of active retinoids. Molecular pharmacology, 87(3), 430–441. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.114.096784
Tzameli, I., Chua, S. S., Cheskis, B., & Moore, D. D. (2003). Complex effects of rexinoids on ligand dependent activation or inhibition of the xenobiotic receptor, CAR. Nuclear receptor, 1(1), 2. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-1336-1-2
Urvalek, A., Laursen, K. B., & Gudas, L. J. (2014). The roles of retinoic acid and retinoic acid receptors in inducing epigenetic changes. Sub-cellular biochemistry, 70, 129-149. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9050-5_7
Vachirayonstien, T., & Yan, B. (2016). MicroRNA-30c-1-3p is a silencer of the pregnane X receptor by targeting the 3'-untranslated region and alters the expression of its target gene cytochrome P450 3A4. Biochimica et biophysica acta, 1859(9), 1238–1244. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2016.03.016
van Der Ven, L. T. M., van de Kuil, T., Verhoef, A., Leonards, P. E. G., Slob, W., Cantón, R. F., . . . Vos, J. G. (2008). A 28-day oral dose toxicity study enhanced to detect endocrine effects of a purified technical pentabromodiphenyl ether (pentaBDE) mixture in Wistar rats. Toxicology, 245(1), 109–122. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2007.12.016
van Der Ven, L. T. M., van de Kuil, T., Leonards, P. E. G., Slob, W., Lilienthal, H., Litens, S., . . . Piersma, A. H. (2009). Endocrine effects of hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD) in a one-generation reproduction study in Wistar rats. Toxicology Letters, 185(1), 51–62. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2008.12.003
Van Pelt, A. M. M., & De Rooij, D. G. (1990). The Origin of the Synchronization of the Seminiferous Epithelium in Vitamin A-Deficient Rats after Vitamin A Replacement. Biology of Reproduction, 42(4), 677–682. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod42.4.677
Vernet, N. g., Dennefeld, C., Rochette-Egly, C. C., Oulad-Abdelghani, M., Chambon, P., Ghyselinck, N. B., & Mark, M. (2006). Retinoic Acid Metabolism and Signaling Pathways in the Adult and Developing Mouse Testis. Endocrinology, 147(1), 96–110. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2005-0953
Verze, P., Cai, T., & Lorenzetti, S. (2016). The role of the prostate in male fertility, health and disease. Nature Reviews Urology, 13, 379. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2016.89
Vezina, C. M., Allgeier Sarah, H., Fritz Wayne, A., Moore Robert, W., Strerath, M., Bushman, W., & Peterson Richard, E. (2008). Retinoic acid induces prostatic bud formation. Developmental Dynamics, 237(5), 1321–1333. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.21526
Vickery, B., Burns, J., Zaneveld, L., Goodpasture, J., & Bergström, K. (1985). Orally administered ketoconazole rapidly appears in seminal plasma and suppresses sperm motility. Advances in Contraception, 1(4), 341–353. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01849310
Vilhais-Neto, G. C., & Pourquié, O. (2008). Retinoic acid. Current Biology, 18(7), 550–552. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2008.03.032
Villota-Salazar, N. A., Mendoza-Mendoza, A., & González-Prieto, J. M. (2016). Epigenetics: from the past to the present. Frontiers in Life Science, 9(4), 347–370. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/21553769.2016.1249033
Wagner, M., Yoshihara, M., Douagi, I., Damdimopoulos, A., Panula, S., Petropoulos, S., . . . Damdimopoulou, P. (2019). Single cell map of the human ovarian cortex. bioRxiv, 791343. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1101/791343
Wang, B., Yang, Q., Harris, C. L., Nelson, M. L., Busboom, J. R., Zhu, M.-J., & Du, M. (2016). Nutrigenomic regulation of adipose tissue development — role of retinoic acid: A review. Meat Science, 120, 100–106. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.04.003
Wang, J.-H., Zhang, L., Ma, Y.-W., Xiao, J., Zhang, Y., Liu, M., & Tang, H. (2016). microRNA-34a-Upregulated Retinoic Acid-Inducible Gene-I Promotes Apoptosis and Delays Cell Cycle Transition in Cervical Cancer Cells. DNA and Cell Biology, 35(6), 267–279. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1089/dna.2015.3130
Wang, N., & Tilly, J. L. (2010). Epigenetic status determines germ cell meiotic commitment in embryonic and postnatal mammalian gonads. Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 9(2), 339–349. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4161/cc.9.2.10447
West, K. P. (2003). Vitamin A Deficiency Disorders in Children and Women. Food and Nutrition Bulletin, 24(4_suppl2), S78-S90. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/15648265030244S204
Weston , A. D., Blumberg , B., & Underhill , T. M. (2003). Active repression by unliganded retinoid receptors in development : less is sometimes more. The Journal of Cell Biology, 161(2), 223–228. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200211117
White, J. C., Highland, M., & Clagett-Dame, M. (2000). Abnormal development of the sinuatrial venous valve and posterior hindbrain may contribute to late fetal resorption of vitamin A-deficient rat embryos. Teratology, 62(6), 374–384. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/1096-9926(200012)62:6<374::AID-TERA4>3.0.CO;2-5
White, J. C., Shankar, V. N., Highland, M., Epstein, M. L., DeLuca, H. F., & Clagett-Dame, M. (1998). Defects in embryonic hindbrain development and fetal resorption resulting from vitamin A deficiency in the rat are prevented by feeding pharmacological levels of all-trans-retinoic acid. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95(23), 13459–13463. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.23.13459
Wickenheisser, J. K., Nelson-DeGrave, V. L., Hendricks, K. L., Legro, R. S., Strauss, J. F., & McAllister, J. M. (2005). Retinoids and retinol differentially regulate steroid biosynthesis in ovarian theca cells isolated from normal cycling women and women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 90. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2005-0330
Wiebel, F. F., Steffensen, K. R., Treuter, E., Feltkamp, D., & Gustafsson, J. A. (1999). Ligand-independent coregulator recruitment by the triply activatable OR1/retinoid X receptor-alpha nuclear receptor heterodimer. Molecular endocrinology (Baltimore, Md.), 13(7), 1105. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1210/mend.13.7.0292
Wiseman, E. M., Bar-El Dadon, S., & Reifen, R. (2017). The vicious cycle of vitamin a deficiency: A review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr, 57(17), 3703–3714. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2016.1160362
Wolf, G. (1996). A history of vitamin A and retinoids. The FASEB Journal, 10(9), 1102–1107. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.10.9.8801174
Wood, J. R., Nelson, V. L., Ho, C., Jansen, E., Wang, C. Y., Urbanek, M., . . . Strauss, J. F. (2003). The Molecular Phenotype of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) Theca Cells and New Candidate PCOS Genes Defined by Microarray Analysis. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 278(29), 26380–26390. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M300688200
Working, P. K. (1988). Male reproductive toxicology: comparison of the human to animal models. Environmental health perspectives, 77, 37–44. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.887737
World Health Organization (2009). Global prevalence of vitamin A deficiency in populations at risk 1995–2005. WHO Global Database on Vitamin A Deficiency. World Health Organization, Geneva. Available at: https://www.who.int/vmnis/vitamina/en/
Xiao, S., Coppeta, J. R., Rogers, H. B., Isenberg, B. C., Zhu, J., Olalekan, S. A., . . . Woodruff, T. K. (2017). A microfluidic culture model of the human reproductive tract and 28-day menstrual cycle. Nature Communications, 8(1), 14584. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14584
Xiao, X., Mruk, D. D., Wong, C. K. C., & Cheng, C. Y. (2014). Germ cell transport across the seminiferous epithelium during spermatogenesis. Physiology (Bethesda, Md.), 29(4), 286–298. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1152/physiol.00001.2014
Xu, H., Beasley, M. D., Warren, W. D., van der Horst, G. T. J., & McKay, M. J. (2005). Absence of Mouse REC8 Cohesin Promotes Synapsis of Sister Chromatids in Meiosis. Developmental Cell, 8(6), 949–961. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2005.03.018
Yadu, N., & Kumar, P. G. (2019). Retinoic acid signaling in regulation of meiosis during embryonic development in mice. Genesis, 57(7–8), n/a-n/a. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/dvg.23327
Yang, Y., Luo, J., Yu, D., Zhang, T., Lin, Q., Li, Q., . . . Huang, Y. (2018). Vitamin A Promotes Leydig Cell Differentiation via Alcohol Dehydrogenase 1. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 9, 644–644. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2018.00644
Yoshida, S., Sukeno, M., Nakagawa, T., Ohbo, K., Nagamatsu, G., Suda, T., & Nabeshima, Y.-i. (2006). The first round of mouse spermatogenesis is a distinctive program that lacks the self-renewing spermatogonia stage. Development, 133(8), 1495. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.02316
Yoshikawa, T., Ide, T., Shimano, H., Yahagi, N., Amemiya-Kudo, M., Matsuzaka, T., . . . Yamada, N. (2003). Cross-talk between peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) alpha and liver X receptor (LXR) in nutritional regulation of fatty acid metabolism. I. PPARs suppress sterol regulatory element binding protein-1c promoter through inhibition of LXR signaling. Molecular endocrinology (Baltimore, Md.), 17(7), 1240. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1210/me.2002-0191
Yuan, W., Wu, T., Fu, H., Dai, C., Wu, H., Liu, N., . . . Zhu, B. (2012). Dense Chromatin Activates Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 to Regulate H3 Lysine 27 Methylation. Science, 337(6097), 971. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1225237
Zhang, H.-Q., Zhang, X.-F., Zhang, L.-J., Chao, H.-H., Pan, B., Feng, Y.-M., . . . Shen, W. (2012). Fetal exposure to bisphenol A affects the primordial follicle formation by inhibiting the meiotic progression of oocytes. Molecular Biology Reports, 39(5), 5651–5657. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-011-1372-3
Zhang, X.-F., Zhang, T., Han, Z., Liu, J.-C., Liu, Y.-P., Ma, J.-Y., . . . Shen, W. (2015). Transgenerational inheritance of ovarian development deficiency induced by maternal diethylhexyl phthalate exposure. Reproduction, Fertility and Development, 27(8), 1213-undefined. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1071/RD14113
Zhao, L., Svingen, T., Ng, E. T., & Koopman, P. (2015). Female-to-male sex reversal in mice caused by transgenic overexpression of Dmrt1. Development, 142(6), 1083. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.122184
Zuno-Floriano, F. G., Holstege, D., Hengel, M. J., Gaikwad, N. W., Aldana-Madrid, M. L., & Miller, M. G. (2012). Determination of Vitamin A and its Metabolites in Rat Testis: Possible Involvement of Vitamin A in Testicular Toxicity Caused by Molinate. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 88(6), 1038–1042. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-012-0612-0
Can be measured in tissues (organs, blood) or cells with e.g. liquid chromatography methods coupled to ultraviolet or mass spectrometric detection (a multitude of publications reviewed in the D-DRP).
Can also be measured with ELISA kits (available for several species).
The different isomers can be studied on mRNA and protein level using commercially available probes and antibodies (see e.g. Topletz et al. 2012).
ELISA kits for CYP26A1, B1 and C1 for several species are available.
Enzyme activity can be measured in microsomes as conversion of RA to its metabolites (Thatcher et al. 2010 analyzed human liver microsomes).
ELISA kits for several species are commercially available.
mRNA and protein levels can be measured (Mark et al. 2008).
cDNA and antibodies for multiple species are commercially available, as are ELISA kits.
Several RAR/RXR activation assays are commercially available, many use HepG2 cells:
http://www.attagene.com (used in ToxCast™).
https://ncats.nih.gov/tox21/projects/assays
AhR mRNA induction or activation can be measured in e.g. human HepG2 cells; commercially available.
http://www.attagene.com (used in ToxCast™).
https://ncats.nih.gov/tox21/projects/assays (Tox21 used in ToxCast™).
CYP1A1 activity can be measured in microsomes.
A multitude of assays (mRNA, protein, activity) are commercially available.
A description of a cell-based method (using mouse pluripotent P19 cells) for identifying chemicals that disrupt RA signaling pathways was published by Chen and Reese in 2013. It has been used to test phthalate esters (Chen and Reese 2016).
Retinoid parameters were combined with chemical names (see Table A, below) and with either female or male reproduction search terms (see Tables B and C, below). No cut-offs (for e.g. year of publication) were used. The searches yielded several hundred hits, however, only a small percentage was deemed relevant. In fact, a larger number of relevant articles was found via non-structured searches (using e.g. references in articles, citing articles, etc).
Retinoid parameters: (retinoic OR retinoid OR retinol OR retinyl OR retinal). Inclusion of the term “vitamin A” rendered the exact same number of hits as when this term was excluded.
The selected chemicals are a combination of a) chemicals handpicked by Nancy Baker and co-workers at EPA, from ToxCast™ and other sources; b) ToxCast™ chemicals with activity on RARs/RXRs and CYP1A1 (information found in tables in the draft-DRP); c) CYP26 inhibitors found via text mining (information found in table in the draft-DRP); and finally, d) chemicals classified as Persistent Organic Pollutants by the Stockholm Convention.
Table A. Search terms for chemicals |
"ser 2–7" (methyl 3-(1H-imidazol-1-yl)-2,2-dimethyl-3-(4-(naphthalen-2-ylamino)phenyl)propanoate |
1-(6-tert-Butyl-1,1-dimethyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-4-yl)ethanone |
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene |
1,3,5-Triisopropylbenzene |
2,2-dimethyl-3-(4-(naphthalen-2- ylamino)phenyl)-3-(1,2,4)triazol- 1-yl-propionic acid methyl ester |
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol |
2,4,6-Tris(tert-butyl)phenol |
2,4-Bis(1-methyl-1-phenylethyl)phenol |
2,6-Di-tert-butyl-4-ethylphenol |
2,6-Di-tert-butyl-4-methoxyphenol |
2-Mercaptobenzothiazole |
2-Naphthylamine |
3-(6-(2-dimethylamino-1- imidazol-1-yl-butyl)naphthalen-2- yloxy)-2,2-dimethyl-propionic acid |
4,4'-Sulfonylbis[2-(prop-2-en-1-yl)phenol] |
4-Nonylphenol |
4-Nonylphenol, branched |
4'-octyl-4-biphenylcarboxylic acid |
AC-41848 hydrate |
Acitretin |
Adapalene |
Aldrin |
all/trans-Retinoic acid |
Alpha-hexachlorocyclohexane |
AM580 |
AR7 |
Azinphos-methyl |
Bensulide |
Benzyl alcohol |
Beta-hexachlorocyclohexane |
Bifenazate |
BMS 493 |
BMS-189453 |
BMS-195614 |
Butylated hydroxytoluene |
CD437 |
Chlordane |
Chlordecone |
Chlorthal-dimethyl |
Citric acid |
Clorophene |
Coumaphos |
CP-532623 |
DDT OR Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane |
Dieldrin |
Diethylaminobenzaldehyde |
Difenoconazole |
Diniconazole |
Dioxin OR dibenzofuran |
Dodecyl gallate |
Dysprosium(III) chloride |
Econazole nitrate |
Endosulfan |
Endrin |
EPN OR ethyl phenylphosphonothioate |
Esfenvalerate |
Fludioxonil |
Gentian Violet |
Heptachlor |
Hexabromobiphenyl |
Hexabromocyclododecane |
Hexabromodiphenyl ether and heptabromodiphenyl ether |
Hexabromodiphenyl ether OR heptabromodiphenyl ether |
Hexachlorbenzene |
Hexachlorobutadiene |
Imazalil |
Imidazole |
Isoniazid |
Isopentyl benzoate |
LE 135 |
Liarozole |
Lindane OR gamma-hexachlorocyclohexane |
Mepanipyrim |
Methoprene acid |
methyl 3-(4-(6-bromopyridin-3- ylamino)phenyl)-3-(1H-imidazol- 1-yl)-2,2-dimethylpropanoate |
Mirex |
N,N-Dimethylformamide |
Nicotine |
N-Phenyl-1,4-benzenediamine |
Organotin |
Pentachlorobenzene |
Pentachlorphenol |
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid OR perfluorooctanesulfonyl fluoride |
Phosalone |
Polychlorinated AND (naphtalene OR naphtalenes OR napthalene OR napthalenes) |
Polychlorinated biphenyls OR PCBs |
Polychlorinated AND (dibenzo-p-dioxins OR dibenzofurans) |
Prochloraz |
Pyraclostrobin |
R115866 OR rambazole |
R116010 |
SR271425 |
Symclosene |
Talarozole |
Tetrabromodiphenyl ether and pentabromodiphenyl ether |
Tetrabromodiphenyl ether OR pentabromodiphenyl ether |
Tetrabutyltin |
Toxaphene |
Tributyltin benzoate |
Tributyltin chloride |
Tributyltin methacrylate |
Triflumizole |
Triphenyltin hydroxide |
Triticonazole |
TTNPB |
B. Search terms for female reproduction | C. Search terms for male reproduction |
“female genitalia” | Aspermia |
“female gonad” | Asthenozoospermia |
“Female reproduction” | Azoospermia |
“Granulosa cells” | Blood-Testis Barrier |
“Polycystic ovarian syndrome” | Cryptorchidism |
“Theca cells” | Ejaculation |
Abortion | Epididymis |
Cervix OR cervical | Epididymitis |
Corpus Luteum | Erectile |
Decidua OR decidualization | Fertilization |
Eclampsia | Hemospermia |
Embryo OR embryonic | Hypospadia |
Endometriosis | Impotence |
Endometrium OR endometrial | Leydig |
Estrous | male infertility |
Fallopian | Oligospermia |
Fertility OR infertility | Orchitis |
Fetus OR fetal | Penile |
Folliculogenesis | Prostate |
Gestational | Prostatic |
Lactation | Prostatitis |
Litter | “Rete Testis” |
Luteal | Scrotum |
Maternal | Seminiferous |
Menopause | Sertoli |
Menstrual OR menstruation | Sperm |
Oocyte | Spermatid |
Oogenesis | Spermatocele |
Oogonia | Spermatocyte |
Ovary OR Ovarian | Spermatogenesis |
Ovulation | Spermatogonia |
Placenta OR placental | Spermatozoa |
Pregnancy OR pregnant | Testes |
Prenatal OR postnatal | Testicular |
Puberty | Testis |
Trimester | |
Uterus OR uterine | |
Vagina OR vaginal |
Charlotte Nilsson
ISBN 978-92-893-6530-7 (PDF)
ISBN 978-92-893-6531-4 (ONLINE)
http://dx.doi.org/10.6027/temanord2020-507
TemaNord 2020:507
ISSN 0908-6692
© Nordic Council of Ministers 2020
This publication was funded by the Nordic Council of Ministers. However, the content does not necessarily reflect the Nordic Council of Ministers’ views, opinions, attitudes or recommendations.
This work is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0.
Translations: If you translate this work, please include the following disclaimer: This translation was not pro-duced by the Nordic Council of Ministers and should not be construed as official. The Nordic Council of Ministers cannot be held responsible for the translation or any errors in it.
Adaptations: If you adapt this work, please include the following disclaimer along with the attribution: This is an adaptation of an original work by the Nordic Council of Ministers. Responsibility for the views and opinions expressed in the adaptation rests solely with its author(s). The views and opinions in this adaptation have not been approved by the Nordic Council of Ministers.
Third-party content: The Nordic Council of Ministers does not necessarily own every single part of this work. The Nordic Council of Ministers cannot, therefore, guarantee that the reuse of third-party content does not in-fringe the copyright of the third party. If you wish to reuse any third-party content, you bear the risks associ-ated with any such rights violations. You are responsible for determining whether there is a need to obtain per-mission for the use of third-party content, and if so, for obtaining the relevant permission from the copyright holder. Examples of third-party content may include, but are not limited to, tables, figures or images.
Photo rights (further permission required for reuse):
Any queries regarding rights and licences should be addressed to:
Nordic Council of Ministers/Publication Unit
Ved Stranden 18
DK-1061 Copenhagen
Denmark
pub@norden.org
Nordic co-operation is one of the world’s most extensive forms of regional collaboration, involving Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, and the Faroe Islands, Greenland and Åland.
Nordic co-operation has firm traditions in politics, economics and culture and plays an important role in European and international forums. The Nordic community strives for a strong Nordic Region in a strong Europe.
Nordic co-operation promotes regional interests and values in a global world. The values shared by the Nordic countries help make the region one of the most innovative and competitive in the world.
The Nordic Council of Ministers
Nordens Hus
Ved Stranden 18
DK-1061 Copenhagen
pub@norden.org
Read more Nordic publications on www.norden.org/publications